Wednesday, January 31, 2007

The REAL winner at the supercasino

Top: South African tycoon Sol Kerzner. Bottom: Casual Tony Blair

A controversial South African billionaire with close links to Labour was the big winner as Britain's first supercasino licence was awarded to Manchester.
Sol Kerzner is poised to become the most powerful man in the British gaming industry. He can expect to earn tens of millions running the new gaming palace offering the first unlimited jackpots on British soil, along with new large casinos given the green light yesterday in Leeds and Luton.
His involvement in the winning bid led to accusations that Labour ministers have been fatally compromised by their links to foreign casino operators.

Officials from Mr Kerzner's company have had at least 12 meetings with three different ministers and the tycoon is a key ally of Millennium Dome boss Philip Anschutz, who entertained John Prescott at his ranch.
Critics accused Labour of betraying its anti-gambling socialist roots and - despite the furore over the Dome's bid - continuing to ignore public anger at its links with controversial foreign businessmen.
NWN: For even more on this story of Labour and its corrupt jews click the link. What with the Lord Levy current scandal too !

Tuesday, January 30, 2007

Two more jokes from Jack in Rochdale.............

An American tourist goes on a trip to China.
While in China, he is very sexually promiscuous and does not use a condom all the time.
A week after arriving back home in the States, he wakes one morning to find his "tool" covered with bright green and purple freckles.

Horrified, he immediately goes to see a doctor. The doctor, never having seen anything like it, orders some tests and tells the man to return in two days.

The man returns a couple of days and the doctor says "I've got bad news for you. You've contracted Mongolian VD. It's very rare and almost unheard of here. We know very little about it".

The man looks a little perplexed and says "Well, give me a shot or something and fix me up doc".

The doctor answers "I'm sorry, there's no known cure. We're going to have to amputate your "tool".

The man screams in horror "Absolutely not! I want a second opinion".

The doctor replies "Well, it's your choice. Go ahead if you want but surgery is your only choice".

The next day, the man seeks out a Chinese doctor, figuring that he'll know more about the disease.
The Chinese doctor examines his tool and proclaims"Ah yes, Mongolian VD. Vely lare disease".

The guy says to the doctor "Yeah yeah, I already know that but what can we do? My American doctor wants to operate and amputate my tool?"

The Chinese doctor shakes his head and laughs "Stupid Amelican docta, always want to opelate. They make more money that way. No need to opelate!"

"Oh Thank God!" the man replies.

"Yes" says the Chinese doctor "You no worry! Wait two weeks. Dick fall off by itself! You save money"

A woman and her boyfriend are out having a few drinks.

While they'resitting there having a good time together she starts talking about this really great new drink.The more she talks about it, the more excited she gets, and starts trying to talk her boyfriend into having one.

After a while he gives in and lets her order the drink for him.

The bartender brings the drink and puts the following on the bar -- a saltshaker, a shot of Baileys, and a shot of lime juice.

The boyfriend looks at the items quizzically and the woman explains."First you put a bit of the salt on your tongue, next you drink the shot of Baileys and hold it in your mouth, and finally you drink the limejuice."

So, the boyfriend, trying to go along and please her, goes for it.

He puts the salt on his tongue -- salty but OK. He drinks the shot of Baileys - smooth, rich, cool, very pleasant.

He thinks - this is OK.

Finally he picks up the lime juice and drinks it....

In one second the sharp lime taste hits....

At two seconds the Baileys curdles ....

At three seconds the salty curdled bitter taste hits.

This triggers his gag reflex but being manly, and not wanting to disappoint his girlfriend, he swallows the now nasty drink.

When he finally chokes it down he turns to his girlfriend, and says, "Jesus,what do you call that drink?"

She smiles widely at him and says,

Wait for it

It's so worth it

"Blow Job Revenge"
An "Electronic Watch on Zion" EXTRA

This is an interim bulletin to a select number on my list to discuss an article which appeared last Friday (27th January) in The Daily Telegraph (London): 'I can still be the father of France' by Simon Heffer and Henry Samuel. Last April I drew attention to the way in which the Daily and Sunday Telegraph and their weekly stable-mate The Spectator, went out of their way to promote the British National Party in advance of the local elections.

As a result of being boosted to the top of the news agenda, the party did well in terms of votes and candidates elected. (Most of those local councillors and their campaign teams are decent patriots who are quite unaware of how their party is being used by the enemies of their nation who created the multi-racial chaos now afflicting it.)

This boosting of the BNP by the Telegraph group (which helps to set the agenda for much of the rest of the British news media) has further accelerated the "modernisation" of that party's policy platform, with particular reference to Jewry, Zionism and Israel.For example, it now issues a Jehad Watch weekly e-mail bulletin which is nothing more than a re-write of Neo-Con and Zionist propaganda, especially the propaganda issued by Israel's ultra-Right party, the Likud.

At the moment, it is Hell-bent on inciting an Israeli and/or an American nuclear strike against Iran.

Jehad Watch is edited (but not entirely written) by somebody who calls himself "Alan Goodacre" (a name too good to be true?) who has appeared on the Nationalist scene from nowhere but who has been appointed by BNP chairman Nick Griffin to sit on his inner circle policy committee with the Economics and Finance brief. (Can these two functions be in any way connected?) "Goodacre" also writes emetic grovelling letters to The Jewish Chronicle on behalf of the party.

I will be covering all these developments in much greater detail in a forthcoming "Electronic Watch of Zion", but I thought I would demonstrate the symbiotic relationship developing between "Right Wing" Jewry and elements of the gentile "ultra-Right" in Europe (and beyond) by drawing attention to last Friday's Daily Telegraph article.

I have only time here to quote extracts from the item. (The full item can no doubt be Googled-up in a trice.)

Naturally, I have picked up on the comments made by Le Pen to boost Griffin and the BNP by denigrating the old National Front, which Griffin and his allies (of the moment) captured in December 1983. After a thorough wrecking and looting job, these people flitted from that party in 1987, leaving it in a shambles.

Griffin moved on with his International Third Position comrades (of the moment) to new pastures.

My commentary on the article (and Le Pen's comments about the BNP and the NF quoted in it) is given in the text of a letter to the Editor of The Daily Telegraph which I run out below the article extracts.Before quoting these extracts, I draw attention to the following:

(1) The main author of the item, Simon Heffer, is a gentile but highly philo-semitic "right wing" Conservative. He is a well established columnist and author. He wrote what I think was the authorised biography of Enoch Powell. He has stature within Establishment political circles. And yet for this interview with Le Pen, he was not trusted to conduct the interview and write it up by himself. He was accompanied by a co-interviewer/co-writer, one Henry Samuel -- of whom, in my ignorance, I have never heard -- whose name would seem to indicate that he is Jewish. Is the game being played by the Jews becoming so delicate that even reliable hacks like Heffer need to be accompanied on certain jobs by a Jewish 'minder'?

(2) On 16th April last year, in isssue #19 of "The Electronic Loose Cannon", under the heading "Tory Party Neo-Cons Find a Use for the BNP", I revealed that Barbara Amiel, the fanatically Zionist wife of Conrad Black, has pally telephone chats with BNP chairman Nick Griffin. In that bulletin I recorded:"Amiel's husband,'Lord' Black, though a gentile, is ardently pro-Zionist. He is the ex-boss of the public companies which once owned the Telegraph Group and The Spectator magazine here in the UK, and other media assets in Israel, Canada and elsewhere. He and his one-time boardroom associates face trial for allegedly looting the companies they administered of around £600 million. The Daily Telegraph, Sunday Telegraph, and The Spectator have been acquired by the Barclay brothers' media empire. They have not interfered with the pro-Zionist orientation of these publications. On the contrary, their pro-Zionist editorial staff have either been left in post or promoted to other posts within the group."

(3) On 29th April 2002 The Daily Telegraph published a strongly pro-Le Pen article by Barbara Amiel headed "Why has it taken Le Pen to ask the awkward questions?"

(4) On Thursday 20th April [!!] 2006 The European Jewish Press carried an article by Shirli Sitbon headed "Ignoring Revisionists" ( This was an "exclusive interview" with Marine Le Pen. The article stated: "....the 37-year-old daughter of extreme-right leader Jean-Marie Le Pen was elected a member of the European Parliament in June 2004. She joined the European Parliament France-Israel study group and is planning her first visit to Israel......"

