Thursday, January 31, 2008

Subject: Schools in 1960 compared with the present day
School 1960 vs. School 2008

Take a look at these comparisons and ask yourself - have things improved in our society thanks to 'government' intervention?
Scenario: Johnny and Mark get into a fistfight after school.
1960 - Crowd gathers. Mark wins. Johnny and Mark shake hands and end up mates.
2008 - Police are called; Armed Response Unit arrives and arrests Johnny and Mark. Mobiles with video of fight confiscated as evidence. They are charged with assault, ASBO's are taken out and both are suspended even though Johnny started it. Diversionary conferences and parent meetings conducted. Video shown on 6 internet sites.
Scenario: Jeffrey won't sit still in class, disrupts other students.
1960 - Jeffrey is sent to the principal's office and given 6 of the best. Returns to class, sits still and does not disrupt class again.
2008 - Jeffrey is given huge doses of Ritalin. Counselled to death. Becomes a zombie. Tested for ADD. School gets extra funding because Jeffrey has a disability. Drops out of school.
Scenario: Billy breaks a window in his neighbour's car and his Dad gives him the slipper.
1960 - Billy is more careful next time, grows up normal, goes to college, and becomes a successful businessman.
2008 - Billy's dad is arrested for child abuse. Billy is removed to foster care and joins a gang. Psychologist tells Billy's sister that she remembers being abused herself and their dad goes to prison. Billy's mum has an affair with the psychologist. Psychologist gets a promotion.
Scenario: Mark, a college student, brings cigarettes to school.
1960 - Mark shares a smoke with the school principal out on the smoking area.
2008 - Police are called and Mark is expelled from School for drug possession. His car is searched for drugs and weapons.
Scenario: Mohammed fails high school English.
1960 - Mohammed retakes his exam, passes and goes to college.
2008 - Mohammed's cause is taken up by local human rights group. Newspaper articles appear nationally explaining that making English a requirement for graduation is racist. Civil Liberties Association files class action lawsuit against state school system and his English teacher. English is banned from core curriculum. Mohammed is given his qualification anyway but ends up mowing lawns for a living because he cannot speak English.
Scenario: Johnny takes apart leftover firecrackers, puts them in a model plane paint bottle and blows up an anthill.
1960 - Ants die.
2008 - MI5 and police are called and Johnny is charged with perpetrating acts of terrorism. Teams investigate parents, siblings are removed from the home, computers are confiscated, and Johnny's dad goes on a terror watch list and is never allowed to fly again.
Scenario: Johnny falls during break and scrapes his knee. His teacher, Mary, finds him crying, and gives him a hug to comfort him.
1960 - Johnny soon feels better and goes back to playing.
2008 - Mary is accused of being a sexual predator and loses her job. She faces three years in prison. Johnny undergoes five years of therapy. Becomes gay.

Wednesday, January 30, 2008

BNP Accounts go under the BBC microscope


File on 4
12 February 2008
The major political parties' fundraising methods have all come under close scrutiny recently, but concerns are now being expressed over the finances of the British National Party. Fran Abrams investigates."

This programme promises to be a treat with a star studded BNP and ex BNP line-up.
We hear that the 'Civil Liberty' connection to the BNP, and its finances, are also being discussed.

All things being equal, it's about time the BNP's accounts received the same coverage as all the other parties.

Tuesday, January 29, 2008

The BNP Constitution

It has reached our ears that the BNP constitution affectionately known as ‘The Barn Door’ to wiser nationalists, is about to change, yet again. We hear that, Nichol’arse Gri££in, is about to add a little something extra to secure his throne in the form of…………

Should we have a drum roll?

A challenger can only challenge once. Yes, once you’ve challenged, Gri££in, you can never challenge him again, it must be done by new blood.

What do you think of this latest addition to the barn door? Leave your comments here.

Polish migrants living in Britain claiming £21m in child benefits for children left behind

Disparity: A chart which illustrates the generosity of benefits in the UK and the low cost of living in Eastern EuropeBritain's taxpayers are forking out more than £21million a year in child benefit for youngsters living in Poland, official figures reveal.

A loophole in EU regulations means migrants from other EU countries who are seeking work in the UK can claim state handouts for children they have left behind in their home countries.

The total benefits bill for the Treasury is likely to be closer to £50million a year when other Eastern European countries are included.

In addition, ministers refuse to reveal how much more is being paid out in tax credits. Last night, the revelations prompted demands for a shake-up of the rules, with critics complaining of a "Government-sanctioned scam" at a time when millions of British children remain in poverty.

Britain's child benefit payments of £941 per year for a first child or £629 per year for younger siblings are far higher than the equivalent paymentsin Eastern European states that are new EU members.

The Polish benefits system, for example, pays a maximum of around £160 per year in child benefit.

Investigations have found that many workers moving to Britain are fraudulently claiming family benefits in both countries, exploiting lax checks and poor information sharing between member states.
Figures released by the Treasury in answer to Parliamentary written questions from the Conservatives show that at the end of September 26,000 Polish children from 16,286 families were being paid child benefits by UK taxpayers.

That means 16,286 first-born children were receiving the full £18.10 per week with the remaining 10,000 getting the lower payment of £12.10 per week.
The figures show that the number of claimants is soaring.

In June last year, the Treasury said 14,000 families from eight Eastern European states were claiming the benefits - around 10,000 were estimated to be Polish.

Open borders: More than 700,000 workers from Eastern Europe have arrived in Britain in the four years since their countries joined the EU
Three months later the figure for Poland alone had risen to 16,286.
At this rate of increase the benefits bill could more than double in a year, with thousands more Eastern European families joining in the benefits bonanza.

Although all the payments are legal under EU law, critics claim they provide an added incentive for immigrants to come to the UK.

For more.........................

Pressure builds up on Nick Griffin to leave !

"The Nottinghamshire village of Brinsley hosted the first ‘Voice of Change’ conference yesterday (27th).
113 patriots attended the event despite the best efforts of some of Griffin’s cabal to put people from their regions off with threats of expulsions from positions and ostracism. The venue and date had previously been set aside for the BNP’s annual January Organisers’ Conference but that was before Sadie was purged by Griffin.
Former South East Regional Organiser Cllr Roger Robertson chaired the Conference and introduced each speaker on stage in turn. First to speak was former Head of Administration and Scottish Regional Organiser Kenny Smith.............................

News coming in of this meeting seems very positive.

At last, a plan to revitalise the BNP and put honesty and democracy back into the movement, has shown itself to have a great 'head of steam' within the BNP.

Correctly, at least one main speaker drew attention to the fact that some have pointed out Mr.Griffins dishonesty in dealing with people and money has been happening since 2002. This blog when in it's first stages, has been pointing this out since late 2001 !

A new Leadership challenge is the way to take back, what was, in effect 'hijacked' by Mr.Griffin and his cronies in 1999 .

BNP Reform people where at the meeting, and it was good to hear that Richard Edmonds and Mike Easter were there to offer support and listen to the complaints and concerns of seemingly many other BNP members and activists.

Monday, January 28, 2008

Communism - McCarthy Was Right
By Jon Basil Utley

© 2000 WorldNetDaily. com

WASHINGTON -- Although Joseph McCarthy was one of the most demonized American politicians of the last century, new information -- including half-century- old FBI recordings of Soviet embassy conversations -- are showing that McCarthy was right in nearly all his accusations.

"With Joe McCarthy it was the losers who've written the history which condemns him," said Dan Flynn, director of < Accuracy in Academia's recent national conference on McCarthy, broadcast by C-SPAN.

Using new information obtained from studies of old Soviet files in Moscow and now the famous Vanona Intercepts -- FBI recordings of Soviet embassy communications between 1944-48 -- the record is showing that McCarthy was essentially right. He had many weaknesses, but almost every case he charged has now been proven correct. Whether it was stealing atomic secrets or influencing U.S. foreign policy, communist victories in the 1940s were fed by an incredibly vast spy and influence network.

The conference, a gathering of old McCarthyites and younger scholars, commemorated the senator's first speech, in Wheeling, West Virginia 50 years ago, when he first held up a list of names of employees of the State Department whom, he said, were major security risks. McCarthy questioned how, in six short years after America's winning of World War II, the communist world was triumphant and had expanded to include 800 million people.

