Wednesday, February 28, 2007
Monday, February 26, 2007
Nation revisited No.25.Doc
From: BILL BAILLIE
Playing the Patriot Game UKRAP party of chinless wonders.
UKIP the anti-Euro party has been ordered by the Electoral Commission to repay donations of over a third of a million pounds from non-UK sources. It appears that they have been illegally funded from abroad. It would be interesting to know where their supporters are based; it would be bitterly ironic if it turned out to be anywhere in Europe.
Nigel Farage their perpetual parliamentary poll-losing leader says that repaying the money could bankrupt the party. But UKIP is well supported and they enjoy the backing of most of the newspapers. That’s apart from the salaries of their Euro MPs that are supposed to be put into the coffers.
A national party with wealthy backers and well salaried members ought not to be pleading poverty. Almost certainly their latest appeal for funds will succeed and they will survive to vote against the genuine patriots of the ITS bloc who are fighting to stop Third World immigration into Europe.
If they do fold they will join their distinguished predecessors in a political graveyard that already contains the Anti-Common Market League and the Referendum Party. The anti-Euro movements have been campaigning for over thirty years, through seven general elections and six prime minister without success.
And while they have been agonizing over British independence we have been invaded by millions of immigrants from Asia, Africa and the Caribbean. While they have wasted millions of pounds on pointless propaganda we have bought a defence system from America that costs billions and will never be used.
While those playing the patriot game have gone into paranoid raptures over what to call the metal tokens in our pockets we have sent our soldiers to die in American wars and lent our support to the rape of Palestine and Lebanon.
If people want to support a political party that is their choice. But no tears should be shed for the demise of so-called patriots who care nothing for their country’s reputation. Our part in the bombing of Serbia and the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq are shameful; and our complicity in Israeli aggression is indefensible.
We heard little from UKIP about immigration, except for the suggestion that we balance exported Brits with imported blacks. We heard nothing from them about Trident or the “special relationship” that keeps dragging us into war. All we have heard from this party of bankrupt jingoists is a tirade of negative propaganda.
Their passing would go unnoticed.
Conrad Black’s Alternative
In 1985 media mogul and biographer Conrad Black added “The Daily Telegraph” to his international portfolio. In 2001 he renounced his Canadian citizenship in order to accept Tony Blair’s generous offer of a peerage. He was nominated by his old friend and fellow conservative Margaret Thatcher and duly created Lord Black of Crossharbour.
Black was the world’s second biggest newspaper owner after Rupert Murdoch. He was an associate of Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz and closely connected to the “New American Century” group surrounding President George Bush.
But at the height of his power in 2003 he was ousted from the board of his company Hollinger International under allegations of financial irregularities and faces fraud charges in the United States involving $2 billion. A tentative trial date has been set for March 5, 2007.
Black used his hundreds of newspapers in Canada, the United States, Britain and Israel to push the neo-conservative, pro Zionist views that he shares with his journalist wife Barbara Amiel. She is beginning to have doubts about America:
“American justice? It’s only a TV show. At best, unlike television, look for justice in the jury box, not in the prosecutor’s office.” (Macleans).
His newspaper “The Jerusalem Post” called for the assassination of Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat. An incitement to murder that clearly violated Israeli criminal law but no charge was ever brought.
He wrote an article in “The Daily Telegraph” urging Britain to quit the EU and join NAFTA. It was entitled “Britain’s final choice: Europe or America?” He wrote: “If the United States received a signal from a British government that it wished to avail itself of a North American option, they would respond immediately … If America were jubilant, Canada would be ecstatic.”
Lord Black has long since relinquished control of his British newspapers to the Barclay brothers but “The Daily Telegraph” is still haunted by his presence and remains a strong supporter of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and a fierce critic of the EU.
Those of us who read the paper before Conrad Black’s era remember it as a conservative but independent voice. It supported the Tory Party but covered the full spectrum of views within the party from Ted Heath to Enoch Powell. What remains is a pale shadow of the old newspaper; it’s now just a posh version of “The Sun” but without the page three girls.
