Thursday, July 30, 2015

Army re-deployed in Northern Ireland......

 

Army deployment to be raised with Policing Board

A heavy PSNI presence in Derry's Ederowen Park on Wednesday morning during searches.

A heavy PSNI presence in Derry's Ederowen Park on Wednesday morning during searches.

09:25Thursday 30 July 2015 16:08Wednesday 29 July 2015

A Derry Councillor has vowed to raise concerns over the deployment of British Army personnel to take part in house searches in Derry through the Policing Board.

SDLP Derry City & Strabane District Councillor for the Galliagh area Brian Tierney said the Secretary of State would also be asked for an explanation about events in the estate on Wednesday.
PSNI officers pictured raiding a bungalow in Glendale Park on Wednesday morning. DER3015MC052

PSNI officers pictured raiding a bungalow in Glendale Park on Wednesday morning. DER3015MC052

Colr. Tierney was speaking after the PSNI confirmed that Army personnel had taken part in searches conducted by senior detectives involved in probing dissident violent crime.
The searches took place at bungalows in both Ederowen Park and Glendale Park for over several hours on Wednesday.
PSNI Chief Inspector Tony Callaghan on Wednesday evening said: “There were no arrests, however a number of items were taken away for forensic examination.”
Speaking about the army deployment, he added: “Due to the suspected presence of munitions or explosives, military specialists were deployed in support of police.
Colr. Brian Tierney has warned parents to beware. (DER0314PG016)

Colr. Brian Tierney has warned parents to beware. (DER0314PG016)

“The role of these military personnel is to search for munitions and explosive devices which if located will then dealt with by the army bomb disposal officer.
“The military used are specifically trained in this type of high risk search thus ensuring that such searches are conducted in as safe a manner as possible.”
Speaking just prior to Chf Insp. Callaghan’s statement, Colr. Tierney said he would now be contacting the SDLP’s representatives on the Policing Board to raise questions over why the army were involved.
Speaking in general terms, he said: “We believe that all dissident or Loyalist action does need to be investigated, but we do believe the PSNI need to be doing that as they are accountable.
Chief Inspector Tony Callaghan, PSNI, Strand Road. INLS3714MC013

Chief Inspector Tony Callaghan, PSNI, Strand Road. INLS3714MC013

“We will be asking questions at the Policing Board level and of the Secretary of State about what was going on, about people witnessing army personnel on their streets.
“We feel the community needs answers. The PSNI are accountable to the Policing Board and we need to hold them to account on behalf of the community as elected representatives.”
Colr. Tierney added that it was important to note that the absence of dissident devices would mean there would have been no justification for such deployments.
Meanwhile, the deployment of the army has sparked outrage from some Republican quarters, with the Irish Republican Socialist Party spokesman Danny Morrison expressing anger at their involvement in the raids in the Galliagh area.
Independent Derry City & Strabane District Councillor Dee Quigley also said he “disgusted” at what was taking place.

http://www.derryjournal.com/news/army-deployment-to-be-raised-with-policing-board-1-6876333

NWN: They haven't gone away at all. There has been a huge increase in terrorist republican activity in NI over recent times. Only last week, a full paramilitary parade complete with firing of rifles occurred in Londonderry.

Wednesday, July 29, 2015

The SS Empire Windrush: The Jewish Origins of Multicultural Britain

Andrew Joyce


‘Will you find out who is responsible for this extraordinary action?’
Oliver Stanley, M.P., June 1948.
The SS Empire Windrush holds a special place of infamy in the minds of British Nationalists. When the ship arrived at Tilbury docks from Jamaica in June 1948, carrying 417 Black immigrants, it represented more than just a turning point in the history of those ancient isles. In some respects it signalled the beginning of mass, organized non-White immigration into northwest Europe. Back in November, TOO published my research on the role of Jews in limiting free speech and manipulating ‘race relations’ in Britain in order to achieve Jewish goals and protect Jewish interests. I’ve recently been revisiting some of my past essays, delving deeper and expanding each of them in an effort that I hope will result in the publication of a book-length manuscript on aspects of Jewish influence. During this process, I’ve been particularly compelled to research further into the role of Jews in Britain’s immigration and racial questions. What I present in this essay is a survey of some interesting facts, which I hope to document and integrate further as my work on the volume proceeds.
The Beginning of the End: Jamaican Blacks disembark from the Empire Windrush
The Beginning of the End: Jamaican Blacks disembark from the Empire Windrush
One of the things that struck me most when I began looking into the origins of multicultural Britain was the hazy and confused background to the arrival of that notorious ship. First though, I might point out one of history’s bizarre ironies —  the vessel that would signal the end of racial homogeneity in Britain started life as a Nazi cruise liner. The ship began its career in 1930 as the MV Monte Rosa. Until the outbreak of war it was used as part of the German Kraft durch Freude (‘Strength through Joy’) program. ‘Strength through Joy’ enabled more than 25 million Germans of all classes to enjoy subsidized travel and numerous other leisure pursuits, thereby enhancing the sense of community and racial togetherness. Racial solidarity, rather than class position, was emphasized by drawing lots for the allocation of cabins on vessels like the Monte Rosa, rather than providing superior accommodation only for those who could afford a certain rate. Until the outbreak of war, the vessel was employed in conveying NSDAP members on South American cruises. In 1939 the ship was allocated for military purposes, acting as a troopship for the invasion of Norway in 1940. In 1944, the Monte Rosa served in the Baltic Sea, rescuing Germans trapped in Latvia, East Prussia and Danzig by the advance of the Red Army.

