Monday, April 30, 2007

Clio Gagged: How Jewish Supremacism gags History
A Talk given in Teramo University, Italy, by Israel Shamir at the Conference on the Holocaust and the Middle East:
Clio Gagged, on April 18, 2007
Preface Commentary by David Duke — “Clio Gagged” is a recent article by that intrepid Jewish writer, Israel Shamir, a man I believe to be the most courageous and intellectually honest Jew in the world. Shamir, an Israeli former member of the IDF, has dared to present the other side of the Jewish-Gentile conflict.
In a media saturated by Jewish power, only one position on this conflict is permitted: Jews are always innocent, Gentiles are always guilty.
Anything else other than this simple polemic is deemed anti-Semitism.
In truth, since the Jewish sojourn in Egypt, through Roman occupation of Jerusalem, the Babylonian Capitivity, their Middle ages presence in Eastern and Central Europe, to the present modern state of Israel, Jewish ideology and power has been far more chauvinist, intolerant, hateful and ultimately murderous than that of their antagonists.
As my book, JEWISH SUPREMACISM shows, no major writing on Earth comes close to the ethnic supremacism and hatred of the Talmud. Obviously, as a person of Jewish descent, Shamir has no wish for reciprocal hatred or harm to fall upon the Jewish people. As a person of European descent, neither do I, but I am committed to exposing and defending my people from the threat of Jewish supremacism.
Shamir, perhaps Quixote-like, seeks a new path for the Jewish people, one that seems an unlikely development in a Jewish extremist power structure that has refined and fortified itself for 3000 years.
One thing that Shamir and I know is that Jewish Supremacism poses a great threat to the heritage and freedom of the European people, and indeed to all peoples on Earth. It has led not only to the ethnic cleansing and barbarous oppression of the people of Palestine, its media occupation in America and Europe have undermined every worthy tradition and morality of the culture of the West, its political power has led to the opening of America and Europe to invasion. It is why American treasure and blood are shed in the sands of Iraq and Afghanistan, and it leads us to a possible apocalypse against Iran. (NWN: Our emphasis )
Shamir is not only brilliant in his ideas, but his knowledge and literary ability make his articles a joy and marvel to read. Read and learn!Clio Gagged – Israel Shamir One should not be amazed that the gentle muse of history, Clio, finds herself gagged. History is not a peaceful collection of facts and trivia. History is a perpetual tug-of-war, for its re-writing may change the world. One can’t change the past, so goes the old adage, and it is true. But if we are dissatisfied with our present, we may change our understanding of past, and this will change our future. This has been known since time immemorial, and this is why history was given into custody of sacred keepers, to ensure the power structure and some continuity.
Whoever controls the past determines the future. The subject of this conference deals exactly with this topic: we are dissatisfied with present, we turn to the past, and by re-assessing it we plan to influence future.
If some parts of the historical narrative are strongly defended, or perverted outright, the more reason we have to attack it.
By no means is the Holocaust the only vigorously defended domain of history, where an offender may find himself in deep water. The old case of Jewish human sacrifices re-emerged recently in Italy, with the publication of Professor Ariel Toaff’s book, Passovers of Blood . As you may already know, Prof Toaff proved that some Jews accused of kidnapping and killing Christian children in the Middle Ages were actually guilty as charged. They were executed for brutal murder, and they weren’t victims of alleged Christian prejudice or primordial antisemitism.
One may think it would be a reason for celebration: the criminals were not libelled but properly punished; justice was carried out, and modern Jews should be happy that the medieval anti-Jewish prejudice is but a myth, akin to the myth of Germans turning Jews into soap.
But the Jewish organisations were not happy at all.
They attacked the Jewish Professor of Medieval Jewish studies in an Israeli University; the mentally tortured, almost crucified professor Toaff withdrew and destroyed the book (mercifully in our days it is not that easy, and the book can be read on the web on ), surrendered the small amount of money he got from the publisher to the Jewish inquisition of ADL, and was forced to a new act of repentance .

__________________Rep. David Duke, P.O. Box 188, Mandeville, LouisianaCall to order books: (985) 626-7714 European American Unity & Rights Organization (EURO)

Over 3,300 supporters of Germany's National Democratic Party (NPD) protested "liberation" ceremonies marking the end of World War II on Sunday.

The NPD gathered in Alexanderplatz square to denounce the "cult of guilt" afflicting Germany.NPD leader Udo Voigt said, "This was not a day of 'liberation' but a day of defeat for Germany and it's nothing to celebrate."

Eight communists were reportedly arrested for throwing objects from behind police barricades. A few scuffles broke out when they came too close, but they were unsuccessful in disrupting speakers.

Germans said the two hour rally was the largest ever held

Sunday, April 29, 2007

Two men were driving through West Virginia when they got pulled over by a State Trooper. (Another one from Jack)
The cop walked up and tapped on the window with his nightstick.
The driver rolled down the window and WHACK, the cop smacked him in the head with his nightstick.
"What the hell was that for?" the driver asked.
"You're in West Virginia, son," the trooper answered. "When we pull you over in West Virginia, you better have your license ready by the time we get to your car."
"I'm sorry, officer," the driver said, "I'm not from around here."
The trooper runs a check on the guy's license--he's clean and gives the guy his license back.
The trooper then walks around to the passenger side and taps on the window. The passenger rolls down the window and "WHACK", the trooper smacks him on the head with the nightstick.
"What'd you do that for?" the passenger demands. "Just making your wish come true," replied the trooper.
"Making WHAT wish come true?" the passenger asked.
"Because I know your type." the trooper says, "Two miles down the road you're gonna turn to your buddy and say,"I wish that asshole would've tried that shit with me".

GRANDMA'S BOYFRIEND from Jack............
A 5-year-old boy went to visit his grandmother one day.
laying with> his toys in her bedroom while grandma was dusting, he looked up and> said, "Grandma, how come you don't have a boyfriend now that Grandpa went to heaven?"
Grandma replied, "Honey, my TV is my boyfriend. I can sit in my bedroom and watch it all day long.
The religious programs make me feel good and the comedies make me laugh. I'm happy with my TV as my boyfriend."
Grandma turned on the TV, and the reception was terrible. She started adjusting the knobs, trying to get the picture in focus. Frustrated, she started hitting the backside of the TV hoping to fix the problem.
The little boy heard the doorbell ring, so he hurried to open the door, and there stood Grandma's minister.
The minister said, "Hello, son, is your Grandma home?"
The little boy replied, "Yeah, she's in the bedroom bangin' her boyfriend."
The minister fainted.

The following are actual written responses to test questions given to young students in a Catholic school. The children's spelling and grammar have been left unedited. Imagine being a nun and reading those answers while trying to keep a straight face:















Tenderness and kindness are not signs of weakness or despair but manifestations of strength and resolution...

Helga Has A Beer from Jack in Rochdale
It was a hot day in Minnesota.
Helga hung out the wash to dry, put a roast in the oven, then went downtown to pick up some dry cleaning.
"Gootness, it's hotter dan hell today" she mused to herself as she walked down Main Street.
She passed a tavern and thought, "Vy nodt?" So she walked in and took a seat at the bar.
The bartender walked over and asked her what she would like to drink.
"Ya know," Helga said, "it is so hot, I tink I'll hafe meself a cold beer."
"Anheuser Busch?" the bartender asked.
Helga blushed and nodded, "Vell fine, tanks, und how's yer pecker?"