(5) Last year I was sent a quote from Jean-Marie Le Pen's autobiography. In this extract Le Pen recollected with enthusiasm the disastrous Anglo-French-Israeli attack on Egypt in 1956, in which he was engaged as an officer in the French Army. I have yet to dig out the relevant quote from my files, but if my memory serves me correctly, Le Pen recorded that he and his brother officers knew that just over the next few sand dunes were Israeli Army troops. He and his comrades yearned to be allowed to rush over and embrace their Jewish comrades-in-arms......I will try to make more sense of all this and a lot of other information which has come to hand in the next "Electronic Watch on Zion".

As Sherlock Holmes was wont to say: "The game's afoot!"

Please give this interim bulletin onward circulation.

Martin Webster.

I can send a Jpeg of the recent Heffer/Samuel article, and Plain Text reprints of any of the other articles I have mentioned herein to anybody who requests the same by no later than 10th February.

I will only do one posting of these research documents.


[Extracts]Daily Telegraph, Friday 27th January 2007'I can still be the father of France'by Simon Heffer and Henry Samuel in St Cloud When French politics wants to show the world its cloven hoof, it hows Jean-Marie Le Pen. Now aged 78, the veteran leader of the Front National -- a far-Right nationalist party no longer on the frnges of poltical life -- is preparing to fight possibly his last presidential campaign.[....]So is the NF racist and anti-Semitic?

Le Pen becomes indignant.

"That's false, and I can prove it by my deeds. The first time that I was elected deputy, the second on my electoral list was a black -- isn't that a little sttange for a racist?"

In my political office there are Jews, Arabs and blacks, so what do I have to do not to be branded a racist?"

[....]Mr. Le Pen is reported to have softened the image of the FN in recent years under the influence of his daughter and possible successor Marine.

[....]However, Mr. Le Pen Bridges at the suggestion that the party has tried to make itself less extreme.

[....] "I challenge anyone to cite me any declaration, intention, action of mine that can be qualified as extremist."

He expressed his sympathy with the far-Right British National party. "I have contacts with the BNP, which also seems to be demonised in a way that does not correspond with reality," he said."

At one stage it was said the National Front was the same as the Front National, which is not the case. The behaviour of the National Front is not the behaviour of the BNP, which obeys the law and has a democratic stance.

I do not take heed of people who say 'don't speak to them, they have a bad reputation, they're pariahs'. I have no reconceptions about pariahs."


From: Martin Webster To: "The Editor, Daily Telegraph" Date: Sunday, January 28, 2007 8:36 PM

Subject: Le Pen on the NF & the BNP
The Editor,
The Daily Telegraph,
111 Buckingham Palace Road,
London SW1W 0DT.


In seeking to respectablise himself in the run-up to the French presidential election ['I can still be the father of France', 27th January] Front National leader Jean-Marie Le Pen was trapped into proclaiming the respectability British National Party by means of denigrating the National Front.

This he did by suggesting that unlike the BNP, the NF had not been law-abiding or democratic.

Simon Heffer might have reminded Le Pen that his pal Nick Griffin, now chairman of the BNP, was an NF member from 1975; a local official from 1976 and a member of its National Directorate from 1980 until the party dissolved in 1987. But there are other more important facts which your readership and M. Le Pen should know:

From 1981 onwards Griffin sustained a secretive political and business association with Roberto Fiore, an Italian who had fled to Britain in 1980 to escape charges connected with alleged terrorist activity. Fiore used Britain as a base to set up what eventually became the International Third Position.

When I discovered this and drew the facts to the attention of the NF Directorate in 1983 Griffin and his supporters convened an unlawful meeting of the body at which I was expelled from the party. The High Court ruled this unlawful seven months later -- too late to do me any good.

Since then, news of the following events has emerged and placed on public record without any denials or legal challenges from Griffin:

In 1981 Fiore made a rail-ferry trip to Dublin to establish contact with the Provisional IRA. His accommodation during the outward stop-over in Birmingham was arranged by Griffin. The Dublin end of the trip was arranged by Griffin's friend Derek Holland, an Irishman who had boasted of an uncle in the Dublin Brigade of the Provisional IRA.Fiore confided to his Birmingham host the purpose of his trip. This person was a long-standing and salaried Special Branch informant who contributed to the 2002 BBC2 TV series True Spies.

Five years after Fiore's Dublin visit, Griffin and Holland followed in the footsteps of the IRA's Joe Cahill to beg funds from Colonel Gadaffi.

Unlike Cahill, they were given only a bulk supply of Gadaffi's Green Book. A photo of them in Tripoli, posing in front of a huge poster of Gadaffi, leaked and was widely published.

Holland is now a full-time ITP official, based in Rome.After falling out with the ITP, Griffin joined the John Tyndall-led BNP in 1995 and became editor of The Rune, a magazine which pandered to the Column 88 thug element.

In it Griffin proclaimed: "BNP members must clear the streets with boot and bottle!"

He was convicted in 1998 for publishing matter "intended or likely to incite racial hatred".NF members were often involved in rough-and-rumble incidents in the face of mob attacks on its lawful activities by the likes of the Anti Nazi League (slogan:"Smash the National Front!" ).

For some reason the BNP does not face a similar onslaught.

Like Griffin, I have been convicted under the Race Act, though not for any "boot and bottle" content.

Whenever NF activities were subject to intense review by leading judges and senior police officers, as after the "Battle of Red Lion Square" in 1974 (Lord Scarman's Report) and "The Battle of Lewisham" (Scotland Yard's Commander Helm in a Jewish Chronicle interview) in 1977, they always affirmed that we were "not the instigators" -- or indeed participants -- in the disorders; that our "demonstrations were lawful"; and that we were "at all times responsive to requests from the police".

As to comparisons between the BNP's "democracy" and that of the NF; I need only say that ALL fully paid-up NF members were entitled to submit resolutions for the party's AGMs, to attend those meetings and to vote. AGM agendas were published as were the outcome of all debates.

The press were invited to attend.

The ONLY persons who may attend BNP annual meetings are officers of the party (who are either appointed by Griffin or whose appointment may be vetoed or terminated by him) or persons who have been members of the party for 10 or more years (a dwindling minority).

Resolutions are rejected without reason and without being circulated; final agendas are not published; only a minority of resolutions discussed are reported to the membership and the general public.

The media are excluded.

I am not a saint. The NF was far from genteel.

But I can look the self-admitted torturer Le Pen, or an opportunist gad-fly like Griffin, straight in the eye.

Yours faithfully,
Martin Webster,
National Activities Organiser,
National Front, 1970 - 1983.
Yet another ex-moderator shines a light on what is wrong with STORMFRONT and quite a lot of other so called white nationalist orgs like the BNP

OK. I've heard through the grapevine that I have some rant fans. I haven't had a good one in a while, so I figured what the hell. I don't know if this counts as an article or essay, but it damn sure isn't going to be poetry, so it doesn't belong there.This is going to be mainly dealing with stuff happening online. For the faint-at-heart, or the Stormfront friendly, stop here, you really don't want to go any further.So, the first topic of the day is those fake White Nationalists I know we've all run across on various webboards and chats. They can talk the talk, even out talk others, but when it comes to walking the walk? They can't even crawl. However, they can damn sure attack others. Usually they will go after someone who has been fighting our fight for a long time. I'm not saying they last long, true White Nationalists know who other true White Nationalists are. For some reason it has been bugging me for a few weeks. I don't know, maybe it has something to do with what I've seen happening on what used to be my home on the 'net. Ah yes, Stormfront. What I once considered to be the best place to go for information. Once it was, now? They're inundated with fake White Nationalists. Filled to the brim with people who seem to be jewish sympathizers.

I thought it was a White Nationalist site. It once was. I am no longer sure what it is now. I think the most of the good posters that are still left are ok, but I can't be sure.You know, for most of the time that I was a moderator at Stormfront, I was a usually silent, more often than not absent, entity. I made most of my 2000+ posts during the first year or two that the board was up.

I took long "vacations". I would come back and touch base with friends, get ready to settle back in, and something stupid would happen. Nine times out of ten it was something inside the moderator forums. I never had a chance to see how stupid the posters were getting on average, I was struggling to make it out of the admin forum. Yep, there was so much bitching and whining and differences of moderating going on in admin, that I didn't even have the energy to notice the overall decline of the posts and posters all the time.I did notice some though, and there were mods that noticed most, if not all of the decline. They'd fight against it, and get nowhere.

We were more or less expected to do our jobs, but some people were doing things one way, some were doing it other ways, and there were one or two that didn't give a crap what anyone thought.