Advertisement

Finally, in May 1945, her German career ended when she was captured by advancing British forces at Kiel and taken as a prize of war. The British renamed her Empire Windrush on 21 January 1947, and also employed her as a troop carrier. Sailing from Southampton, the ship took British troops to destinations as varied as Suez, Aden, Colombo, Singapore and Hong Kong. Crucially, the ship was not operated directly by the British Government, but by the New Zealand Shipping Company. It is with this little fact that we begin tumbling down the proverbial rabbit hole. I quickly discovered that the New Zealand Shipping Company, like other crucial players in the story of the Windrush, was Jewish owned and operated. The company was for the most part controlled by the Isaacs family, particularly the direct descendants of Henry and George Isaacs. Henry and George left England in 1852 at the instigation of a third brother, Edward, and arrived in Auckland via Melbourne. They established the firm of E & H Isaacs, acting as profiteers during the Taranaki and Waikato war, and winning a number of heavy contracts in connection with the provisioning of the troops.
Henry took a great interest in shipping affairs, and was for many years a member of the Auckland Harbour Board. He was one of the chief shareholders of the Auckland Shipping Company, which was subsequently merged into the New Zealand Shipping Company. The other major shareholders of the company were Laurence and Alfred Nathan, of L.D. Nathan & Company. The Auckland shipping industry, like many colonial shipping routes, had by the 1890s been effectively monopolized by Jews. During 1947 and 1948 many former German vessels were passed on to several of these contracted private companies at the discretion of the Ministry for War and the Ministry for Transport. The Secretary of State for War during these crucial years was none other than Emanuel Shinwell, the socialist son of Polish and Dutch Jews. With a degree of loyalty and patriotism typical of his race, Shinwell was discovered by MI5 to have been passing British secrets to the Irgun in Palestine in November 1947. To Shinwell, disproportionately handing government vessels and contracts to fellow Jews would have been mere grist to the mill.
A Vanity Fair Depiction of N.Z. Shipping Company Magnate Henry Isaacs
A Vanity Fair Depiction of N.Z. Shipping Company Magnate Henry Isaacs
In 1948 the British Empire was crumbling. India had been granted independence in 1947, and an exhausted, over-stretched, and indebted Britain was busy arranging for the return of colonial troops to their homelands, and the collection of others for present or future conflicts. The Windrush was used mainly for this purpose until in May 1948 the ship’s Jewish operators were given permission by the British Ministry of Transport to increase their profits by filling to capacity with commercial customers (immigrants rather than contracted troops) at Jamaica before returning to Britain with these new settlers. This momentous decision appears to have been taken very arbitrarily (and certainly un-democratically) since it elicited great shock and confusion among British politicians when it later came to light. They might not have been so shocked had they considered the ethnic origin of the head of the Ministry for Transport who authorized that action. The Minister of Transport in that crucial period was Harry Louis Nathan, formerly a member of the law firm of Herbert Oppenheimer, Nathan and Vandyk, and a distant relative of the owners of the NZ Shipping Company.
Harry Nathan: Approved non-White Immigration to Britain
Harry Nathan: Approved non-White Immigration to Britain
If the web is already beginning to look a little tangled, readers would do well to consider some of these developments and ‘coincidences’ within the context of the Anglo-Jewish Cousinhood, a topic I covered for TOO about three years ago. From the early 19th century until the First World War, English Jewry was ruled by a tightly connected oligarchy. Daniel Gutwein states that this Anglo-Jewish elite comprised some twenty inter-related Ashkenazi and Sephardic families including the houses of Goldsmith, Montagu, Nathan, Cohen, Isaacs, Abrahams, Samuel, and Montefiore. Some of these names have featured already, and will feature again in the Windrush story. At its head, of course, stood the House of Rothschild.[1] This network of families had an “exceptionally high degree of consanguinity,” leading to it being termed “The Cousinhood.”[2] Conversion and intermarriage in the group was exceptionally rare, if not non-existent. The business activities of the group overlapped to the same degree as their bloodlines. I illustrated this in my previous essay by pointing out that:
In 1870, the treasurer of the London Jewish Board of Guardians was Viennese-born Ferdinand de Rothschild (1838–1898). Ferdinand had married his cousin Elvina, who was a niece of the President of the London United Synagogue, Sir Anthony de Rothschild (1810–1876). Meanwhile, the Board of Deputies was at that time headed by Moses Montefiore, whose wife, a daughter of Levi Barent Cohen, was related to Nathan Meyer Rothschild. Nathan Meyer Rothschild’s wife was also a daughter of Levi Barent Cohen, and thus Montefiore was uncle to the aforementioned Anthony de Rothschild. … Anthony was married to a niece of Montefiore, the daughter of Abraham Montefiore and Henrietta Rothschild[3]et cetera, et cetera. In financial terms, the houses of Rothschild and Montefiore had united in 1824 to form the Alliance Insurance Company, and most of the families were involved in each other’s stock-brokering and banking concerns. Endelmann notes that in these firms “new recruits were drawn exclusively from the ranks of the family.”[4] Working tightly within this ethnic and familial network, the Cousinhood amassed huge fortunes, and in the years before World War I, despite comprising less than three tenths of 1% of the population, Jews constituted over 20% of non-landed British millionaires.[5] William Rubinstein notes that of these millionaires, all belonged to the Cousinhood.[6]
