Book challenged at Kohrs Library In Deer Lodge By Pat Hansen for The Montana Standard - 03/31/2009DEER LODGE — A personal memoir has been challenged and a request made to have the book removed from the William K. Kohrs Library in Deer Lodge.The book, challenged by Greg Gerdes of Deer Lodge, is "For Those I Loved," by Martin Gray. The book is a New York Times best-seller first published by Little, Brown & Co. in 1972 and read by more than 30 million people worldwide, according to Barnes & Noble Web site.In it, Gray, a Polish Jew, tells of how he survived the German invasion, recalls his life in the Warsaw ghetto and Treblinka concentration camp, where his mother and brothers died, his life in the Soviet Army, and the building of a new life in the United States.In accordance with Kohrs Library policy regarding complaints and censorship, librarian Nancy Silliman read the challenged book and informed Gerdes that she had decided to retain the book in question. Gerdes then appealed her decision to the library board.Board chairman David Gregory said the board held a hearing to gather information. At that time, Gerdes allegedly claimed the author witnessing the Treblinka concentration camp holocaust is untrue and the book is anti-German hate propaganda.During the hearing Gerdes presented a statement and showed the board $5,000 in cash saying he would donate it to the library if any one can prove there were graves at Treblinka.A business card Gerdes gave the board indicates he is president of the National Association of Forensic Historians dedicated to "exposing historical fraud via the scientific method." No phone number was included on the card, but the association's Web site stated, "No matter what anyone thinks about the holocaust per se, one thing is eminently clear — the Treblinka holocaust didn't happen." It goes on to say there is no proof of mass graves, no indication that bodies were burned and that Treblinka was a transit camp where the gas chambers were, in reality, delousing facilities.
Peggy Kerr, president of the Friends of the Library, spoke against banning or censorship at the information- gathering meeting.
John Thompson, a Deer Lodge resident, described the library as a place of choices for the community, saying American people have a right to choose what they want to read.
Gregory said the board is not judging the book nor its contents, but will decide the issue based on three criteria: the library's collection management policy, the basic premise of intellectual freedom, and the first amendment of the U.S. Constitution that guarantees freedom of speech and of the press.
The board will decide the issue at a public meeting at 5 p.m. Thursday, April 16, in the Kohrs Library.
Correspondent Pat Hansen may be reached via e-mail at phansen@blackfoot.net.
NWN:
Thank you to the NWN poster for this story
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
NWN has been talking to a top English Defence League official . Don't even think NWN follows that 'Tommy Robinson' bloke, or h...
-
Someone has just tried to post the link to this website on here, we have deleted it. WARNING 2008 list online WTF is going on at the BNP ? ...
27 comments:
THEY THINK WE ARE BRAIN DEAD!!
Goldstone to head UNHRC Gaza inquiry
By Ron Kampeas · April 3, 2009
(JTA) -- A Jewish South African with close ties to Israel will head a U.N. inquiry into war crimes during Israel's recent war with Hamas in the Gaza Strip.
Richard Goldstone, a trustee of Hebrew University, will head the commission appointed Friday by the U.N.'s Human Rights Council.
Israel did not say whether it will cooperate; it has in the past ignored other UNHRC probes, noting the body's tendency to single out Israel for criticism while ignoring other major violators.
Goldstone, who headed war crimes prosecutions in Rwanda and the former Yugoslavia, said he would investigate alleged war crimes by both sides.
"It's in the interest of the victims," Goldstone said in Geneva, where the UNHRC is headquartered. "It brings acknowledgment of what happened to them. It can assist the healing process."
He said his Jewishness and ties to Israel were added values. "I've taken a deep interest in what happens in Israel," he said. "I'm associated with organizations that have worked in Israel. And I believe I can approach the daunting task that I have accepted in an evenhanded and impartial manner."
Joining him on the commission are Christine Chinkin, a British professor of international law; Pakistani lawyer Hina Jilani; and retired Irish Army Col. Desmond Travers.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3CzLrs2bxg&eurl=http%3A%2F%2
Power of the media.
Media ‘boost bogus Shoah tales’
From The Jewish Chronicle
James Martin
April 2, 2009
http://thejc.com/articles/media-boost-bogus-shoah-tales%E2%80%99
A world expert on false Holocaust testimonies is concerned that media interest in Shoah accounts is encouraging people to fabricate stories.
Professor Sue Vice, of Sheffield University, has suggested that the current popularity of “misery memoirs”, or mis-lit, has created a situation where “accounts of suffering are very marketable”.
Giving the annual Holocaust lecture at Royal Holloway University’s Holocaust Research Centre, Professor Vice argued that the media, “intrigued by the Holocaust, may be a factor behind false accounts”.
She described two types of false testimony: those that are totally invented, such as Binjamin Wilkomirski’s Fragment: Memories of a Wartime Childhood, and those which, while authentic accounts, have had incidents added to them.
Speaking about the psychological motives and delusions of “Holocaust envy”, whereby writers embellish their stories to make their accounts more marketable, she cited Herman Rosenblatt’s Angel at the Fence, in which he concocted events to add a romantic love story to his Holocaust experience.
“The process by which he came to invent it reveals the pressure of the media. In fact, the book was marketed in a way that gave preference to the love story over the Holocaust.”
Following the talk, an audience member suggested that errors in later testimonies might be attributed to lapses in memory.
Kitty Hart, a survivor and author of the memoir Return to Auschwitz — who was also present — suggested that accounts written as recently as 2009 must be suspect. But the suggestion was refuted by another guest who said survivors of traumatic events, such as the First World War, sometimes only spoke about their experiences at the end of their lives.
A world expert on false Holocaust testimonies is concerned that media interest in Shoah accounts is encouraging people to fabricate stories.....
TRUE EVER SOOOOOOOO TRUE!!!
ENOUGH SAID!!!!
As a retired Metropolitan Police Inspector I believe the documents, the entry in the register and the Mail on Sunday article, provide sufficient evidence to warrant a criminal investigation against Mr Cohen for the offence of fraud by false representation, contrary to Section 2 of the Fraud Act, 2006.”
Mr Barnbrook pointed out that Mr Cohen has claimed the full additional costs allowance since 1990. “If this is correct it means he has claimed £310,714 in total.”