Saturday, April 28, 2007

Addenda by Martin Webster :

"Last Wednesday (25th April) I sent you (Ed:NWN) a bulletin with the Subject line: "The Times boosts Griffin/BNP (again)".
In this I discussed the promotion being given to the British National Party leader Nick Griffin by certain elements within the British media, especially The Times and the Telegraph group, which relentlessly promote Jewry's interests in all fields, at home and abroad.
I singled out for special attention the former assistant editor of The Times, Michael Gove (now a Conservative Party MP) who accorded Griffin his first substantial and respectful coverage in the mainstream media, and commented on Gove's association with The Times' deputy-editor Danny Finkelstein who also writes regular columns for the Jewish Chronicle.
If any of you felt that my interpretation of the Jewish promotion of Griffin was 'over-the-top', then I invite you to read the following information which appeared in today's (27th April) issue of the Jewish Chronicle.
I run out below the relevant text of that report and explanatory comments.This additional material should be pasted into my 25th April posting in-between the paragraph which read:"At the last general election Gove was successful in getting elected to Parliament. He and Finkelstein are still reported to be leading lights in Cameron's strategy department..."and the paragraph which read:"In my view, Gove, Finkelstein & Co are using -- one might almost say running -- Griffin/the BNP for the joint benefit of Jewry and the Conservative Party. It's a kind of double-whammy..."Regards,Martin.
Additional Material: Stop Press! --
The Michael Gove, Danny Finkelstein, David Cameron, Conservative Party and Jewry link-up (and their joint interest in manipulating the BNP) became all the more obvious in today's (27th April) issue of the Jewish Chronicle, which on page 16 runs a report headed: "Janner's son is a Cameron donor".
Readers should be aware that the "Janner" in the headline is 'Lord' (Greville) Janner, former Chairman of the Board of Deputies of British Jews and former Labour Member of Parliament for Leicester North-West, who on his elevation to the House of Lords became head of the Holocaust Education Trust, in which role he was one of the leading players in the Zionist 'Holocaust' shake-down of Switzerland a decade ago.
The JC report reads:"The son of veteran Labour peer Lord Janner was named this week in the House of Commons Register of Members' Interests as a donor to Tory leader David Cameron's private office."Daniel Janner, QC, declined to say how much he had given, but said that he had been influenced by his friendship with former 'Times' journalist and Surrey Heath Tory MP Michael Gove 'for whom I have the highest regard'."Mr. Janner, who once stood as a Labour candidate in Bosworth, said that although he had been a Conservative for years, the clash of politics had not harmed his relationship with his father....."....Other donors to the Tory leader included Jewish philanthropist Trevor Pears, who gave an undisclosed personal donation to Mr. Camereon's campaign."
Mr. Cameron also declared a flight from London to Manchester provided by the Community Security Trust when he addressed a CST function in the North...."The CST is the 'spook' and security organisation of the Board of Deputies of British Jews. The CST president is 'Lord' Michael Levy, currently at the centre of the "Loans for Peerages" scandal currently rocking the Labour Party.
A Metropolitan Police report on the matter is now pending with the Crown Prosecution Service. Levy is Labour Prime Minister Tony Blair's principal fund-raiser and his "Personal Envoy" in the Middle East.

Friday, April 27, 2007

Ediciones Ojeda
tiene el placer de invitarle a la conferencia que tendrá lugar en Barcelona mañana sábado día 28 de Abril

Hitler, Himmler y los campos
de concentración de Europa oriental


La historia como fue
Horario de 10 a 14 horas y de 16.30 a 20.30 de la tarde de lunes a sábado.Apartado de Correos 34055 E-08006 BarcelonaTelf.: 932370009 Fax: 934159845Nuestra cuenta bancaria: La Caixa 2100-1344-60-0200026408IBAN ES32 2100-1344-6002 0002 6408 / BIC CAIXESBBXXX

Por tratarse de una celebración privada, queda reservado el derecho de admisión.
No traiga su teléfono móvil
Prohibido fumar
Se ruega asistir vestido con corrección

(Personas de estética skin abstenerse)
NWN : David Irving will be speaking in Barcelona this weekend
STORMFRONT Mods censoring posts & subverting the BNP leadership election

NWN: We have received the following posts that have been deleted from SF UK by John Joy Tree/ Andy Robertson, which we are reproducing in full below. This form of censorship by the Griffinite toadies must cease !

Some Noteworthy Stormfront Posts by Tyndallite No. 1

The following post by Tyndallite was recovered to another forum (there was another one supporting Chris Jackson which has apparently been deleted by mods) has earned the poster a threat from the BNP to the effect that if he doesn't delete it he will be expelled!!

What price the "Free Speech Two" eh??

Originally Posted by Tyndallite


* Le Pen only gets 11% (half the vote that he expected)
* Trails in a dismal 4th place.
* 90% of the French electorate vote (which is almost everybody), thus giving a much truer indication of the French voters' opinions, and thus showing that Le Pen only has about a 10% core vote of the electorate to count on.

Perhaps the reason for this dismal showing is contained in his statement to immigrant youths living in ghettos:“You are the branches of the French tree. You are as French as can be.”, and also by his watering down of his policies in general (remember the black female on one of his election campaigns?).

This should be a lesson to be learnt for the Griffin camp and their liberal limpdick 'thinkers', who constantly like to tell us how clever they are with their "we want immigrants in the party" type claptrap (and other such silly 'ideas').Le Pen's watering down of his rhetoric and policies, and his arsekissing to the immigrants, obviously didn't cut the mustard with the electorate.

Although the people are fed up with the immigrants, they have chosen to side with the equivalent of the Tories (perhaps a 'better the devil you know' feeling), rather than go with Le Pen, who they may now see as a man who doesn't have any clear ideals, a man who just says whatever he thinks the electorate want to hear.

This shows the danger in adopting such a mercenary tactic. Obviously, extremist type comments should not be used by Nationalists, but by trying to be all things to all men, a party could simply be seen as 'just like the others'. If this becomes the case, and Nationalists do appear to be just like the rest, then why would the electorate bother taking a chance on Nationalists in the first place? Better the devil you know, is a principle that should not be overlooked by the BNP 'intellectuals' (the same 'intellectuals' you may remember who were calling for immigrants to be let into the party).

No. Nationalism should always show itself as different to the opposition. The myriad opposition parties, should all be shown to be one and the same ideology, Internationalism. Nationalists should always distance themselves from this Internationalist paradigm, and ALWAYS be crystal clear about immigration. Le Pen muddied this clarity with his own waffle ...... and paid the price.

And the second deleted post is;

Another Tyndallite hit....

Originally Posted by Tyndallite

(1) Marine is the main person responsible for Le Pen's watering down of his policies, so I don't personally have much faith in her 'judgment of the situation' abilities.

(2) This election reminds me of the Thatcher lies of the 79 general election. France seems to have regressed 30 years.

(3) Sarkozy and his Tory types will not be able to solve this issue.

(4) I predict a riot. I predict that the immigrants will now go on even more extreme burning sprees in order to humiliate Sarkozy.

We should not water down our BNP policies any more.

Ignore the sawdust Caesars of the BNP with their silly limpdick liberalism. We should educate the present incoming party members. They need to be educated to understand that the political classes are not letting all these immigrants in out of a mistake of policy (as Tory types wrongly believe).

The political classes are letting them in because they wish to deliberately exterminate the white race.The difference between a Nationalist, and a know-nothing tory type pratt (and the majority of the British public), is the conspiracy theory that we whites have been marked down for eradication (whether Jews are behind this conspiracy is a secondary question, and not the important fundamental issue).

The fundamental issue is that our members understand this deliberate extermination policy, for if they don't, they may drift back into lib/lab/con if those parties begin promising to crack down on immigration etc (like the public did in 79 when Thatcher started peddling her bull**** about how we were being swamped by alien cultures).

The present bunch of party members seem to be airhead (although well intentioned) naive tory types, without a clue as to the big picture.

They're easy-come-easy-go (and easy to manipulate, just how Griffin likes them I suspect).The present party leadership strike me as similar to the liberals in their denial of information to others. For example, Lib/Lab/Con politicians have all had a grounding in Classical civilisation, but deny such knowledge to our young people (by ensuring a study of Antiquity is kept off the school curriculum).

By the same token, Griffin and co are well aware of the real issue of white extermination being a deliberate policy by the establishment (the conspiracy theory), but deny such knowledge to the members.

We can learn a lot from Le Pen's recent dismal performance.

Arrest the President Now!

On September 11, 2001, the most infamous day in American history, the tallest buildings in New York were not knocked down by airplanes hijacked by Arabs — they were destroyed by demolition charges.

This is no longer wild conspiracy theory — it is a series of provable facts, deftly presented on a website that every American should not only read but possibly memorize, so they can repeat it verbatim to every law enforcement officer in the country.
The web site is located here:

The mass gun killer in the USA - Cho Seung Hui

Check out a possible reason for this chinese lads hate for his 'fellow' students.

Thursday, April 26, 2007

The big question for British Jews when the Telegraph changed hands in 2004 was whether the new owners, the Barclay brothers, would be as friendly towards Israel and the Zionist cause as Lord Black.

London, April 20, 2007
A yiddishe revolution in America's media

Some of the most Waspy papers in the US have just been acquired by the most Jewish of publishers NOT so long ago, the very idea of the Tribune Company, owner of the Chicago Tribune, Newsday, Baltimore Sun and the Los Angeles Times falling into Jewish ownership would have looked preposterous. The New York Times and Washington Post may glory in their Jewish antecedents. But the Tribune, the creation of the Anglophobe colonel Robert McCormick, an American-firster who thought the Nazis were Europe's problem, not America's, was despised in Jewish households.

