A person still within the relatively high ranks of the BNP, has asked us to pose two questions. The first being brought about after reading the EiE blog and Ian Dawsons comments on his resignation email. We Quote:
“Deliberately Leaked Resignation Email
Nick Griffin has accused me of deliberately leaking my resignation email, which he claims contained disgraceful lies and misinformation. I can honestly say that I did not leak that email to anyone. That is the honest truth and people can have my word on it. (That is my word Nick, not your word, as the former can be taken as gospel the latter should not be trusted). Also the resignation letter did not contain any lies (you seem to think that the claim about Mark making money from leaflets is libellous, yet I never said I could prove it with firm evidence, just that I would ‘stake my life on it’ based on the things which I had seen, heard and experienced – and Mark Collett HAS made money from leaflets in the past. There is a difference and as Mark’s reputation would unlikely suffer, being as low as it is, then your claim for libel (don’t forget you have libelled me and both you and Collett have slandered me with your Searchlight/State Asset and various other accusations) does not stack up – though feel free to try it as my legal representative would have a field day with that one. The email was an internal email and was sent through the proper channels to AC members only.”
The second, because he knows, Mark Collett uploaded pornographic material to the Internet of Nick Griffins bodyguard, Mr Martin Reynolds, and which is now in wide and embarrassing circulation.
The BNP member wants to know why, Mr Nicholas Griffin clings to Mark Collett, because this BNP member claims to know that it was, Mark Collett who forwarded the Ian Dawson email to the opposition.
So, because this member would be expelled were he to ask himself, we shall ask for him.
WHY IS MARK COLLETT HANDING INTERNAL EMAILS TO THE REDS, MR GRIFFIN?