Mr Barnbrook first offered the information to Mr Simon Walters, a journalist working for the Daily Mail. “The Mail on Sunday will probably print the article tomorrow,” he said. “I asked Mr Walters to give our party some publicity for launching the complaint. Mr Walters, who was very polite and grateful for the story, stated that we might not get a mention due to the fact that Mr Cohen is Jewish and that it thus might not be good for the BNP,” Mr Barnbrook said.
“This is, of course, nonsense, and has nothing to do with the fact that Mr Cohen is Jewish or not. This has to do with the ruling elite’s arrogance and the daylight robbery being perpetrated on the taxpaying public by members of all three parliamentary parties. The BNP is proud to be at the forefront of exposing them all.”
Opps!!
The Great Power
There are countless stories of fear instilled in people using incredible tools and technology. Countless stories of war, disease and pestilence. Countless homeless people everywhere with their numbers growing every day. We are told more war is needed, more pointless battles to fight imaginary enemies. And wars to fight tiny enemies whose real size has been blown completely out of proportion. Apparently tiny enemies can multiply like rabbits, even in caves with no women around. These mighty phantoms of smoke stand ready to take on the most powerful nations in the world. We must believe that terrorists apparently don't have bills, families, jobs, the need to eat , crap or have any day to day concerns. They must be super-human.
I said back in 2001 that time would prove the lie that terrorism doesn't really exist. I also said that nothing more would happen. The only acts of terrorism after September 2001 until April 2009 involved the stock market and anthrax. Both of these were government created. Even Dr. Thomas Barnett, political scientist and consultant to the pentagon, stated more than five years ago in a very public speech televised from the pentagon that these are "Horizontal events that can be built upon." He had a large wall screen multimedia display which showed this graphically, too.
Many great countries in the world have attacked themselves in one form or another to manipulate their people. When done correctly it works every time. The citizens will clamor looking to their government for help, not realizing they are embracing the enemy.
Today, there is fear around every corner. Members of armed forces stand guard at airports with machine guns, seemingly ready to spray lead at the slightest provocation. Taking pictures of tall buildings is forbidden in some cities, as though there is some kind of advantage for an imagined terrorist to have such photos. Yet these photos are available on-line and have been for years. So what if someone takes a picture? But it isn't about preventing an attack. This is really about creating fear, and it works.
People today barely notice the clever editing performed in many old movies and past television shows. These often surface after having not been in video rental stores or for sale since release. Editing and computer technology have provided an easy means to put the word "terrorist" into old TV shows and movies. Usually this word is heard by a lead character who utters it off-camera. Yet few notice these patterns unless they are looking for it.
Most people know the story about Pavlov's dogs. He found that if he electrically shocked a dog it would foam at the mouth. When he rang a bell at the same time he shocked the dog, eventually the dog would have an association of the bell and electric shock so engrained that it would foam at the mouth by only hearing the bell ring.
Similar conditioning techniques work on human beings, too. That's what boot camps are all about. But there's more to it.
War veterans, who have been subjected to enemy mortar fire in battles, become trained and conditioned to hit the ground immediately when a mortar shell comes down. The idea is to do this quickly enough before the shell lands and explodes to avoid the deadly flying shrapnel. When these men come home, for some of this is so engrained that a back-firing vehicle will make them hit the ground. Known as shell-shock, this is rarely seen anymore. Modern electronic ignition systems have eliminated back-firing in vehicles.
People in debt can be sickened by the ring of a doorbell. The visitor could be a bill collector or process server handing them a summons for a debt they cannot possibly pay. They only need to have this happen once or twice to condition them. Even a ringing phone can be a source of great stress since it is a bill collector's favorite tool. These people use an answering machine or caller ID to screen their calls.
Even a television is a conditioning tool as it trains the mind to think a certain way. A sixty second commercial production company (they make those commercials with a blue screen at the end) told me something interesting years ago. They stated that statistically a viewer needs to see a commercial about six times or more, before it clicks in a viewer's head. Then they will pick up a phone to place an order. Now you know why that green lizard is on television everywhere. That one is way past six thousand times.
Yet few consider the tremendous cost of advertising and that the insurance subscriber is heavily subsidizing it. Even fewer know the ease that an insurance company can now raise rates on policy holders, even on a monthly basis in some cases. You start out cheap, and end paying more than you did before you switched to them. Some things that appear to be a deal are not. The grass is always greener on the other side
Whether it's a terrorist around every corner or a seemingly harmless green lizard, the average person is assaulted many times every day by a barrage of mind-controlling BS. It comes in waves through all forms of the media, even on the web.
What about a deep hole and several cubic yards of concrete to be isolated from it? Imagine a man who stands in such a hole and pays off a driver to flip the lever on the cement truck to bury him in concrete. Soon the weight of it is so great that he cannot move his arms and legs. Then his cell phone rings and it's a company selling windows for a home he doesn't even own.
The answer here isn't avoidance, but awareness. It's about making family members and children truly know they are heavily, and I do mean HEAVILY manipulated. There are armies of psychologists hired by big corporations and they know precisely how to push most anyone's button. But like psychological warfare, all this mind control only works on the unsuspecting and the un-informed.
It brings tears to my eyes and others to see the staggering amount of suffering in the world. Who cannot see it and not be moved? A food ministry television commercial asking for contributions shows a long line of people waiting at a semi for food and they are all Americans standing in an American parking lot.
What has America been reduced to? Many have said for years and still continue to say, "Things are going to get bad." Clearly they don't realize that everything has already gone bad, but reached a new low of badness. Watching things "get bad" is equivalent to watching the hour hand on a clock. Its movement is barely perceptible, unless you have a long time to stare at it. But it happens slowly and surely.
It doesn't matter if the goal is to make people live in fear and terror, want a world government, go buy temporarily cheap insurance or buy a chamois cloth that soaks up gallons of grape juice.
It's all about conditioning the mind to be receptive to the message and not about truth. Always has been, always will be.
In fact, if one examines the ways people are manipulated and controlled from organized religions to government controlled events, you'll quickly see the pattern.
Only then can you wake up from the bad dream.
http://incogman.wordpress.com/2009/02/16/whats-the-big-deal-about-the-holocaust/
ITS WAKE UP TIME!!!!
PARIS (AP) - A Paris appeals court has handed the head of a black supremacist group an eight-month suspended sentence over remarks in which he called Auschwitz «heaven on earth.