The colonel loathed the wartime US President Franklin D. Roosevelt, whom he viewed as being in cahoots with the British and a traitor to his social class. In McCormick's view, FDR was unsound because he was in thrall to the Jews. Now, after a very public auction, the Tribune Company has fallen into the hands of a very Jewish entrepreneur, Sam Zell, described by the American Jewish paper The Forward as a "billionaire boychik".

At the state-of-the-art Washington bureau of the main titles, the reporters in their gleaming steel work pods regard the arrival of Zell as the second coming. Uncertainty is the enemy of newspapers and ever since the Tribune group was put on the block, there has been nervousness about new ownership.

Zell, described by Forbes magazine as the 52nd-richest man in America, is as Jewish as you can get. The son of Polish refugees from the Shoah, he attends a traditional synagogue regularly, is a big donor to Israeli- and Jewish causes and made most of his money in property. But unlike many Jewish philanthropists, he shows little interest in associating with the rich and the great, eschews the idea of having his name plastered across donated buildings, and at the age of 65 years he still prefers denim to Brooks Brothers.

Even though Zell is a neophyte when it comes to the press, he has eased concerns with plans for an employee shareholder ownership plan which would give workers a stake in the enterprise and incentivise them to "deliver the goods".

In the financial world, Zell, whose original family name was Zielonka, is known as the "grave dancer" because of his success in picking up burnt-out businesses, cutting costs, fixing them up and turning them around.

It might have been thought that the Tribune company -- which aside from its main newspaper titles also owns 25 television stations, the Chicago Cubs baseball team and its historic ground, Wrigley Field -- is hardly the kind of burnt-out business in which Zell specialises. But most American big-city newspapers are currently regarded as in the emergency ward.
Circulations even for emblematic titles like the Los Angeles Times have been tumbling, advertising revenues are under pressure from the Internet and the magic pill of making online news and information pay is still a long way off. The days when the Chandler family, founders of the LA Times, ruled over California's media have gone. The family, which dominated California's power elites, sold the paper to the Tribune in 2000, ending a 120-year association.
This title, like the Chicago Tribune, was also known for its trditional, preppie background and its disdain for Hollywood and things Jewish.

Yet in many ways, the LA Times ought to be the jewel in the crown of Tribune. It ranks alongside the Washington Post and New York Times in the annals of quality journalism in the United States. Its reputation began to suffer when it became part of a media conglomerate, losing the special edge which comes with local ownership.

Indeed, it is thought that Zell could recover some of his investment rapidly were he to sell the paper on to another Jewish tycoon, the movie and record producer David Geffen, one of the founders of Dreamworks with Steven Spielberg.

The scenario is favoured by some of the paper's workforce. Geffen is much more of a political figure than Zell, having been an early supporter of Bill Clinton. More recently, he raised $1.3 million (£650,000) for Democratic presidential contender Barack Obama at a star-studded Hollywood fundraiser.

Were Geffen to acquire the LA Times, it would be a transformational deal.

The big question for British Jews when the Telegraph changed hands in 2004 was whether the new owners, the Barclay brothers, would be as friendly towards Israel and the Zionist cause as Lord Black. Among British media, which are often hard on Israel, the Black Telegraph had been a beacon of fairness. The US media are very different. They generally start from the point of view that Israel is a good thing, an exemplar of democracy in a crazy part of the world and, crucially, an important strategic ally of the United States.

Yet the histories of the Chicago Tribune, banned from many Jewish households over the decades, and the LA Times have been very different, despite the large Jewish populations in their respective cities. Ownership by Zell and possibly by Geffen, if the LA Times is disposed of, would be likely to change the complexion of the papers.

Zell and Geffen may not be traditional newspaper proprietors, but both are overtly Jewish and pro-Israel. They would bring a different perspective to the previous American first-owning families, whose culture still lingers on the fringes.

Zell insists he will leave journalism to those who know about it. But newspaper proprietors always find it hard to keep their hands out of the cookie jar.

Alex Brummer is City Editor /DAILY MAIL

Blackburns Bishop writes in zionist/communist SEARCHLIGHT magazine

'A senior Church of England bishop who has a number of British National Party (BNP) councillors in his diocese, has written in an anti-fascist magazine, urging Christians to vote against the party in the forthcoming local elections.

The comments from Rt Rev Nicholas Reade, Bishop of Blackburn, who was writing in 'Searchlight' magazine, make him the latest in a long line of church leaders and denominations to publicly urge votes against the BNP in the local elections next week.'

Surely our good selves can now show the primate, the error of his ways. After all, communism is anathema to christianity. That is if the 'good gent' is a christian in the first place !

An own goal for this lefty idiot methinks ! : - )

Mass Media bulling up Griffins BNP !