Views on The News
All political parties are founded with particular objectives, but in order to be electable they have to appeal to the masses and they inevitably trim their policies to suit a wider audience. The Labour Party dropped nationalization, their core principle, in order to win the 1997 general election. The Tories have ditched immigration control and the privatization of health and education. The Liberal Democrats have sacked their popular leader in response to a malicious press campaign; and the formerly fascist BNP has rebranded itself as an anti-Muslim populist party. Now UKIP are working on their new image. Dave Cameron described them as: “a bunch of fruitcakes and loonies and closet racists,” and another Tory described John Redwood’s Euro-sceptic supporters as: “a swivel-eyed barmy army from ward eight of Broadmoor.”
Only days after Tony Blair announced that 1,600 British troops would be withdrawn from Iraq it was announced that we are sending 1,000 more soldiers to Afghanistan. The cynical way that Blair broke the news shows that he has abandoned any pretence of pandering to the masses. He is seeing out his last days like an Oriental potentate issuing decrees from the royal palace and surrounded by a bodyguard of sycophantic eunuchs. If he suddenly ordered the firstborn of every generation to be slaughtered Gordon Brown would nod in prudent agreement and the Tories would support it in the national interest.
Tony Blair has volunteered Britain for America’s latest anti-missile system, the second generation Patriot or Star Wars system. During the first Gulf War in 1991 America sold the Patriot system to Israel and Saudi Arabia to defend them against Iraq’s ageing Scud missiles. They failed to stop an Iraqi Scud attack on the American base at Dhahram, Saudi Arabia that killed 28 soldiers. President George Bush Snr defended the system and claimed that it was 97% accurate.
But a year later Professor Reuben Pedatzur of Tel Aviv University testified to a US Senate Committee that the Patriot system was less than 10% effective.
Tony Blair is about to spend several billion pounds on another military mistake that probably doesn’t work and will never be used.
The Six Nations rugby match between Ireland and England at Croke Park marked a new chapter in Anglo Irish relations. The stadium is the home of the Gaelic Athletic Association and the scene of the 1920 atrocity in which fourteen were gunned down by British forces during Ireland’s war of independence. All armies both national and revolutionary have committed war crimes. They can never be excused and they should not have happened. We must accept the past and look to the future. It’s time for us to forget ancient quarrels and stand together as our continent is overwhelmed by the teeming masses of the Third World. There’s more at stake than flags and anthems.
The Political Roots of Drug Crime
The recent spate of drug-related killings in the UK can be traced to the political violence in Jamaica. In the Seventies the left wing People’s National Party government of Michael Manley imposed a levy on bauxite that angered the Americans. When he vowed to realign Jamaica with neighbouring Cuba they reacted by backing the rival Jamaica Labour Party of Edward Seaga.
The CIA armed Seaga’s supporters and pumped millions of dollars into his 1980 election campaign. This resulted in political violence that still simmers and occasionally breaks out, as it did in the riots of 2001. Michael Seaga won the 1980 election amidst a hail of bullets and accusations of vote rigging.
The Americans completed their anti-communist sweep of the West Indies with Operation Urgent Fury in 1983 when they invaded Grenada and assassinated Maurice Bishop the leader of the People’s Revolutionary Government that had been installed by the coup d’etat of 1979.
When young men are armed to the teeth and beyond the law they inevitably turn to drug running. This happened in Northern Ireland, in Colombia, in Afghanistan, in the West Indies and now in London, Birmingham, Bristol and Manchester.
Trinidad and Tobago is currently torn by political violence between the ruling African dominated People’s National Movement and the East Indian supported United National Congress. Just as in Jamaica the armed gangs of both parties are heavily into drugs – in this case the trans-shipment of Cocaine from South America.
It is the sons and grandsons of the politically motivated drug gangs of the West Indies who are shooting each other in the UK. Once again American foreign policy has solved one problem and created another. By flooding Jamaica with guns in the Seventies they have created the armed gangs that now rule our streets.
Of course not all the drug dealers are black; there are plenty of Asian and white kids who prefer to make hundreds of pounds a day rather than stacking shelves for a minimum wage. But the gun culture of our cities can be directly traced to the CIA.
This problem will not be solved by well-meaning social workers or by well-armed cops. Its time to face reality and start talking to the Jamaican government about retraining and resettling disaffected youngsters.
