Saturday, April 25, 2009




Czechs throw out ex-Klan leader

Duke once held a seat for Louisiana in the House of Representatives
Czech authorities have ordered a former Ku Klux Klan leader, David Duke, to leave the country.

The 59-year-old American was invited to the Czech Republic by a local far-right group and had planned to give lectures and promote a book.

But on Friday he was arrested and questioned by police on suspicion of denying the Holocaust, an offence under Czech law.

Mr Duke has not been charged, but was ordered to leave the country.

He has reportedly been given a deadline of midnight on Saturday.

His lawyer was quoted in local media as saying she would lodge a complaint against the police on his behalf.

The Czech interim prime minister-designate, Jan Fischer, appeared on Czech television to say the opinions expressed in Mr Duke's book were "simply unacceptable, incomprehensible".

David Duke is a former Grand Wizard of the notorious white supremacist Ku Klux Klan group. He once held a seat for Louisiana in the House of Representatives, and made an unsuccessful bid for the US presidency.



http://www.davidduke.com/

12 comments:

Anonymous said...

The man's a hero.

Anonymous said...

Makes clear what kind of Europe we are living in.

Note also today's report in The Guardian about the police bribing large numbers of infiltrators in groups opposed to the Government and leaning on them.

Not in Britain of course. And of course not among the BNP leadership.

richard chadfield said...

But on Friday he was arrested and questioned by police on suspicion of denying the Holocaust, an offence under Czech law
-------------------------------
Amazing is it not? One can deny anything except the one and only holocuast. One can deny other holocausts such as the Armenian Holocaust where Gentile Christians were butchered by the Turks under the leadership of the 'Young Turks' who, I believe, were Jewish. See here http://www.agiasofia.com/armenia/armenia1.html or just use a search engine of your choice. One can deny the holocausts committed by the communists. One can deny the Palestinian holocaust and there will be no reprocussions.But there is one special holocaust that you can not question or investigate. Why is that? Why should the truth fear investigation?
You can deny ,as many do, the existence of God. There will be no reprocussions but you can not deny or investigate the one and only holocaust. Why is this so?
Why does the truth fear investigation?
Richard Chadfield

Anonymous said...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t19MVoU5RAQ

THIS MAN IS A REAL HERO DONT FORGET!!!

Anonymous said...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pF7Y7pAMtFk&feature=related


NOW HERE THIS!!!

Anonymous said...

What evidence does Richard Chadfield have that the 'Young Turks' were Jews?

I have looked at the website he suggests and others , but there is no evidence offered there that Jews were involved.

In fact, the opposite is stated, with the identities of those who conceived the ideology and the leaders who put it into practice being identified.

Which of them were Jews?

Perhaps Richard Chadfield would like to answer?

If not, then he has simply hijacked the Armenian Massacre for an irrelevant anti jewish rant.

This just makes it easy for our opponents to confuse the issue over free speech and the question of why only one holocaust is 'undeniable'.

Bill Jax

richard chadfield said...

To Bill Jax.
You said: What evidence does Richard Chadfield have that the 'Young Turks' were Jews?
----------------------------------
Some time ago I put up a posting saying that I had heard ,or read , at some point in the past that the 'Young Turks' were Jewish. I asked if any readers of my post could supply information on this point. I received the reply below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Richard Chadfield:

Yes, you are quite right about the Young Turks.

Turkey has complex Judeo-types whose power base was once centered in the secret society's and Masonic lodges of Turkey and Salonika. In Salonika, Jews of differing types formed 75% of the population and they came to dominate the "The Committee of Union and Progress."

The crypto-Jews came from the followers of the false Messiah Sabbatai Zevi http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabbatai_Zevi and were called Sabbateans, but today are known as The Donmeh (to turn.)

Many spoke a language called Ladino, which is a Sephardic language that developed in the Judeo-Spanish world, in the same way that Yiddish developed in The Ashkenazi sphere. BTW, did you know that "Ashkenazi is a middle Hebrew word meaning "German?"

Finance for this revolutionary movement was supplied by the bag man known as " Alexander Parvus" His real name was: Israel Lazarevich Gelfand.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parvus

He then acted as middle man between The Jewish German banker Max Warburg and Lenin. Trotsky (Bronstein) Lenin's partner in crime, was funded by Jacob H. Schiff, of the New York banking House: Kuhn, Loeb & Company.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacob_Schiff

Max Warburg's brother Paul, was Schiff's brother in law and partner, with another brother, Felix Warburg, being Shiff's son in law and partner.