Below is the text downloaded from The Times web site of the boost given to the BNP generally, but to Griffin in particular, in its issue of 19th April.
Compare the balanced tone, the friendly intimate family life observations, given in this Times article with the kind of pre-election publicity accorded to the National Front by that paper and the rest of the British media when the NF was on the boil in the 1970s.
A radical difference in treatment will become apparent immediately.
There HAS to be a reason for the difference.
Either the media has changed, or the nationalist movement (whatever its name) has changed.
It's worth remembering that that The Times is part of the global media empire of Rupert Murdoch, every element of which sustains an unremitting pro-Jewish, pro-Israel, pro Neo-Con, pro war in Iraq agenda.
In that context, it's also well to remember that the very first big lump of good personal publicity awarded to Griffin was in The Times in (I think) 2000.
The author of that item was Michael Gove, an ardent pro-Zionist, who along with Daily Mail columnist Melanie Phillips, used to bully Palestinian witnesses on BBC Radio 4's "The Moral Maze". Gove and his immediate boss on The Times, deputy-editor Danny Finkelstein, ran David Cameron's campaign to become leader of the Conservative Party, currently in opposition.
Finkelstein is also a regular Jewish Chronicle columnist, often alternating with Melanie Phillips.These people work in tandem with the Neo-Con clique in the Telegraph group, including Matthew D'Ancona, Charles Moore, Con Coughlin & Co., who tend to be philo-semitic Roman Catholics rather than Jews (though several have Jewish wives or other Jewish connections).
At the last general election Gove was successful in getting elected to Parliament.
He and Finkelstein are still reported to be leading lights in Cameron's strategy department.
In my view, Gove, Finkelstein & Co are using -- one might almost say running -- Griffin/the BNP, for the joint benefit of Jewry and the Conservative Party.
It's a kind of double-whammy:
Firstly, Jewry's promotion of Coloured Immigration into Britain produced, by The Law of Unintended Consequences, a challenger to its monopoly position of influence over Britain's venal body politic: the Muslims.The Jews want an anti-Muslim, anti-Islamic atmosphere whipped up in Britain so as to limit the size and influence of the Muslim component of the multi-racial population, but need to keep a distance from any such campaign.So they used their media patronage to induce the opportunist, careerist, cash-mad crook Nick Griffin to dump the BNP's opposition to multi-racialism and Jewish power and to adopt instead an anti-Muslim focus.
By this means the BNP "joins the mainstream".
Having been thus "modernised", Griffin/the BNP are now being used by Jewry as mercenaries, in just the same way that it deployed the Lebanese 'Christian' Phalangists to massacre Palestinian refugees in 1982; in just the same way that it is now deploying the American and British military to suppress potentially anti-Israel regimes in the Middle East.
Secondly, the Conservative Party obviously hopes to win the next general election. Parties wins elections not just by a attracting votes to themselves but by denying votes to their opponents.
It is not in dispute that so far the BNP has done best electorally in working class areas where for generations the Labour Party has dominated the scene to such an extent that the Conservative Party puts up only a token campaign.If in these local elections (with help from media headlines) the BNP can break the Labour Party's virtual monopoly grip on Town Halls within its heartland areas, then the attitude of a significant portion of the local electorate towards their "traditional" voting loyalty is also likely to fracture.
This will demoralise local Labour Party organisations and provide the Conservative Party with a great opportunity at the subsequent Parliamentary general election.
In a national election many of those who voted BNP in the local elections may continue to do so -- that's fine by the Tories; at least those votes are denied to Labour.But other voters, having once experimented with a new political partner, may become politically promiscuous. They may perceive the Conservatives as the more credible party of government ("a better provider") and so jump into bed with the Tories.
In sum: the BNP is being used. Griffin knows it.
He revels in the good fortune this brings his personal finances.
When he talks about "joining the mainstream" he is talking about a personal income stream, a money stream.
The vast majority of BNP members and voters (good at heart, but naive political dunces) cannot see what's going on behind the Union Jack bunting.
P.S. I note that Griffin told the Times reporter that he takes £1,800 from BNP funds as his salary. I am quite sure that this is not an accurate sum. It will not include "expenses" -- which will certainly double his monthly take -- to say nothing of his cut from sundry BNP "commercial" enterprises.
===================== Times (supplement) - 19th April 2007
The British National Party gains strength
As a Government minister warns of the dangers of immigration, Martin Fletcher finds a swath of middle England ready to vote for BNP leader Nick Griffin -- a convicted racist who favours birching delinquent teenagers and paying immigrants to leave It is, at first sight, a vision of rural bliss -- a cream-coloured cottage high in the hills of Mid Wales and two miles from the nearest road. The daffodils are out. Lambs gambol in the fields. Chickens peck around the yard. In the side garden, beyond the rabbit hutch and fishpond, two blonde girls are playing in the sun. Look closer, however, and you spot the incongruities: the two rottweilers in their caged kennel, security cameras, the burglar alarm. You begin to suspect that the owner has chosen this house precisely for its inaccessibility. He has reason to.
Nick Griffin is leader of the whites-only British National Party and one of the most hated -- and, to his many detractors, hateful -- men in the country. He is a former National Front member, convicted of inciting racial hatred against Jews in 1998 and acquitted of similar charges against Muslims in two high-profile trials last year. He is a man who has called Britain a ³multi-racial hellhole², Islam a ³wicked, vicious faith², British Muslims ³the most appalling, insufferable people to have to live with², overt homosexuality ³repulsive² and the Holocaust ³the hoax of the 20th century². He has declared that ³nonwhites have no place here at all and [we] will not rest until every last one has left our land².
I am about to spend two days with Griffin before next month¹s local elections. Anti-fascist groups insist that the BNP should be denied the proverbial oxygen of publicity, but as the party gains strength with each successive election that stance becomes increasingly untenable. Nearly a quarter of a million people voted BNP in last May¹s local elections and elected 49 councillors. The party is putting up 750 candidates on May 3, double last year¹s tally, and may gain dozens more seats.
The BNP is Britain¹s fastest-growing party and it is absurd to hope that it will go away if ignored. The self-styled champion of indigenous Britons greets me in a T-shirt and green wellies. He is a youthful-looking 48 with a plastic left eye (he lost the real one when a shotgun cartridge exploded in a fire) who has spent the morning working on his two acres. As he goes inside to change, I chat to his wife Jackie, a specialist nurse in Powys. She and their four children -- three daughters and a son, ages 14 to 21 -- are BNP members, but she makes clear that she does not share all her husband¹s views. ³
There¹s some things you have common ground on and others you don¹t agree on,² she says, refusing to elaborate.
She clearly adores him, however. She frets about his safety. She calls him a ³hopeless romantic² but merely giggles when I ask for examples.Griffin reappears in a purple shirt and suit -- he disapproves of politicians dressing down, though he does wear a gold ear-stud.
He poses for pictures in his tiny office. The wallpaper on his computer screen reads: ³Haha, Dad you don¹t know how to change this back!!² There are trophies from his days as a Cambridge boxing Blue. There is also a framed Kipling poem which starts: ³It was not part of their blood/ It came to them very late/ With long arrears to make good/ When the English began to hate.² Griffin kisses Jackie goodbye, reminds her to water his newly planted aubretia, and we head off in his Ford Mondeo estate for the fertile BNP territory of West Yorkshire, with its immigrant populations of 10, 20 or even 30 per cent. In the back is a book recording the Scottish National Party¹s transformation from an extreme to a mainstream party.
Griffin¹s inspiration, however, is Jean-Marie Le Pen, the leader of France¹s far-right National Front, who turned ³a bunch of crazies into a serious political force². ³You¹re all lying scum,² he replies when I ask why he is letting a journalist accompany him. ³It¹s part of your job. But you can¹t say you¹re a normal party, then hide yourself away. There¹s nothing to hide.²That, of course, is the question. He tells me about a life spent mostly on the extreme right of British politics. His parents met while heckling a Communist Party meeting in North London in 1948. During the 1964 general election campaign, Griffin pedalled up and down the street outside his home in Barnet with Conservative posters on his tricycle. By 1974 his father, a Tory councillor and member of the right-wing Monday Club, was so dismayed by Britain¹s leftward drift that he took his family to a National Front meeting. Griffin, then 15, joined immediately. After graduating in law from Cambridge he worked for the NF in London, living on the dole. The party imploded during the Thatcher years. He quit in 1989.
In the mid1990s John Tyndall, the neo-Nazi demagogue who founded the BNP in 1982, lured him back into Far-Right politics. Griffin made statements condoning street violence. He received a nine-month prison sentence, suspended for two years, for alleging the existence of a Jewish conspiracy to brainwash the British people. In 1999, however, he ousted Tyndall as BNP leader and set about turning a bunch of neo-Nazi skinheads into an electable party.
The rhetoric was tempered, some of the worst rowdies left and suits replaced bomber jackets.
Griffin has earned his £1,800-a-month BNP salary.
The party won three council seats in Burnley in 2002. It now has 49 nationwide, and on May 3 Griffin expects to win many more in what he sarcastically calls ³enriched² areas such as inner Essex, the Black Country, West Yorkshire and Lancashire. The party will also be contesting seats in blue-rinse towns such as Harrogate, Bath, Windsor and Torbay. One recent poll suggested that 7 per cent of the electorate would consider voting for it. Griffin says that membership has risen from 1,300 in 1999 to 10,500, boosted by home-grown Islamic terrorist plots, globalisation and his dramatic acquittal in last year¹s race-hate trials. Critics insist that the BNP¹s move towards respectability is purely cosmetic. Griffin retorts, as we join the motorway, that it is ³deep and sincere².
He admits ³past stupidities², and says that he regrets the way that the BNP used to provoke confrontations or to discuss race in a way that was ³frankly crude, or cruelly and inaccurately supremacist². He is not racist, he argues.