It was the Cousinhood that pioneered the way into direct political power for Jews in Britain. By 1900, through a process of ethnic and familial networking, the Cousinhood had secured many of the most significant administrative positions in the Empire. Feldman notes that the Nathan family alone had by that date secured the positions of Governor of the Gold Coast, Hong Kong and Natal, Attorney-General and Chief Justice in Trinidad, Private Secretary to the Viceroy of India, Officiating Chief Secretary to the Governor of Eastern Bengal and Assam,  and Postmaster-General of Bengal.[7] In Parliament, Lionel Abrahams was Permanent Assistant Under-Secretary at the India Office, working under his cousin Edwin Montagu who was then Parliamentary Under-Secretary for India.[8] Together with the rapid development of a Jewish monopoly over key Imperial positions were countless cases of nepotistic corruption and profit-seeking. The Cousinhood was instrumental in disseminating false Russian pogrom narratives throughout the West, in fomenting the profit-driven Boer War, and in the Indian Silver and Marconi scandals.
The Nathan and Isaacs families who owned and operated the New Zealand Shipping Company also comprised part of the Cousinhood, as was the case also with Harry Nathan who occupied the strategically valuable position of Ministry for Transport between 1946 and 1948. These were crucial years in which many foreign and domestic ex-military vessels were being re-purposed for commercial purposes and handed over by the Royal Navy to private (most often Jewish-owned) companies. Much like the nepotistic corruption at the heart of the Marconi scandal, having a Jew running the Ministry for War and a Jewish cousin running the Ministry for Transport was good news for Cousinhood members who had monopolized shipping companies and routes and now stood to gain from successive government contracts to newly acquisitioned vessels like the Empire Windrush. These government contracts and the Jewish quest for profit played a huge role in the burgeoning of the commercial passenger industry that would bring wave after wave of Blacks, Indians and Pakistanis to Britain over the next two decades.
passenger
It doesn’t really concern me whether the beginnings of this movement was part of a concerted campaign to flood Britain with non-Whites, whether the motivation was purely profit-driven, or whether it was a mixture of both. The fact remains that Jews occupied conspicuous roles throughout the process. Even the method by which Blacks were enticed to set sail for Britain must be remarked upon. Around three weeks before the Empire Windrush arrived in Jamaica, Blacks were bombarded with ads for cheap travel to Britain and articles extolling the new life they could have in London. Stephen Pollard writes that “the response was almost instantaneous. Queues formed outside the booking agency and every place was sold.”[9] Many of the ads were propaganda pieces that presented an idealized picture of life and job opportunities in Britain — in stark contrast to the bleak reality. Nonetheless, the ads were successful in generating a buzz of excitement among Blacks keen to make the move to the new welfare state.
Daniel Lawrence quotes, as an example, one migrant who explained his move to Britain: “Well, I left Jamaica because I saw the advertisements in The Gleaner. … I left to better my position. That was the chief reason.”[10] The Gleaner, is part of the Gleaner Company which to this day enjoys an effective monopoly of the Jamaican press. The company has its origins in 1834, when it was founded by the Jewish brothers Jacob and Joshua De Cordova. Since its founding it has been a kind of Jamaican micro-Cousinhood. Even when it registered as a private company in 1897, its first directors possessed a mixture of Ashkenazi and Sephardi names, from Ashenheim to de Mercado. At the time the Empire Windrush ads appeared, the managing director was Michael de Cordova. Even as late as the 1960s, and despite numbering no more than six hundred in the whole country, according to Anita Waters the powerful Jewish minority of Jamaica controlled “many of the larger economic enterprises.”[11] Before the socialist policies of the Manley administration were implemented (1972–1980), Jews “controlled the country’s only cement factory, the radio sector, the telephone company, and the largest rum company.”[12]
For all intents and purposes, the Empire Windrush was passed into Jewish ownership by a Jewish Secretary for War, given the green light to boost profits and start bringing non-Whites to Britain by a Jewish Minister for Transport, and provided with armies of eager passengers by a Jewish-owned media. Despite these facts, a very different narrative emerged in the aftermath of the ship’s arrival. Pollard writes that “in the years since the arrival of the Empire Windrush … a myth has taken hold that the British government was responsible for bringing the passengers over as part of a concerted plan to help overcome a labour shortage. …But this is wrong. It is clear from the reaction of ministers that they were as surprised as the public when they first learned, via a telegram from the Acting Governor of Jamaica on May 11, what was about to happen.”[13] The myth was a helpful one because it acknowledged the un-democratic nature of the event while deflecting blame away from the most obvious source of the scourge — the Jews of the shipping industry and the Ministry of Transport. It’s an interesting fact that, with the relevant contracts assigned and the process underway, Harry Nathan quietly vacated his position on May 31. Astonishingly, since that date Nathan has eluded all scholarly and journalistic attention until my own investigation.
The Labour government fumbled in the aftermath of the arrival of the Empire Windrush, clinging to the fantasy that upholding the ‘tradition’ that members of the colonies should be “freely admissible to the United Kingdom” could act as a means of holding the crumbling Empire together.[14] Part of the Cabinet’s strict adherence to this established, but previously superfluous, protocol, may also have been influenced by the interpretation of existing immigration law presented to them. The responsibility for interpreting existing law for the Crown and the Cabinet lies with the Solicitor General — a role that had been occupied since 1945 by yet another Jew, Frank Soskice. As I noted in a previous essay, Soskice would later introduce Britain’s first legislation containing a provision prohibiting ‘group libel.’ Soskice, was the son of a Russian-Jewish revolutionary exile. It was Soskice who “drew up the legislation” and “piloted the first Race Relations Act, 1965, through Parliament.” The Act “aimed to outlaw racial discrimination in public places.”