Stellio Capochichi had been convicted in 2007 on charges including provoking racial hatred and handed a one-month prison sentence for comments posted on a Web site.
Capochichi wrote that actions by «Zionists» at the International Monetary Fund make life in Africa so difficult that «the Auschwitz concentration camp appears (by comparison) like heaven on earth.
A prosecutor asked the appeals court to sentence Capochichi, who goes by the name Kemi Seba and founded the Tribu Ka group, to a six-month prison sentence.
Anti-discrimination group SOS Racisme expressed disappointment with Thursday's ruling.
http://aangirfan.blogspot.com/2009/04/pentagon-controls-eu.html
Hate preacher Abu Qatada smuggles out jihadist rallying cry from high-security British jail
Hate preacher: Abu Qatada has issued a 6,000 word rally cry to his followers from jail
Extremist cleric Abu Qatada has issued a 6,000-word statement to his followers from inside one of Britain's high security prisons.
The letter was reportedly smuggled out of Long Lartin high-security jail, Worcestershire, and is circulating on jihadi websites.
The 48-year-old Palestinian preacher praises the Mujahidin and the 'martyrs of Hamas' and claims his treatment is helping to radicalise a new generation of young British Muslims.
In the statement he says: ' A new generation of the Muslim youth has been raised and especially amongst our brothers who originate from the Indian subcontinent, who were no longer mesmerised by the English authority, nor English values - rather they hate it and they know its enmity towards them, so they have become enemies towards it.'
He also boasts that prison has helped him lose more than 50lb in weight and he has been cured of diabetes and back problems.
The cleric claims that Bilal Abdullah, the NHS doctor jailed for the car bomb attacks in London and Glasgow in 2007, told him he was heavily influenced by his taped sermons.
James Brandon, of the Quilliam Foundation, told the Times: 'It is terrifying that Abu Qatada has been allowed to distribute pro-jihadist texts from within British prisons.
'The very reason that Abu Qatada has been detained is because he has threatened public safety by inciting terrorism and violence.
'Yet the Prison Service appears powerless to prevent him from continuing to incite violence and hatred from behind bars.'
Quatada is considered one of the most dangerous Muslim hate preachers and classified as a high-risk Category A prisoner.
High-security jail: Abu Qatada is currently being held at HM Prison Long Lartin near Evesham, Worcestershire
He arrived in Britain on a false passport in 1993 and was originally arrested in 2001, but was released soon after.
He was eventually detained under emergency anti terror laws in October 2002.
He is currently being held pending deportation to Jordan, where he has been convicted in his absence for involvement in terrorist attacks.
Qatada is being held in an isolation unit while all his telephone calls and letters are monitored.
A Prison Service spokesman said: 'This prisoner has absolutely no access to the internet and cannot personally contribute to websites.
'However, we are unable to prevent third parties from publishing information which is, or claims to be, on other people's behalf or in their name.'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6m6ZxpDkRM&eurl=http%3A%2F%2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6m6ZxpDkRM&eurl=http%3A%2F%2
As a retired Metropolitan Police Inspector I believe the documents, the entry in the register and the Mail on Sunday article, provide sufficient evidence to warrant a criminal investigation against Mr Cohen for the offence of fraud by false representation, contrary to Section 2 of the Fraud Act, 2006.”
Mr Barnbrook pointed out that Mr Cohen has claimed the full additional costs allowance since 1990. “If this is correct it means he has claimed £310,714 in total.”
Mr Barnbrook first offered the information to Mr Simon Walters, a journalist working for the Daily Mail. “The Mail on Sunday will probably print the article tomorrow,” he said. “I asked Mr Walters to give our party some publicity for launching the complaint. Mr Walters, who was very polite and grateful for the story, stated that we might not get a mention due to the fact that Mr Cohen is Jewish and that it thus might not be good for the BNP,” Mr Barnbrook said.
“This is, of course, nonsense, and has nothing to do with the fact that Mr Cohen is Jewish or not. This has to do with the ruling elite’s arrogance and the daylight robbery being perpetrated on the taxpaying public by members of all three parliamentary parties. The BNP is proud to be at the forefront of exposing them all.”
Opps!!
04 April 2009 21:44
.....................................
Well,you would certaimly know about corruption wouldn't you!!!
Another mason i think.
BBC EXPOSED YET AGAIN!!
CP BBC Merseyside Radio biased interview with Brian Gerrish (see full archive article) (02/04/2009)
BBC and Media
So rattled is Common Purpose by the steady leak of information revealing its political agenda and huge fees taken from the taxpayer, that they have now apparently enlisted the BBC to manage their tawdry image. Brian Gerrish was recently invited to speak concerning CP on BBC Radio Mersyside on Friday 27 March 2009 after the Presenter Roger Phillips linked his name with the BNP. Mr Phillips claimed that he was only able to find material by Brian Gerrish on the BNP's website. This is despite the fact that a single entry of the name Brian Gerrish in Google produces hundreds of linked articles and talks. Brian complained at the BBC bias and was quickly invited onto the Friday lunchtime show apparently to star the local Liverpool Common Purpose Director Ken Pye.
On the day, and not surprisingly, Mr Pye was 'unable' to appear. This left Roger Phillips to attempt to discredit Brian Gerrish. Normal tactics were used including suggestions of 'conspiracy theory', BNP and claims that Common Purpose was 'suffering' under Freedom of Information requests from the public. But why was Mr Phillips so keen to defend and support Common Purpose?
Aside from the fact that hundreds of BBC senior staff have been Common Purpose trained at £3950 plus VAT each (see BBC and media Archive of this site), Mr Phillips is a regular participant in Liverpool Common Purpose net-working events, alongside none other than Mr Ken Pye. Using license payers money on air Mr Phillips was happy to make claims trying to highlight the honesty and probity of Common Purpose although he had no documents or evidence to support his claims. Phillips apparently made further supportive claims for Common purpose after Brian Gerrish had left the show. Is this what the BBC is for...Common Purpose advertising? Mr Phillips had also failed to look at any of the documentary evidence on this site. So the interview was again biased. Welcome to Common Purpose control of the media. The interview will be posted on this site shortly. See the BBC Media Archive section on cpexposed.com for a copy of a Phillips / Pye Common Purpose event.
http://judicial-inc.biz/Irma_Grese_by_redirect.htm
http://judicial-inc.biz/1.o.Zio_IQ_book.htm
http://www.cpexposed.com/archive/results.php?city=Lancashire
http://judicial-inc.biz/R_adical_gays.htm
http://www.zundelsite.org/
THE HOAX WILL FALL!!