He does not believe that whites are superior. He believes that races are different and that multiculturalism is a recipe for disaster. He opposes miscegenation ³because most people want their grandchildren to look basically like them². If the liberal elite had its way, the world would become ³a giant melting pot turning out coffee-coloured citizens by the million². The BNP no longer demands the recriminalisation of homosexuality, but Griffin still expresses disgust at the idea of two men ³snogging in public².
His revised views on the Holocaust are striking, too. He says that he derided the Holocaust only because the Left used it as ³a huge moral club² with which to beat opponents of multiculturalism. He now accepts that millions of Jews were killed, but claims that some historians (he cites David Irving) still question whether it was deliberate genocide.
The rules of warfare on the Eastern Front allowed 50 civilian hostages to be shot for each soldier killed in a partisan attack, Griffin states without trace of irony. ³When you consider that the communists claim the partisans killed at least 10,000 German soldiers, that would account for five million people being shot to death.²
Near Halifax we pick up Martin -- Griffin¹s hulking, 21st, shaven-headed bodyguard who bench-presses 500lb (227kg) but assures me that he is a ³nice pussycat really². Martin drives us to an evening meeting in Ripon. As we pass through Bradford he points to a mosque which, he claims, has a firing range beneath it. ³That¹s why we have a car with tinted windows,² Griffin adds. The BNP leader says that he can no longer visit Indian restaurants because ³I wouldn¹t know what¹s in the curry² and within 15 minutes there would be a crowd outside ³with iron bars and knives².In pockets of Britain the BNP is almost a mainstream party now, with ever more people daring to run for office or to put posters in windows. But it still prints its newspaper in Eastern Europe because British plants refuse to, has trouble renting halls and cannot advertise its meetings because they would be picketed. Potential supporters are instead instructed to gather at ³redirection points² and told where to go.
In Ripon the meeting point is the town square, where the local BBC radio station interviews Griffin. Ripon and Harrogate are ³lovely English towns and we believe they should stay that way. They can¹t if there are high levels of immigration,² he says. On our way to the meeting we pass a painting of a black inmate outside the Workhouse Museum. Griffin splutters. It was poor whites who suffered in workhouses, he says. About 70 people are packed into a back room of the Golden Lion pub, with not a skinhead or pair of Doc Martens in sight and more tweeds than T-shirts. They are male and female, young and old, working class and middle class, ex-Labour and ex-Tory, several of them Daily Telegraph readers. They are mostly solid Yorkshire folk who have watched immigrants transform areas in which they grew up and believe -- rightly or wrongly -- that their way of life is under threat. They are bewildered more than hate-filled. They are fearful more than fear-inspiring, and feel gagged by political correctness. They do not come from sink estates. They are stakeholders, people with something to lose.³We¹re being overwhelmed,² laments a retired Latin teacher. ³I¹ve nothing against other races. It¹s just that they keep flooding into the country to breaking point,² says a lorry driver. ³We can¹t invite the whole world to live in England,² says a former merchant marine officer. Few will give their names.
Griffin and his fellow speakers do nothing to calm their fears. Quite the opposite.
In a promotional video he decries the alleged banning of the cross of St George, Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs and even Piglet because the character offends Muslims. Against a background of soft music and beautiful scenery, a woman¹s voice decries the millions of foreigners of all races settling in Britain: ³The one thing they have in common is there are too many of them.² Michelle Shrubb, a candidate who lived in South Africa, says that a black crimewave is coming to Britain. Nick Cass, the BNP¹s Yorkshire organiser, declares that ³decent British people are fed up to the back teeth with seeing the country fall apart and being called racist when they want to do something about it². The merchandise table offers ³It¹s Cool to be White² T-shirts and ³I vote BNP because they look after me² bumper stickers. BNP candidates are presented with rosettes for daring to stand up and be counted.
Griffin humorously coaxes about £500 in donations from the audience, then answers questions for an hour. He puts on no airs and graces. He has a pint on the table beside him. He presents himself as an ordinary bloke, like his audience, who is fighting a corrupt elite that bleeds taxpayers for its disastrous social engineering projects and treats them with contempt. He is a shameless populist. He calls the rise of the BNP ³a peasants¹ revolt². He talks of ³our people², meaning whites. He mocks those who regard criminals as victims, advocates ³damn good thrashings² for wayward teenagers, and says of drug-dealers: ³Hang the bastards.² The audience loves it, but this is more than knockabout political rhetoric. Griffin firmly believes all this.
Party policy -- which he sets -- is draconian and xenophobic.
The BNP would deport all illegal immigrants, asylum-seekers and subversive foreigners, and offer existing immigrants money to return home. ³It¹s clearly worth talking in terms of six-figure sums to persuade families to go,² Griffin says. He would create civilian anti-crime patrols. Anyone who has done National Service would be allowed to keep guns to shoot burglars, and as ³a last resort against a tyrannical government².
He would restore hanging for the worst murderers, paedophiles, rapists and drug-dealers, and bring back the birch. He would abolish affirmative action programmes and hate-crime legislation, ban the promotion of homosexuality, prevent the NHS from recruiting foreign workers and stop women soldiers serving on the front line. State schools would restore mandatory (nonhalal) lunches and morning assemblies with Christian worship (minorities should ³either accept our ways or go somewhere else²). A BNP government would take Britain out of the EU and the European Convention on Human Rights. Remove the BNP label, Griffin claims, and most Brits would support these policies.
The next day we go to Dewsbury (³It¹s like living in Rorke¹s Drift,² says a local BNP councillor), where The Dewsbury Reporter refuses to interview Griffin. Some people greet him on the street but no one heckles. ³The English are very polite. If they don¹t like you they walk away,² he says. From a studio in Leeds he does a phone-in show for BBC Radio Wales, on which successive callers denounce him as a racist and fascist and he snarls back (³the usual Searchlight ambush², he says later, referring to an antifascist group). We visit Heckmondwike, where David Exley, a soft-spoken and rather impressive BNP Councillor, has persuaded Kirklees council to restore a run-down park (wards that vote BNP find shocked councils suddenly chucking money at them).
We then visit an old factory near Leeds that houses the BNP¹s recording studio, Great White Records. Griffin has written the lyrics for its first in-house album, The West Wind. One song begins: ³I wandered through my native land/ And stood aghast at what I saw/ As she wept under foreign hands/ No justice, truth or rule of law.² I suggest that Griffin¹s one good eye sees only the worst aspects of Britain. ³It¹s already a divided, sad, overtaxed, fearful place,² he replies. ³And it¹s going to be too unpleasant to put into words.² Between umpteen calls on his mobile phone -- one is about ways to use Simone Clarke, the ballet dancer identified as a BNP member -- I ask if Griffin sees any advantages to multiculturalism. Chicken tikka masala, he replies. And some good sportsmen, though he thinks that England¹s all-white 1966 World Cup footballers outperformed today¹s team because they had ³common values and identity². Then he lists the downsides -- a catastrophic loss of social cohesion, racial harassment and violence, spreading knife and gun cultures and old folk dying in nursing homes surrounded by staff who do not speak their language and feeling ³totally alone, alienated and in a foreign place². He warms to the theme, claiming that some Muslims deliberately use heroin -- ³Paki poison² -- to undermine nonMuslim communities around them. ³It¹s narco-terrorism.² Even worse, he says, is the way that hardline Muslim males deliberately seduce and corrupt ³thousands² of young white girls in a practice called ³grooming² that the authorities downplay for fear of being labelled racist. But surely the vast majority of Muslims in this country are good, law-abiding citizens? Griffin disagrees: ³The vast majority are entirely decent Muslims, but the better Muslims they are, the less good they are as British citizens.² The Koran orders them to obey the word of God, he says, not infidel governments: ³Democracy and Islam are absolutely incompatible.²
A Gallup poll this week suggested that 81 per cent of London-Muslims were ³loyal to Britain² compared with just 45 per cent of non-Muslims. In public Griffin appears personable and plausible. Talking in his car, he verges on the paranoid. Many British Muslims subscribe to a form of Islam that preaches a ³ruthless, aggressive imperialism², he says. Its goal is a world-wide caliphate. ³It¹s a takeover attempt,² he says, and it will end -- literally -- in civil war. Wherever an Islamic population establishes itself ³you get all sorts of bloodshed and horrors and there¹s no reason to think that this little part of the world will buck the trends of world history².
I ask, mischievously, if Griffin can see himself as Prime Minister. It¹s possible, he replies, though he says that he and Jackie have agreed that they don¹t want to live in London. He then spells out how: the US economy collapses, decades of Western economic growth come to ³a grinding, shuddering halt² and the people turn on the liberal elite. The only question, he says, is what will replace it -- a ³nativist backlash² or Islam. If the crash comes later than 2030 or 2040 ³the likely winners will be the Islamists purely because of demographics². The 60 people at that night¹s BNP meeting in a Batley pub are not thinking in such apocalyptic terms. They have more immediate and prosaic fears about the consequences of immigration -- their children being squeezed out of jobs and council housing, the emergence of no-go areas, the undermining of their rights and culture. ³We¹re frightened to be British,² says Ann Nailor, who runs five Age Concern shops. ³I feel alienated in my own community,² says Neil Feeney, a water company employee. ³People who read your paper have no idea about places like this,² said Marjorie Shaw, a former policewoman now in a wheelchair. ³The BNP are the only ones standing up for this country,² adds Lynn Winfield, a pub dishwasher. Griffin fans the flames. He calls the English ³one of the most oppressed peoples on earth². He says that when people like him try to speak out about real problems ³they try to throw them in jail². He says that bad laws should be broken. He calls global warming ³an excuse to say that we, the international elite, have to interfere with every sovereign state in the world, and if we don¹t you will sink by Thursday². When I take my leave, Griffin asks what I will write. That he is both the BNP¹s greatest asset and its greatest liability, I reply. He does not protest. He recalls something that he said earlier: ³I perhaps have too much baggage that won¹t be allowed to stay in the lost baggage office. I can take the BNP to a certain level, but to make the final push someone else may have to take over . . . I can go back to Wales and keep pigs. Tremendous.²