There were people protecting obvious trolls, obvious fakes.

We had moderators that have jew friends. (NWN: Now we wonder who they mean here ;-) )

We had cheerleaders that weren't good for much of anything else.

White Nationalist community?

More like a freakin' zoo.

Over the past couple of years, it has been obvious that Stormfront and I were going to have to have a parting of the ways. It had been softened. It was focusing on quantity, and didn't care about quality. People outside of the moderator team seemed to be dictating policy. Friends were turning on friends. What had we become?

This wasn't White Nationalism as I knew it, this was... I don't even know what it was.

Around this time last year, there was something of a big upset on Stormfront. For me it was something that showed me how far Stormfront in general had slipped.

MuadDib was removed as a moderator.

Now, this is old news. As I said, it happened a year ago.

I remained a moderator for a little while after that. I tried to do my job, one of my jobs being to remove personal attacks from the board. Supposedly it was against the guidelines.While I was doing my job, in both the Sustaining Members forum, as well as the Lounge, I noticed something weird.

There were a few threads that were going on, concerning the firing of MuadDib, and there were people that were heated on both sides. I thought it was a bullshit move, but, I was maintaining my silence, and doing my job.

Well, I was removing posts that insulted anyone, Kelso, MD, Don, etc. I was browsing through the thread in the Lounge, when I noticed that posts I had deleted had been restored. I checked the thread to see who undeleted them. It was Don.

See, most of MD's supporters in this were trying to avoid attacking others, but his detractors were extremely insulting. The only posts I remember seeing undeleted, were ones attacking MD. You know, that pissed me off. I'm supposed to enforce these guidelines, and the admin is going behind me and unenforcing? I made a post in admin, wanting to know what the hell was going on. Don answered, said to let them get it out of their system. My answer was to go and undelete all the posts I had deleted that were attacking someone else. It was bullshit.

There was other crap going on inside the admin forum. Between the crap from the past couple of years, the bullshit firing of MD, and the other stuff that was going on behind the scenes, I'd had enough. I quit.

I could not deal with it anymore. I did it nicely, I didn't go off on a tangent, and I did it silently. I walked away for a short time after that and found a new home.Not too long after that I pulled another disappearing act. There was nothing going on on the internet, it was for personal reasons. But I came back about 2 months ago.

And guess what I come back to? MD is now "banned with extreme prejudice". What the fuck?

Has Don lost his mind? I don't know, but obviously jack_boot has. Once again there was a thread in the Lounge, as well as in Sustaining Members. I made one post to Sustaining Members, logged out, and haven't logged back in since.Most of you know why I think jack_boot has lost his mind, but I'm sure there are some folks that aren't going to understand. Let me share a few posts of his with you, and you can tell me why I'm saying such things about someone I used to respect.
Originally Posted by jack_boot; November 9, 2006; Lounge
I have not read any posts in this thread yet, but I will say this before I go back and review.We've put up with MuadDib's brutal posting style for many years. His bellicose over-reacting as a moderator got him fired. Quite frankly he was an embarrassment.In the past few weeks he'd started taking a nasty turn, going beyond mere brusque discourtesy, and we saw the nadir, or so we thought, with his insults and sneering taunts in the now-deleted Enemy Agents thread.His behavior there went beyond my tolerance level as a self-respecting gentleman. I would never countenance such behavior from anyone in public, any more than I would permit a man to beat his dog in my presence, and it is unacceptable here as well. There is a damn line that can't be crossed.I sent MuadDib a PM cautioning him one final time, and advising that his privileges here were hence restricted. I mentioned that another member, a member I thought he liked and cared for - as we all do - was very upset about his behavior, and that he had lowered himself in this other member's estimation as well. I did so thinking that MuadDib would feel some remorse and reconsider, and perhaps refrain from his churlish excesses.Any decent man would have felt such remorse. But I learned quickly I was not dealing with a decent man but a guttersnipe. Because MuadDib thereupon began a campaign of slander and harrassment against this other member, making the most foul allegations and spreading rumor intended to ruin his victim's personal life. The allegations were of such a low down slimy nature that, if I had been in the same room, I would certainly have struck MuadDib in the face, no matter the outcome or consequences.There is the pretty picture of your uncompromising, hardcore fallen hero. He is in fact nothing but a cad. Stormfront will not asscociate with him; we couldn't care less if our world view is the same, or that he resolutely opposes the Jew, as do we. That is merely a coincidence, as though I had the same taste in whiskey as the wino in the alley.This is the largest crock of shit I think I have ever read in my life. And a perfect example of how low Stormfront and parts of it's staff have sunk.
Originally Posted by jack_boot; November 9, 2006; Sustaining Members
MuadDib is permanently banned. Before the cosmic shitstorm starts elsewhere, here is a thread on the issue.His politics are irrelevant. MuadDib is no longer welcome at the forum due to his thoroughly nasty disposition.That is the end of the matter as far as I am concerned, and he will never be welcomed back here as long as I have anything to say about it.

Now don't start to think that jack acts with Don not knowing what he is doing. Here is Don's post in the same thread:

Originally Posted by Don Black; November 9, 2006; Sustaining Members
Unfortunately, you all don't see what we see, and you won't because of privacy concerns, thinking this is just some personality conflict. It isn't.I feel guilty because I didn't handle this four years ago.
Now jack_boot has to clean it up and others suffer because of my own softness.LOL.

This is funny. OK, that incarnation of the board started in August of 2001, these posts are from November 2006. Alrighty, by my math that is 5 years. So, basically what Don is telling us is that shortly after he made MD a moderator, he already wanted to remove him. Is that how it reads to everyone else? He had no problems removing Jay, or Worker, or Liz. Why did he have a four year problem in getting rid of MD?Don will probably spew some bullshit about cult-like following. I've seen him say something along those lines before. There was no cult following four years ago, Don. Four years ago his "cult" probably consisted of myself and some other people that really enjoyed reading what he had to say.The bottom line is; Don doesn't like getting his hands dirty. He doesn't like taking a hand in things until they are out of hand. He claims to be a softy, I just don't think he has what it takes to do something like Stormfront anymore. I think he blew it. He wouldn't take control, and he let lesser men run it into the ground. Stormfront as I once knew it has been gone for a while. In the place of what I used to love, is a place that no longer cares about the jewish question:
Originally Posted by jack_boot; December 6, 2006; Lounge
The situation grows desperate and time is short. Stormfront seeks to engage committed Nationalists as friends and allies, and there is little use in butting heads over the Jewish Question.We risk alienating each other. Stormfront fails to see how such strife, among those who are actually compatriots and kinsmen, will help us save what is left of our heritage and our homes.Reasoned discussion rather than confrontation.Persuasion in place of bullying.Welcome and accommodation instead of hostility and exclusion - up to a point, of course.That is the key. That is our improved trajectory.

Originally Posted by jack_boot; December 6, 2006; Lounge
In the spirit of cooperation then, Young Soldier, you are invited to drop the subject of the Jewish Question altogether, and focus on the issues from that perspective we all share.That is the compromise we seek, and we believe will result in a positive, productive alliance.If you insist on expressing your disdain for a primary ideological and editorial commitment of this project, we will not attain that result. I think we all get the message, and you are still welcome to participate here despite your misgivings.

What happened to naming the jew?

What happened to educating people on who our biggest enemy is?

It doesn't happen at SF anymore.

Matter of fact, you're asked NOT to approach the subject of the jewish question. When the hell did it become Jewfront?

Stormfront used to name the jew, name the n*gger, named all our problems, but especially the jew. Don Black used to know the jews were our biggest enemy. When did he lose sight of that fact?

I think I've said it in a post or two, maybe I haven't. jack_boot spoke of fallen heroes, the only hero of mine that fell was Don Black. Don used to be someone I looked up to, and held a huge amount of respect for. I can no longer respect him, or his complacency.Complacency is killing our race, is killing our culture. Don and Stormfront can be as complacent as they like. They can keep going mainstream, because that is what is happening. Even the antis know that Stormfront has declined. A loss of over 10,000 active members in a year? That active member number keeps getting smaller. The threads keep getting more and more mundane. The implosions and infighting happens left and right. They're complacent about the death of our race, yet chastise people for their use of a swastika avatar. Is that White Nationalism? It is on Stormfront.Stormfront could have been something wonderful. It could have been great. It was feared, it was smeared, it was attacked. It was being blocked on ISPs in spite of free speech. The potential to be a real educational tool was there. It turned into a playground where the more extreme of us are no longer welcome. I never thought I would call myself extreme, but in comparisson to Stormfront, I'm REALLY extreme.Stormfront is lost to us, I fear.