Of the lists, a key one consisted of 108 names from a House Appropriations Committee report, of persons declared as "security risks" in the State Department -- the Lee List. The House committee chairman had complained that State wasn't bothering to do anything about the suspects. Details of the list and its accusations were presented at the conference.

Speakers detailed many of the cover-ups used to smear McCarthy. Veteran journalist and teacher Stan Evans, director of National Journalism Center, told of the Tydings Committee, which had investigated McCarthy's charges of communists in government. Its report had exonerated everybody.
Among the accused it stated categorically that there was no evidence against Owen Lattimore, a man McCarthy said was a major figure in the communist conspiracy. Lattimore had been Roosevelt's key advisor on China policy. Yet Evans showed evidence from 5,000 pages of FBI files on him -- files released only a few years ago to the public, although the White House had access to them.

However, evidence before the committee showed that Lattimore had supported Soviet policy at every turn, even declaring that the Stalin purge trials in Russia, "sound like democracy to me." With then-Vice President Henry Wallace in Russia, Lattimore compared concentration camps to the Tennessee Valley Authority, and later urged Washington to abandon China to communism and to withdraw from Japan and Korea. FBI chief J. Edgar Hoover, who had fed information to McCarthy, broke with him afterwards, fearing McCarthy would prejudice FBI sources of information for its criminal prosecutions.

Although most of McCarthy's cases involved actual spies and "security risks," the really important issue was that of communist influence over American foreign policy, argued Evans.
Harry Hopkins, Roosevelt's closest advisor who lived in the White House, had regular contacts with Soviet intelligence. He helped bring about the disastrous Yalta and Pottsdam agreements.
The Morganthau Plan, to prevent German reconstruction and starve the Germans to make them desperate enough to go communist, was the product of Laughlin Currie and Harry Dexter White at the Treasury Department.
The abandonment of Chiang Kai-shek by denying military support was the product of "China Hands" led by John Stewart Service, John Patton Davies, and Lattimore. Evans described other major spy networks -- in England, the Burgess Maclean group which infiltrated Washington as well as London.

Reed Irvine, chairman of Accuracy in Media, told how he himself had been a leftist in his early career. He had been against McCarthy, but McCarthy's speeches had made him think and start to read "evidence that I had avoided."
He described how all during his military career as a Marine officer and later in Japan with the U.S. occupation he had never hidden his leftist views and later had even been offered a job at the CIA. Irvine argued that real communists were only in the hundreds, but that thousands of leftists, such as he, all feared McCarthy and had wanted him discredited.

Pulling all the latest evidence together was luncheon speaker Professor Arthur Herman. His new book, "Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator," and featured in the Sunday New York Times Magazine, shows the vindication of most of McCarthy's charges. Herman, who is also coordinator of the Smithsonian' s Western Heritage Program, said that the accuracy of McCarthy's charges "was no longer a matter of debate," that they are "now accepted as fact." However, the term "McCarthyism" still remains in the language.

Asked whether McCarthy had understood all the forces arrayed against him, Herman said no, that McCarthy hadn't realized he'd be fighting against much of the Washington establishment.
President Truman was fearful that exposures would reflect on key Democrat officials, he said, and big media and the academic world were very leftist, a heritage of the Depression and World War II. High government officials also feared investigations of their past appointments and associations with people who turned out to be communists or sympathizers.

That was the reason McCarthy was so demonized, he said.

Joe McCarthy had been a Marine air gunner, an amateur boxer, a county judge and towards his end, under constant attack, he began to drink heavily. Herman said he certainly was over his head and his fall came about after sweeping attacks on General Marshall and the Army. Senator Taft and other key supporters began to draw away from him.

If Robert Kennedy, his competent and well-connected co-counsel, had stayed on, McCarthy might have behaved more carefully, said Herman. An argument with other co-counsel Roy Cohn left Cohn in charge, but Cohn and staffer David Schine were disastrous for McCarthy.
Still, McCarthy's original charges helped bring about Eisenhower's electoral victory and the defeat of the Democrats and key leftist Democratic senators such as Tydings of Maryland.
Four years after his original charges, Joe McCarthy was censured by the Senate and died shortly thereafter.

There is more evidence to come. Herb Rome Stein, another speaker, who started out with the old House Un-American Activities Committee, is writing a book about the Vanona FBI intercepts and their links to other evidence from his comprehensive study in Russia of Soviet archives, made available to Westerners since the fall of communism.
His book, The Vanona Secrets, will be released by Regnery Gateway this fall.
< Audiotapes of the "Accuracy in Academia" conference are available online.

Is anyone bothered?

Why Would The BNP Second In Command Simon Darby Allow A Lib Dem Election Agent To Use His Address ?

(Or Why Would A Labour Councillor Allow Darby To Use His Address When Darby Stood In Castle & Priory For The BNP ?)

UK Rubber Ltd is Simon Darby's company.

Name & Registered Office:
Company No. 02838605

Status: Active
Date of Incorporation: 22/07/1993

Country of Origin: United Kingdom
Company Type: Private Limited Company
Nature of Business (SIC(03)):
2417 - Manufacture synthetic rubber primary forms
Accounting Reference Date: 31/03
Last Accounts Made Up To: 31/03/2006 (TOTAL EXEMPTION SMALL)
Next Accounts Due: 31/01/2008
Last Return Made Up To: 22/07/2006
Next Return Due: 19/08/2007 OVERDUE
Last Members List: 22/07/2006

Liberal Democrat Candidate 2005
Evan Melvyn Ab-Owain

Office of Election Agent to which claims, notices, writs, etc may be sent.

When Darby won Castle and Priory, he gave his address as the 'ALBION WORKS' in the Black-Country. Former West Mids Organiser BNP Steve Edwards, who Darby dumped on, checked this out. Not only did Darby not have a business there, it was owned by a Labour councillor. What is also strange is, no one complained, no press coverage etc Darby would have lost his seat had it been revealed.

Posted by Simon Smith

Sunday, January 27, 2008

Dear Mr Griffin...

A person still within the relatively high ranks of the BNP, has asked us to pose two questions. The first being brought about after reading the EiE blog and Ian Dawsons comments on his resignation email. We Quote:

Deliberately Leaked Resignation Email

Nick Griffin has accused me of deliberately leaking my resignation email, which he claims contained disgraceful lies and misinformation. I can honestly say that I did not leak that email to anyone. That is the honest truth and people can have my word on it. (That is my word Nick, not your word, as the former can be taken as gospel the latter should not be trusted). Also the resignation letter did not contain any lies (you seem to think that the claim about Mark making money from leaflets is libellous, yet I never said I could prove it with firm evidence, just that I would ‘stake my life on it’ based on the things which I had seen, heard and experienced – and Mark Collett HAS made money from leaflets in the past. There is a difference and as Mark’s reputation would unlikely suffer, being as low as it is, then your claim for libel (don’t forget you have libelled me and both you and Collett have slandered me with your Searchlight/State Asset and various other accusations) does not stack up – though feel free to try it as my legal representative would have a field day with that one. The email was an internal email and was sent through the proper channels to AC members only.”

The second, because he knows, Mark Collett uploaded pornographic material to the Internet of Nick Griffins bodyguard, Mr Martin Reynolds, and which is now in wide and embarrassing circulation.

The BNP member wants to know why, Mr Nicholas Griffin clings to Mark Collett, because this BNP member claims to know that it was, Mark Collett who forwarded the Ian Dawson email to the opposition.

So, because this member would be expelled were he to ask himself, we shall ask for him.


Saturday, January 26, 2008

Last German survivor of WWI passes away unnoticed

Dr. Erich Kästner, thought to be the last survivor of the German Imperial Army, has passed away with barely an acknowledgement in Germany.
Link from Belfast
NWN: This is disgraceful ! No comment for a guy, and the last of his generation who served his Country in that conflict.
This is another example of Germans being put upon and having to be the hated figures of history.
Other soldiers like myself know the truth.
Old soldiers never die......................

Jewish Neo -Cons admit their part.............

The Long Fuse to the Iraq War

They Knew They Were Right: The Rise of the Neocons, Jacob Heilbrunn, Doubleday, 289 pages
by Philip Weiss

It is hard to imagine a title more overdue than They Knew They Were Right: The Rise of the Neocons.
Ever since neoconservatism’s chief contribution to world betterment, the Iraq War, began losing its luster, its adherents have gone into a kind of hiding, and the media has given them cover.
Former Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz and New York Times columnist David Brooks, one or both of whom are neoconservatives, have suggested that the word is an anti-Semitic epithet.
Others try to avoid it entirely: when Bill Kristol, who was definitely once a neoconservative, was hired by the New York Times as a columnist, the paper called him a “conservative” and said his father Irving Kristol, one of the movement’s founders, was a leader of “modern conservatism.”