Marquette Park USA in the mid 1970's

Among the Intellectualoids Rebranding Saint George
Just when it seems the Church of England can go no further in offensivefatuousness, it manages, faithfully, to excel itself yet again, to the continuing despair of those would-be satirists whose most absurd and savage inventions cannot hope to compete with the reality.
The latest exercise in grotesquerie is a call to "rebrand" Saint George,the Patron Saint of England, in the interests of culture-war, politicalcorrectness and leftism.
The proposals are contained in a paper, "When the Saints Go Marching Out: Redefining Saint George For A New Era,"created by what is described as an "Anglican think-tank" Ekklesia, and published in the Church of England Newspaper.
Simon Barrow, one of the paper's authors, declares: "It is time thatSaint George was reclaimed from the dragon, from past associations with racism and the far right, and from images of arrogant flag-waving." The fact that Saint George is associated in popular mythology with slaying adragon to rescue a maiden seems a particular cause of offense, possiblybecause dragons are an endangered species and a persecuted minority group.
It was apparently Richard the Lionheart who officially claimed SaintGeorge as England's Patron Saint in the 12th Century. During theCrusades an apparition of Saint George is said to have appeared on the walls of Jerusalem, waving his sword and encouraging the English on to re-take the holy city for Christendom.
Saint George's Day was a great celebration for some time after the victory of Agincourt, but over a long period it gradually fell out of fashion until a major revival of interest and enthusiasm in very recent times.This new interest in Saint George, like all other notions of patriotism,has increasingly been attracting the ire of the politically-correct in the great British culture-war.
In Norwich three years ago a magistrate refused to allow the Otter pub to open on Saint George's Day, April 23,on the grounds that "St. George's Day is not a special day." The same court did, however, grant a special license for Chinese New Year, and exemptions are given for Saint Patrick's Day around the country as a matter of course. Politically-correct councils have banned flying SaintGeorge's flag on the grounds that it would "send the wrong message."
In Bath, in 2003, a St. George's Cross flag, measuring 12 inches by nine inches, was ordered removed from within an office at a police station because it could be seen through a window from the upper deck of double-decker tourist busses. A senior police officer ordered its removal after a local councilor complained that the national flag might cause offence to ethnic minorities (no evidence that it actually didcause such offence was forthcoming). Chief Inspector Mike Creedy of BathPolice confirmed: "The flag was removed as a result of a request tostaff in view of sensitivity surrounding the diversity issue."
Inresponse Falklands veteran Major Martin Tracey hoisted a 4-foot by3-foot St George's flag over the front of his shop in the city centre and scores of other residents followed suit. There have been countless other incidents of politically-correct attacks on the flag and its patriotic associations.Now Mr. Barrow claims that: "The patron Saint of England should be rebranded, and Saint George's Day should become a national day to celebrate the tradition of dissent." He believes Saint George should be re-branded as a "People's Saint," rather, perhaps, as the ineffable Diana was rebranded a "people's princess" when being a real princess proved too much for her. Saint George, he fears, has been hijacked not only by the dragon, but also by "associations with racism and the far right." He must be reclaimed from "images of arrogant flag-waving."It was under the flag of Saint George -- the red cross on a white ground of the White Ensign -- that the British Navy kept the Atlantic sea-lanesopen in World War II, and made eventual victory against Nazism in Europe possible. It was under the flag of Saint George that the converted merchant ship HMS Jervis Bay, armed with old 6-inch guns, steamed into the 11-inch guns of the pocket-battleship Admiral Scheer, going to certain death to buy half an hour for the convoy she was escorting to scatter and escape. When one of the Scheer's salvos hit the Jervis Bay's bridge, destroying the ensign and blowing off the Captain's arm and shoulder, his next order, according to one of the few survivors rescued later, was to hoist another ensign.
Among the "dissents" Mr. Barrow believes should be celebrated on SaintGeorge's Day are: "the pro-democracy Putney Debates, the equality-seeking Levellers, the anti-slavery abolitionists, the women's suffrage movement, conscientious objectors and peacemakers, anti-racism campaigners, human rights activists and those struggling against debt and poverty."
An incorrigible, politically-incorrect, voice whispers that Captain Fogarty Fegen of HMS Jervis Bay might be a more fitting individual to connect with St. George.The pro-Democracy Putney debates? What might they be? In fact they wereheld in 1647 between Oliver Cromwell and some other officers then in the process of establishing a military dictatorship in England and sects of extremist Puritans, who apparently thought Cromwell was not going far enough.Of course, there have been others in the British tradition of "dissent."
Oswald Mosley, for example, was a dissenter who started the BritishUnion of Fascists. Or how about the London Tube bombers? If they were not dissidents, who can claim the title?
Some people, looking at the unfortunate performance of the British sailors and marines taken prisoner by Iran, Britain's strange passivity over the growth of Islamist extremism in London and over huge increases in crime rates, might say it is actually more not less of the traditions of both patriotism and dragon-slaying that Britain needs at present.
C. S. Lewis once wrote of writing for children: "Let them at least have heard of brave knights and heroic courage."
Of these, Saint George is one of the most primal symbols.
Hal G. P. Colebatch, a lawyer and author, has lectured in InternationalLaw and International Relations at Notre Dame University and Edith CowanUniversity in Western Australia and worked on the staff of twoAustralian Federal Ministers.

Wednesday, April 25, 2007

RACords Rundbrief

Ab Mittwoch bei uns erhältlich:
HKL - Unplugged
Stimme des Blutes - Schicksalsstunde (Soloprojekt der als kriminellen Vereinigung geltenden Gruppe aus Süddeutschland)
2 Balladen-CDs, die für etwas Abkühlung sorgen werden in diesen doch etwas zu warmen Tagen.
Ab Freitag wird dann auch die neue Scheibe der Schwaben-RAC'n'Roller Ultima Ratio zu erwerben sein.
Immer noch aktuell:
Anger Within - Lost Path Perun Fest 2006 Live Lieder für einen neuen Zeitgeist (Sampler mit namhaften deutschen Gruppen)
MkG RACords
0711 / 1603828

Why Desire a Muslim State in Eastern Europe?

Granted, we can't read the minds of Jewish congressmen like Lantos, but nonetheless, we can think of a reason for a Muslim state being created in Eastern Europe: such a state would, sooner or later, cause trouble for its non-Muslim neighbors.

And that trouble, in turn, would be a great excuse for America, with its huge military and unlimited funds, to become heavily involved in Eastern Europe.

And by becoming heavily involved in Eastern Europe, America could then help mold and shape political and ethnic issues in the entire region - especially in nearby Russia, which hasn't become the "democracy" that the Jewish neocons in America had hoped for.

The neocons of America wanted easily-manipulated democrazy for Russia, but they got Putin instead, who expelled Jewish billionaires from Russia and who probably won't let any negroes or Pakistanis become "equal" to Whites [1].
Oy vey.
In other words, American policy could be used to make Russia and other Eastern European states more friendly and accessible to the Jews, simply because America would have a strong presence there, just as America has a strong presence in the Middle East now.
Indeed, America could then change certain features of Eastern Europe for the Jews just like it has changed certain features of the Middle East for the Jews [2]. Or, to quote Rabbi Solomon Silvergoldbergwitzfeld, "by using American muscle combined with Jewish brainpower, we can eventually make the world safe for all Jews!":

[1] democrazy = a place where all humans are equal, regardless of race, sex, religion or toilet habits, and a place where Jews can dominate the media, banks and other key parts of society

[2] many people in Eastern Europe hate Jews because of Jewish involvement in communism there, and furthermore, David Duke's book was being sold inside of the Russian parliament building, which we found both astonishing and funny

Charlie Chaplin ? So this is how he got on without any talent is it ?

This was taken from a jewish east London website, link below. We do recall that when Chaplin died some jewish radicals dug his body up in Switzerland circa 1977 and reburied it in a jewish cemetary.

Go east along Mile End Road passing the Genesis Cinema on your left. At one stage this was known as the (13) Paragon Theatre of Varieties and among the people who performed there was the young Charlie Chaplin (he billed himself as the “Hebrew” comic) and the young Barnet Winogradowsky (later Lord Delfont). Keep walking and turn right into Stepney Green. You will come to a Victorian block of flats called (14) Dunstan Dwellings where Rudolph Rocker lived at no.33 in what was virtually an anarchist commune.

A guy goes into a seafood restaurant and asks to see the dishes of the day.
Jack from Rochdale.
The waiter wheels over a trolley and the man examines the dishes.
"I'll have the little green squid with the hairy lip, please" says the man.
"O.K." replies the waiter and calls out "Gervais!"
A little French chef appears with a large knife, the waiter instructs the chef to kill the little green squid with the hairy lip. Gervais is just about to slice at the poor squid when he notices a tear running down its face. Gervais is touched, and admits that he hasn't the heart to kill the squid.
"Not to worry" says the waiter, and calls out "Hans!" at which an enormous German bloke comes out of the kitchen. "Sir", says the waiter, "this is Hans, the dishwasher. Hans kill that squid!" The dishwasher wields a huge rolling pin and is just about to bludgeon the little green squid with the hairy lip when it cringes back and gives a little cry. "I am sorry sir, I just cannot kill the squid," Hans admits, his lower lip trembling.
"Well sir," says the waiter, "it just goes to show.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * That Hans that do dishes, can be soft as Gervais. With mild green, hairy lip squid!"

Tuesday, April 24, 2007

National Fronts view of the liberalisation of BNP policies

Craig Cobb (VNN) asks Steve Rowland (NF) to discuss the BNP’s “liberalising” policies.

Listen to Mr Steve Rowland’s views regarding the British National Party starting just after 20 minutes after the start (at 20:25). His views are put very blunt and for newcomers must be quite as eye opener though for anyone familiar with the sorry state of the BNP’s leadership it comes really as no surprise.
Why females should avoid a girl's night out after they are married... from Jack.

The other night I was invited out for a night with "the girls".

I told my husband that I would be home by midnight, "I promise!"

Well, the hours passed and the margaritas went down way too easy.