It has slid too far to pull itself back out and make any difference.


White Nationalism is not mainstream, and at this point doesn't need to be mainstream.

Mainstream = jewish tool.Just because Stormfront is lost to us, doesn't mean we just have to accept it. So we've had a bit of a defeat, a setback if you will. Yep, the decline of Stormfront is a huge disappointment, but, aren't we used to disappointments and setbacks? What do we do with them? We use them to push us back up. We use them as examples of things to watch out for, or things to not do. Stormfront is a guide. A guide on the direction to not take.

When you go soft, and quit questioning our enemies, you're no longer a part of the solution. How can you be when you don't recognize the problem?

__________________-Francis: It will give Kelso something to do with his crayolaRed: Other than fellate it?-White Nationalist Forums

posted by 'RED' - VNN Forums

NWN: We have been saying this for a while, that Don Black 'did a Griffin' BEFORE Nick Griffin. These people have done an ideological 'about turn' without telling the memberships. We noticed the trend after both appeared at a Jared Taylor 'knees-up' in the USA in 2000 all 'buddy buddy' with Rabbi Meyer Schiller.

Sunday, January 28, 2007

Jack from Rochdale is back.................

Two men were talking. "So, how's your sex life?"
"Oh, nothing special. I'm hav ing Social Security sex."
"Social Security sex?"
"Yeah, you know; I get a little each month, but not enough to live on!"

A wife went in to see a therapist and said,
"I've got a big problem, doctor.
Every time we're in bed and my husband climaxes,
he lets out this ear splitting yell."

"My dear," the shrink said, "that's completely natural.
I don't see what the problem is."
"The problem is," she complained, "it wakes me up!"

Tired of a listless sex life,
the man came right out and asked his wife
during a recent lovemaking session,
"How come you never tell me when you have an orgasm?"
She glanced at him casually and replied, "You're never home!"

A man was in a terrible accident,
and his "manhood" was mangled and torn from his body.
His doctor assured him that modern medicine
could give him back his manhood,
but that his insurance wouldn't cover the
surgery since it was considered cosmetic.
The doctor said the cost would be $3,500
for "small, $6,500 for "medium, $14,000 for "large."

The man was sure he would want a medium or large,
but the doctor urged him to talk it over with his wife
before he made any decision.
The man called his wife on the phone and explained their options.
The doctor came back into the room, and found the man looking dejected.

"Well, what have the two of you decided?" asked the doctor.

The man answered, "She'd rather remodel the kitchen."


An husband and his wife had a bitter quarrel on the day of
their 40th wedding anniversary.
The husband yells, "When you die,
I'm getting you a headstone that reads:
'Here Lies My Wife-Cold As Ever'."

"Yeah," she replies, "when you die,
I'm getting you a headstone that reads:
'Here Lies My Husband - Stiff At Last.'"


My husband came home with a tube of K-Y jelly and said,
"This will make you happy tonight."
He was right.
When he went out of the bedroom,
I squirted it all over the doorknobs.
He couldn't get back in.

One night an 87 year old woman came home from Bingo
to find her 92 year old husband in bed with another woman.
She became violent and ended up
pushing him off the balcony of their 20th floor
"assisted living apartment" . Killing him instantly.

Brought before the court on charge of murder,
the judge asked her if she had anything to say in her defense.
She began coolly, "Yes, your honor,
I figured that at 92, if he could have sex .. He could fly."

We haven't yet seen the very latest copy of the BNP's VOF , but we have it from a 'very good source' that a disgraceful attack has been made against the late JOHN TYNDALL in there.

Saturday, January 27, 2007

Just over 1,000 unique viewers in a week at this blog !

That is the NWN position at the moment.

We are looking to make that times 5 by next year, if not before.

Friday, January 26, 2007

"Some of that material was intended for distribution in sensitive areas of Leeds intending to stir up racial hatred against ethnic and religious minorities" - Judge Peter Benson

A right-wing extremist from Leeds has been jailed for possessing and distributing hardcore racist material.

Anthony White, of Wyther Park Hill, Bramley, was handed a 21-month sentence after admitting six offences of possessing racially inflammatory material and one offence of distributing racially inflammatory material.

NWN: But I have just watched the news and they are saying the prisons are full and Judges have been told "only major criminals are to be sent to jail" . I spoke with Tony a couple of years ago very briefly when I spoke in Leeds, he seemed an OK bloke.

The Great Warlord goes missing.

When it comes to a debate on Iraq, Tony Blair goes missing
By Colin Brown, Andrew Grice and Ben Russell
Published: 25 January 2007

Tony Blair has been accused of treating the House of Commons with
contempt by failing to stay in the chamber to hear MPs protest about
disastrous handling of the chaos in Iraq.

As MPs yesterday staged the first Iraq debate in government time since
the war, the Prime Minister retreated to the quiet of his oak-panelled
office behind the Speaker's chair to prepare for a series of private
meetings on more pressing matters - the row over gay adoption, a weekly
briefing with a handful of senior backbenchers, and a speech to the

Mr Blair could have cleared his diary to be in the chamber for the
awaited debate. However, he found the prospect of the CBI conference at
a London hotel a mile from Parliament more congenial.

After 30 minutes of interrogation from MPs at Prime Minister's Question
Time, he slipped out of the chamber by the Speaker's chair to his room
and grabbed a snack lunch with his close aides. MPs from all sides
showed their disapproval of his policy on Iraq - and his refusal to
respect for those who paid the price for that failure - by filling the
chamber to hear the debate.

Sir Menzies Campbell, the Liberal Democrat leader, criticised him for
refusing to stay for the occasion. Even Sir Menzies's own MPs were
surprised by the ferocity of his attack, as he savaged Mr Blair,
"What could be more important than that the Prime Minister should be
here to debate the issue of Iraq at a time when British forces are at
risk every day ... Isn't that the kind of leadership we are entitled

Ten minutes later, as Margaret Beckett, the Foreign Secretary, stood at
the dispatch box to open the debate, Mr Blair settled down in his
private room at the Commons with his aides, and prepared for a meeting
about Northern Ireland with the Rev Ian Paisley, leader of the
Democratic Unionist Party.

In the chamber, a short stroll away, Sir Malcolm Rifkind, the former
foreign secretary, protested at Mr Blair's absence, saying: "As the
disastrous conflict in Iraq has rightly been referred to as Blair's
what is so important about the Prime Minister's engagements this
afternoon that he is not able to be present in the House to take part
the first debate on Iraq in government time since the war itself

At 1.45 pm, after Mr Paisley left, two Labour MPs, Angela Eagle and
Chris Bryant, were shown into Mr Blair's office to discuss the row over
an opt-out for the Roman Catholic church over gay adoption.

Meanwhile, in the chamber, William Hague, Mrs Beckett's shadow, pointed
to the government front bench where Mr Blair had been, and contrasted
Blair's absence with some of his more statesmanlike predecessors.

"It is unimaginable that an Attlee or a Callaghan or a Churchill or a
Thatcher would not have been here to debate a situation in war," said

Alex Salmond, the Scottish National Party leader, added: "Why was he so
anxious to talk us into this disastrous war but so reluctant to explain
how we are going to get out of it?"

At 2.40 pm, Mr Blair's black Daimler swung into the afternoon traffic
take him the short distance to the Victoria Park Plaza Hotel for a
speech and question-and-answer session with the CBI. But the Prime
Minister did not entirely escape the shadow of Iraq. As he arrived at
the hotel, he was greeted by a group of 20 anti-war demonstrators
shouting: "Tony, Tony, Tony, why aren't you in Parliament?"

Inside the conference, there was no mention of Iraq. "This is my second
question time of the day; I think you are more polite than my first
audience," he told CBI representatives.

When Mr Blair was asked what he would do if he could write his
legacy on a blank sheet of paper, he hoped it would be ensuring public
support for taxpayer-funded public services. However, he conceded that
his overall legacy would be written by others - perhaps an acceptance
that for the vast majority of people, it would be Iraq.

Tory officials later accused Mr Blair of getting his priorities wrong,
pointing out that David Cameron pulled out of the CBI's annual
conference last November to visit British troops in Iraq.

At 3.45 pm, the Prime Minister's official spokesman defended Mr Blair,
saying he would report to the Commons after Operation Sinbad was
concluded in Basra, which would be "the important point of decision" on
the role of British troops in Iraq.