It must be considered very likely that it was human beings who must have been gassed.”
Yes, it "must" have been this way because Jewish propaganda has committed itself to saying that this is the way it was, regardless of the mounting evidence to the contrary. They have painted themselves into a corner, which forces them to continually parade in front of the public more phony 'evidence' explained with unsubstantiated innuendo.
James Baker, the former U.S. Secretary of State admitted as much when he stated that once the U.S. had committed itself to the unreality of the WWII war propaganda, there was no way they could turn around and correct themselves:
"We painted Hitler as a monster, a devil. And that's why we could not move away from that portrayal after the war. We had mobilized the masses against the devil incarnate. And so we were forced to continue in this satanic scenario after the war. We could not possibly have explained to our people that the war had actually been only a preventative economic measure."
--Baker, James Addison (1930- ), Secretary of State of the United States of America, (Quoted in the German news magazine 'Der Spiegel,' issue 13/1992.
http://www.holocaustdenialvideos.com/
MORE ON HOAXING!!
Race Suicide
by the late Dr. William Pierce
Hello!
With the end of the year at hand this seems like a good time to sum
things up. Before we sum up the past year, though, let's look at the
past century. The salient feature of the 20th century was the collective
suicide of the White race. In 1900 we ruled the world. We ruled
politically, militarily, culturally, economically, scientifically, and
in every other way. No other race even came close. We ruled India and
Africa directly, and China was for all practical purposes an economic
colony of Europe and America. The Chinese Emperor remained on his throne
only so long as he let White men have their way in China. Japan was the
only non-White nation of any significance which even had pretensions of
autonomy.
We had superior weapons, superior armed forces, superior communications,
superior transportation, superior agriculture and industry, superior
standards of health, superior organization, superiority in every facet
of science and technology. We had the best universities -- really, the
only universities worthy of the name -- the best engineers. We built
things that other races couldn't even imagine. We explored, we
conquered, we ruled.
More important than anything else was our moral superiority -- and
please don't misunderstand my use of that term. I don't mean that we
were meek and inoffensive and turned the other cheek. I mean that we
were proud and self-confident. We knew who we were, and we knew that we
were far, far better than anyone else, and we weren't at all embarrassed
by the fact that we were better. We recognized racial differences in the
same way we recognized that the sun rises in the east, and we felt not
the slightest need to apologize to anyone for that. Egalitarianism was a
moral and mental disease that afflicted only a few of our people,
despite the murderous outburst of egalitarian insanity that was the
French Revolution a century earlier. Any sort of racial mixing was
abhorrent to us. We looked on miscegenation with the same disgust and
disapproval as on bestiality or necrophilia. We didn't tolerate it. And
we didn't accept or trust Jews. That was our situation a century ago.
We did have some faults, however: some very serious faults. We were not
vigilant. We were so confident in our superiority that we failed to heed
the warnings of the few among us who were vigilant. We didn't pay
attention when a few warned us, "Hey, we'd better do something about the
race problem. We have nine million non-Whites in the United States,
according to the 1900 census, and in the future they could become a real
problem for us. Let's start getting rid of them now."
We thought, "Well, as long as they stay on their side of town and stay
out of sight, how can they be a problem for us? Besides, they're useful
for picking cotton and as cleaning women and cooks and gardeners."
And when a few warned us about the Jews we also didn't pay attention. A
few warned us about the damage the Jews had done to us in the past,
about their malevolence, about their growing wealth, but most of us
didn't take the warnings seriously. We saw the Jews as obnoxious and
unpleasant people, and we didn't let them into our private clubs and our
better hotels, but we didn't consider them really dangerous. We didn't
even become alarmed when they began buying up our newspapers and
elbowing their way into other propaganda media.
And lack of vigilance wasn't our only fault. We were too ready to
quarrel with one another. No other race was seen as a threat to ours, so
we felt no need to suppress our internal rivalries and jealousies and
hatreds and form a solid front against the non-White world. We let
fester old rivalries between the English and the Germans and between the
Germans and the French and between the English and the Boers in South
Africa and between those of us who spoke Germanic languages and those of
us who spoke Slavic or Romance languages. We didn't notice our faults,
our weaknesses -- but others did.
The latter half of the 19th century saw not only the beginning of the
acquisition of our mass media by the Jews, but also the nearly
simultaneous hatching of two long-term, murderous conspiracies designed
to exploit our weaknesses and turn them against us. These two
conspiracies were Zionism and Marxism, communism. Some Jews went with
one, some with the other, but both were deadly for us.
The Marxists issued their Communist Manifesto as far back as the middle
of the 19th century, but it was another 50 years before they were able
to have much of an impact on the Gentile world. As for the Zionists,
they also began propagandizing and organizing at about the middle of the
19th century and only became noticeable at the beginning of the 20th
century, when they began having international Zionist congresses and
more or less openly laying their plans to foment wars and revolutions,
of which they could take advantage to promote Jewish interests.
For example, at the Zionist Congress in 1897, in Basel, Switzerland, the
Zionist leader Theodor Herzl told his fellow Jews that they were having
trouble persuading the Turks, who at that time controlled Palestine, to
turn the country over to them, but that the Jewish leaders had plans for
getting around the Turks. And I should mention that Herzl's address to
the 1897 Zionist Congress has been published in a number of places, and
any diligent researcher can dig up a copy. Herzl said, and I quote: "It
may be that Turkey will refuse us or will be unable to understand us.