A very good read on this and one of the best resources is Christopher Jon Bjerknes' book:

"The Jewish Genocide of Armenian Christians"

You can read it on line here:

http://www.jewishracism.com/JewishGenocide.htm

Also, here's a link to interviews with Christopher Jon Bjerknes and a US Armenian community.

http://www.jewishracism.com/interviews.htm

I hope this helps.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you go to : http://www.jewishracism.com/JewishGenocide.htm you will be able to download the 574 page book ' Jewish Genocide of Armenian Christians'.
In my post I said : 'who,I believe , were Jewish'. I did not make a definite statement on the matter because I still need to know more before I make a definite statement.
The whole point of my post seems to have been lost on you. The post was about freedom of inquiry without which there is no freedom at all. If freedom is to be a reality no subject can be out of bounds and no questions forbidden. If this causes difficulties so be it –the alternative is enslavement. (no I am not interested in augments about pragmatism.)
Richard Chadfield

Mr Spock said...

If the law has to be used to stop people debating the holocaust, it would be logical to presume that it did not happen.

Anonymous said...

Good reply from Richard Chadfield.
I am just concerned about un supported anti jewish propaganda - like the bogus protocols and others - distracting from the issue.

False anti jewish propaganga just makes it easy to denounce any real evidence by lumping it together with the rubbish.

If the websites you quote in your second post had been included in the first, then we could all have accessed them immediately.

Thanks anyway.

Bill Jax

Henry said...

To Bill Jax

Hi, I am the poster who responded to Richard Chadfield's request for information concerning the Young Turks and the Armenian Genocide.

Mr Jax, from your first post it would appear that like many other people these days, you feel compelled to defend the Jews against any of the many charges that arise from their well recorded activities, and while I fully support your demand for evidence, I can't help wondering if you apply the same test to those who peddle bogus claims regarding Muslims and Islam - I hope you do.

Let me explain.

Before anyone gets the idea that I have an anti-Jewish/pro-Muslim agenda, allow me to state that I would like nothing better than to see the back of all Asians, Arabs, Chinese, Africans, etc, regardless of which ever God(s) they choose to lower their heads to. However, It cannot be denied; that Britain would not now be facing it's greatest ever battle, if it wasn't for the actions of the Jewish community, who, as in all other Western States, have striven by means of stealth, to bring about our destruction. The fact that people, even at this late stage, cannot see where the real danger lies, serves only to demonstrates how successful their use of stealth has been - The battle is almost lost and we've yet to fire even one shot. Our native population is educationally subnormal and morbidly obese, feasting their lives away on a diet of kebabs, egg fried rice, and 'Italian' style pizza baked by 500,000 Iraqi's, who are allowed to stay here, still claiming refuge, from a man (Saddam) who was removed from office and hanged, several years ago. Forgive me for generalizing, but, it seems, the British have exchanged their once great culture for chicken tikka masala, and think they have scored the better deal.

The laws that allow these people to come here, were, in the main, drafted by Jewish lawyers and academics, passed by Jewish and pro-Jewish politicians, and supported by Jewish and pro-Jewish groups.

The Armenian Genocide, and the methods employed by the Jews, directing matters while hidden in the background, should alert us to the fact that our own genocide is well underway and advancing at rapid pace.

Mention the word "genocide" and for most people what springs to mind is a nightmare vision of 'gas chambers' at Auschwitz or mass executions at Bug river. They never realise that there are other, slow but subtle methods available for the more patient executioners, who in our case, choose to employ ethnocide and miscegenation in place of zyklon-B.

In the Ukraine, when outright mass murder needed to be hidden from world view, the Judeo-Bolsheviks employed famine to do the Job. In Russia, working people to death by the millions was much the fashion. In Alexander Solzhenitsyn's last book '200 Years Together' Solzhenitsyn tells us that a Russian Jew invented the 'gas chair' and another Russian Jew, a bean counter named Berg, invented the 'gas van' as a more efficient and economic means of killing Russians - No wonder this book is still waiting to be published in English.

Mr Jax, I wouldn't concern myself too much with regard to the "The Protocols." Contrary to what you state, the "bogus protocols" have never yet been proven as such. Please don't direct me to any articles about Maurice Joly, Times articles or Swiss court cases, I've seen them all and I'm not interested. The 'Protocols' are an unfortunate paradox: World events prove them to be sound, yet they seem to be of service only to the very group (Jews) that it's alleged they were meant to undermine. The predictive accuracy of this document has proven to be 100%, but woe betide anyone who mentions it in support of his argument.