Jacob Heilbrunn asserts that neoconservatives have so far gotten away “scot-free” with planning the greatest foreign-policy disaster since Vietnam. And so his book will call them to account. Not quite.

Heilbrunn achieves one important chore: a forthright social narrative of the neocons as a Jewish movement. Tracing ideological currents in the Jewish community from the 1940s to the 1970s, Heilbrunn, a journalist who himself flirted with neoconservatism, describes how the neocons were propelled by resentments against WASP elites—the men who had ignored the Holocaust, they felt, and “frozen out” Jews from the establishment. It would be hard to overemphasize Heilbrunn’s accomplishment.
There has been endless prevarication about the fact that neoconservatism is an element of the Jewish experience, even from liberal Jews. Yet Heilbrunn will have none of it. He says that neoconservatism is “intimately linked with the memory of the Holocaust and the allies’ failure to save the Jews during the war” and notes that a “peculiar amalgam of intellectual rigor and ethnic resentment … lies at the heart of the neoconservative outlook.”

And here’s the topper: a “lifelong antipathy toward the patrician class among the neocons … prompted them to create their own parallel establishment.”

The sociological insights in his story are often exciting. Neocon godfather Norman Podhoretz had “the classic Jewish experience with the WASP elite” but became a “social climber” himself Heilbrunn says.
The other godfather, Irving Kristol didn’t at first take the late Allan Bloom seriously. Bloom told Heilbrunn that his relationship with Kristol got “easier” once Bloom, like Kristol, had wealth. The neocons didn’t like Kissinger because he was hofjude, “a court jew of the WASP foreign policy establishment.”
They didn’t like Zbig Brzezinski because he was Polish and the neocons suspected him of Pale-era anti-semitism.

Boiling resentment meant very little without a political program. The neocons got that in the late 1960s. And not surprisingly, the issues had a Jewish character. “With the trial of Adolph Eichmann in Jerusalem, the 1967 war, and the rise of black anti-Semitism in the United States, neoconservatism was born,” Heilbrunn writes. So now Brzezinski was resented because he was against the Israeli settlements in the West Bank, and McGeorge Bundy because he wanted to push Israel to make a peace agreement with the Palestinians.

Neoconservative ideas might have been confined to small magazines, but the neocons stunned themselves in the 1970s by gaining traction in American political life—through the offices of Washington Sen. Henry Jackson (whom a Saudi ambassador called “more Jewish than the Jews”). With Jackson’s support, the neocons staged their first great victory, pressuring the Soviet Union to free Jews. After Daniel Patrick Moynihan won his New York Senate seat with “strong Jewish support” in 1976, the neocons had a second home.

At that time, of course, they were Democrats. Martin Peretz, the once leftwing editor of The New Republic, was so shaken by the Left’s friendliness to the Palestinians, that he provided access in his pages to hawks, and became “a major force in the mainstreaming of neoconservative ideas.” Douglas Feith, an architect of the Iraq disaster, tells Heilbrunn, “I grew up in a liberal Democratic Jewish household.”
Again Israel was key.
At the age of 15, two years into the Israeli occupation of the West Bank, Feith wrote a precocious letter to the New York Times attacking the State Department policy in the Middle East. “It is appalling the State Department can be so blind to historical precedent as to call for a withdrawal from the captured area.” Captured, not occupied.

Israel-centrism made the neocons lousy wardheelers. They turned against Jimmy Carter on foreign policy, and so helped to elect Ronald Reagan in 1980. Not one to slight the power of his subjects, Heilbrunn says that had they not spurned Carter, he might have been re-elected. Neocons came back to the Dems in 1992, again over Israel. George H.W. Bush—“a scion of the WASP establishment”—was “acting like Jimmy Carter when it came to Israel.” Knocking off the Soviet Union gave the neocons a sense of hubris that would doom their ideas about Iraq.
Their thinking was also damaged by the fact that the neocons overprized “filial piety”—and so their sons were enlisted in their fathers’ battles without having to develop their own ideas.

Good stuff. Alas, the book’s riches are set in the ancient past: the ’70s, ’80s, and ’90s. Didn’t the neocons just wreck our image around the world? Heilbrunn doesn’t get to 9/11 till page 228. There are only 60 pages left, and the social insights that have characterized the first half of the book disappear, giving way to a stentorian, op-ed style. The neocons have “debauched” the idea of intervention. They were “hopelessly naïve about the Arab predicament.”

I hoped that this book would do for the parallel establishment what The Best and the Brightest did for the last one in the wake of Vietnam.
But Heilbrunn seems to have had only three or four interviews with Iraq war planners and we learn little about their psyches.
How do they feel about Israel?
How much money do they make?
Do they think there is going to be another Holocaust?
What was the importance of Cheney’s American Enterprise Institute chapter (both he and his wife have been fellows at AEI) to his inoculation with neocon doctrine? Heilbrunn doesn’t provide answers.

There are two reasons for his failure, the first vocational, the second far more worrisome. Heilbrunn was evidently under a deadline, and having spent years working on the first part of his book, he appears to have rushed the second half. His writing goes downhill. In the galley, two sentences in a row have the verb “would end up.” Twice on the same page former Sen. Bob Kerrey provides “important … cover” for the neocons.

The more troubling reason is self-censorship. It is one thing to write about the past with dispositive energy and quite another to render sharp judgments about the present. Heilbrunn hints at great ideas without the ability to follow through on them. He says the neocons’ obsession with radical Islam as another cold war was a self-delusion—did they also confuse Palestinian suicide bombers with Nazis?
He talks about a parallel establishment and “an elite caste,” but doesn’t do anything to explore the huge pots of money available to the neocons and to politicians who stick by Israel. There is no follow through because all these ideas are close to anti-Semitic “canards,” the word the pro-Israel crowd likes to use when anyone tries to address Jewish influence in public life. Heilbrunn is conscious of these tactics.
He notes that Francis Fukuyama said much more about the neocons’ love of Israel in an article than he did in his subsequent book and chalks the scholar’s silence up to “the bullying tactics the neoconservatives often employed to avert any criticism of Israel, however mild.” Well, Heilbrunn seems to have worried about the same thing.

As for bullying, what are we to make of Heilbrunn’s own vicious outbursts toward anybody who has tried to change American policy toward the hateful Israeli occupation?
Thus George Kennan worried about “so-called ethnic lobbies.” Stephen Walt and John Mearsheimer’s groundbreaking 2006 paper, “The Israel Lobby,” is dismissed as an “addled essay”, without another word. Jimmy Carter is accused of “crackpot moralism.” Edward Said was “a smooth, urbane purveyor of much nonsense about the Middle East.”

Between these knifings, Heilbrunn loses his own point of view. He tells us that Bush fell “into the web that the neoconservatives had woven around him.” Sounds like a conspiracy. Twice the author uses the word “cabal.” Harvard’s government department “was the first academic neoconservative cabal.” Later there is “the Pentagon cabal of neoconservatives.” Not even Walt and Mearsheimer used the word, though maybe they should have. Certainly, the neocons have often formed cells and have not been transparent about their ideas or their aims.

The book’s promotional copy teases the reader with that revelation. The boldfaced paragraph on the back of the galley asserts that many believe that a “cabal” of neocons launched a “war primarily on Israel’s behalf.” If Heilbrunn doesn’t believe this, he ought to state why not. As it is the reader is left with the shadowy sense that the neocons have a pro-Israel agenda that they are not upfront about.
But it isn’t a conspiracy, Heilbrunn warns. The neocons have convinced themselves that the U.S. and Israel have congruent interests. “They just believe this stuff. They’re not agents,” an anonymous source tells him, speaking of Cheney aide David Wurmser, who is married to an Israeli.
Jacob Heilbrunn’s book should be hailed as a real sign of progress in assessing responsibility for the Iraq War, and yet the real work remains undone.
I understand why there are inhibitions.
Blaming the neocons’ Israel-first worldview for the war raises deep fears among Jews.
The liberal Forward greeted Walt and Mearsheimer’s paper on the Israel lobby with the bitter retort: “In Dark Times Blame the Jews.”
We need to get past this sort of defensiveness if we are going to understand our own democracy, let alone the Middle East.
What Heilbrunn rightly calls an “elite caste” could lose status, yes. But others’ lives are at stake. ____________________________________Philip Weiss is at work on a book about Jewish issues. He blogs at www.philip

Check out Cllr. Simon Smiths own blog

Oi vay it's Holocaust Day !
A message from Sharon Ebanks....