This will not discourage us. We will seek other means to accomplish our
end. The Orient question is now a question of the day. Sooner or later
it will bring about a conflict among the nations. . . . The great
European war must come. With my watch in hand do I await this terrible
moment. After the great European war is ended the peace conference will
assemble. We must be ready for that time." -- end quote --
Remember, Herzl was talking about the Jews' plans 17 years before the
outbreak of the First World War. But the Jews were ready when the time
came. In 1916, with the war more or less stalemated, they approached
Britain's political leaders and made a deal to bring the United States
into the war on the side of Britain in return for a British promise to
take Palestine away from Turkey and turn it over to the Jews after the
war. The British side of the deal was made public in the so-called
Balfour Declaration. And the Zionists kept their end of the bargain by
working through Jews close to the Democratic President of the United
States, Woodrow Wilson. Wilson had won the election to his second term
in the White House in 1916 by promising America's voters that he would
keep the United States out of the European war. But as soon as he took
office in 1917 he began scheming to get the country into the war on the
side of Britain, which, of course, he did two months later. That cost a
couple of million additional Gentile lives, but it got Palestine for the
Jews -- and it also prolonged the war enough for the Jews in Russia to
topple the czar and get their communist revolution off the ground.
When I said that some Jews took the Marxist route and some the Zionist
route, I didn't mean that all Jews became active workers in one or the
other of those movements. Most Jews remained full-time money-grubbers
and provided propaganda and financial support for their conspiratorial
brethren, continuing to buy up mass media and to dispense capital to the
Zionists or the communists as needed. And they didn't wait for the First
World War for that. The first big Gentile bloodletting of the last
century in which they had a hand was the Boer War in South Africa,
between the British and the Boers. This cruel and murderous war, in
which Jewish capitalists were allied with British capitalists against
South Africa's Dutch and German and French farmers -- the Boers -- laid
the foundations for Jewish control of much of Africa's mineral wealth.
In 1904 the Jewish Wall Street speculator Jacob Schiff, planning ahead
for a communist takeover of Russia, helped to finance the Japanese side
in the Russian-Japanese war and used his influence to block loans to the
Czar's government from America. This was the same Jacob Schiff who a
little more than a decade later provided the Jewish-Bolshevik movement
with an infusion of $25 million to finish the job in Russia: that's $25
million from capitalist Wall Street to finance the communist butchery of
Gentile Russians. In 1917 $25 million was a lot of money; in any case it
bought enough bombs and bullets and communist propaganda leaflets to get
the job done.
Now, none of this Jewish activity was really secret. The lemmings didn't
know about it, because it wasn't in the funny papers or the movies. But
Jews weren't even trying to keep their sympathies or their activities
secret, and observant Gentiles continued to issue warnings to anyone who
would listen. But, as I said a moment ago, we weren't vigilant. White
Americans didn't believe that they were in any danger. Things such as
the deal to bring America into the First World War in return for the
turning of Palestine over to the Jews were too subtle for the American
mind.
After the war the mass murder of Ukrainians and Russians by
Jewish-Bolshevik commissars might possibly have registered with White
Americans except that to the average White American Russians and
Ukrainians weren't real people: they spoke a different language and
dressed differently from us. And besides, by that time the Jews had
gotten a pretty good grip on Hollywood and the broadcasting industry,
and so the only side of the story most Americans were allowed to see or
hear was the Jewish side.
Europeans were more vigilant than Americans. For one thing Europeans had
longer memories: they were more aware of the long history of Jewish
scheming and predation than Americans were. For another thing, in Europe
the danger was quite a bit closer. Communist parties in a number of
European countries besides Russia had taken advantage of the chaos in
the wake of the war to make grabs for power, and in a few countries --
Hungary, for example -- they had succeeded temporarily. People noticed
the ethnicity of the commissars and were horrified by their behavior
toward the Gentile populations. Even in insular Britain no less a public
figure than Winston Churchill spoke out clearly about the danger of
Jewish communism. In a full-page feature article in the February 8,
1920, issue of London's Illustrated Sunday Herald, Churchill wrote, and
I quote:
"This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of
Spartacus-Weisshaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky in
Russia, Bela Kun in Hungary, Rosa Luxembourg in Germany, and Emma
Goldman in the United States, this world-wide conspiracy for the
overthrow of civilization and the reconstitution of society on the basis
of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality
has been steadily growing. It played . . . a definitely recognizable
part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring
of every subversive movement during the nineteenth century; and now at
last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the
great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by
the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed
masters of that enormous empire.
"There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of
Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by
these international and for the most part atheistical Jews. It is
certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the
notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are
Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from
the Jewish leaders. Thus Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his
nominal subordinate Litvinoff, and the influence of Russians like
Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot be compared with the power of Trotsky or
of Zinovieff . . . or of Krassin or Radek -- all Jews. In the Soviet
institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. And the
prominent, if not indeed the principal, part in the system of terrorism
applied by the Extraordinary Commission for Combating Counter-Revolution
[the Cheka] has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by
Jewesses. The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief
period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same
phenomenon has been presented in Germany (especially in Bavaria), so far
as this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration
of the German people. Although in all these countries there are many
non-Jews every whit as bad as the worst of the Jewish revolutionaries,
the part played by the latter in proportion to their numbers in the
population is astonishing." -- end of quote --
Actually, Churchill said quite a bit more in this article about the
dangers of allowing Jewish communism to go unchecked, and if you really
want to make a study of the background of our present mess you should
read the entire article yourself. That's the February 8, 1920, issue of
the Illustrated Sunday Herald. If you can't find it yourself in a large
research library, the entire article is photographically reproduced in
the book The Best of Attack! and National Vanguard Tabloid, which is
available from National Vanguard Books, the sponsor of this program. And
when you do find the article from which I just read -- a major article
written by one of the most prominent personalities of the last century
and published in a major British newspaper -- you might ask yourself why
you had never heard of it before I called it to your attention.
As I said, we lacked vigilance. A few people paid attention -- America's
pioneer automaker Henry Ford, for example -- but most White Americans
were too busy with their ball games and funny papers. And we didn't
really care about what the Jews were doing to White people overseas,
since they weren't Americans. About the only people who really paid
attention were the Germans, who resolved not to let the Jews do to them
what they had done to the Russians and had tried to do to the
Hungarians. So they proceeded to get Rosa Luxembourg and her pals off
their backs and out of Germany. And when the Germans did that, the Jews
in America began screaming bloody murder and calling for another world
war to save them from the Germans. And by this time the Jews had almost
a monopoly on getting their side of the story to the American public.
Well, our people had one other fault in addition to an inadequate sense
of racial solidarity with other Whites around the world and a lack of
vigilance: we also lacked responsible leadership. We lacked even a
system for giving us responsible leadership. What we had were
politicians: skilled liars -- actors, lawyers -- who never asked
themselves, "What policy is good for our people?" but only, "How can I
get elected? What must I promise the people in order to get their votes?
