Wednesday, October 29, 2008


Suspected Holocaust denier wins his legal fight against extradition


Fred Tobin wins battle !

on 29th October 2008

Dr Gerald Toben today won his fight against extradition to Germany where he is wanted for publishing anti-Semitic material on his website
Suspected 'Holocaust denier' Dr Gerald Toben today won his fight against extradition to Germany where he is wanted for publishing anti-Semitic material on his website.
Dr Toben, 64, a prominent Australian academic, is wanted to stand trial for posting the alleged diatribes between 2000 and 2004.
The German authorities claim they are 'of an anti-Semitic and/or revisionist nature'.
In the European Arrest Warrant issued in October 2004, he is accused of approving of or playing down the murder of the Jews by the Nazis.
But District Judge Daphne Wickham ruled the warrant invalid as it contains inadequate detail about the offences.
It neither states the name of the website nor where the propaganda is said to have been published from - merely referring to the 'world-wide internet'.
After discharging Toben, Judge Wickham granted him bail pending an appeal by the German authorities.
But he was not expected to be released today, after she imposed a series of strict conditions including a £100,000 security.
Grey wavy-haired Toben, smartly dressed in a suit, appeared pleased on hearing the judge's decision from the glass-fronted dock at City of Westminster Magistrates' Court.
The public gallery was packed with his supporters.

Judge Wickham rejected an argument from Melanie Cumberland, for the German authorities, that the required information could be acquired.
The judge said: 'Compliance, in my view, cannot be fulfilled by a drip-feed of information as and when the issuing authority provides it.
'I find that the particulars are vague and imprecise, I find the warrant invalid and therefore discharge the defendant.'

She added that she had not been required to decide at this stage whether the alleged crimes were valid extradition offences.
Toben has been in custody since October 1, when he was arrested at Heathrow Airport on a flight from America, on his way to Dubai.
He was refused bail at that time because it was feared he could easily evade the authorities.
Ms Cumberland opposed bail today but Ben Watson, defending, successfully argued it would be 'abhorrent' to keep him behind bars any longer.
His other bail conditions include residence at an approved address, written confirmation from the Australian High Commission of which passports he holds, and not to access the internet.
He is also banned from giving press interviews. These were safeguards 'to prevent any public order act offences', said Judge Wickham.
Toben claims he will not get a fair trial in Germany.
The controversial author was reportedly jailed in 1999 at Mannheim prison for breaching Germany's Holocaust Law Section 130, prohibiting anyone from 'defaming the dead'.
Toben's Adelaide Institute website has drawn criticism for many years.
In 2000 he fought an order by the Human Rights and Equal Opportunities Commission in Australia to remove its 'offensive' content.
The commission claimed it breached Australia's Racial Discrimination Act.
Toben completed his Dr of Philosophy course at the University of Stuttgart in 1977 and taught in schools and colleges all over the world.
He founded the Adelaide Institute and is the author of 10 books on education, political science and history.
When his Heathrow plane was cleared of passengers flamboyant Toben moved seats which officers suspected was a bid to evade detection.
When cautioned he replied: 'You can't arrest me on British soil.' At an earlier hearing he accused the 'world press' of wrongly portraying him as 'horrible, terrible, vicious' and said: 'I must respond to that, because this is nonsense.'

Attempting to reassure the court he would not jump bail, he added: 'The world is my prison.
'I'm well known and to suggest there's no honour in my person is to slander me.'

Toben went on to claim he could not be tried in Germany due to 'double jeopardy', referring to ongoing proceedings on the same issue in Adelaide.
He also suggested the new warrant was a re-hash of the old matters he was convicted of in 1999 but with a 'cyber-crime' veneer.
Toben appeared to admit he left Germany without serving his prison sentence after paying 6,000 Deutschmarks for bail.
He said: 'I can't defend myself in Germany because if I open my mouth the prosecutor says I'm in contempt.'
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1081579/Suspected-Holocaust-denier-wins-legal-fight-extradition.html
NWN: This is only a partial victory as Dr.Tobin was released on £100,000 bail.

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

Hoorah!

Anonymous said...

This is a Victory! I was in court today to witness the proceedings. David Irving, Lady Renouf and Dr Toben's heroic solicitor Kevin Lowry-Mullins gave excellent interviews to the Australian TV crew and journalists outside of the court. The two state prosecutors Gareth Julian & Melanie Cumberland left the court building heads bowed looking very glum and unhappy and didn't wished to interviewed or photographed by the media!

Anonymous said...

No mention as far as I know from British TV . I wonder why ...

The state prosecutors should be ashamed of themselves. Let shame be on their heads and on their descendants. They are intelligent people they should know the truth...

Anonymous said...

Excellent news.

Anonymous said...

'I find that the particulars are vague and imprecise, I find the warrant invalid and therefore discharge the defendant.'

What went wrong?

According to one Jewish source, the warrant deliberately avoided greater detail in order to ensure Toben's extradition.

Anonymous said...

It seems that the grounds for his release were based upon omissions and errors in the German warrant.
Will the Germans be allowed to present a fresh (corrected and therefore valid) warrant for their appeal?

ENGLISHMAN said...

Surely if the warrant is invalid there is no case to answer and mr toben should be freed immediately,irrespective of any "appeal" by the german eussr.He is guilty of no crime in England ,so therefore he should be a free man today,why not?