Jews open doors for Obama
made Jewish leaders an early stop at every stage in his political
In his first run for the Illinois Senate in 1996, he sought the backing
of Alan Solow, a top Chicago lawyer. Eight years later, running for the U.S. Senate — long before he became the shoo-in, when he was running in a Democratic field packed with a dozen candidates,
including some Jews — one of his first meetings was with Robert
Schrayer,a top Jewish philanthropist in Chicago.
When he launched his campaign for the Democratic presidential
nomination in late 2006, he named as his fund-raising chief Alan
Solomont, the Boston Jewish philanthropist who helped shepherd
Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) to the Democratic candidacy in 2004.
Israel Public Affairs Committee, last March to deliver his presidential
candidacy's first foreign policy speech."Some of my earliest and most ardent supporters came from the Jewish community in Chicago," Obama told JTA in 2004, after his keynote speech galvanized the Democratic convention in Boston.
Chicago."My support within in the Jewish community has been much more significant than my support within the Muslim community," Obama
said at the April forum, adding: "I welcome and seek the support
of the Muslim and Arab communities."
early in his campaign.His rock-star status as well as the relationships Obama has built in the community have helped avoided murmurings about his otherwise notable divergences from pro-Israel orthodoxies.Does not rule out attack on IranIn his AIPAC speech, for example, Obama favored diplomacy as a means of confronting Iran's suspected nuclear weapons program.
"While we should take no option, including military action, off the
table, sustained and aggressive diplomacy combined with tough
sanctions should be our primary means to prevent Iran from building
nuclear weapons," he said.AIPAC does not oppose diplomacy in engaging Iran, but dislikes it as an emphasis, believing that talks could buy the Iranian regime bomb-making time.
candidate attending AIPAC's policy forum in Washington — drawing
away onlookers from Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.), although
she outpolls Obama among Jewish voters.
security, and the United States government and an Obama
presidency cannot ask Israel to take risks with respect to its
That can’t be our long-term aspiration."Early in his campaign, he handily killed an Israel-related controversy in its early stages. At a chat he had said that "no one has suffered more than the Palestinians."Blame the leadership was what he meant, he later explained: "What
I said was, nobody has suffered more than the Palestinian people
from the failure of the Palestinian leadership to recognize Israel,
to renounce violence and to get serious about negotiating peace
and security for the region," Obama said during an MSNBC debate.
extra mile in areas where he agrees with groups such as AIPAC.
assist US states that choose to divest from Iran. His top Middle
East adviser is Dennis Ross, who had the job during the Clinton
administration and who has since principally blamed the Palestinian
leadership for the failure of the Oslo peace process. Fine-tunes stance with Israeli governmentAnd in recent speeches, Obama tweaked his pro-Israel rhetoric to echo the recent drive by the Israeli government and pro-Israel groups to insist on recognition of Israel as a Jewish state."I think everyone knows what the basic outlines of an agreement would look like," he said in a speech redistributed by his campaign.
"It would mean that the Palestinians would have to reinterpret the
notion of right of return in a way that would preserve Israel as a
Jewish state. It might involve compensation and other concessions
from the Israelis, but ultimately Israel is not going to give up its state."
commitments, and is on a first name basis with two of the top
Jewish religious lobbyists in Washington — Rabbi David Saperstein
of the Reform movement and Nathan Diament, who represents
the Orthodox Union.But that connection is not enough to supplant Clinton among Jewish voters. In a recent American Jewish Committee poll, his favorable rating was 38 percent, while hers was 53 percent.
her. Her years as first lady and as senator have made her a more
familiar presence among Jews. Public policy groups are likelier to favor
her uncompromising approach to pushing universal health care, as
opposed to Obama's appeal to build consensus on the issue.Obama's appeal is in his broader vision, according to Solomont."This election will be about change: a change in government and
the way politics is conducted," he told JTA last May. "There is a
connection between gridlock and the smallness of our politics." http://www.cjnews.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=13849&Itemid=86