I'll give you an example:

Go to the wiki entry for "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion" here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Protocols_of_the_Elders_of_Zion

Scroll down to the section titled "Short History" where you'll see this:

"...The current belief is the forgery was initiated and authorized by factions of the Russian aristocracy opposed to the political and social reforms initiated by the previous Tsar, (Alexander II). The fabricated document was meant to convince the antisemitic Tsar Nicholas II not to allow additional reforms, since all reforms would play into the hands of this just uncovered "secret Jewish plot" .Once the Russian Revolution began in 1905, however, the use of the forgery changed. The same group, now part of the White movement, disseminated the document during their 18 year fight against the Bolsheviks in an attempt to link the Red Army, which had a few Jews in its leadership, to the fictitious conspiracy."

It's quite clear that this wiki article is designed to ridicule the notion that a "secret Jewish plot" had been at work and had set in motion the 1905 revolution.

In fact the truth is even worse as far as the "secret Jewish plot" goes, because not only did Euro/American Jewish bankers support the revolution, they also, 1: Financed the Japanese in the Russo/Japanese War and 2: Took the opportunity to corrupt 50,000 Russian POW held by the Japanese in order to turn them against the Tsar.

Here is just one of many available sources:

"Although he never lived in Japan, Jacob Schiff clearly had more influence there than any other Jew before and after World War II. He and his work greatly affected Japanese policy toward the Jews, which ultimately saved the lives of thousands of European Jews during the 1930s and 1940s. The Japanese did not forget Schiff and the financial backing he provided them during the Russo-Japanese War, Japan's first modern war against a Western power. Underwriting such a huge undertaking was novel experience for this nation newly emerged from feudalism. Japan quickly found itself financially drained and sought a loan of $50 million dollars in London, then the world's financial capital, in order to purchase a modern fleet that could counter Russia's. Since the Japanese had not yet been victorious in battle, Baron Korekiyo Takahashi, head of the Bank of Japan, found it difficult to convince skeptical European bankers of the military strength of his small nation. Schiff, however, quickly responded to Takahashi's request. Angry at the czar for ignoring his pleas to ameliorate the lot of the Russian Jews, especially following the bloody Kishinev pogrom of 1903, Schiff offered to arrange the entire loan. Three other loans were floated by Schiff in consortium with his cousin, the German banker M. M. Warburg, and English Jewish banker Sir Ernest Cassel, thus providing Japan with the desired European moral and financial support. In 1906 Schiff became the first Westerner to be honoured personally by the emperor with the Order of the Rising Sun."

"The world reacts to the Holocaust" By David S. Wyman, Charles H. Rosenzveig. p,556

http://www.google.co.uk/search?sourceid=navclient&hl=en-GB&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4GGLL_en-GBGB317GB317&q=The+world+reacts+to+the+Holocaust+By+David+S.+Wyman%2c+Charles+H.+Rosenzveig

As for the corrupting of the 50,000 POW from the Tsar's Army?

See this NY Times article dated 24/03/17

"Kennan Retells History - Relates How Jacob H. Schiff Financed Propaganda In Czar's Army"

http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=9E05E4DB143AE433A25757C2A9659C946696D6CF

The last claim in the wiki extract on a "Short History" of the protocols was this:

".. The same group, now part of the White movement, disseminated the document during their 18 year fight against the Bolsheviks in an attempt to link the Red Army, which had a few Jews in its leadership, to the fictitious conspiracy.

This is deliberately misleading.

While The Red Army might have had only "a few Jews in its leadership" Trotsky (Bronstein) included. The author(s) use deceit to deflect attention from the real claims that the Bolsheviks, not the Red Army, were massively Jewish.

In "The Last Days Of The Romanovs" (1920) The Times Russian correspondent at the time of the revolution, Robert Wilton wrote, "Taken according to the number of population, the Jews represented one in ten; among the commissars that rule Bolshevik Russia they are nine in ten, if anything the proportion of Jews is still higher." (391)

Myself, I would never bother to use the "Protocols." For one thing - they're not needed when proving the case against the Jews, and while I have no idea how they sound in the original language, I do know they sound like the ideas of a mad man when read in English translation. Strangely, It's not raw ant-Semitism that keeps the 'Protocols alive, it's their unfailing accuracy.