Sunday, February 25, 2007
VNN guestbook are asking where this idiot is now. Now, I don't normally bother about the usual idiots, but this one you see, made some very personal accusations against me .
He made them on a public forum........VNN UK.
I now understand he is called Mark Hammill (sp).
But the main point is, he was the Rochdale BNP treasurer , and the Rochdale Organiser of the BNP knew it !
I thought Kev Bryan was a friend. Bryan knew this info for ages.
Unfortunately, RochdaleBNP is run by Kev Bryan, one who should know better. Bryan has crossed me many times, in his support for Nick Griffin, in the past.
He even had BNP legend Ken Henderson, take a picture together with traitor Nick Griffin, to try and piss me off.
I still have the pic........so whom does it piss off most ?
Who now supports Griffin ?
The Oldham nationalist bods are now coughing up their poisonous pro- Griffin supporters, including some who have been there since 'we' started (Hello Alan). You do remember me , you have 'slagged me off' on the web and elsewhere.
The usual ones including 'Alan', we know about, they must be thrown out of any positions . Due to their low intelligence and complete lack of political ideology.
And, at last, they have coughed up some git called 'Simmo', who is a spotty kid who lives with his Mum, to behave himself, for slagging me off incessantly !
The age of the Griffinite idiot Treacy is gone.
Revenge is best served cold !
There seems to be odd goings on about this escapades reportings.
Also, what do readers think about this comment from Joe Owens on VNN ;
"Why no mention of Griffin being attacked on BNP website? Is it becouse it was Nationlists over a large amount of money Griffin borrowed, that he ain't paid back? Thread closed on Stormfront?"
To quote peadophile writer ,Lewis Carroll ; "curioser and curioser".
Saturday, February 24, 2007
These rumours and talk will just not go away. There is still the odd comment on boards like Stormfront UK, about possible challenges to that despot, and 'sell-out', Nick Griffin.
I, for one, rue the day I helped him get elected !
This site will support any challenge in the BNP that supports the BNP policies BEFORE Griffin.
We have heard that the names Jonathan Bowden and Eddy Butler are 'popping-up'.
'Heaven bloody forbid' these two clowns get the leadership of the BNP.
It will be compulsory wearing of cumerbunds and dickie bows, at BNP meetings, and cocktail gowns for the Ladies, if they get in.
I cannot see that happening in the real heartlands of racial nationalism such as Halifax, Bradford, Burnley or Oldham..
* For info about Eddy Butler, it was my fault this 'record breaking' boring speaker came from my area (Stockport) when I was the NF North West Regional Organiser.
Butler supports blacks in the UK. That's enough for me to know Butler.
The radical right might have the best speakers, but we also have the most boring too. I name Eddy Butler and Andrew Brons. Brons is honest though !
We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to Repeal the 1972 European Communities ACT and withdraw the UK from the EU.
I propose that the 1972 European Communities Act should be repealed on the basis that Britain is a net financial contributer to the European Union to the tune of many £billions each year to no advantage to the British people.
This is money which would be far better spent for the benefit of British citizens.
Over 70%% of our laws are now made in the EU by people the UK electorate have little or no control over. Our imigration policy is being increasingly decided by the EU and due to the EU's 'open borders' we cannot decide for ourselves who lives or works in the UK.
This is additional to the masses of red tape, rules, directives and regulations being imposed upon us by the EU which is doing our UK businesses much harm. We believe Britain would be much better off out of the EU.
Friday, February 23, 2007
Seems that BNP 'lightweight' and all round poisonous bloke, Richard Chadfield, has been sacked from his BNP position down Tameside way.
What goes around comes around, right Richard ?
Chadfield is speaking at a Rochdale NF march in 1983 in the above picture. Though since then, he has even called for having non-whites in the BNP !
it has come to our attention that Oldham BNP stalwart BILL LOCKETT has died .
Bill was the very first BNP candidate to stand when we formed Oldham BNP in the late 1990's, he got over 10% in a first time out foray into the local elections.
More detail to follow................
NWN: What has happened to the 'Griffin effect' ?
Thursday, February 22, 2007
Good luck to our friends in Halifax tonight - Halifax bye-election !
This could be a very good result for the BNP, and there are still some very good people involved in Halifax.