To the Stormfront Dick-Heads (NWN:Gri££inites)

I made a comment upon my own forum the other day where I stated I wouldn’t mind Griffin taking a bullet and writhing in agony while he died.

Whilst I don’t apologise for the comment, as I meant it, I do apologise to my friends who have taken some flack over it. I’m actually sitting here and smiling, because those very same people wish death daily upon those who haven’t done half as much as Griffin has done to others, but then they pretend to know Griffin, the reality of the man is a different thing entirely.

People are screaming that I am anti BNP, yes, I am. I’m anti BNP because it and everything it stands for, is a lie.

Every single one of their policies can be ripped to shreds in 5 minutes just by inspecting some of the membership as well as most of BNP HQ.

The BNP claims to stand for family values and morality. WHAT???

Officials who attempt to bed children, upload animal porn to councillors computers, spam people with disgusting emails etc

The BNP claims to stand for freedom of speech. WHAT???

The BNP denies everyone and anyone that right, and some of the dumb members are AFRAID to voice their concerns.

Tell me, how does it feel to be afraid of the very thing you pay £35 a year to belong to?

The BNP claims to be a party of law and order when its ranks are filled with thieves, liars, thugs, drug dealers, and fraudsters. You can say what the hell you like about me, but I won’t promote, or support a LIE, no, I leave that to the morons.

NWN : We know about the sort of stuff that M/s Ebanks has had to put up with. The threats and lies and filth thrown by the 'Nick Griffin fan club'. Their hypocracy knows no bounds. You need the patience of Job to put up with Gri££ins fan club !

Friday, January 25, 2008

Bloody Sunday Procession – Counter demonstration – January 26th 2008

The Young National Front and the National Front are calling for all its members, along with other British nationalist groups to attend a counter demonstration on January 26th 2008 from 9.30am in Glasgow.

The march which is being organised by Cairde na h’Eireann group, claims to be in remembrance of the people that marched for civil rights in Londonderry in 1972.

Whilst as the public enquiry into Bloody Sunday, claimed the British Army had shots fired at them, during the violence which took place, on that day. We also acknowledge the people that died on this day, but also acknowledge that the parade has been hijacked by alleged republican paramilitary groups.
Here is that Nick Griffin/Purging the Droid gaffe !
You know, the one where he says it is not about race anymore it's about culture. He then tells we that disagree........... to sod off !

Now we have known for a while, that Gri££in likes to 'fly kites' to see the kind of uproar he will face, when he has consistantly pushed for a removal of all that genuine nationalists hold dear. He has pushed for a multi-racial BNP since day one. He was the one who pushed for a removal of the compulsory repatriation policy - that was the thin end of the wedge.

In 2002 ,he pushed for a multi-racial family in Oldham to stand for the BNP.

The Oldham BNP told him where to get off !

Now he has Dicky Barnbrook and his multi-racial family............

Thursday, January 24, 2008

BNP chief on police march


Thousands of police march in London over 'unfair' pay
Evening Standard comment: A march that discredits police
A senior member of the BNP marched at the head of a huge police demonstration over pay in London today.

Richard Barnbrook, the far-Right party's leader in London, walked alongside top members of the Police Federation and at one point was yards from Liberal Democrat Mayoral candidate Brian Paddick.

Mr Barnbrook, a BNP councillor in Barking & Dagenham and a candidate in the election to pick London's next Mayor, told the Standard he took part to support the police and denied his presence was an embarrassment. An estimated 22,500 off-duty police officers, many wearing white baseball caps with the logo "Fair play for police", walked from Park Lane to Millbank, passing close to the Houses of Parliament.

Police Federation officials claimed they were powerless to prevent Mr Barnbrook from marching. Spokesman Metin Enver said he was not invited specifically but police officers recognised him when he turned up. He said: "Some of my colleagues saw we had the BNP Mayoral candidate with us. The one thing we want to make clear is we didn't invite him. It wasn't a closed march. He chose to attend by his own accord which is his right in a democracy. It is disappointing if anyone chose to join the march for their own agenda.

"We didn't ask him to leave because whether we like it or not we live in a democracy."

NWN: Comments please ? Certainly, we need an honest Police force, but I remember the way that the miners were treated by the Police in the Miners strikes of the 1980's.

Coppers also waved wads of £10 notes at the workers at fleet street /wapping industrial dispute too, trying to take the piss out of the strikers.

The Police were raking in the dosh especially with the overtime payments in these 'politically motivated actions' by the Thatcher regime.

So many people now won't support them, when they should be supported, and why should they ?

We ourselves, either NF or BNP have suffered by Police 'dirty tricks' , harassment, and in some cases beatings over a 30 year period to my own knowledge.

Certainly the Barnbrook pic was a stunt, which Herr Griffin is known for. But if it wasn't for the London Evening Standard making a story out of it, no one would have known !

The story was positive to the BNP.

Now the question is; why did the press give good publicity to the BNP ?

Sunday, January 20, 2008

NWN has for years been questioning the role of the moderators on Stormfront UK

Now many are following suit !

We have Andy Robertson/John Joy Tree (boo) , Godwinson/Charlie Schmid ( an honest bloke really) and Red X Knight , some guy from that 'hotbed of white British nationalism', Ulster (Kerr ?).

There is a scramble now, as Red X and Goddy have had enough. We are not surprised.

Today, 08:54 PM #692
"Friend of Stormfront"
Sustaining Member

Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,402
Re: Critics of main British Nationalist Party - The one and only thread


Originally Posted by JohnJoyTree
Right, that's it

All future Anti-BNP threads or pro-BNP threads in response will be fused into this one

All future anti-BNP posts (and pro-BNP replies to them) outside this thread will go to the bit bucket

How very high-handed. Stormfront Britain has three dedicated mods: Spartan, RedXKnight, and godwinson. I can't see JohnJoyTree anywhere, though he is a mod on Stormfront Italia. Have the three mods with direct responsibility for this forum been consulted and agreed to this? I've PMed Spartan and godders to ask. RedXKnight has chosen not to receive private messages ... maybe he can reply directly here.

Originally Posted by PaganBrit
Some good points there. Unfortunately there are those who think splitting the nationalist vote and setting nationalists against each other is a good idea. What's even more unfortunate is that people fall for the ol' divide-and-conquer strategy every time.

Who are these people ... precisely?
During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. George Orwell

Saturday, January 19, 2008

Dr.Mark Deavin and an interesting quote ......................

"...............But here's an even stranger coincidence. Shortly before the 1997 general election, Mark Deavin spoke freely of his plans to undercover researchers from Searchlight magazine and The Cook Report, who had posed as emissaries from Jean-Marie Le Pen's Front National. One necessary step, he said, was to get rid of the BNP leader John Tyndall ("who is actually an obstacle") and replace him with Deavin's chum Nick Griffin. This would leave one other obstacle. "If Blair becomes prime minister," Deavin predicted, "the BNP will be the official opposition in the inner cities, in working-class areas. The UKIP will be the opposition in the shires, the county areas, the middle-class opposition. That party is a serious opposition to us in middle England, but, if we had the resources, we could tear it to pieces." .........................,,202962,00.html

We will destroy BNP, UKIP leader pledges

THE UK Independence Party will set out to destroy the British National Party at the next general election, one of its leaders said yesterday.
Nigel Farage, the leader of the UKIP’s group of 11 MEPs in the European Parliament, told The Times of his party’s plans to win a seat in Westminster next year.

The party is keen for Robert Kilroy-Silk, its most prominent politician, to stand in the most winnable constituency, backed by a full manifesto. Another strategy is to tackle the far-right BNP head-on, ruining their chances by poaching more moderate voters.

“There is only one party in Britain that can stop the BNP and that’s UKIP,” said Mr Farage. “Why should we be frightened of that?” One reason for the UKIP to be frightened is that this is a highly sensitive area for the party, which, as Mr Farage mentions, has suffered the gibe of being “BNP in blazers”.