Around 3a.m., a bit worse for wear, I headed for home.

Just as I got in the door, the cuckoo clock in the hall started up and cuckooed 3 times.

Quickly, realizing my husband would probably wake up," I cuckooed" another 9 times.

I was really proud of myself for coming up with such a quick-witted solution, in order to escape a possible conflict with him. Even when totally smashed...3 cuckoos plus 9 cuckoos totals 12 Cuckoos = MIDNIGHT!

The next morning my husband asked me what time I got in, and I told him


He didn't seem concerned at all. Whew! Got away with that one!

Then he said, "We need a new cuckoo clock."

When I asked him why he said that, "Well, last night our clock cuckooed three times, then it said, "Oh shit.", cuckooed 4 more times, cleared its throat, cuckooed another 3 times, giggled, cuckooed twice more, and then tripped over the coffee table and farted."
Has Mark Cotterill really packed in ?

The ex(?) - EFP leader has been sited 'snooping around' in Blackburn, knocking on activists doors, according to one good source. Any truth in this ? Seems strange !
The latest BNP members bulletin..............

there is no politics in the damned thing ! There are 'adverts' such as the RWB and even the costs of using tentpegs for the members. There is also talk of Trafalgar Club fundraing stuff. There is a fireworks display (NWN:bring your wallets). Scotland are flogging mugs and other such ephemera. Where are the training seminars and policy/ideology discussions ?

Ideology is the driving force in nationalism. Without it what drives the BNP ?
The BNP and Zionism

Subject: Washington Times on NeoCon/"Nationalist" alliance


The below analysis published in the Washington Times on 11th April about how and why ultra Right Wing Zionists are cosying-up to various "Nationalist" groups in Europe) should be read with great care.It substantially conforms with the analysis which I expressed to you more than a year ago, and which I have rehearsed in many subsequent postings and bulletins:

1. The Jews were the force which, via money power and media power (and hence political power) encouraged mass Coloured Immigration into Britain and elsewhere in Europe as a means of disrupting and subverting White-Gentile nations, underminding their sense of racial and national solidarity and, thereby, enhancing the power of Jewry which, by strict application of racialist policies, protects itself from the debilitating multi-racial chaos swirling around in the gentile world.

2. In recent years Jewry has woken up to the fact that the numerical size of the Muslim population in Europe is growing at a huge rate, as are other non-White immigrant groups. The growth of the non-Muslim/non-Whites doesn't bother Jewry as these people are not co-ordinated by a common political loyalty or religious belief.
The Muslim non-Whites, on the other hand, DO have a common religious and political focus (just like the Jews) and, what is more, on account of the Palestine situation and, latterly, the Iraq situation, the Muslims are politically and religiously opposed to Jewry.

3. Hence the Jews feel their domination over the body politics of the European nations will become progressively diluted if the Muslim populations (however poor) increase within European nations while the Jewish populations (however rich) decrease -- either proportionately or in absolute terms. However much gentile politicians lust after Jewish cash and media patronage, the bottom line for them on polling day is the number of votes for them in the ballot boxes.
An increasing Muslim population might be able to muster cash as well as votes to influence our craven politicians.

4. Thus ten or more years ago the Jews set about trying to devise a plan whereby the Muslim population can be cowed, discredited and, ultimately, forced out of European nations (a policy inclusive of keeping Turkey out of the EU!) on the grounds of their proclivity to "terrorism", whilst at the same time not discrediting and dismantling the "multi-racialist project" or stopping further non-White immigration (providing it is not Muslim!) -- regardless of the fact that the number of White casualties from Afro-Caribbean violence and crime in Britain far exceeds Islamic extremist terrorist outrages, such as the 7th July tube bombings in London.

5. Part of this Jewish project has been to infiltrate and adjust the policies and strategies of European "Nationalist" parties so that they accept the de facto multi-racialist situation of their respective nations; abandon their anti-Jewish policies; and concentrate their energies on making war on "Islam"/the Muslims -- a strategy which the ignorant rank-and-file 'lumpen' of "Nationalist" parties will not be able to distinguish from the earlier Nationalist campaign against ALL Coloured Immigration, for repatriation and a total rejection of the multi-racial concept. This cynical Jewish strategy is summed-up in their "Clash of Civilisations" construct which suggests falsely that Jewish values are part and parcel of Western/European/Christian civilisation; that Jewry and Israel are part of "Us"!

6. We have seen exactly that policy transformation enacted before our very eyes within a year of Nick Griffin taking over the British National Party in 1999. We saw it enacted within the Front National in France, especially after Jean Marie Le Pen's daughter, Marine, got elected to the European Parliament and immediately joined a delegation to visit Israel.

It is no doubt as a result of that visit (probably including a ritual visit to and a genuflection at Yad Vashem) that she came into contact with the Israel ultra-Right: Bibi Netanyahu and Conrad Black's wife, Barbara Amiel.

I am quite sure that Nick Griffin has been lobbied by Marine Le Pen in this regard, and that it was thanks to her that early last year Griffin was telephoned by Amiel with an opening gambit: "Isn't it about time we were talking to each other.....?"Regards,Martin Webster.

========================================== Times - 11th April 2007TODAY'S COLUMNIST
In bed with Islamists

By Paul Belien

For almost four decades, Muslims have been the fastest-growing segmentof the population in Western Europe. As a consequence, the Muslim vote isbecoming ever more important.This first became apparent in the September 2002 general elections inGermany, when Socialist candidate Gerhard Schroeder beat Conservativeopponent Edmund Stoiber with the slightest of margins -- barely 8,864votes.Germany is home to almost 700,000 Turkish-German voters -- inaddition to nearly 3 million non- (or rather not-yet-) voting Turkishimmigrants.

The Muslims voted overwhelmingly for Mr. Schroeder.

They did so again in 2005, though then the native, or "German-German,"vote went to the right to such an extent that it resulted in a narrow victoryfor Christian-Democrat candidate Angela Merkel. As time goes by, however,it will become ever more difficult to counter the Muslim voting bloc.

Last year the Muslim vote tipped the balance toward the left in the localelections in both the Netherlands and Belgium. The Institute for Migrationand Ethnic Studies of the University of Amsterdam found that 84 percent ofthe Turkish immigrants in the Netherlands voted for the left, as did 90percent of the Moroccans.In Antwerp, Belgium's largest port, the anti-Islamist Vlaams Belang partywon 33.5 percent in October's local elections.

Sociologist Jan Hertogencalculated that without the immigrant vote the VB would have polled 40.4percent and would have beaten the Socialists.Most of the immigrants who came to Europe during the past decades wereattracted by the generous welfare benefits that Western Europe lavishlybestows on the "underprivileged." Today, as more and more young Muslimsreach voting age, European parties have begun to cater to Islamist causes.Left-wing politicians in Europe introduce separate swimming hours forwomen in public pools, impose halal food on cafeterias and demand thatschools banish the Holocaust from history lessons.Pundits who predict that Western Europe is about to witness a shift to theanti-immigrant right are mistaken. This trend will be over by the end ofthe decade, when the impact of the immigrant vote will move Europeanpolitics dramatically to the left. The right's chances of winning electionsare dwindling.

The anti-immigrant right realizes this. As Filip Dewinter, the AntwerpVB leader, said after last year's elections:"I am a realist. The number of potential voters for our party is decliningyear by year... In the past ten years the number of new Belgians inAntwerp -- half of whom are Moroccans -- has doubled. ... If the number offoreigners in Antwerp continues to grow by 1.5 percent a year, as itcurrently does, then in 20 years from now there will be more people offoreign than of indigenous extraction in this city."The Muslim vote is also bound to have a major impact on the upcomingFrench presidential elections on April 22. More than 10 percent of theFrench electorate is Muslim. Since Muslims are the youngest part of thepopulation, representing almost a quarter of those under 20 years of age,their political importance will only grow.In some French cities already half the inhabitants are Muslims. This makesit all but impossible for the right to win in urban constituencies -- unlessvirtually all the indigenous "French-French" cast a right-wing vote.

Nicolas Sarkozy, the candidate of the ruling center-right UMP party, seemsconvinced that many indigenous French might, indeed, do this. Hence, he isspeaking out loudly against an Islamist takeover of French urbanneighborhoods, such as the Parisian suburbs.If Mr. Sarkozy's strategy proves to be the right one, it shows that manyFrench have come to realize that these elections offer the last chance topreserve something of the old France.Some politicians on the European far-right, however, seem convinced thatthe Islamization of Western Europe has become inevitable. Like the partiesof the left, they hope to counter electoral decline by striking a deal withthe Islamists.This explains why last week Jean-Marie Le Pen, the leader of theanti-immigrant National Front in France, emphasized that, unlike Mr.Sarkozy, he does not want to "clean the suburbs out with a high pressurehose." (NWN: And hence why Sarkozy beat Le Pens populist nonsense. Griffin take note ! )

Mr. Le Pen told the Muslim youths in the suburbs: "You are the branchesof the French tree. You are as French as can be."