Crucially, the 1965 Act created the ‘Race Relations Board’ and equipped it with the power to sponsor research for the purposes of monitoring race relations in Britain and, if necessary, extending legislation on the basis of the ‘findings’ of such research. Clearly Soskice would have been at pains to admonish, with legal jargon, any ‘racist’ reactions among Ministers to the arrival of Empire Windrush and subsequent streams of Black immigrants sailing on Jewish vessels. It was Soskice who informed Arthur Creech Jones, the anti-immigration Minister for Labor, that neither the Jamaican nor the British government had any legal power in peacetime to prevent the landing at Tilbury of the Empire Windrush. And so the former Monte Rosa, once a triumphant symbol of ‘Strength through Joy,’ disgorged its passengers on the Thames as part of a new initiative: ‘Destruction through Diversity.’ It was soon followed by numerous other troopships, like the SS Orbita, laden with dusky immigrants and stinking of “vomit and urine.”[15]
It was only during the next Churchill government that some reflection took place on the longer-term implications of what had begun, with Churchill recorded by Sir Norman Brook as remarking:
Problems will arise if many colored people settle here. Are we to saddle ourselves with colour problems in the UK? Attracted by Welfare State. Public Opinion in UK won’t tolerate it once it gets beyond certain limits.[16]
But by then it was too late. Over the course of the following decade, Black immigration to Britain increased dramatically. Between 1948 and 1952 between around 2,000 Blacks entered Britain each year. By 1957 the figure had climbed to 42,000. Government investigations into this new population revealed that the idea that Blacks were helping fill a labor shortage was grossly ill-founded. In one report, completed in December 1953, civil servants stated that the new population found it difficult to secure employment not because of prejudice among Whites, but because the newcomers had “low output” and their working life was marked by “irresponsibility, quarrelsomeness, and lack of discipline.” Black women were “slow mentally,” and Black men were “more volatile in temperament than white workers … more easily provoked to violence … lacking in stamina,” and generally “not up to the standards required by British employers.”[17]
Worse, future social and criminal patterns were already being established. In 1954 Home Secretary David Maxwell Fyfe issued a secret memorandum to the cabinet on blacks pimping White women, stating that: “Figures I have obtained from the Metropolitan police do show that the number of colored men convicted for this offense is out of all proportion to the number of colored men in London.”[18] Three months later he again wrote to the cabinet stressing that “large numbers of colored people are living on national assistance or the immoral earnings of white women.”[19] While the famed Notting Hill Race Riots of 1958 are often pointed to as an example of Black victimhood and the need for a Black reaction against White ‘oppression,’ the riots were instead the culmination of White reactions against Black crime and miscegenation. Earlier in 1958 the Eugenics Society, now the Galton Institute, issued warnings that the mingling of races that had started in Britain “ran counter to the great developing pattern of human evolution” and attacked the United Nations for minimizing the “quite obvious dissimilarities between people and individuals.”[20] The Notting Hill riots, occurring a decade after the arrival of Empire Windrush, were seeded one August evening when White youths intervened in an argument between a Swedish prostitute and her Black ‘husband’ Raymond Morrison. A brawl broke out between the youths and Morrison’s friends. The following day some of the White youths verbally assaulted the Swede for being a “Black man’s trollop.” The White youths then assembled between three and four hundred fellows to begin a violent demonstration against Black criminality, resulting in six days and nights of almost uninterrupted inter-ethnic warfare.
The Fruits of the Empire Windrush
The Fruits of the Empire Windrush
This period represented one of the clearest opportunities for Britain to turn back the tide. But, as I have previously documented, it was also the period in which the efforts of a large number of unelected Jewish lawyers began the British ‘race relations’ sham, choking out free speech, and with it any opportunity for effective White resistance.
After catching fire during a voyage, Empire Windrush sank to a watery grave off the coast of Algeria in 1954. Its legacy was to last much longer. Liberals and the Cultural Marxist elite named a public space in Brixton, London, “Windrush Square” to commemorate the 50th anniversary of its landing. It also featured during the opening ceremony of the 2012 Olympic Games, and the salvaged wheel of the vessel sits relic-like for veneration at the offices of the Open University in Milton Keynes.
I see a more tangible legacy however. Last year Jamaican Lloyd Byfield smashed his way into the apartment of Londoner Leighann Duffy after she spurned his advances. Armed with a claw hammer and knife he stabbed her 14 times in front of her six year old daughter. What made the brutal crime even more disgusting was the fact that Byfield was an illegal immigrant who had previously been jailed for 30 weeks after attacking a White woman with a chisel. A deportation order was made during that sentencing, but was never carried out because Britain remains as catatonic on matters of race and immigration as it was in May 1948. The motherless, raped, and murdered White children of Britain are the truest legacy and reflection of that fateful voyage. But, it is hoped, the mechanics behind that voyage are now a little better known.