What policy will make me popular?" And as the grip of the Jews on the
mass media, on Hollywood and Madison Avenue -- and therefore on the
minds of the public -- became more and more nearly complete throughout
the last century, the question the politicians asked themselves became,
more and more: "What must I do to please the Jews and gain their
support?"
And so in 1933, in the same year that a German government took office
with a policy of freeing the German people from the grip of the Jews, in
America a government took office with a policy of doing whatever the
Jews wanted done. Franklin Roosevelt surrounded himself with more Jews
than any previous American President. In this regard he was the Bill
Clinton of his day.
Using Roosevelt as their willing tool, the Jews pulled the same sort of
bait-and-switch trick on the American people to get us into the Second
World War that they had pulled using Woodrow Wilson to get us into the
First World War. Just as Wilson had done 24 years earlier, Roosevelt ran
for re-election in 1940 on a campaign promise to keep the United States
out of the war in Europe, and while he was making that promise to the
American people he was actively scheming with his Jewish advisors and
supporters to get the United States into the war as soon as he could,
and meanwhile to keep the war in Europe going by making promises of
support to those countries opposed to Germany.
It was fighting on the wrong side of that war, more than anything else,
which laid us low. It also destroyed the British Empire and laid Britain
low. Throughout the non-White world Whites began abdicating their rule,
withdrawing, apologizing. The disease of egalitarianism spread like
wildfire. There was a moral collapse throughout the White world. It
wasn't just the German people who lost the Second World War; it was all
Europeans, all White people, including European-Americans.
The Jews were the only real winners of the war. The First World War
resulted in opening up Palestine for their Zionist faction and
delivering Russia to their communist faction. The Second World War not
only saved them from Hitler, it delivered all of eastern and much of
central Europe to their communist faction and finished delivering
Palestine to their Zionist faction. The war cost them a million or so of
the less-nimble Jews in Europe, but it gave them the basis for their
enormously profitable "Holocaust" story, with which they have beaten the
White world over the head ever since.
And so today we have George Bush trying to outdo Bill Clinton in
multiculturalizing the government of the United States. Conservative
Americans, patriotic Americans, put their hope in Bush to pull America
back from the insanity of the Clinton era, and the first thing Bush does
is try to ingratiate himself with the Clintonistas, with the Jews, by
appointing non-Whites to the most important posts in his administration.
Read the man's lips. What he's saying is: "Hey, I'm really not such a
bad guy. See, I'm appointing Blacks, I'm appointing Jews, I'm appointing
Mexicans. And the Blacks and Mexicans I'm appointing are just as
pro-Jewish as I am. My tough-talking Black secretary of state speaks
Yiddish and will support Jewish interests around the world just as
strongly as Bill Clinton's Jewish secretary of state has done. You can
trust me. I'll do whatever you tell me. I'll support Israel. I'll
support 'speech crime' laws. I'm your man." And he's not saying that,
he's not making these appointments, because that's what Republicans want
or even what Americans want. It's what the Jews want. George Bush is a
hollow man, an empty man.
And George Bush is a splendid symbol of the state of our race today: a
splendid symbol of our moral collapse during the past century. It is
entirely fitting that such a man should be our figurehead leader as we
continue on the course of racial suicide that we have been on for the
past century. It is entirely appropriate that he became our figurehead
leader through the comic-opera sort of process we have witnessed during
the last two months of the first year of this century -- which certainly
will be our last century if we do not make a radical change of course
soon and begin regaining our lost moral strength.
NUT'S THE LOT OF EM!!!
At a KinkyJews Seder, Pharoah Isn’t the Only One With the Whip
By Gabrielle Birkner
Published April 02, 2009,
When about 100 Jews gather in Brooklyn on April 5 for a pre-Passover Seder, they will pay homage to their enslaved ancestors not with the traditional sinus-clearing horseradish, but by spanking each other with wands of chocolate licorice.
They will recount the story of Passover with a liberal dose of double entendre; they will break from the Haggadah reading to play a grown-up version of show-and-tell, in which guests showcase their “most-treasured kinky item” — be it a restraint, a whip or a pair of spiked heels; and they will sing a sex-positive version of “Dayenu,” with lyrics like, “If she only dressed in leather/Bright and shiny patent leather/If she only dressed in leather/Dayenu.”
The unconventional Passover meal, which will be held this year at the Brooklyn swingers spot Club Casbar, has become an annual ritual for the members of KinkyJews. The New York-based social organization caters to Jews drawn to outside-the-mainstream sexual behaviors, such as power-exchange relationships, sadomasochism and partner swapping. For the group’s members, the Passover story of Jews in bondage, and their hard-won freedom and escape, has special meaning.
“We don’t draw a direct comparison between our ‘bondage’ and the bondage of true slavery,” said Naomi, the yeshiva graduate who founded KinkyJews, and who asked that her last name not be published. “However, we do have an additional perspective when we relate to the concepts of bondage, slavery and redemption of the Passover story, since these are common themes in our relationships and sexual expression.”
Naomi, a 30-year-old nonprofit programming professional who has held jobs at a Manhattan synagogue and at a group that serves Jewish students, started KinkyJews on the social-networking site Friendster in 2005 “to create a safe and inclusive community for people who identify strongly with both Judaism and kink.” Ever since, the New York-based group has grown steadily, with the number of people who have registered as members on the group’s Web site surpassing 2,000, according to Naomi.
Another member of the organization, Dave, a 40-year-old who works in finance and also asked to be identified only by his first name, said that at its core, KinkyJews is about engaging those who might not otherwise participate in Jewish communal life. He said that when, as a young adult, he was first drawn to power-exchange relationships — sexual experiences that involve domination and submission — he worried that there was something wrong with him. “Initially, I had no idea that there was anyone else like me, let alone Jewish women who were actually into these kinds of things,” he said.
KinkyJews hosts about two events a month, ranging from holiday parties to happy hours, from film screenings to Lower East Side walking tours — complete with talks about the role of Jews in smut peddling and a stop at the sex toy store Babeland.
The sold-out Passover Seder, now in its fourth year, is the group’s largest annual event. Tickets are $60 for couples, $50 for single men, and $15 for single women. “It’s always easier to attract single men than single women,” Naomi explained. “Men are much more likely to come to events with sexual themes.”