Declaring their distance from the BNP while not putting off voters swinging from either the BNP or any of the main political parties is one of their first challenges.
“The UKIP is a country mile away from the BNP on any issue. We’re not racist, we’re for free trade,” he said. “The BNP is authoritarian, whereas the UKIP is basically a liberal party, which used to be classed as left wing; now it’s seen as right wing,” he said.
The UKIP were the fourth largest party in the European elections in June, gaining 2.7 million votes to the BNP’s 800,000. Mr Farage believes that a substantial number of the BNP voters were anti-immigration Eurosceptics who were not comfortable with the racism of the BNP but had not heard of the UKIP. Once its membership had been depleted, the BNP would wither as it lost momentum, he said.

“All the Labour Party and the Tories do is encourage the BNP. They’ve created the BNP,” said Mr Farage. “People have justifiable concerns about levels of immigration which they ignore. If the UKIP were to take half the BNP vote, but do so because they allowed people to express their anxieties about immigration but without having to vote for a party that is violent and racist, then we should not be frightened of that.” ...................................

NWN: Many of us will remember Nick Gri££ins bluster about how he, Dr.Mark Deavin (remember him ?) and a few others ,will destroy UKIP circa 1998 at AC meetings.

Friday, January 18, 2008

Stormfront now openly supporting Griffin

This forum has pointed this out for many a year, certainly since John Joy Tree/Andy Robertson paid his way to be a super mod on SF.

Now we have Nick Griffin /PTD actually determining forum policy and Joy Tree jumping to it !

The real problem lies with SF owner Don Black. There is loads of info explicitly showing Blacks support for Griffin. For example;

Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 09:19:33 -0400>



Subject: Re: Hello>

CC:> >

Peter,> > What username are you using on the board? There's no account with the email >> > I like Nick Griffin, with whom I'm personally acquainted, though I don't > think any moderator has removed legitimate posts supporting Tyndal, much > less ban the poster.

We have pointed out to Don Black that they, the yanks, should NOT play any part in the internal dealings of nationalism in Britain or any other Country.

We now have the situation where anti-Griffin posters only have one thread on SF UK, which of course makes it easier for the Griffin troublemakers to flood and destroy it at will.

Wednesday, January 16, 2008

Lance Stewart and Arthur Kemp

NWN would like to ask readers just what are the real jobs these two characters have within the BNP ? We wouldn't trust Nick Griffins judgement with the time of day, so allow us please, a cynical view .

Tuesday, January 15, 2008

Austrian Holocaust denier gets six-and-a-half years in prison

It was the third time that Wolfgang Frohlich (r), 56, had been found guilty on similar charges, following letters to Austrian members of parliament and Pope Benedict XVI denouncing the genocide as a "Satanic lie."
VIENNA (AFP)---A Vienna court sentenced Monday a former extreme-right city councillor to four years in prison for Holocaust denial, adding another two-and-a-half years of a previous suspended sentence, a report said.
It was the third time that Wolfgang Frohlich, 56, had been found guilty on similar charges, following letters to Austrian members of parliament and Pope Benedict XVI denouncing the Holocaust as a "Satanic lie," the APA news agency said.
Pleading "absolutely not guilty," according to APA, Frohlich had already served 23 months behind bars since 2003 -- and gasped in court as the other 29 months were added.
Frohlich -- kicked out of the populist far-right FPOe party in 1994 -- is to appeal, said his lawyer, Harald Schuster.
Austria has one of the strictest sets of laws surrounding Holocaust denial and neo-Nazi activity.
British revisionist historian David Irving spent 13 months in jail after his arrest in 2005 before being expelled to the UK.
NWN: And yet another use of the Courts ! Please forgive me if I am wrong, but a 'symbol' of the Courts is a lady with a set of scales in one hand and a sword in the other. The lady/symbol is blindfolded.
Looking at recent events there is a central control over all this it is all too organised.

Griffin 'spills the beans' on Stormfront UK forum
Today, 09:24 PM

Purging The Droid
vbmenu_register("postmenu_5032066", true);

Forum Member

Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 341
Re: Critics of main British Nationalist Party = Permanent Juveniles ?
Originally Posted by Doriot
Of course the adult thing to do would be to ignore the financial corruption, sexual perversion, a chairman whose work rate is equivalent to a snail, the downright peculiar policy initiatives, the South African staffed security dept, the alienation of decent activists and Orwellian cries of state agent when anyone raises any criticism.The adult thing to do would be to assume that this manifestly corrupt and quite frankly incompetent leadership is the best we can do and is going to save Britain and the White race.
PTD/Nick Griffin
You can try as hard as you like, but when all is said and done you and others like you are on your way out.
Once the results come in from the GLAs and we have two seats on the London Assembly then, for you Nutzis and other oddballs, reds and infiltrators , it's game over.Graham and the rest of them are yesterday's people, haggling over which councillor said what as if any of them are in a position to make a difference!
Watch the GLA elections and understand, we are about to enter a new arena and a new age.
I have not the slightest sympathy - not one jot, pregnant or otherwise - for any scumbag or traitor who tries to distract us from our goal.Forgive my intemperate language, but we are either in the business of saving our country or we are not.
I am not prepared to allow this to be jeopardised by the Nutzis and their race-freak ideals.
Our mission is to preserve our culture, when all is said and done race is not the issue, only culture and nationality. If you don't like it, frankly - sod off!

Monday, January 14, 2008

'Harry Potter', Daniel Radcliffe and the magic circle

Dear Friends:
I don't often circulate Show Biz news, but the two items below, one from the Jerusalem Post, the other from The Observer, are useful for the insight they provide into the way "Stars" are created by the owners of the Entertainment Industry. (The emphases in the reports have been added by me.)Providing one is able (and willing!) to read between the lines, one can see why the people with the power in that industry love to implement the dictum of the Max Bialystock character in the film The Producers : "If you've got it -- flaunt it!!" (Yes -- you remember that film, or at least the song: "Springtime for Hitler"!)
Daniel Radcliffe may not be a Hogwarts magician any more, but he is certainly a member of a -- correction -- the magic circle which picked him out and projected him as a star since he was a 9 year old and which has ensured that promotional ballyhoo attended his every career move since then.After you've read the two reports, you may care to peruse my footnotes.
P.S.: How many of you can remember the real name of the ginger-haired lad who played alongside Radcliffe in the Harry Potter films? (I can't -- but then I've never seen any of them.)
Many fans of those films say he contributed at least as much as Radcliffe to their success, yet for some reason, does not seem to be getting the career-promotion treatment accorded to Radcliffe. I wonder why?=================================================== Post - Updated Jan 3, 2008 21:37 IST » Jewish World » Jewish Features » Article
Harry Potter star donates glasses for Holocaust exhibitionby Associated Press, Manchester, England
"Harry Potter" star Daniel Radcliffe, who captivated moviegoers as the bespectacled schoolboy wizard, has donated the first pair of glasses he wore as a child to an art exhibition marking the horrors of the Holocaust. The British actor joins several other celebrities and members of the public whose spectacles will be linked together in the shape of a railway track, recalling the trains that carried many of the Nazis' victims to concentration camps throughout Europe.
An estimated 6 million Jews died. The exhibition in Liverpool will open January 21. The port city in northwest England will host Britain's Holocaust Day commemorative service on January 27, the anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz. Muslim leaders are set to attend the multicultural service, which is the culmination of a series of lectures, exhibitions, stage shows and musical events recalling the Nazi atrocities and more recent genocides. Jason Isaacs, who stars as the sinister Lucius Malfoy in the "Harry Potter" films, will also take part in the service.
The 18-year-old Radcliffe, whose mother is Jewish, sent the oval, gray metal-framed pair of glasses he wore as a 6-year-old. [ MW emphasis]
Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, US chat-show host Jerry Springer and Yoko Ono, the widow of Beatle John Lennon, have also donated glasses to the exhibition. "[It is] such a symbolic piece of artwork, which will help people to learn how important it is to never forget the horrors of the Holocaust and to challenge hatred and prejudice wherever it arises," Ono said in a statement released by Liverpool City Council. Organizers are seeking a total of 110,000 pairs of eyeglasses. When installed inside Liverpool Town Hall's main ballroom, organizers hope mirrors will multiply the number of spectacles and give the appearance of 330,000 pairs - the estimated number of Jews in Britain at the time of the Holocaust.
"We wanted to remind people of the horrors of the Holocaust, but we wanted an artistic response and not just want a mound of spectacles," Jean Evans, the project's director, told The Associated Press. The exhibition will also offer a legacy of its own.Within weeks, it will be dismantled. The glasses of the famous will be auctioned for charity while the others will be sent to people in developing nations through the charitable group Vision Aid Overseas. =================================================The Observer - Sunday 39th December 2007, page 3. [extract]Wizard to play the magician of Somalia
Harry Potter star Daniel Radcliffe lands role as a war photographerwhose work has been widely acclaimed since his tragic death
by David Smith, New York
FROM HOGWARTS school to the hell of Somalia's civil war, Daniel Radcliffe is to make his biggest career leap yet.
The Harry Potter actor has seen off competition from Hollywood's A-list to star in the true story of a young British photographer who met a tragic end.
The film, Journey, will see Radcliffe play Dan Eldon, a 22-year old who was among four journalists stoned to death by a mob in Mogadishu in July 1993. Eldon left behind 17 journals, thousands of pictures and a legacy that has won admirers including Madonna and Julia Roberts.
His mother, Kathy, says that she has rejected numerous bids for film rights to the story, and met by turned down leading actors including Orlando Bloom, Heath Ledger, Ryan Phillippe and Joaquin Phoenix, all of whom were eager to play the part.
But then she sat down with 18-year old Radcliffe and his parents at the Four Seasons Hotel in Los Angeles."The timing is right and the person is right and I couldn't ask for more," said Kathy, a journalist, producer and activist. "He has portrayed a magician for years and my Dan was a diferent kind of magician.
There are parallels in the two Dans' lives. Daniel Radcliffe is a poet, he keeps journals and he's half Jewish.
He has a puckish sense of humour and energy inside him which remind me of Dan."....[snip]....Eldon was born in Hampstead, north London, to Kathy, who is American, and a British father, from whom she is now divorced.....[snip]....=============================================================
M.W.'s footnotes:"....and the person is right ..... he's half-Jewish".
In fact, as Radcliffe's mother is Jewish, he is fully Jewish since Jewish identity is conveyed via the maternal line, according to Jewish religious law and the Israeli 'Law of the Return'.
But why would the fact that he is Jewish make Radcliffe the "right person" to play the saint and martyr Daniel Eldon?
One must conclude that Eldon was "half Jewish".
His birth-place, "Hampstead, north London", has long been a noted Jewish area -- so much so that ten years ago a large part of it was incorporated within the first Jewish Eruv to be established in Britain.
I wouldn't mind betting that Radcliffe and Kathy Eldon, like other members of their Magic Circle, are devout "anti-racists".