[1] D. Gutwein, The Divided Elite: Politics and Anglo-Jewry, 1882-1917 (Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1992), p.5.
[2] T. Endelmann, “Communal Solidarity and Family Loyalty Among the Jewish Elite of Victorian London,” Victorian Studies, 28 (3), pp.491-526, p.491 & 495.
[3] Ibid, p.496.
[4] Ibid, p.519.
[5] Ibid.
[6] W. Rubinstein, “The Jewish Economic Elite in Britain, 1808-1909,” Jewish Historical Society of England. Available at: http://www.jhse.org/book/export/article/21930.
[7] D. Feldman, “Jews and the British Empire c1900″ History Workshop Journal, 63 (1), pp.70-89. Available at: http://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/655/2/655.pdf.
[8] Ibid.
[9] S. Pollard, Ten Days That Changed the Nation: The Making of Modern Britain (Simon& Schuster, 1999), p.4
[10] D. Lawrence, Black Migrants, White Natives: A Study of Race Relations in Nottingham (Cambridge University Press, 1974), p.19
[11] A. Waters, Race, Class and Symbols: Rastafari and Reggae in Jamaican Politics (Transaction, 1999), p.41.
[12] Ibid.
[13] Pollard, p.5.
[14] Pollard, p.8.
[15] I. Thomson, The Dead Yard: Tales of Modern Jamaica (Faber & Faber, 2009), p.53.
[16] Pollard, p.13.
[17] K. Paul, Whitewashing Britain: Race and Citizenship in the Postwar Era (Cornell University Press, 1997), p.134.
[18] J. Procter, Writing Black Britain, 1948-1998: An Interdisciplinary Anthology (Manchester University Press, 2000), p.71.
[19] Ibid.
[20] Ibid.
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2015/07/jews-the-ss-empire-windrush-and-the-origins-of-multicultural-britain/#more-28730