By that time, Mr Blair was back at Downing Street, possibly
contemplating his final months in office and his legacy in a country


The wreath laying and march in Woolwich, London, in memory of whites killed by ethnics is back on. It is on Saturday 3rd Feb.

The government do not care about these deaths so it is left to those who do care to turn up and remember the fallen who have died as a result of this social terrorism known as 'Multiracialism'.

This march is always a favourite -esp. with the 'London lot'. Please try your hardest to 'show your face' and let the left, and the other enemies of the people in the state, know that we will remember the 'fallen' and those in government, who by their laws are directly responsible for these deaths.

Anyone wishing to attend should contact South East NF on: 07757-654222

The debt we owe to Deborah Lipstadt

Deborah Lipstadt has written a very important commentary on Jimmy Carter and his book on the Palestinians (I won’t link to it at Amazon as Amazon has been playing peculiar games with it, presumably in order to suppress its sale).

Lipstadt, a woman who until now has been famous only for having all of David Irving’s money, expressly makes the connection between Israeli treatment of the Palestinians and what was done to the Jewish people in the 1930’s and 1940’s. This argument usually hides in the weeds. It is the real basis behind all defenses of Israeli actions against the Palestinians, as well as many of the peculiarities of Israeli exceptionalism, such as Israel’s unique ability to shelter international gangsters on the basis that they are Jews, or Israel’s unique right to make peremptory attacks against other countries on the basis that there might be a possible threat against the state of the Jewish people. This doctrine has now been extended, in the case of Iran, to allow for peremptory attacks even when there is no threat against the Jewish people.

In Lipstadt’s view, which is the view shared by all Jewish defenders of Israel, Carter is wrong for failing to emphasize the Holocaust in a book about what Israel is doing to the Palestinians today. This lack of logic from Lipstadt would be the stuff of comedy if it did not form the basis for all the atrocities that Israel commits. Most apologists for Israel are too smart to put it in so many words, so we owe a bid debt of gratitude to Lipstadt for being so fucking stupid as to let the cat out of the bag. In fact, I think many people sympathetic to Israel don’t really realize the basis for the chip on Israel’s shoulder as they can’t bring themselves to believe that the basis could be something that is so insane.

The bigger picture is that many Jews feel that the Holocaust gives Jews, and by extension the Jewish state, a permanent ‘Get Out Of Jail Free’ card. The world stood by and let horrible things happen to the Jews, so the Jews have a unique right to obtain retribution in whatever way they see fit. One of the main ways they have seen fit to obtain justice is to grab themselves a country. No non-Jew has the moral right to complain about it, as every non-Jew inherits the guilt for the Holocaust. Thus, Jimmy Carter has no right to criticize the Jewish state for what it is doing to the Palestinians. Despite the fact the Palestinians had nothing to do with the Holocaust (in fact hardly anyone alive today had anything to do with the Holocaust), they also have no moral right to criticize what is being done to them. This is the kind of reasoning which makes sense to young children, and many criminals (“I have a right to rob banks because I had a sad childhood’), but doesn’t make any sense to the rest of us.

One of the peculiarities of the Jewish post-Holocaust experience is the fact that there is a certain sexual frisson created by fantasies of how the world will again conspire to destroy the Jewish people (and seeing the Holocaust everywhere can have some amusing consequences). Benny Morris (of all people) is obviously getting off on describing how the Jews will be destroyed by the inevitable nuclear attack from Iran, while the rest of the world secretly applauds. It’s Jewish masochistic porn. Of course, Morris isn’t an idiot, and is perfectly aware that Iran hasn’t threatened Israel’s existence, has no nuclear weapons, and has no foreseeable chance of having nuclear weapons, while Israeli leaders have directly threatened Iran and Israel has such weapons, so Morris’ fantasy is closer to sadistic porn rather than masochistic porn. Morris is following the same reasoning as Lipstadt. A Jew is entitled to write propaganda advocating an attack on innocent civilians living in a country that poses no threat to Israel. Why? Because of the Holocaust!

Thursday, January 25, 2007

A Pot? Melting? Where?

In George W. Bush's State of the Union speech on Tuesday night, he mentioned America as being a "melting pot" of, apparently, ethnic groups [1].

However, if one reads the American citizenship law of 1790, he will discover that America's founders did not intend for the United States to be a multi-ethnic country [2]. In fact, that law mentions "White" people only as prospective citizens.

Furthermore, the two major figures who pushed the bogus idea that America was designed to be a racial "melting pot" were both Jewish, i.e., the poet and immigration activist Emma Lazarus, who wrote the poem found on the Statue of Liberty in New York which suggests that America should absorb the world's huddled masses of immigrants, and the writer/playwright Israel Zangwill, who invented the term "melting pot" to describe America. In other words, two non-Whites were central to pushing the phony idea that America was designed to be multicultural.

Our question: why is Bush mentioning false ethnic claims that were advocated by non-Whites?

[1] the speech:,20867,21110566-2703,00.html [scroll about 1/3 down the page to see the "melting pot" comment]

[2] quoting the citizenship law of 1790: "Act of March 26, 1790 (1 Stat 103-104): That any alien, being a free white person, who shall have resided within the limits and under the jurisdiction of the United States for the term of two years..."

Wednesday, January 24, 2007

Can the Jewish Model Help the West Survive? Kevin MacDonald


I just recently learned that the neocon patriarch Leo
Strauss was a follower of Jabotinsky. Jabotinsky was
deeply ethnocentric, believing that Jews were shaped
by their long history as a desert people and that the
establishment of Israel as a Jewish state would allow
the natural genius of the Jewish race to flourish,
stating, for example: "These natural and fundamental
distinctions embedded in the race are impossible to
eradicate, and are continually being nurtured by the
differences in soil and climate."7 What is striking
is that virtually the entire organized Jewish
community in the United States is allied to the Likud
party and the settler movement in Israel, whose
leaders openly idolize Jabotinsky.

As a European in a society that is rapidly becoming
non-European, I can sympathize with Jabotinsky's envy
of the native Slavic peoples he observed in the early
twentieth century. He wrote:

I look at them with envy. I have never known, and
probably never will know, this completely organic
feeling: so united and singular [is this] sense of a
homeland, in which everything flows together, the past
and the present, the legend and the hopes, the
individual and the historical.8

Every nation, civilized or primitive, sees its land as
its national home, where it wants to stay as the sole
landlord forever. Such a nation will never willingly
consent to new landlords or even to partnership.9


Indeed, hatred toward all things European is normative
among a great many strongly identified Jews.11 I
recently came across the following statement by Dov
Fischer, vice-president of the Zionist Organization of
America, in the Forward, a very prestigious Jewish
publication, in 2002:

Although we appreciate a half-century of West European
democracy more than we appreciated the prior millennia
of European brutality, we recognize who they are, what
they have done—and what's what. We know, if they
don't, that they need Arab oil more than they need
Jewish philosophy and creativity. We remember that the
food they eat is grown from soil fertilized by 2,000
years of Jewish blood they have sprinkled onto it.
Atavistic Jew-hatred lingers in the air into which the
ashes rose from the crematoria.12


An excellent example of an ethnically conscious
wealthy Jew is Haim Saban, who was recently profiled
in the New York Times. Mr. Saban controls the largest
media company in Germany. Saban has stirred
controversy in Britain, where he publicly expressed
interest in buying ITV, the country's biggest
commercial network, while accusing its competitors,
including BBC News, of pro-Arab coverage. He views his
acquisition of a dominant position in German media as
benefiting Israel in the long run. Obviously he thinks
of media ownership as not simply a way of making
money, but of influencing content by promoting Jewish
causes. The Times describes him as "perhaps the most
politically connected mogul in Hollywood"—and that's
saying a lot. He is described as "throwing his weight
and money around Washington and, increasingly, the
world, trying to influence all things Israeli. `I'm a
one-issue guy and my issue is Israel.'" To that end,
he has become one of the largest individual donors to
the Democratic Party and its candidates in the
country, giving millions over the past decade—$7
million in just one donation to the Democratic
National Committee in 2002. He hobnobs with John Kerry
and he vacations with Bill Clinton. It is certainly
striking that Bill Clinton is on record as expressing
very positive attitudes about massive immigration and
the impending minority status of his own people, while
maintaining a close relationship with a wealthy Jewish
ethnic activist intent on advancing the interests of
Jews. One could say virtually the same thing about the
entire political class in America. This is, I think, a
parable of our times.