NWN: Once again we see that even within this boring US election, ethnic electorates within 'democracy' will vote along racial lines, and this is within the SAME political party !

2008 Democratic Presidential Primary
Clinton, Obama, No Clear Leader in Democratic Race

The race for the Democratic Nomination has been narrowed to a two-person competition between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. Rasmussen Markets data shows both candidates are considered to have a good shot at the nomination.
Somewhat surprisingly, as the campaign has tightened, racial tensions have bubbled to the surface with the two camps exchanging accusations. Those tensions are reflected in this week’s polling data. Overall, Clinton and Obama are close nationally in the Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll. But, among white voters, Clinton leads 41% to 27%. Among African-American voters, Obama leads 66% to 16%.

Holocaust revisionist to face trial

French Holocaust revisionist Robert Faurisson

French revisionist historian Robert Faurisson is to face trial on charges of attending an anti-holocaust conference in Iran.
Faurisson said he received a letter from the French judicial police (DCPJ), demanding he should present himself before the court on January 24, IRNA reported.

On December 11, 2006, Iran hosted a two-day conference entitled 'Review of the Holocaust: Global vision' aimed at probing the West's allegations, claiming that over six million European Jews were killed by Germany during World War II.

Faurisson in Tehran repeated his theories about gas chambers and said that in the past 32 years, he had been waiting for someone to show him one of those chambers.

The French holocaust revisionist was convicted of 'Holocaust denial' by a Paris court in July 2006 over remarks he made on Iranian television.

Faurisson, then 77, was given a three-month suspended prison term and was also fined 7,500 euros.

Speaking on the Sahar 1 Iranian satellite channel in February 2005, Faurisson said there was never a single execution gas chamber under the Germans. "So all those millions of tourists who visit Auschwitz are seeing a lie, a falsification," he said.

In 1989, Faurisson was hospitalized after he was attacked by French Jews. He suffered a broken jaw and ribs and severe head injuries in a savage attack by a number of radical Jews while he was walking his dog in the town of Vichy.

In 1991, he was removed from his university chair under the Gayssot Act, a French statute passed in 1990 that prohibited any doubts over the Holocaust.

Saturday, January 12, 2008

Friday, January 11, 2008


NWN: ????

The good life: Blair after Downing Street
Landing a lucrative job with a Wall Street bank is just the latest in a series of financial coups by the former prime minister.

One of the more memorable vignettes from Alastair Beaton's television play The Trial of Tony Blair, which imagined the future that lay ahead for the ex-prime minister, is set in an office with a fine view of central London.

The office is vast, but nearly empty. There are telephones, but they are silent. Two members of staff are at their desks by the windows, keen to work, but with nothing to do. The former prime minister is pacing the empty floor, also with nothing to do.
Margaret Thatcher has talked in the past about what a wrench it is to go from doing one of the most stimulating jobs in the world to having time on your hands. She complained that it was as if your life had been smashed to pieces. But her plight was more acute than Tony Blair's, because his was a planned departure rather than a political coup, and it has not taken long for him to make himself busy again.

The former prime minister has been in and out of the Middle East, in his capacity as peace broker for the "Quartet" – the US, EU, UN and Russia. Yesterday he met George Bush at the King David Hotel in Jerusalem. The day before, he had met the leaders of the Palestinian Authority, and before that, Israel's Prime Minister, Ehud Olmert.

Before Christmas, he presided over a donors' conference to try to persuade the world's rich nations to increase aid to the Palestinians, and won promises worth more than £3.7bn. The Palestinians and the radical Arab regimes still mistrust a man they regard as Bush's poodle, but no one can deny that he has put in the hours.

He has also started organising two charitable foundations, done a deal with a publisher, and crossed the globe as the hottest property on the international lecture circuit. As his old friend and former agent John Burton put it: "He hasn't had time to get bored."

He hasn't been getting poor either. To his other commitments, Mr Blair has now added a part-time job as a senior adviser with the Wall Street bank, JPMorgan Chase. Its chairman and chief executive, Jamie Dimon, said: "We operate our business all over the world and Tony Blair will bring our leaders and clients a unique and invaluable global perspective that is especially critical in turbulent times like these."

The bank did not specify how much Mr Blair is to be paid for his "unique" advice, but speculation in the US business press put the figure at around $1m, or £511,000 a year, a graphic illustration of how prime ministers can get seriously rich only after they have left office.

John Major began a lucrative association with the Carlyle Group, a Washington-based fund management company, within a year of his election defeat, first as a member of its European advisory board, and then as its European chairman. That alone is likely to have been worth substantially more than his prime minister's salary. He took up his first UK directorship, with the car components and bus group Mayflower, a year later. He had several other directorships, and, like most other former prime ministers, he signed a seven-figure deal for his memoirs.
Margaret Thatcher also wrote memoirs, which outsold most books on politics, for which she was paid at least £1.5m, and she was paid more than £250,000 a year as a consultant to the Philip Morris tobacco company – with half the money going to her directly, the other half to the Thatcher Foundation. She also made lucrative tours of the US lecture circuit.
Next week, Mr Blair will give three lectures in North America, and over those three days he will earn nearly as much as he did in three years in Downing Street. On Monday, he will address a crowd of 5,000 at the Gibson Amphitheatre, near Los Angeles, as a guest of the American Jewish University. Some guests will have paid £1,200 for the chance to hear and meet him.
The tickets to his next speech, at Indian Wells, California, a luxury resort oasis near Palm Springs, on Tuesday, will be slightly cheaper, about £500 a head. On Thursday he will be in Toronto, addressing 2,000 people at an event sponsored by TD Bank Financial Group.