I draw your urgent and careful attention to the below forwarding from Rev. Stephen Sizer.
You may remember reports a couple of years ago of Ariel Sharon's boast that "WE control the policy of the United States..."This article, "Helping Israel Die) by former CIA analyst Ray McGovern, gives the psychological/religious background for this boast.
We all know about the financial relationship between American political parties/presidential candidate and Zionist organisations in the USA, but there is a psychological/religious background to the set-up as well which cannot be under-estimated.The "Christian-Zionist" nexus is amazingly powerful. We under-estimate its influence on account of the increasingly secular approach to politics (apart from the Jews!) which obtains here in the UK and elsewhere in Europe.
But in religion-crazed -- or should one says crazy-religion obsessed -- USA, "religion" is a very potent force.
President George W. Bush is deeply embedded in that lunacy. It has replaced the alcoholism of his earlier years.ALL of this article is well worth reading (essential, if you want to catch the context) but the passages which follow the "Compassion Deficit Disorder" sub-heading are especially powerful and shocking.
I hope you can circulate this to all and sundry.I have broken up the author's paragraphs to facilitate on-screen comprehension. Otherwise, the text is unnaltered.Regards,Martin Webster.================================================
From: Stephen Sizer
Subject: Helping Israel Die
Helping Israel Dieby Ray McGovern [a CIA analyst for 27 years] President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney are unwittingly playing Dr. Jack Kevorkian in helping the state of Israel commit suicide. For this is the inevitable consequence of the planned air and missile attack on Iran.The pockmarked, littered landscape in Iraq, Lebanon and Afghanistan and the endless applicant queues at al-Qaeda and other terrorist recruiting stations testify eloquently to the unintended consequences of myopic policymakers in Washington and Tel Aviv. Mesmerized. Sadly, this is the best word to describe those of us awake to the inexorable march of folly to war with Iran and the growing danger to Israel's security, especially over the medium and long term. An American and/or Israeli attack on Iran will let slip the dogs of war. Those dogs never went to obedience school. They will not be denied their chance to bite, and Israel's arsenal of nuclear weapons will be powerless to muzzle them. In my view, not since 1948 has the very existence of Israel hung so much in the balance. Can Bush/Cheney and the Israeli leaders not see it? Pity that no one seems to have read our first president's warning on the noxious effects of entangling alliances. The supreme irony is that in their fervor to help, as well as use, Israel, Bush and Cheney seem blissfully unaware that they are leading it down a garden path and off a cliff. Provoke and Pre-empt Whether it is putting the kibosh on direct talks with Iran or between Israel and Syria, the influence and motives of the Vice President are more transparent than those of Bush.Sure, Cheney told CNN's Wolf Blitzer recently that the administration's Iraq policy would be "an enormous success story", but do not believe those who dismiss Cheney as "delusional". He and his neoconservative friends are crazy like a fox. They have been pushing for confrontation with Iran for many years, and saw the invasion of Iraq in that context.Alluding to recent U.S. military moves, Robert Dreyfuss rightly describes
But what about the President?
How to explain his fixation with fixing Iran's wagon?
Cheney's influence over Bush has been shown to be considerable ever since the one-man search committee for the 2000 Vice Presidential candidate picked Cheney. The Vice President can play Bush like a violin. But what strings is he using here?
Where is the resonance?
Experience has shown the President to be an impressionable sort with a roulette penchant for putting great premium on initial impressions and latching onto people believed to be kindred souls -- be it Russian President Vladimir Putin (trust at first sight), hail-fellow-well-met CIA director George Tenet or oozing-testosterone-from-every-pore former Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon.
Of particular concern was his relationship with Sharon. Retired General Brent Scowcroft, a master of discretion with the media, saw fit to tell London's 'Financial Times' two and a half years ago that Sharon had Bush "mesmerized" and "wrapped around his little finger".As chair of the prestigious President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board under George W. Bush and national security adviser to his father, Scowcroft was uniquely positioned to know -- and to draw comparisons. He was summarily fired after making the comments about Sharon and is now persona non grata at the White House.