The point is that Jewish elites have been hugely
influential in advancing the interests of their
people. This is surely a goal to emulate.

The best way to preserve ethnic interests is to defend
an ethnostate—a nation that is explicitly intended to
preserve the ethnic interests of its citizens. From an
ethnic point of view, a major problem with massive
immigration is that there is likely to be an increase
in ethnic competition. Multicultural societies
sanction ethnic mobilization because they inevitably
become a cauldron of competing ethnic interests.

In this very dangerous game of ethnic competition,
some ethnic groups are better prepared than others.
Ethnic groups differ in intelligence and the ability
to develop and control economic resources. They differ
in their degree of ethnocentrism, in the extent to
which they are mobilized to achieve group interests,
and in how aggressively they behave toward other
groups. They differ in their numbers, fertility, and
the extent to which they encourage responsible
parenting. And they differ in the amount of land and
other resources held at any point in time and in their
political power.

Given these differences, it's difficult at best to
ensure peaceful relations among ethnic groups. Even
maintaining a status quo in territory and resource
control is very difficult, as can be seen by the
ill-fated attempts of Americans to achieve an ethnic
status quo with the 1924 immigration law.18 And
accepting a status quo would not be in the interests
of groups that have recently lost land or numbers; nor
is it likely to be acceptable to groups with
relatively low numbers and control of resources; nor
would a status quo be likely to be acceptable to
groups prone to high fertility. Yet the
alternative—that all humans renounce their ethnic
group loyalties—seems utopian to say the least.

And given that some ethnic groups—especially ones with
high levels of ethnocentrism and mobilization—will
undoubtedly continue to function as groups far into
the foreseeable future, unilateral renunciation of
ethnic loyalties by some groups means only their
surrender and defeat—the Darwinian dead end of
extinction. The future, then, like the past, will
inevitably be a Darwinian competition in which
ethnicity plays a very large role.

The alternative faced by Europeans throughout the
Western world is to place themselves in a position of
enormous vulnerability in which their destinies will
be determined by other peoples, many of whom hold deep
historically conditioned hatreds toward them.
Europeans' promotion of their own displacement is the
ultimate foolishness—an historical mistake of
catastrophic proportions./

Tuesday, January 23, 2007


Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 07:22:21 -0000

Do you remember the white creep descendant of a sea faring hero who
went to Africa to apologise for being white and slavery, well this is the
masochistic creep who organised the trip he is obsessed with white guilt.

Maybe some educational material could be sent to him?

Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 7:57 AM


Please would you send that e-mail to your mailing list with a note
inviting people to contact the organiser of that silly march? His phone number
is 0208 694 2220.

(He gave this out on the radio appealing for white
teenagers to take part).

His name and address is David Pott, 58 Geoffrey Road, Brockley, London SE4 1NT.

His website is

> Thank you

Sunday, January 21, 2007

Well done to Ricky Hatton for his World Title fight victory in Las Vegas, USA !

Saturday, January 20, 2007

Another exclusive 'pic from the past' of nationalist history.

This pic is another of the NF so called 'secret march' in Levenshulme, Manchester, in early October 1977.

October 1977..........that 'secret' NF march soon after Lewisham, in Levenshulme, South Manchester.

Here are the guest speakers; John Tyndall, Andrew Fountaine (in the bowler hat) and Stockport member Derek Warburton.

This is one of many pics taken of the many NF demonstrations in Rochdale in the very early 1980's. This one was of a demo at the top of John Street,Rochdale. The guest speaker was Eric Blucher, the leader of the Norwegian NF at that time.

This was the major opposition to the BNP in the mid 1990's. Here we can see some socialist worker party (swp) trollope with her black boyfriend distributing illegal anti BNP leaflets in Heywood near Rochdale.

Friday, January 19, 2007

Subject: Dispelling Myths About the Crusades


An Interview with Professor Thomas Madden: Dispelling Myths About the

medieval historian Professor Thomas Madden of St. Louis University, to
dispel some common myths concerning the Crusades. The text of this
interview is transcribed below.

1. Some authors contend the Crusades were wars of aggression against a
peaceful Muslim world. What is your position in this matter?

It is difficult to see how anyone familiar with the sources could make
such a claim. The original goal of the First Crusade, as it was
annunciated in the papal call as well as numerous crusader charters,
to respond to Muslim aggression against Christians in the East and to
restore those lands taken by Muslims to their Christian owners.

2. Many adversaries of the Crusades claim that, although Crusaders wore
crosses and religious symbols, their only goal was to gain riches and
territories. What is your opinion on the matter?

This is a fairly old-fashioned view, now largely rejected by scholars.
It was based on a Victorian experience with colonialism that has no
relationship at all to the medieval Crusades. We now know that
crusading was almost never profitable. Crusaders often impoverished
themselves and their families in order to pay for their expeditions.
Whatever booty they received (and the Crusades were notoriously bad for
plunder) was more than offset by their expenses. The vast majority of
Crusaders had no interest in remaining in the East, but rather
their vows and returned home as soon as they were able.

During the interview, Prof. Madden declared: "I have no doubt that had
there been no Crusades at all that western Europe would have been
conquered by Muslims in much same fashion as southeastern Europe was."
3. Some accuse the Crusades of being a sort of medieval colonialism
disguised in religious trappings. Is this true and could you comment on

Colonialism, if it is to have any meaning at all, requires certain
things: most importantly a mother country that funds and directs the
colonial expansion, a colonial government linked to a home government,
and policy of colonization or exploitation in the colony. The Crusades
had none of these things. No mother country supported the Crusades.
Rather they were funded and undertaken by individuals across
for the benefit of their souls and their co-religionists overseas. The
governments in the Crusaders States were independent, with no direct
ties to any European countries. And the Europeans had no policy of
colonization or exploitation in the East. Rather, the overriding
purpose of the Kingdom of Jerusalem was to safeguard the Holy Places
the lives of Christian pilgrims coming to visit them.

4. Is the following thesis historically defensible: Although the West
lost political control over the Holy Land and the near East after the
seventh and last Crusade, the effort Christians made from the 11th to
the 13th centuries broke the impetus of the Muslim offensive against
Europe and thus prevented the European continent from becoming Islamic
back in medieval times.

No, on several counts. The Seventh Crusade was by no means the last
Crusade. They continued well into the sixteenth century. The famous
Battle of Lepanto in 1571 was a Crusade. Catholics did lose the
mainland, but they held onto Cyprus and Rhodes for centuries. I
it is fair to say, however, that the Crusades did slow the advance of
Muslim Empires – namely the Ottoman Empire – into Europe just long
enough to allow Europeans to effectively defend themselves. I have no
doubt that had there been no Crusades at all that western Europe would
have been conquered by Muslims in much same fashion as southeastern
Europe was.

5. The Fourth Crusade is one of the most maligned of the Crusades. This
is the Crusade you have studied in depth. Could you comment on some of
the myths about the Fourth Crusade?

The biggest myth is that the Crusade was purposely diverted from its
original goal – either by Pope Innocent III or Doge Enrico Dandolo
in order to conquer Constantinople. In fact, on several occasions the
pope forbade the crusaders to go to Constantinople and once they were
there, forbade them to attack the city. It is also not true that the
Crusaders were led to Constantinople by a hatred of the Greeks or an
envy of their empire. Instead, they came to Constantinople at the
invitation of a Greek claimant to the throne, who promised to help them
on their Crusade. The Crusaders only attacked Constantinople after
their Greek friend double-crossed them, refusing to pay their reward or
to join the Crusade. Even then, they only initiated hostilities when
Greeks murdered their former friend and ordered the Crusaders to leave
immediately without reward, support, or even food. The Fourth Crusade
is a tragedy, but it is one in which the Greeks and Latins both played
important parts.

Robert Henderson
Blair Scandal website: blairscandal/
Personal website:
We all know those cute little computer symbols called "emoticons," where: :-) means a smile and
:-( is a frown.

Well, how about some "ARSEICONS?"

Here goes:

(_!_) a regular arse
(__!__) a fat arse
(!) a tight arse
(_*_) a sore arse
{_!_} a swishy arse
(_o_) an arse that's been around
(_x_) kiss my arse
(_X_) leave my arse alone
(_zzz_) a tired arse
(_E=mc2_) a smart arse
(_ £ _) Money coming out of his arse
(_?_) Dumb Arse

you have just been e-mooned!

Jack from Rochdale...........

Sunday, January 14, 2007

Out of the mouths of babes !