Not every Jewish man who is interested in sexual themes, however, is equally excited by the Kinky Seder.
Rabbi Shmuley Boteach, the author of “The Kosher Sutra: Eight Sacred Secrets for Reigniting Desire and Restoring Passion for Life” (HarperOne), said the notion of a kink-themed Seder is disrespectful to both the sanctity of marital relations and to the Passover holiday.
“Can you imagine the outrage if a group of people decided to commemorate African-American slavery by having an orgy?” Boteach asked. “This wasn’t a joke. Millions of God’s children were sold on the block, and here you are trivializing evil with this vulgar celebration.”
More broadly, he said that while it’s perfectly acceptable for a couple to indulge in a sexual fetish within the confines of a love-filled marriage, he disapproves of “kinky” group events such as the Kinky Seder
“To do this in the name of Judaism is especially unfortunate, when you take into account the very sexual nature of Passover,” he said, noting that, according to Passover midrash, Israelite women enslaved in Egypt would seduce their husbands, in defiance of Pharaoh’s decree against their procreation. “That was to ensure the future of the Jewish people. It wasn’t trivial.”
Unsurprisingly, KinkyJews has its share of critics who find the organization to be a bit of a shande. “I get hate mail,” Naomi said. “One person compared us to Jews for Jesus…. But we have no intention of besmirching Jewish tradition; we’re just celebrating ourselves in a fun way.”
Kinky Seder guests, who are encouraged to dress in “fetish attire” — no jeans, no sneakers, please — are likely to be disappointed if they’re expecting an orgy to break out at the Seder. While KinkyJews-sponsored events occasionally involve on-site sexual experimentation, the vast majority do not, members say.
“I grew up going to Seders that were so serious,” said a 24-year-old freelance sex writer whose pen name is Ginger Millay, and who will be attending the Kinky Seder for the first time this year. “It will be nice to go to one that’s based in the tradition, but is also fun and silly and hedonistic. If it devolves into something else, great; and if not, that’s okay, too.”
YET EVEN MORE HOAXES !!!
April 07, 2009
'Jerusalem Post' admits it was duped by hoaxer on report of anti-Semitism in Norway
Bruce Wolman, who reads the Norwegian press, offers this important report:
It may be difficult for Americans to believe, but a disputed Jerusalem Post article asserting that Norway is rife with anti-Semitism continues to reverberate in the Norwegian media one week after publication. In fact, the headlines have gotten larger with each passing day. Having kept silent since last Wednesday-- when it posted its third version of the story in an effort to get its facts straight-- the Jerusalem Post offered yet another, extended retraction in today's paper:
In two recent news articles, The Jerusalem Post sought to report on whether Norway was a country suffering from the age-old scourge of anti-Semitism. In doing so, it stumbled, in part by dealing with members of the Jewish community it should not have believed.
First among these is the Norwegian army captain David Weiss, a man who is neither an army captain nor named "David Weiss." After speaking to the 45-year-old Norwegian Jew for a March 31 article [JP's second version of the story] in which Jews reported relative tolerance but also anti-Semitism in the Scandinavian country, the Post touched off a dramatic search for the supposed army captain by local Norwegian media.
When they could not find the man, some Norwegian reporters called this reporter [Haviv Rettig Gur], who supplied the cellular phone number of "Weiss." He was finally tracked down over this past weekend by a reporter from the major Norwegian daily Dagbladet. In the ensuing interview, "Weiss" told the reporter he had just wanted to set out how he, and Jews like him, experienced anti-Jewish incidents in Norway. He did not explain why he needed a false identity.
The Dagbladet's revelation came too late for several other media outlets, too. "Weiss" was interviewed by the BBC and the major Norwegian daily Aftenpostgen before Dagbladet managed to squeeze out of him his identity was faked.
Indeed, Aftenposten's highly-respected political editor Harald Stenghelle publicly accused the military of a coverup over Weiss's identity just one day before Dagbladet's revelation.
Weiss even got himself invited to the Pessah Seder of Oslo's Rabbi Yoav Melchior before finally telling the truth.
The "Weiss" incident followed an erroneous Post report that Norway's finance minister had chanted "Death to the Jews" at a demonstration in January. Such errors prompted criticism by the former MK and minister Rabbi Michael Melchior, who serves as the titular chief rabbi of Norway.
"A respected newspaper that is quoted around the world has to be extremely careful with claims of anti-Semitism. The battle against anti-Semitism is very important, not just to Jews but to civilization. There are problems out there. There are anti-Semitic phenomena and places where criticism of Israel passes the red line into anti-Semitism," said Melchior. "But you can't deal with anti-Semites if you're not very clear yourself about where the lines are drawn and where truth lies. This has to be done with extra care."
And what of the original question of anti-Semitism in Norway? In the wake of our articles, other Norwegian Jews have contacted the Post and related their experiences of living in the country. In general, they say, Norway does not suffer from widespread anti-Semitism. Norwegian Jews are an accepted and respected part of the country. But, they add, there are rare incidents of tension over their Jewishness, usually with children being teased in school or with Muslim immigrants bringing their politics into their day-to-day meetings with Jews.
The controversy began with the Jerusalem Post's slandering of the Norwegian Finance Minister, Kristin Halvorsen, saying she had led chants of "Death to the Jews!" But when the Post revised its story and named its sources, the Norwegian media attempted to seriously address the charges of anti-Semitism in their society. Much to its later regret, Norway's leading newspaper, Aftenposten, was the nation's first media to contact the local sources for the Jerusalem Post article. Aftenposten accepted the word of Erez Uriely - the self-proclaimed head of the Center against Anti-Semitism in Norway - that "David Weiss" actually was an officer in the Norwegian military. (Uriely, an Israeli living in Oslo, was the second source the Post had quoted to describe personal experiences of anti-Semitic abuse in Norway.)
Aftenposten printed its interview with Weiss last Thursday. Weiss repeated his charges of anti-Semitism and complaints about the anti-Israeli attitudes of Norwegian politicians and the media. And he explained that his intelligence work was the reason his personal info remained hidden. Only later did Aftenposten contact the Defense Ministry, which informed the paper on Saturday that there was no officer named David Weiss serving in the Norwegian military.
