Griffins rigged BNP Leadership election continues.........
BNP members are now receiving their copies of British Nationalist through the post. Inside there is a very brief amount alloted to the Chris Jackson challenge for the BNP Leadership. This election is a farce worthy of .........well, Nick Griffin really !
Nick models himself on Tony Blair, how many knew that ?
Griffin is still 'steaming ahead' with HIS three week leadership election schedule regardless of any distractions .
The precedent for leadership challenges was set by Nick Griffin himself in 1999, where a much longer time period was involved .
Griffin used IDENTITY magazine set up to promote himself, he sent out glossy A4 4 sided leaflets, and an audio cassette to all BNP members. He availed himself of the BNP membership lists which he has NOT allowed challenger Chris Jackson to peruse.
He invited himself to BNP meetings across the country to advertise himself, all of which he now denies Chris Jackson.
Then he sets a THREE week time limit for this BNP Leadership election?
Both this writer and Mr.Jackson himself, helped to get Nick Griffin elected to his position in 1999, so we know a thing or two about his campaign.
But what neither of us know is just where did the money come from, to fund Nick Griffins election campaign in 1999 for the magazine, leaflets and audio cassettes ?
14 comments:
Nick Griffin is not in the pay of MI5 or anyone else, he is a careerist and corrupt bastard. The Bnp didn't have many members when he challenged JT, so it would not have cost as much as it would today.
If Chris Jackson does bad in the election, he then (and supporters) as to decide to stay in or leave the Bnp. The only way you are ever going to get rid of Griffin, is when he goes himself or is caught with his fingers in the till.
The magazine Griffin used for publicity was the Patriot, Identity wasnt published until he became leader.
Apart from that the comments are correct. There was an audio tape voiced by Simon Darby I think, and a full colour document Moving Ahead.
All of which gave Griffin an advantage as such 'sophistocated' tactics had not been seen in the BNP till then.
This time round Griffin also has an advantage, an unfair one, like you say the conditions he enjoyed and took full advantage of then are denied to everyone else now.
Do as I say not as I do?
Happen it was the £1500.00 that Griffin "re-paid" to Lecomber after his election that paid for it!
You are of course quite right bp, my mistake.
Yes, the famous £1,500 that was bandied about at the time, as Old Burnley states.
This was supposed to have been on Lecombers credit card.
Now we know that Lecomber was unemployed at that time, so how did he have a credit card ?
Plus, as Joe says and JT said, Griffin is not MI5........but Lecomber surely is. Hence why he only got 3 years for a bombing campaign.
So this means that MI5 put Griffin into his position ?
JT said that Lecomber was state, as do I.
I support Nick Griffin but I do think he is being unfair. I would give mr jackson longer than 3 months.
I think you are being unfair to him with the membership lists. I don't think the Data Protection Act came into force until 2000 so it was legal in 1999 but not now.
Youdontknowme... your point about the data protection act is a valid one, but is it fair ?
Chris Jackson had problems searching out BNP members for his nomination forms.
As an Englishman it is bad form !
Lecomber is deffo a wrongin.
If MI5 wanted JT toppled to put moderniser Griffin in, then they must have some long-term plan to destroy nationalism. They (MI5) will know Griffin is corrupt and may eventually set him up and blackmail him. This is all speculation i know, but don't put it past them.
If Griffin has been stealing funds then he's been doing it with Lecomber. If this is true then the secret state will know. The fact Griffin will not proscribe Lecomber speaks volumes.
If JT thought Lecomber was state, then why did he not get shut of him?
To be fair Joe, Lecomber only became a major problem after he had linked up with Nick Griffin for the 1999 challenge.
Let us have a stock take of Griffins home since he became BNP leader.
your point about the data protection act is a valid one, but is it fair ?
Whether its fair or not is irrelevant. It's the law. Would you like the BNP to be sued for hundreds of thousands of pounds, possibly running into the millions?
If anything this election will do is to bring to the forefront that the party needs change. Least we forget the reason why the old BNP was set up the way it was, was because the old NF 'National Directorate' was a nightmere. Splits upon splits upon spilts.
The decision was made to give the Chairman 'ultimate power'. This has served the party well, however if it falls under a person of Griffin's dubious qualities, then it becomes bad.
The fact is Griffin has lead the party as far as it can go. We need change and a new Chairman for the 21st Century to step forward and bring the party victories in General Elections, Griffin will never be able to do this.
I wish Chris well, if anything this election will open a lot of eyes from the rank and file, which is good.
Griffin will of course win, but the 'wheels of change' has been set in motion and they cannot now be stopped.
Joe Owens is right. Griffin is only interested in money, and the state knows it well.
Griffin has been told by the State/Zionist representatives that if he pursues a certain course of action, they will help him to enrich himself.
Post a Comment