The truth is; no one knows who was really behind this document, but never forget what the Jewish historian, Heinrich Graetz said about his co-religionists:

“To twist a phrase out of its meaning, to use all the tricks of the clever advocate, to play upon words, and to condemn what they did not know . . . such were the characteristics of the Polish Jew. . . Honesty and right thinking
he lost as completely as simplicity and truthfulness. He made himself master of all the gymnastics of the Schools and applied them to obtain advantage over any one less cunning than himself. He took a delight in cheating and overreaching, which gave him a sort of joy of victory. But his own people he could not treat in this way: they were as knowing as he. It was the non-Jew who, to his loss, felt the consequences of the Talmudically trained mind of the Polish Jew.”

Heinrich Graetz "History Of The Jews" quote reproduced from Werner Sombart's "Jews and Modern Capitalism" (p.172)
http://socserv.mcmaster.ca/econ/ugcm/3ll3/sombart/jews.pdf

Mr Jax, If you would like to see a genuine blueprint, for destructive change then I'd recommend you investigate the life and work of Count Richard Nikolaus von Coudenhove-Kalergi, paying special attention to his ideas on a future European Union and its melting-pot population.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Count_Richard_Nikolaus_von_Coudenhove-Kalergi

Kalergi, while not thought to have any Jewish blood, was something of a racial hybrid and a fanatical philo-Semite who was married to a Jewess.

In his book Praktischer Idealismus (Practical Idealism, Wien/Leipzig 1925,) he wrote:

"The man of the future will be of mixed race. Today's races and classes will gradually disappear owing to the vanishing of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, similar in its appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals."
"Instead of destroying European Jewry, Europe, against its own will, refined and educated this people into a future leader-nation through this artificial selection process. No wonder that this people, that escaped Ghetto-Prison, developed into a spiritual nobility of Europe. Therefore a gracious Providence provided Europe with a new race of nobility through spiritual grace. This happened at the moment when Europe’s feudal aristocracy became dilapidated, and thanks to Jewish emancipation."

You can read "Praktischer Idealismus" in the originiol German by following the link to the pdf download on this page:: http://balder.org/judea/Richard-Coudenhove-Kalergi-Practical-Idealism-Vienna-1925.php.

Mr Jax, your second post in response to Richard Chadfield's reply to your first, gives me some hope that through discussion and shared information we might find a common objective that allows us to focus our attention on the alien presence that has lived here illegally since 1665, and which for many years has been the driving force behind the destruction of our society, our traditions, and now, our future generations. Some people are starting to wake up, but, with corrupt media and corrupt political guidance, they are being shepherded into pens, and allowed to bleat away their anger and frustration on the one million plus scapegoats and unwitting destroyers who are now allowed into our Island each and every year.

Our malaise has been both chronic and neglected. Time is at a premium, and for white Europeans, it's running out fast. This situation did not happen overnight, nor did it happen by chance.

Let's be honest about this - Our real problem is the Jew and we need to do something about it, fast.

One thing is for certain: For many years the Jew has been busy doing something about us.

Anonymous said...

Bill Jax replies to Henry:

It is not at all that I wish to defend Jews or attack them.

I am only concerned that evidence is used and not wild prejudice.

It is because so much ridiculous propaganda has been produced and then cited, that it is easy to dismiss any real evidence simply by lumping it all together.

This technique has been described on this blog relating to Nick Griffin. In order to discredit rumours of his relationship with Martin Webster, a ridiculous story of him and a donkey were put about. So...when anyone mentions Griffin and Webster, they can be dismissed as one of those twits believing the donkey story.

So it is with things like the protocols - based on a play written in Paris in the 1880s.

As you say, it does not matter if the protocols are genuine or a forgery, they are predictive.

But when you try to show how predictive the protocols are, you are dismissed as one of those crank conspiracy theorists that believe in a forgery.

The point is shifted...from what is going on around us...to the subject of a forgery.

Only by sticking to evidence and being aware of these tricks can we hope to succeed.

The references in Richard Chadfield's first post in no way supported his assertion. Only those in his second post did so.

We surely all know the difficulty of raising this subject in conversation with the ordinary public. We risk immediate ridicule. Only by having a proper grasp of evidence can we hope to make any progress.

All the best...Bill Jax

Anonymous said...

The ideal choice for Prime Minister

Berkeley live.....................