This is a picture of an octopus. It has eight testicles. (Kelly age 6)

Oysters' balls are called pearls. (James age 6)

If you are surrounded by sea you are an Island. If you don't have seaall round you, you are in continent. (Wayne age 7)

Sharks are ugly and mean, and have big teeth, just like EmilyRichardson. She's not my friend no more. (Kylie age 6)

A dolphin breaths through an asshole on the top of its head.My uncle goes out in his boat with pots, and comes back with crabs.(Millie age 6)

When ships had sails, they used to use the trade winds to cross theocean. Sometimes, when the wind didn't blow, the sailors would whistle tomake the wind come. My brother said they would be better off eating beans.(William age 7)

I like mermaids. They are beautiful, and I like their shiny tails. Howdo mermaids get pregnant? (Helen age 6)

I'm not going to write about the sea. My baby brother is alwaysscreaming and being sick, my Dad keeps shouting at my Mom, and my bigsister has just got pregnant, so I can't think what to write. (Amy age 6)

Some fish are dangerous. Jellyfish can sting. Electric eels can giveyou a shock. They have to live in caves under the sea where I think theyhave to plug themselves into chargers. (Christopher age 7)

When you go swimming in the sea, it is very cold, and it makes mywilly small. (Kevin age 6)

Divers have to be safe when they go under the water. Two divers can'tgo down alone, so they have to go down on each other. (Becky age 13)

On holiday my Mom went water skiing. She fell off when she was goingvery fast. She says she won't do it again because water shot up her fanny.(Julie age 7)

Saturday, January 13, 2007

BNP to fight excellent
HALIFAX ward too !

I hear that the bye-election is in one of our strong areas in Halifax, possibly Mixenden.

Halifax BNP have been 'put under the cosh' of late. We know many of them over the 'big hill' including Richard.

Good folk all !

Dear Mr. Barker,

To the guy who wanted to know what happens if you fall under the, expulsion from the BNP laws........well I can tell you. I was possibly the first by Griffin/Lecomber, under their sweep of real nationalists from the BNP. The above letter from, second in command of the BNP, and criminal lunatic Tony Lecomber, is from circa July 2001.

Now being as Lecomber , the 'convicted bomber' and 'state agent' has fallen from grace in the BNP. Does this mean that I am now welcome in the BNP ?

As the BNP stands at the moment, unless and until, the BNP gets back to being 'the' political vehicle for British people FIRST............I do not want to know them.

Griffin has all but destroyed the BNP, but that was his remit , according to Scotland Yard in early 1999.

When you 'get the boot' are treated as a leper, not allowed to attend BNP functions. You are lied about. Called a 'state agent' and traitor. Receive threatening messages, and so on and so forth. I am sure you get the message.

P.S. What about Lecombers riposte "yours for race and nation". Is that now a banned statement from the BNP ?

Who ate all the pies ?

It looks like 'fat Kaiser' from Rochdale, who has been known to be with the AFA reds in the past.

The above pic is some berk demonstrating against the BNP ballerina tonight, and who also lives with, and has children with some chinese guy. Bleagh !

Nick Griffin has an awful lot to answer for !

Urgent message............

We have noticed of late that we are attracting the attention of people that hate Britain.

If we lose this blogger, people should immediately contact by e-mail either; or;

Please save these addresses !

We already have this blog as a 'back-up';

Friday, January 12, 2007

At last !!

A decent chain letter as opposed to normal chain letters/pyramid schemes, this one costs nothing, and you can only win.Simply send this e-mail to 9 of your mates.

INSTRUCTIONS: Anaesthetize your wife/girlfriend, put her in a large carton,(don't forget some ventilation holes), and send it to the person who is at the top of your list.
Soon, your name will be at the top of the list, and you will receive 823,542 women through the post.

Statistically, among those women, will be at least:
0.5 Miss Worlds
2.5 Models
463 Wild nymphos
3,234 Good-looking nymphos
20,198 Who enjoy multiple orgasms
40,198 Bi-sexual women.

In total, that is 64,294 women who are simply hornier, less inhibited, and tastier than the grumpy old bag you posted off.

And, best of all, your original package is guaranteed not to be one of those that come back to you.


One bloke for example who sent the letter to only 5 instead of 9 of his friends got his original bird back, still in the old dressing gown he sent her off in, with the same old migraine attack, and the accusatorial expression on her face.

On the same day, the international supermodel he'd been living with since he sent off his old girlfriend moved out to live with his best friend (to whom he had not sent the chain letter).

While I am sending this letter, the bloke that is in 6th place above me has already received 837 women and is lying in hospital suffering from exhaustion. Outside his ward are 452 more packages.


This is a unique opportunity to achieve a totally satisfying sex life.

No expensive meals out, no lengthy conversations about trivialities (that only interest women).

No obligations, no grumpy mother-in-law, and no unpleasant surprises like marriage or engagement.

Do not hesitate........send this letter today to 9 of your best friends.

PS. - Even when you have no girlfriend, you can send your vacuum cleaner; one of the other women that arrives will know how to use it.

PPS. - This letter can also be copied to women you know so that they can prepare themselves for the great adventure that they may soon undertake.
funniest video ever...
from Jack in Rochdale.....

Don't miss the warnings at the end, listen carefully,

This is great.. .. just click the link

Insight into the Jewish psyche.

Itche Goldberg obituary
Just an obituary of another Jewish activist, but this one is a good illustration of the point that Jewish communists remained jews.
Goldberg was an advocate of Yiddish culture. And notice that he didn't sour on communism in the USSR until it started being anti-Jewish.
Murdering 20,000,000 goyim was part of an idealistic struggle, but you have to draw the line somewhere.
[obituaries Itche Goldberg, 102; fixture in communist struggle and a teacher of Yiddish culture By Adam Bernstein Washington Post January 9, 2007]
Itche Goldberg, a Polish-born Jew who became a fixture in the communist struggle of the 1920s and '30s and later emerged as a writer, editor, publisher and teacher of Yiddish language and culture, died of cancer Dec.27 in his New York home.
He was 102.
After his family settled in Canada, Goldberg became involved in a Jewish fraternal group called the Workmen's Circle. He became a Yiddish instructor, initially in Canada and later in Philadelphia and New York.
He was part of an ideological movement that used Yiddish to teach Jews about the international proletariat struggle.
He became a leading cultural figure in the International Workers Order, a communist-affiliated insurance and fraternal organization that had splintered from the Workmen's Circle.
He once said about the split, which occurred around 1930: "There was no question about our Jewishness or Jewish consciousness, and the Jewish consciousness led us very naturally to the Soviet Union.
Here was Romania,anti-Semitic. Poland, which was anti-Semitic.
Suddenly we saw how Jewish culture was developing in the Soviet Union. It was really breathtaking.
You had the feeling that both the national problem was solved and the social problem was solved. This was no small thing. It was overpowering, and we were young."
Before the International Workers Order folded amid the communist witch hunt of the early 1950s, Goldberg spent two decades as cultural director of its Jewish section. In that position, he edited several journals - including a children's publication with cartoons and stories - and oversaw secular Yiddish-languageschools that peaked with 80,000 students in the United States and Canada.
He started a publishing concern for Jewish history texts and Yiddish songbooks, and in the 1970s and 1980s he taught Yiddish at New York's QueensCollege. He also persevered in publishing Yiddishe Kultur, a literary and cultural magazine started in the late 1930s. He assumed the editorship in 1964, when his predecessor left for a kibbutz in Israel.
Goldberg became a relentless fundraiser to maintain bi=monthly publication, which became increasingly difficult.
Yiddishe Kultur had a few hundred subscribers when it last went to press in 2004.
Eugene Orenstein, who teaches Jewish studies at McGill University in Montreal and is a former student of Goldberg's, called his teacher one of the last links to a world that saw the blossoming of Yiddish culture in theWest with the mass immigration of European Jews from the 1880s to the 1920s.
Besides promoting the work of modern Yiddish writers, many of whom he knew in the 1920s and '30s, Goldberg also translated varied works into Yiddish,from Latin classics to Harlem Renaissance poet Langston Hughes.
Yitzhak Gutkind Goldberg was born in 1904 in Opatow, Poland. The family left for Warsaw in 1914, just before the start of World War I. His father and older brother went ahead to Canada. Goldberg, his mother and four other siblings stayed in Poland six more years. While they waited, Goldberg talked his way into a Hebrew teachers seminary in Warsaw. When the family was reunited in Toronto, where his father had become a junk dealer, Goldberg attended McMaster University in Ontario.Self-taught in English, he studied philosophy and economics until quitting school in his fourth year. Goldberg gradually came to realize the horrors of Stalinist Russia and specifically the regime's murderous treatment of Jews.
During his editorship of Yiddishe Kultur, Goldberg published a memorial issue every August honoring Yiddish writers executed under Stalin.
Goldberg was viewed as a far more avuncular figure in his later years and received a flurry of press attention as an eccentric and tenacious figure in a shrinking circle of Yiddish experts. He believed that promoting Yiddish was critical to the survival of Jewish culture, especially as the language, estimated to have 12 million speakers in 1939, dwindled to half a million speakers.
"You get the impression that I'm full of fight?" he asked the New York Times in 2004. "I'm not really. I might as well tell you: I only have two dreams.
One dream is that someone will knock on the door and I will open it and they give me a check for $150,000 for the magazine. Second dream is that someone knocks at the door and I open it up and he gives me a corned beef sandwich."He is survived by his wife, Jennie Goldberg; two children, David Goldberg and Susan Goldberg, both of New York; two granddaughters; and two great-grandchildren .
January 15, 2007 Issue Copyright © 2007 The American Conservative

Fragmented Future

Multiculturalism doesn't make vibrant communities but defensive ones.