It is thought that his fees for this short tour could add up to £500,000, which could push his earnings for his first year on the lecture circuit over the £1m mark, including £240,000 he is said to have been paid for a 20-minute speech in China.
He has also negotiated a deal worth £4.6m with Random House for his memoirs – though the bulk of that money will not be paid until he has produced a manuscript, which could take a long time. From the day he left office, he was also entitled to a pension for life, currently valued at £63,468 a year.

Compare these figures with the £187,611-a-year salary, which until July was all that he could contribute to the Blair household income to supplement the earnings of his wife Cherie, and it is clear how leaving office has improved the Blairs' finances.
Six months ago, they must have struggled just to pay the interest on the £3.5m mortgage on their house in Connaught Square, and £500,000 for the two flats Cherie bought in Bristol. Now the couple have been to look at Winslow Hall, a £3m, 22-acre estate near Chequers.

In March, Mr Blair will move all his operations to a new headquarters on the site of the old US embassy in Grosvenor Square, where he has a 10-year lease costing £550,000 a year. He has another office in Jerusalem, in his capacity as Middle East peace envoy, with a staff that includes four British diplomats, plus security and a fleet of silver SUVs and three Mercedes, provided by the United Nations. The UK has contributed £400,000 towards its running costs, but Mr Blair is unpaid for his work.
About a quarter of the former prime minister's time is spent on his two planned charitable foundations. One, which will be based in London, will seek to promote inter-faith understanding between Christians, Jews and Muslims. The other, run from Myrobella, the former Blair home in his old Sedgefield constituency, will aim to attract 365 adults into coaching football, athletics, indoor rowing and tennis in the North-east.

The scale of the Blair operation means that several former Downing Street staff have not needed to look far for new jobs since July. Ruth Turner, who was questioned by police over allegations of cash for honours, is working on the inter-faith think-tank. Four other former aides are working for Mr Blair, and another is doing the organisation work in the Middle East.

There are things Mr Blair has not done, for which he deserves credit. The offer from JPMorgan Chase was not the first approach he has had from big business; he has turned all the other offers down. He has not taken a seat in the House of Lords, which he said was not his style. He has not gone to Washington to accept the Congressional Medal awarded him by his friend George Bush.
And, so far, he has not told us how he thinks Gordon Brown is coping. Of all the self sacrifices, that one is probably the hardest.
Balancing the Blair budget
NWN: This is Blairs payback for his no doubt corrupt help to the International bankers and Zionism, of which JP Morgan are a part !

A trip down memory lane

The following article first appeared on NWN in Sept 2006

A terrible sickness pervades

By Julian Graeme

Very rarely a day goes by without hearing stories of an expulsion, suspension or a disciplinary hearing of some unfortunate BNP member.

I would concede that the BNP, like any other organization, has to defend itself from attack from without, or from disruption within, its confines. There does, however, appear to be an inordinate wave of unrest among the more experienced nationalists in the party. People I have known for years are coming to me with stories of suppression and threats. Many of them are afraid to say or do anything in case they offend some minor lackey with the result of their being disciplined or worse.

The BNP is a voluntary organization and as such, is dependent on its success by attracting more and more members to swell the ranks. Indeed, increased membership is more important than a full coffer it is the life-blood of the party.

Members generate funds and all the money in the world wouldn’t do a blind bit of good if there were no dedicated members to use that money wisely and to the best effect.

I remember the early days of the BNP when there were only two paid positions in the whole of the party. Regional Organisers, Press Officers (we had one!) and others in prominent positions, worked for the love of the party not seeking any reward whatsoever other than the satisfaction that they had played a part in building up a party of nationalist unity.

Expulsions were a rarity and those who were given the boot, deserved it!

People like Hill, Hepple, Clayton-Garnett and Cotterill who were exposed as either infiltrators or turncoats. By and large, disputes were settled within local branches before they mushroomed into a major incident.

Today, the BNP is a party run by fear.

A loyal official can be replaced at the drop of a hat anytime, anywhere often without good reason and to the detriment of the area in which he or she was involved. Every day, there are new policies introduced that often dilute the original. Moderation is the name of the game and even the mildest of racial bias is not only frowned upon but stifled at birth!

I have met newer BNP members who openly declare they have no racial prejudice nor would they demur from allowing ethnics into their family circle!

Yet they loudly declare they are nationalists!

What have we seen within the BNP recently? We have seen election victories and annual mass rallies. We have seen an influx of non-white members, a selection of Asian candidates to represent British Nationalism and last but not least, an open declaration of support for the bandit state of Israel! The election victories are not down to the sole efforts of the new leadership. These results were the direct consequence of the work put in at local levels and all credit to those who achieved these results. The Red, White and Blue rallies are purposely designed to attract younger members and to provide entertainment to their liking. There is nothing wrong with this but I have noticed that there are no longer annual general meetings where each and every member had a chance of attending. These meetings were always well organized and gave members a chance to put their own points of view forward. I have spoken at many of these AGMs in the past and always found then both informative and enjoyable. Why, then, are they no longer held?

Is the leadership afraid of too much criticism?

Do the party leaders wish to shy away from unpopular policies?

Probably it’s because they fear the presence of so many dissenters under one roof may spark off a call for resignations! The BNP cannot go on for ever and a day watering down policies. There will come a time when the party will change its name to accommodate the new resolutions. The word ‘British’ will become redundant in favour of something more all-embracing. ‘National’ will be dropped as it implies racial preference. What the hell we will be left with, God alone knows! Probably something like ‘The Progressive Party’ or some such nonsense!

The electorate believes that the BNP supports the white community 100%. It will serve no purpose foisting on the voters a nationalist candidate from an ethnic community. They want a change; they want a party they can identify with themselves. Unfortunately, they won’t get this within the present climate of BNP policy. Surely, it’s time to call a halt to this charade of moderation and return to the basic roots of nationalist principles.

Julian Graeme.

Thursday, January 10, 2008

Wednesday, 9 January 2008

A message to Nick from Wigan BNP

The following letter was sent to Nick Griffin from Wigan BNP

Wigan BNP Activists: Extraordinary General Meeting

Dear Nick,
As you are aware we have been extremely distressed over the discord in the party during the past month and it has only been our faith in Nationalism and its importance for our future that has kept us from throwing in the towel. We have read both sides of the dispute and have been struck by the difference in tone between them.

The intemperate language employed by Simon Darby in his blog when he first accused the “rebels” of being “Nazis" and the following day “Searchlight moles” does not incline one to believe other statements he makes. A blog full of contradictory statements is to say the least unpersuasive.

By contrast the “enoughisenough” blog is a lesson in restraint with no extreme or unbelievable statements. There is certainly no evidence of an attempt to take over the party. Admittedly it was foolish and wrong to start the blog. It would have been much better to resign in protest over the failings of Mark Collett and Dave Hannam but it was even more foolish to publish details of the dispute on the BNP web site for all to see and to brand those who support Sadie et al as Nazis. To then offer these Nazis an amnesty if they returned to the fold seems to be the height of political naivety and would surely be used against us by our opponents.

The appearance of South African security people in the higher echelons of our party is a certain vote loser and will also be exploited by our opponents.

Why do we need all this security and spying on our neighbours? We are a legitimate party and if we behave as such we should have no fear of the machinations of our opponents and have no secrets worth spying on.

We do NOT believe Sadie, Kenny and matt are Nazis or Searchlight moles, indeed they have been hard working and a credit to the party as have Nick Cass, Jonathan Bowden, Bev Jones, Richard Purdy and many others who are not now with us. We can not afford to lose good people such as these.

The only people who have brought the party in to disrepute are Mark Collett and Dave Hannam but they remain in the party.
On the website it says that no person is above the party and we heartily agree. We can’t see therefore why these two remain an exception to the rule. If they cared about the Party they would take a back seat or are they agents of the state? They have certainly caused more strife than any one from MI5 could have done.

In spite of the above, we remain committed to the Party and you as leader but our enthusiasm is much diminished.

Just think what we could achieve without this dissent.

The feeling of our group and prospective members is that while good workers are being sacked and trouble causers retained we will make no progress. We are losing members because of this and several people who indicated the intention of joining no longer wish to do so.

We resolve therefore to keep our group going on a minimum maintenance basis but feel we are wasting our time in actively campaigning until matters are resolved.