Suddenly the issue was no longer anti-Semitism in Norway, but whether the Norwegian military was engaged in a cover up. When Aftenposten asked the Ministry if Weiss worked for any of the intelligence agencies, the initial response "was the Ministry doesn't comment or answer questions concerning personnel in these branches of the Military."
As the story roiled among the Norwegian newspapers, the Defense Ministry regretted its initial ambiguity and released the following statement on Sunday:
Captain David Weiss does not work for the Military. We don't know who this person is. There is nobody with that name or rank in the Intelligence Services .... We have released this information because this person has invoked the authority of the Military in this case.
Aftenposten's foreign editor, Harold Stanghelle, then wrote two pieces. In one he doubted the truthfulness of the military's statements, arguing that Weiss most likely was connected to military intelligence.
In the second, though, Stanghelle returned to the main issue and severely criticized the Jerusalem Post:
Once upon a time The Jerusalem Post was an important newspaper. For all of us who had worked on-and-off in Israel, it was indispensable. The Post solidly and analytically reported all about Israeli society.
But that was long ago. It has since been overtaken by owners and staff who are firmly positioned far out on the Israeli right, and it has been a long time since one could find reliable information there.
While assailing the Post's reportage, Stanghelle praised all the Norwegian Jews who had helped to expose the falsehoods in the articles:
This has been dramatic, and there is no doubt that Norway is one of the western countries with the strongest engagement in the Mideast and clearest critiques of Israel. The reasons are complicated, but one of the many important elements is the fate of the Oslo-accords.
But there is a long distance from an active Israeli critique to something comparatively as nasty and as dangerous as anti-Semitism.
It is this that Imre Hercz [a Jewish Norwegian Holocaust survivor] realizes when he asserts to NTB that "it was incorrect to say that Norway is anti-Semitic. Most people are not anti-Semitic."
The extreme Israeli Right sees it differently. It considers nearly all criticism of Israel as synonymous with hatred of Jews. Both on ideological and tactical grounds. For if they can succeed in placing the criticisms within the stinking stall of anti-Semitism, then they have also neutered the criticism. Hence, it becomes very important for them to widen the concept of anti-Semitism itself - and to make use of it.
Is this any different from what we see in America from the very same circles? Stanghelle noted that Anne Sender, head of the Oslo Jewish Congregation, had been accused by Israeli rightists of demonizing "Jews, Rabbis and Judaism" because she dared to criticize the Israeli settlers. Even the Norwegian rabbi, Michael Melchior, faced abuse in Israel for allegedly demonizing "honest and idealistic Jews".
As for Weiss's exposure, on Sunday, Dagbladet finally sat down with the so-called David Weiss in an Oslo bar. The paper uncovered his real name, but refused to reveal it for the man's own safety. The 45 year-old Norwegian currently lives alone in an apartment in Oslo with his dog. Not yet chastened, he immediately presented the Dagbladet reporter with a fake identity card showing David Weiss to be in the elite Seals unit of the US Navy.
The impostor made it clear to Dagbladet that he had nothing to do with the Norwegian military or intelligence, and that he was sorry to have brought the military into the conflict which had been unleashed with his statements to the Post. He also confirmed he had never been an officer in any military.
[DAVID WEISS: The man with his back in the photo is the 45 year-old claiming to be David Weiss. He admits to Dagbladet's reporter that the officer and intelligence agent Weiss does not exist. Photo: Arve Bartnes]
Weiss explained the genesis of the falsehood: After reading the first Jerusalem Post story on anti-Semitism, he had contacted the Post and had a conversation with reporter Haviv Rettig Gur. Gur filed a revised article and related Weiss's claims of anti-Semitism. But Weiss had not considered the conversation with Gur to be an interview. Only when Aftenposten found him a few days later, "he understood things had gone out-of-control."
The Jewish Norwegian apologized to Aftenposten's editor Harald Stanghelle: "I broke out in a sweat when he went out and said that the military lied about me. It really was not my intention to make him out to be an idiot."
Stanghelle at first expressed skepticism upon learning of Dagbladet's unmasking of Weiss. But by Monday, he had to apologize to the Norwegian military for doubting them. "For Aftenposten the David Weiss case is over."
It's Easter week and most Norwegians are on vacation. That didn't stop the Norwegian Officers' Association from expressing their extreme displeasure with Stanghelle's accusations that the military lied about Weiss and often covered up about its unorthodox intelligence activities. The Paratroopers Organization also announced its annoyance with the libel. If the intention was to take the spotlight off of Israel's behavior in Gaza, the plan succeeded.
A great deal of damage has been done to Israeli-Norwegian relations over this incident. The Jerusalem Post's reputation lies in shreds in the Nordic countries. As we have seen here, broadly painting critics as anti-Semitic can cause tremendous blowback on Israel itself, but have we seen the last of such articles coming out of Israel or its friends abroad? Are the methods of the ADL and Abraham Foxman so different from the Center Against Anti-Semitism in Norway?
Teachers suspended after asking GCSE pupils to act out scenes from Schindler's
A Nazi officer about to shoot an inmate in Spielberg's Schindler's List. Pupils at Pingle Secondary School in Swadlincote were encouraged to 'get into the minds' of characters in the 1993 film
Two drama teachers have been suspended amid allegations that children were asked to act out scenes of film violence as part of their GCSE course.
It is believed that parents complained to the school after their children were told to act out scenes from Steven Spielberg's Oscar-winning film Schindler's List.
They were encouraged to get 'get into the minds' of characters in the 1993 film, which includes scenes of violence and torture.
One parent, who did not want to be named, said: 'It has come as a bit of a shock because both teachers are very highly thought-of and well-liked by the pupils.
'We just hope it won't affect the students' work.'
Head of Drama Ms S Crouch and another teacher, Miss K Derrick, have been suspended on full pay as the school launches an investigation and seeks replacement teachers.
The suspensions were imposed just days before pupils were due to sit crucial practical GCSE drama examinations, which have now had to be postponed until April 30.
It is understood the allegations relate to pupils in previous examinations earlier this year.
Pingle Secondary School, in Swadlincote, Derbyshire - which has 1,500 pupils aged 11-19 - sent letters to parents telling them about the suspensions which happened two weeks ago.
NUT CASERS!
http://www.globalwarminghoax.com/comment.php?comment.news.109.3
That fucking cunt Goldbollock should first investigate the holohoax death numbers.
Post a Comment