In the presence of [ethnic] diversity, we hunker down. We act like turtles. The effect of diversity is worse than had been imagined. And it's not just that we don't trust people who are not like us. In diverse communities, we don't trust people who do look like us. -Harvard professor Robert D. Putnam It was one of the more irony-laden incidents in the history of celebrity social scientists.

While in Sweden to receive a $50,000 academic prize as political science professor of the year, Harvard's Robert D. Putnam, a former Carter administration official who made his reputation writing about the decline of social trust in America in his bestseller Bowling Alone, confessed to Financial Times columnist John Lloyd that his latest research discovery-that ethnic diversity decreases trust and co-operation in communities-was so explosive that for the last half decade he hadn't dared announce it "until he could develop proposals to compensate for the negative effects of diversity, saying it 'would have been irresponsible to publish without that.'"

In a column headlined "Harvard study paints bleak picture of ethnic diversity," Lloyd summarized the results of the largest study ever of "civic engagement," a survey of 26,200 people in 40 American communities: When the data were adjusted for class, income and other factors, they showed that the more people of different races lived in the same community, the greater the loss of trust. 'They don't trust the local mayor, they don't trust the local paper, they don't trust other people and they don't trust institutions,' said Prof Putnam. 'The only thing there's more of is protest marches and TV watching.' Lloyd noted, "Prof Putnam found trust was lowest in Los Angeles, 'the most diverse human habitation in human history.'"
As if to prove his own point that diversity creates minefields of mistrust, Putnam later protested to the Harvard Crimson that the Financial Times essay left him feeling betrayed, calling it "by two degrees of magnitude, the worst experience I have ever had with the media."

To Putnam's horror, hundreds of "racists and anti-immigrant activists" sent him e-mails congratulating him for finally coming clean about his findings. Lloyd stoutly stood by his reporting, and Putnam couldn't cite any mistakes of fact, just a failure to accentuate the positive.

It was "almost criminal," Putnam grumbled, that Lloyd had not sufficiently emphasized the spin that he had spent five years concocting. Yet considering the quality of Putnam's talking points that Lloyd did pass on, perhaps the journalist was being merciful in not giving the professor more rope with which to hang himself.

For example, Putnam's line-"What we shouldn't do is to say that they [immigrants] should be more like us.

We should construct a new us"-sounds like a weak parody of Bertolt Brecht's parody of Communist propaganda after the failed 1953 uprising against the East German puppet regime: "Would it not be easier for the government to dissolve the people and elect another?"

Before Putnam hid his study away, his research had appeared on March 1, 2001 in a Los Angeles Times article entitled "Love Thy Neighbor? Not in L.A." Reporter Peter Y. Hong recounted, "Those who live in more homogeneous places, such as New Hampshire, Montana or Lewiston, Maine, do more with friends and are more involved in community affairs or politics than residents of more cosmopolitan areas, the study said."

Putnam's discovery is hardly shocking to anyone who has tried to organize a civic betterment project in a multi-ethnic neighborhood. My wife and I lived for 12 years in Chicago's Uptown district, which claims to be the most diverse two square miles in America, with about 100 different languages being spoken.

She helped launch a neighborhood drive to repair the dilapidated playlot across the street. To get Mayor Daley's administration to chip in, we needed to raise matching funds and sign up volunteer laborers. This kind of Robert D. Putnam-endorsed good citizenship proved difficult in Uptown, however, precisely because of its remarkable diversity.

The most obvious stumbling block was that it's hard to talk neighbors into donating money or time if they don't speak the same language as you. Then there's the fundamental difficulty of making multiculturalism work-namely, multiple cultures. Getting Koreans, Russians, Mexicans, Nigerians, and Assyrians (Christian Iraqis) to agree on how to landscape a park is harder than fostering consensus among people who all grew up with the same mental picture of what a park should look like. For example, Russian women like to sunbathe. But most of the immigrant ladies from more southerly countries stick to the shade, since their cultures discriminate in favor of fairer-skinned women. So do you plant a lot of shade trees or not?

The high crime rate didn't help either. The affluent South Vietnamese merchants from the nearby Little Saigon district showed scant enthusiasm for sending their small children to play in a park that would also be used by large black kids from the local public-housing project. Exotic inter-immigrant hatreds also got in the way.

The Eritreans and Ethiopians are both slender, elegant-looking brown people with thin Arab noses, who appear identical to undiscerning American eyes. But their compatriots in the Horn of Africa were fighting a vicious war.

Finally, most of the immigrants, with the possible exception of the Eritreans, came from countries where only a chump would trust neighbors he wasn't related to, much less count on the government for an even break. If the South Vietnamese, for example, had been less clannish and more ready to sacrifice for the national good in 1964-75, they wouldn't be so proficient at running family-owned restaurants on Argyle Street today.
But they might still have their own country.

In the end, boring old middle-class, English-speaking, native-born Americans (mostly white, but with some black-white couples) did the bulk of the work. When the ordeal of organizing was over, everybody seemed to give up on trying to bring Uptown together for civic improvement for the rest of the decade. The importance of co-operativeness has fallen in and out of intellectual fashion over the centuries. An early advocate of the role of cohesion in history's cycles was the 14th-century Arab statesman and scholar Ibn Khaldun, who documented that North African dynasties typically began as desert tribes poor in everything but what he termed asabiya or social solidarity. Their willingness to sacrifice for each other made them formidable in battle. But once they conquered === message truncated ===

Thursday, January 11, 2007

New video showing Saddam after his execution - viewer warning...............

Video Description

The video shows Saddam Hussein shortly after he was executed.

This video does not show the execution.

Rather, it shows Saddam's body, proportedly right after he was hanged.

The short video simply shows Saddam's corpse under a sheet, and the effects that hanging had on his neck.The video seems to have first emerged at a Shia website in Arabic, after which it was uploaded to Google.The grainy film appeared to have been taken in a room lit by daylight. A man is heard addressing another familiarly as Abu Ali and urging him to hurry - possibly because the people filming were aware of breaching regulations in doing so.

NWN: Just how Saddams throat was cut we have no idea, but once again it shows just how bad the people are that Zionist led USA have placed into power. It also looks now like the extra 20,000+ US troops being sent to Iraq, are in fact, for an invasion of IRAN !

US declares war on

Last Updated: Thursday, 11 January 2007, 16:29 GMT from the BBC......

US forces storm Iranian consulate

US forces have stormed an Iranian consulate in the northern Iraqi town of Irbil and seized six members of staff.
The troops raided the building at about 0300 (0001GMT), taking away computers and papers, according to Kurdish media and senior local officials.

The US military would only confirm the detention of six people around Irbil.

Tehran said the attack violated all international conventions. It has summoned ambassadors from Switzerland, representing US interests, and Iraq.

A spokesman for Iran's foreign ministry described the raid as an attempt to sabotage Tehran's relations with Iraq. One Iranian MP said it showed America's cruelty and meanness.

The raid comes amid high Iran-US tension.

The US accuses Iran of helping to fuel violence in Iraq and seeking nuclear arms. Iran denies both charges.
Tehran counters that US military involvement in the Middle East endangers the whole region.

Heroes of London Bridge including banker who lost his life confronting jihadis with a skateboard and nurse who died running towards dange...