We hope and pray for a speedy, sensible and amicable conclusion to this sorry dispute or our Party and country are doomed.
This will not go away.
Yours sincerely,
Charles Mather,
Wigan BNP Organiser

Tuesday, January 08, 2008

Israel's richest man emigrates to Britain - and buys a £35m, bullet-proof mansion

Published: 08 January 2008
Lev Leviev, who until a week ago was classified as the richest man in Israel, has joined the growing list of Israeli billionaires who have made their homes in London, where wealthy foreigners are not asked to pay tax on income earned overseas.
This month, Mr Leviev officially moved into a bullet-proof house in Hampstead, which he bought for £35m. His near neighbours include several other mega-rich Israeli tycoons who prefer UK tax rates. In Israel, they are liable for tax on all their income, no matter where it is from.
Mr Leviev is famous in international circles as the man who broke the cartel controlled by the multinational diamond company, De Beers, by buying up diamond mines in Russia, Angola and Namibia. It is said that one third of all the diamonds sold anywhere in the world are cut and polished by his company.
Recently, he also went on a worldwide property buying spree, and opened a jewellery shop in New York's Madison Avenue. His acquisitions included the former New York Times building, for which he paid almost £300m.
News of his departure has shocked the Israeli business community and created a political headache for its government, because of the drain of wealth from Tel Aviv to London. Among those who have made their homes in London are Zvi Meitar, the founder of one of Israel's biggest law firms; Benny Steinmitz, a diamond dealer and property tycoon; Yigal Zilka, head of Queenco Leisure International; and the real estate developer, Sammy Shimon.
Mr Leviev's departure knocked 11 per cent off the stock market value of his company, Africa-Israel Investments. Officially, his spokesman has said that the multinational nature of Mr Leviev's business meant he has spent more time in London than Tel Aviv over the past year. Unofficially, another motive for moving is a dispute with the government over his 2002 tax bill.
His wife, Olga, and his two youngest children, aged 15 and 13, have also moved to London. Their other seven children have stayed in Israel, where their daughter Tzvia Leviev-Alazarov, will take charge of the family's Israeli interests. Just before he left, Mr Leviev sold his private jet and he is reported to have bought a bigger one.
Last September, Forbes magazine listed Mr Leviev as the 12th richest man in the Middle East, with a fortune of just over £2bn. He is thought to have grown richer since. He is a friend of the Russian oligarch, Roman Abramovich, and introduced him to Avram Grant, who was appointed manager of Chelsea football club last September.
Until now, Mr Leviev's life has been a success story that would have delighted Israel's founding fathers. His family, who are strict Bukharian Orthodox Jews, arrived penniless, in 1971, from Uzbekistan, then part of the Soviet Union. His grandfather had been deported to Siberia. Soon after reaching Israel, Mr Leviev left school to become a diamond cutter, and upheld a family tradition by circumcising his sons, and the sons of work colleagues.

Monday, January 07, 2008


Jews open doors for Obama
Obama and the Jews
By RON KAMPEAS Jewish Telegraphic Agency Friday, 4 January 2008 WASHINGTON —
Ask about Barack Obama's natural constituencies, and you might hear that he's the first black with a viable shot at the White House; or about his Kenyan father and his childhood in Indonesia; or the youthfulness of his followers; or the millions of Oprah junkies swooning over his candidacy. What you might not hear is that the Illinois senator, who made history Thursday by winning the Democratic caucus in Iowa, has
made Jewish leaders an early stop at every stage in his political

In his first run for the Illinois Senate in 1996, he sought the backing
of Alan Solow, a top Chicago lawyer. Eight years later, running for the U.S. Senate — long before he became the shoo-in, when he was running in a Democratic field packed with a dozen candidates,
including some Jews — one of his first meetings was with Robert
Schrayer,a top Jewish philanthropist in Chicago.

When he launched his campaign for the Democratic presidential
nomination in late 2006, he named as his fund-raising chief Alan
Solomont, the Boston Jewish philanthropist who helped shepherd
Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) to the Democratic candidacy in 2004.
First foreign policy speech is delivered to Jewish LobbyAnd he chose a gathering of the pro-Israel lobby, the American
Israel Public Affairs Committee, last March to deliver his presidential
candidacy's first foreign policy speech."Some of my earliest and most ardent supporters came from the Jewish community in Chicago," Obama told JTA in 2004, after his keynote speech galvanized the Democratic convention in Boston.
Three years later, addressing the National Jewish Democratic Council's candidate's forum, he made the same point when he was asked about his ties with Arab Americans and Muslim Americans in
Chicago."My support within in the Jewish community has been much more significant than my support within the Muslim community," Obama
said at the April forum, adding: "I welcome and seek the support
of the Muslim and Arab communities."
His Jewish followers are fervent, distributing "Obama '08" yarmulkes
early in his campaign.His rock-star status as well as the relationships Obama has built in the community have helped avoided murmurings about his otherwise notable divergences from pro-Israel orthodoxies.Does not rule out attack on IranIn his AIPAC speech, for example, Obama favored diplomacy as a means of confronting Iran's suspected nuclear weapons program.

"While we should take no option, including military action, off the
table, sustained and aggressive diplomacy combined with tough
sanctions should be our primary means to prevent Iran from building
nuclear weapons," he said.AIPAC does not oppose diplomacy in engaging Iran, but dislikes it as an emphasis, believing that talks could buy the Iranian regime bomb-making time.
But his words did not stop the Chicago hotel ballroom packed with 800 AIPAC members from cheering Obama on.
A few weeks later, Obama drew more rubberneckers than any other
candidate attending AIPAC's policy forum in Washington — drawing
away onlookers from Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.), although
she outpolls Obama among Jewish voters.
No one winced when he said that Palestinian needs must be considered in working out a peace deal, although that's hardly standard AIPAC pep talk.He made the same point at the NJDC event. Willing to go extra mile for Israel"It is in the interests of Israel to establish peace in the Middle East," he said. "It cannot be done at the price of compromising Israel’s
security, and the United States government and an Obama
presidency cannot ask Israel to take risks with respect to its
But it can ask Israel to say that it is still possible for us to allow more than just this status quo of fear, terror, division.
That can’t be our long-term aspiration."Early in his campaign, he handily killed an Israel-related controversy in its early stages. At a chat he had said that "no one has suffered more than the Palestinians."Blame the leadership was what he meant, he later explained: "What
I said was, nobody has suffered more than the Palestinian people
from the failure of the Palestinian leadership to recognize Israel,
to renounce violence and to get serious about negotiating peace
and security for the region," Obama said during an MSNBC debate.
Obama tempers his deviations from pro-Israel orthodoxy by going an
extra mile in areas where he agrees with groups such as AIPAC.
He has led the effort in the Senate to pass legislation that would
assist US states that choose to divest from Iran. His top Middle
East adviser is Dennis Ross, who had the job during the Clinton
administration and who has since principally blamed the Palestinian
leadership for the failure of the Oslo peace process. Fine-tunes stance with Israeli governmentAnd in recent speeches, Obama tweaked his pro-Israel rhetoric to echo the recent drive by the Israeli government and pro-Israel groups to insist on recognition of Israel as a Jewish state."I think everyone knows what the basic outlines of an agreement would look like," he said in a speech redistributed by his campaign.

"It would mean that the Palestinians would have to reinterpret the
notion of right of return in a way that would preserve Israel as a
Jewish state. It might involve compensation and other concessions
from the Israelis, but ultimately Israel is not going to give up its state."
On domestic issues, Obama is savvy about Jewish social justice
commitments, and is on a first name basis with two of the top
Jewish religious lobbyists in Washington — Rabbi David Saperstein
of the Reform movement and Nathan Diament, who represents
the Orthodox Union.But that connection is not enough to supplant Clinton among Jewish voters. In a recent American Jewish Committee poll, his favorable rating was 38 percent, while hers was 53 percent.
Clinton also has most of the Jewish congressional delegation backing
her. Her years as first lady and as senator have made her a more
familiar presence among Jews. Public policy groups are likelier to favor
her uncompromising approach to pushing universal health care, as
opposed to Obama's appeal to build consensus on the issue.Obama's appeal is in his broader vision, according to Solomont."This election will be about change: a change in government and
the way politics is conducted," he told JTA last May. "There is a
connection between gridlock and the smallness of our politics."

Heroes of London Bridge including banker who lost his life confronting jihadis with a skateboard and nurse who died running towards dange...