Tuesday, July 28, 2015

We're one crucial step closer to seeing Tony Blair at The Hague

Desmond Tutu has helped us see the true nature of what the former prime minister did to Iraq and increased pressure for a prosecution
Blair at Leveson May 2012
Tony Blair arrives at the Royal Courts of Justice in London to give evidence on media ethics to the Leveson inquiry in May 2012. 
For years it seems impregnable, then suddenly the citadel collapses. An ideology, a fact, a regime appears fixed, unshakeable, almost geological. Then an inch of mortar falls, and the stonework begins to slide. Something of this kind happened over the weekend.
When Desmond Tutu wrote that Tony Blair should be treading the path to The Hague, he de-normalised what Blair has done. Tutu broke the protocol of power – the implicit accord between those who flit from one grand meeting to another – and named his crime. I expect that Blair will never recover from it.
The offence is known by two names in international law: the crime of aggression and a crime against peace. It is defined by the Nuremberg principles as the "planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression". This means a war fought for a purpose other than self-defence: in other words outwith articles 33 and 51 of the UN Charter.
That the invasion of Iraq falls into this category looks indisputable. Blair's cabinet ministers knew it, and told him so. His attorney general warned that there were just three ways in which it could be legally justified: "self-defence, humanitarian intervention, or UN security council authorisation. The first and second could not be the base in this case." Blair tried and failed to obtain the third.
His foreign secretary, Jack Straw, told Blair that for the war to be legal, "i) there must be an armed attack upon a state or such an attack must be imminent; ii) the use of force must be necessary and other means to reverse/avert the attack must be unavailable; iii) the acts in self-defence must be proportionate and strictly confined to the object of stopping the attack." None of these conditions were met. The Cabinet Office told him: "A legal justification for invasion would be needed. Subject to law officers' advice, none currently exists."
Without legal justification, the attack on Iraq was an act of mass murder. It caused the deaths of between 100,000 and a million people, and ranks among the greatest crimes the world has ever seen. That Blair and his ministers still saunter among us, gathering money wherever they go, is a withering indictment of a one-sided system of international justice: a system whose hypocrisies Tutu has exposed.
Blair's diminishing band of apologists cling to two desperate justifications. The first is that the war was automatically authorised by a prior UN resolution, 1441. But when it was discussed in the security council, both the American and British ambassadors insisted that 1441 did not authorise the use of force. The UK representative stated that "there is no 'automaticity' in this resolution. If there is a further Iraqi breach of its disarmament obligations, the matter will return to the council for discussion as required in paragraph 12." Two months later, in January 2003, the attorney general reminded Blair that "resolution 1441 does not authorise the use of military force without a further determination by the security council".
Advertisement
Yet when Blair ran out of options, he and his lieutenants began arguing that 1441 authorised their war. They are still at it: on Sunday, Lord Falconer tried it out on Radio 4. Perhaps he had forgotten that it has been thoroughly discredited.
The second justification, attempted again by Blair this weekend, is that there was a moral case for invading Iraq. Yes, there was one. There was also a moral case for not invading Iraq, and this case was stronger.
But a moral case (and who has launched an aggressive war in modern times without claiming to possess one?) does not provide a legal basis. Nor was it the motivation for the attack. In September 2000, before they took office, a project run by future members of the Bush administration – including Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz – produced a report which said the following: "While the unresolved conflict with Iraq provides the immediate justification, the need for a substantial American force presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein." Their purpose, they revealed, was "maintaining American military pre-eminence". The motivation for deposing Saddam Hussein was no more moral than the motivation for arming and funding him, two decades before.
But while the case against Blair is strong, the means are weak. Twenty-nine people have been indicted in the international criminal court, and all of them are African. (Suspects in the Balkans have been indicted by a different tribunal). There's a reason for this. Until 2018 at the earliest, the court can prosecute crimes committed during the course of an illegal war, but not the crime of launching that war.
Advertisement
Should we be surprised? Though the Nuremberg tribunal described aggression as "the supreme international crime", several powerful states guiltily resisted its adoption. At length, in 2010, they agreed that the court would have jurisdiction over aggression, but not until 2018 or thereafter. Though the offence has been recognised in international law for 67 years, the international criminal court (unlike the Rwanda and Yugoslavia tribunals, which hear cases from before they were established) will be able to try only crimes of aggression committed beyond that date.
The other possibility is a prosecution in one of the states (there are at least 25) which have incorporated the crime of aggression into their own laws. Perhaps Blair's lawyers are now working through the list and cancelling a few speaking gigs.
That the prospect of prosecution currently looks remote makes it all the more important that the crime is not forgotten. To this end, in 2010 I set up a bounty fund – www.arrestblair.org – to promote peaceful citizens' arrests of the former prime minister. People contribute to the fund, a quarter of which is paid out to anyone who makes an attempt which meets the rules. With our fourth payment last week, we've now disbursed more than £10,000. Our aim is the same as Tutu's: to de-normalise an act of mass murder, to keep it in the public mind and to maintain the pressure for a prosecution.
That looked, until this weekend, like an almost impossible prospect. But when the masonry begins to crack, impossible hopes can become first plausible, then inexorable. Blair will now find himself shut out of places where he was once welcome. One day he may find himself shut in.
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/sep/03/tony-blair-the-hague-iraq-war

NWN: Good ! This bastard Blair ought to get the rope !

Sunday, July 26, 2015

David Cameron orders plans for military intervention in Libya to take the fight to 'death cult' ISIS 

  • The spread of ISIS in Libya has led the Prime Minister to investigate plans for possible military intervention in the North-African country
  • Cameron described ISIS as 'one of the biggest threats our world has faced' 
  • Prime Minister was speaking ahead his tour to South East Asia  