We are on the eve of a crackup of the so-called European far right betweenpro-Islamists and anti-Islamists. This rift was one of the reasons why theAustrian Freedom Party fell apart.Within the French NF, too, traditionalist Catholics feel less and less at easewith the pro-Arab policies of those who consider America to be a greaterthreat to Europe than North Africa and who prefer Hamas over Israel.One might argue that anti-Semitism is at play here. But it might also bejust the same political opportunism that has affected the left.

=======================================From: [deleted] <[deleted] @[deleted]>To: Martin Webster Date: Sunday, April 15, 2007 12:02 AM

Subject: Stop The BNP

Martin, Something of interest. [deleted] April 2007Vote to stop BNP by: Ben Simons The Board of Deputies of British Jews is calling on all communities to unite in making sure voters across the country reject the far right British National Party (BNP) in May's local elections.The move comes following a record number of candidates who will be standing for the BNP on May 3. More than 800 BNP candidates will be contesting seats compared to 363 in 2006 and 221 in 2004.

"This development demonstrates once again the danger of complacency when it comes to the far right," said Board president Henry Grunwald. "Holocaust denial and Jewish conspiracy theories remain core elements of the BNP¹s ideology." Grunwald added: "Any gains in the party¹s popularity damage society as a whole by stirring up tensions between communities and undermining the values of tolerance that have allowed the Jewish community, and other minorities, to flourish in Britain.
Most importantly, this is a wake up call for us to work with other communities in making sure that we get out the vote to oppose the BNP at election time."
But in an email to, the BNP claims Grunwald is wrong.

"Can you show me where 'Holocaust denial and Jewish conspiracy theories' appear in BNP literature, web sites, manifestos, etc? I've never seen them," said BNP national press officer Dr Phill Edwards."It's an own goal by Henry Grunwald because he is demonstrating his own paranoia and insecurities which, unfortunately, so many Jews seem to possess."The BNP has Jewish members - I know one of our elected councillors is Jewish and I know at least two regional organisers who say they are Jews. Grunwald is out of touch and does his people a disservice."

Meanwhile, Holocaust survivor and Unite Against Fascism supporter Henry Guterman has spoken of his concern."Having lost many members of my family in the Holocaust, I do not want to see a repetition of the Nazis systematic annihilation of many communities who spoke up against their evil policies."That is why I am determined to fight the BNP who are trying to copy Hitler¹s method of coming to power."

Sunday, April 22, 2007


Sorry folks but we are upgrading our hardware, and much software. We hope to be back very early next week, before St Georges Day.

Tuesday, April 17, 2007

This isn't Hollywood, this is the real thing, a video taken by our troops in action in the Middle East.

Much of the language is very strong, and expected, from troops in the thick of is the link....turn your speakers up !

Sunday, April 15, 2007


To see the front cover and details of contents - follow this link to the FC blog.

Contents include;

Charlemagne - Europe's Emperor; nationalist balladeer Stigger interviewed on Skrewdriver, Warlord etc.; the Banking Swindle - and much more.

We'd like more outlets, mail-order firms, organisers and activists or take 5 or more copies.

The rates for multiple copies are: 1.30 pounds each inc postage in the UK 1.35 pounds inc postage outside the UK [airmail to Europe, surface mail elsewhere].

The mag retails at 1.80 pounds [price on cover - 2.90 euros/4.50 dollars]

Bringing out the magazine, one of the few remaining truly independent mags out there, is an expensive business - and without your help and support in ensuring quick distribution of copies, it makes the job of publishing FC 100 times more difficult.

Your help is vital!

Watch our web-site for updates and news NEW Final Conflict

Saturday, April 14, 2007

Gunther Deckert NPD ,will speak in Barcelona, Spain, on Saturday, the 21st.April ; he will address the problems of Germany and Europe and focus on the immigration problems.


[ says: So to the Neo-Cons, Zionists and Israel Firsters, anyone who opposes Israel or who seeks justice for the Palestinians, becomes a 'Islamist collaborator'!]

NWN: says that this is even more severe, but is explicitly aimed at white far right parties like the BNP. Read this story and digest .........


In bed with Islamists TODAY'S COLUMNIST By Paul Belien April 11, 2007

For almost four decades, Muslims have been the fastest-growing segment of the population in Western Europe. As a consequence, the Muslim vote is becoming ever more important. This first became apparent in the September 2002 general elections in Germany, when Socialist candidate Gerhard Schroeder beat Conservative opponent Edmund Stoiber with the slightest of margins -- barely 8,864 votes. Germany is home to almost 700,000 Turkish-German voters -- in addition to nearly 3 million non- (or rather not-yet-) voting Turkish immigrants. The Muslims voted overwhelmingly for Mr. Schroeder.

They did so again in 2005, though then the native, or "German-German," vote went to the right to such an extent that it resulted in a narrow victory for Christian-Democrat candidate Angela Merkel. As time goes by, however, it will become ever more difficult to counter the Muslim voting bloc.

Last year the Muslim vote tipped the balance toward the left in the local elections in both the Netherlands and Belgium. The Institute for Migration and Ethnic Studies of the University of Amsterdam found that 84 percent of the Turkish immigrants in the Netherlands voted for the left, as did 90 percent of the Moroccans. In Antwerp, Belgium's largest port, the anti-Islamist Vlaams Belang party won 33.5 percent in October's local elections. Sociologist Jan Hertogen calculated that without the immigrant vote the VB would have polled 40.4 percent and would have beaten the Socialists.

Most of the immigrants who came to Europe during the past decades were attracted by the generous welfare benefits that Western Europe lavishly bestows on the "underprivileged."

Today, as more and more young Muslims reach voting age, European parties have begun to cater to Islamist causes.

Left-wing politicians in Europe introduce separate swimming hours for women in public pools, impose halal food on cafeterias and demand that schools banish the Holocaust from history lessons.

Pundits who predict that Western Europe is about to witness a shift to the anti-immigrant right are mistaken. This trend will be over by the end of the decade, when the impact of the immigrant vote will move European politics dramatically to the left. The right's chances of winning elections are dwindling.

The anti-immigrant right realizes this. As Filip Dewinter, the Antwerp VB leader, said after last year's elections: "I am a realist. The number of potential voters for our party is declining year by year... In the past ten years the number of new Belgians in Antwerp -- half of whom are Moroccans -- has doubled. ... If the number of foreigners in Antwerp continues to grow by 1.5 percent a year, as it currently does, then in 20 years from now there will be more people of foreign than of indigenous extraction in this city."

The Muslim vote is also bound to have a major impact on the upcoming French presidential elections on April 22. More than 10 percent of the French electorate is Muslim.

Since Muslims are the youngest part of the population, representing almost a quarter of those under 20 years of age, their political importance will only grow. In some French cities already half the inhabitants are Muslims. This makes it all but impossible for the right to win in urban constituencies -- unless virtually all the indigenous "French-French" cast a right-wing vote.

Nicolas Sarkozy, the candidate of the ruling center-right UMP party, seems convinced that many indigenous French might, indeed, do this. Hence, he is speaking out loudly against an Islamist takeover of French urban neighborhoods, such as the Parisian suburbs. If Mr. Sarkozy's strategy proves to be the right one, it shows that many French have come to realize that these elections offer the last chance to preserve something of the old France.

Some politicians on the European far-right, however, seem convinced that the Islamization of Western Europe has become inevitable.

Like the parties of the left, they hope to counter electoral decline by striking a deal with the Islamists.

This explains why last week Jean-Marie Le Pen, the leader of the anti-immigrant National Front in France, emphasized that, unlike Mr. Sarkozy, he does not want to "clean the suburbs out with a high pressure hose." Mr. Le Pen told the Muslim youths in the suburbs: "You are the branches of the French tree. You are as French as can be."

We are on the eve of a crackup of the so-called European far right between pro-Islamists and anti-Islamists.

This rift was one of the reasons why the Austrian Freedom Party fell apart. Within the French NF, too, traditionalist Catholics feel less and less at ease with the pro-Arab policies of those who consider America to be a greater threat to Europe than North Africa and who prefer Hamas over Israel. One might argue that anti-Semitism is at play here. But it might also be just the same political opportunism that has affected the left.

Heroes of London Bridge including banker who lost his life confronting jihadis with a skateboard and nurse who died running towards dange...