David Cameron has warned that Britain must be prepared to help put an end to the the deadly spread of jihadi groups like ISIS across the world in order to prevent attacks on home soil.
The Prime Minister made specific references to the threat of Libya, where an ISIS franchise has been running terror camps and implementing the group's barbaric interpretation of Shari'a.
Speaking ahead of his four day tour of South East Asia, Cameron described ISIS as 'one of the biggest threats our world has faced.' 
Scroll down for video:
Defiant: David Cameron has warned that Britain must be prepared to help put an end to the the deadly spread of jihadi groups like ISIS in Libya
Defiant: David Cameron has warned that Britain must be prepared to help put an end to the the deadly spread of jihadi groups like ISIS in Libya
21 Egyptian Coptic Christians were lined up and beheaded on a Libyan beach by ISIS militants 
21 Egyptian Coptic Christians were lined up and beheaded on a Libyan beach by ISIS militants 
Cameron has already began to order security personnel to investigate the best way for Britain to help ease the threat of radicals in countries like Libya, according to The Sunday Telegraph
The defiant warning comes as reports suggest that Sousse gunman Saifeddine Rezgui,23, was believed to have attended a terror camp in Libya.
He used his newly learnt weapons skills to shoot dead 38 foreign tourists, including 30 British nationals, at a popular tourist beach in Sousse, Tunisia.
Fears remain that ISIS lone wolf terror attacks could strike in Britain, following the shocking terror attacks in France, most notably the Charlie Hebdo massacre. 
Led down the beach to their deaths, the video was filmed in high definition and released last February
Led down the beach to their deaths, the video was filmed in high definition and released last February
Some experts have questioned the authenticity of the video, sparking rumours it may have been staged
Some experts have questioned the authenticity of the video, sparking rumours it may have been staged
Leading the massacre, an American accented fighter plays the leader role similar to Jihadi John
Leading the massacre, an American accented fighter plays the leader role similar to Jihadi John
Barbaric: Following the horrific scenes, the camera focuses on the blood stained water 
Barbaric: Following the horrific scenes, the camera focuses on the blood stained water 
Although the ISIS group in Libya have reportedly been forced out of much of the Libyan city of Dernah, their militants still maintain a worryingly strong presence in the struggling country.
Photos emerged this week of black ISIS banners being pulled down by rebel militants in Dernah and an ISIS commander was marched through the streets naked before he was executed.
Despite the apparent losses suffered by ISIS, the group continues to hold checkpoints in the city of Sirte as well as carrying out atrocities in other parts of the country. 
David Cameron's decision to visit several of the South East Asian states, including Malaysia and Indonesia comes amid fears that Islamic State is looking to gain a foothold in the region.
The Prime Minister is heading to Indonesia on the first stop of a four-day tour intended to drum up trade for Britain.
He will also use meetings with President Joko Widodo in Jakarta and later Prime Minister Najib Razak of Malaysia to raise the threat from the extremists.
Horrific: ISIS have become feared for their brutality and merciless killings, most notably the Speicher massacre a year ago
Horrific: ISIS have become feared for their brutality and merciless killings, most notably the Speicher massacre a year ago
Brutal: Shi'a Iraqi army recruits were made to lie on the ground before they were gunned down in cold blood
Brutal: Shi'a Iraqi army recruits were made to lie on the ground before they were gunned down in cold blood
Around 500 people from Indonesia - which has the world's largest Muslim population - and 200 from Malaysia are thought to have joined IS in Iraq and Syria.
Earlier this month, Malaysian police reportedly foiled a twin terror attack, thought to have been ordered by ISIS strategists.
In a statement Inspector General of Malaysia's Police Khalid Abu Bakar described how the failed attacks could have been 'like what happened in Tunisia, France and Kuwait last month.'
Several popular entertainment areas, frequently used by Westerners, are believed to have been the intended targets by the terrorists. 
Cameron said: 'We will only defeat these brutal terrorists if we take action at home, overseas and online and if we unite with countries around the world unite against this common enemy. 
'All of us face a threat from foreign fighters and from increasing radicalisation within our countries and it's right that we look at what help we can provide to one another.' 


NWN: Doesn't this confirm that Cameron is a 'paid agent' for the NEW WORLD ORDER/NWO ? 'We' helped to de-stabilise Libya. We got Gaddafi murdered. Then 'we' got some of our people murdered by some Libyan militants in Tunisia recently. What a surprise ? British people were targetted due to the foreign policies of UK's government zionist followers like David Cameron.  Well it was a surprise for the 'brain deads' who don't keep up with the news or events, and who have the attention span of a goldfish. The idiots in Britain primed by the controlled mass media said "why us ?".And now that idiot Cameron is planning even more of the same as shown above? So Britain and UK citizens will become even more of a target.

We are having more and more austerity imposed on us, all because the big banks like Rothschilds want that. As it means more profits for them.

Gaddafi promised action in stopping the human flood of refuse now swamping Europe. He stamped on ISIS and Al Quaida (as did Saddam Hussein). So 'we' got rid of him/them ! The flood is heading our way, and what are the Camerons of the world doing ?

That's right Nothing to stop the flood ! But doing even more warmongering . Which is what has got us into this whole mess in the first place.

Monday, July 20, 2015

Our 'Establishment' is collapsing - 

Thank God !

60 Minutes Australia: Special Investigation Spies Lords and Predators. Recently Broadcast on Australian TV .

Prime Minister David Cameron only today railed against 'conspiracy theories'. Well, here is another conspiracy theory Cameron !

Sunday, July 19, 2015

John Tyndall Died 10 Years Ago Today

gr-jtspeech2



Ten years ago – on 19th July 2005 – John Tyndall, editor of Spearhead, founder of the British National Party and chairman of the National Front during its most successful era, died at his home in Hove aged 71.
With hindsight we can see that the last chance of rescuing the BNP died with John Tyndall.  The tragedy of the BNP’s multiple splits and factional bitterness has recently been replayed as tawdry farce, with the former girlfriend of one of the party’s drug-dealing leaders giving sordid revelations to ‘anti-fascists’ about cocaine abuse and fraud at the BNP’s national headquarters.
Let us instead remember the BNP built up by John Tyndall, which for a brief moment promised to arrest our nation’s decline into decadence, multiculturalism and alien domination.
John Tyndall’s memory stands as a beacon of hope for nationalists, long after those who seized control of his party have passed into tragicomic irrelevance.

http://efp.org.uk/john-tyndall-died-10-years-ago-today/

Thursday, July 16, 2015




Remember the British victims
of Zionist Terrorism
E.g.: the King David Hotel, Lord Moyne, Sgts Paice and Martin etc.

There are two events on:
Saturday 1st August 2015
which we ask you to attend and support.
These events have been initiated by the


Forgotten British Heroes Campaign


(1) at 4.00pm
Wreath-laying and short open-air meeting
near the site of a Zionist bomb outrage at
the British Colonial Club in Trafalgar Square
[see assembly place details below]

(2) at 6.00pm
Indoor Meeting and video presentation

Meeting Chairman:
Jez Turner
who, until recently a soldier in the British Army, will open the meeting
with introductory comments on the need to study Zionist terrorism in
the 1940s because its techniques are the model — and the provocation —
for the wave of terrorism which is sweeping the world today

Speakers:

Richard Edmonds:
On the theme: In the ongoing and future wars between the state of Israel
and the Arab/Muslim world, Great Britain should be strictly neutral.
Britain owes Israel nothing.

Lady Michèle Renouf:
will show her film of unique interviews on
British victims of the Zionist terror groups

Martin Webster:
How the ‘Establishment’ frustrated the attempt to have
the war criminal and terrorist Menachem Begin arrested
when he visited the UK as Israel’s Prime Minister in 1977

Peter Rushton:
The history of Zionist terrorism against British servicemen,
diplomats and other Crown servants — perpetrated in tandem
with genocidal ethnic cleansing atrocities against the Palestinians

Literature stalls + post-meeting Social

RV will operate from 5pm 5.30pm.
  Phone from 9am onwards on the day for details of meeting and wreath laying
07917 921734




Forgotten British Heroes Campaign
PO Box 301, Carshalton, Surrey SM5 4QW
Tel: 07932 049019
<
forgottenbritishheroes@inbox.com>

Invitation

You are cordially invited to attend an outdoor and an indoor event
in central London on

Saturday 1st August

which we have organised to honour the memories of British servicemen
and women and civilian personnel who were murdered or mutilated by

Zionist terrorists

after the Second World War, both in Palestine and here in Britain, whose sacrifice
is being deliberately expunged from the historical record by corrupt politicians of
all the main parties who now grovel to Zionist billionaires for financial patronage.
We especially seek to honour the memories of:

The 20 year old British Army Sergeants Mervyn Paice and Clifford Martin
who were kidnapped and then hanged by piano wire
in Netanya, Palestine, on 31st July 1947;

• the 100 British Mandate officers and civilians murdered by a huge bomb
at the King David Hotel, Jerusalem, on 22nd July 1946;

Rex Farran — brother of Captain Roy Farran DSO, MC, an SAS
anti-terrorism specialist — who opened a letter-bomb addressed to
“R. Farran” at the Farran family home in May 1948;

• Those injured and maimed by a bomb detonated at the former
British Colonial Club in Trafalgar Square, London, on 7th March 1947.
 
Please be at the Edith Cavell Memorial statue,
which is in the north-east corner of Trafalgar Square
(near the site of the former British Colonial Club)
at 4.00pm on Saturday 1st August.

Please bring bring Union Jacks and the flags of
England, N. Ireland, Scotland and Wales
— but no other flags or banners.

There will be a wreath-laying near the site of the former Colonial Club and then a
short open-air public meeting. We will expose the Zionists as the inventors of
contemporary terrorist techniques and exponents of genocidal war crimes against the
indigenous people of Palestine which began with the massacre of villagers at
Deir Yassin on 10th April 1948, and which continue with the recent mass
slaughters of mainly civilian Palestinians in Gaza and
on the illegally-occupied West Bank.
 
You are then invited to join us at a
private indoor meeting
in West London
which starts at 6.00pm

The theme of the meeting will be:

“Zionist Terrorism — Yesterday and Today”

There will be video presentation and speeches which explore Zionist terrorism in greater detail.

A redirection service will operate from 9.00am on the day of these events
(Saturday 1st August) on the following mobile phone number -
07917 921734
We look forward to your support and your company at either
— or hopefully both — these important events.

Yours faithfully,

Martin Webster  ·  Richard Edmonds  · Lady Michèle Renouf  ·  Jez Turner  ·  Peter Rushton
for:
Forgotten British Heroes Campaign




Grenfell Tower fire: Undocumented migrants could still be missing Campaigners call for immigration status amnesty amid c...