Compassion Deficit Disorder George W. Bush first met Sharon in 1998, when the Texas governor was taken on a tour of the Middle East by Matthew Brooks, then executive director of the Republican Jewish Coalition. Sharon was foreign minister and took Bush on a helicopter tour over the Israeli occupied territories. An Aug. 3, 2006 McClatchy wire story by Ron Hutcheson quotes Matthew Brooks: "If there's a starting point for George W. Bush's attachment to Israel, it’s the day in late 1998, when he stood on a hilltop where Jesus delivered the Sermon on the Mount, and, with eyes brimming with tears, read aloud from his favorite hymn, 'Amazing Grace'.
He was very emotional.
It was a tear-filled experience.
He brought Israel back home with him in his heart.
I think he came away profoundly moved."
Bush made gratuitous but revealing reference to that trip at the first meeting of his National Security Council (NSC) on January 30, 2001.
After announcing he would abandon the decades-long role of honest broker between Israelis and Palestinians and would tilt pronouncedly toward Israel, Bush said he would let Sharon resolve the dispute however he saw fit.At that point he brought up his trip to Israel with the Republican Jewish Coalition and the flight over Palestinian camps, but there was no sense of concern for the lot of the Palestinians. In A Pretext for War James Bamford quotes Bush:"Looked real bad down there", he said with a frown. Then he said it was time to end America's efforts in the region. "I don't see much we can do over there at this point," he said. So much for the Sermon on the Mount. The version I read puts a premium on actively working for justice. There is no suggestion that tears suffice. Then-Secretary of the Treasury Paul O'Neill, who was at the NSC meeting, reported that Colin Powell, the newly-minted but nominal Secretary of State, was taken completely by surprise at this nonchalant jettisoning of longstanding policy.Powell demurred, warning that this would unleash Sharon and "the consequences could be dire, especially for the Palestinians". But according to O'Neill, Bush just shrugged, saying, "Sometimes a show of strength by one side can really clarify things".
O'Neill says that Powell seemed "startled". It is a safe bet that the Vice President was in no way startled.
A similar account reflecting Bush's compassion deficit disorder leaps from the pages of Ron Susskind's 'The One Percent Doctrine'.Crown Prince Abdullah, Saudi Arabia'ss de facto leader was in high dudgeon in April 2002 when he arrived in Crawford to take issue with Bush's decision to tilt toward Israel and scrap the American role of honest broker in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.With Bush's freshly bestowed "man-of-peace" epithet for Sharon still ringing in his ear, Abdullah began by insisting that the president and his aides watch a 15-minute video. It showed the mayhem on the West Bank, American-made tanks, bloodied and dead children, screaming mothers.Then, still wordless, they all filed into another room where the Saudis proceeded to make specific demands, but Bush appeared distracted and was non-responsive. After a few minutes, the president turned to Abdullah and said, "Let's go for a drive. Just you and me. I'll show you the ranch".
Bush was so obviously unprepared to discuss substance with his Saudi guests that some of the President's aides checked into what had happened. The briefing packet for the president had been diverted to Cheney's office. Bush never got it, so he was totally unaware of what the Saudis hoped to accomplish in making the trip to Crawford.(There is little doubt that this has been a common experience over the past six years and that there are, in effect, two "deciders" in the White House, one of them controlling the paper flow.)
Not that Bush was starved for background briefings. Indeed, he showed a preference to get them from Prime Minister Sharon who, with his senior military aide, General Yoav Galant, briefed the President both in Crawford (in 2005) and the Oval Office (in 2003) on Iran's "nuclear weapons program".Sorry if I find that odd. That used to be our job at the CIA. I'll bet Sharon and Galant packed a bigger punch. There is, no doubt, more at play in Bush's attitude and behavior regarding Israel and Palestine. One need not be a psychologist to see ample evidence of oedipal tendencies.
It is no secret that the President has been privately critical of what he perceives to be his father's mistakes.
Susskind notes, for example, that Bush defended his tilt toward Israel by telling an old foreign policy hand, "I'm not going to be supportive of my father and all his Arab buddies!"And it seems certain that Ariel Sharon gave the young Bush an earful about the efforts of James Baker, his father's Secretary of State, to do the unthinkable; i.e., crank Arab grievances into deals he tried to broker between Israel and the Palestinians. It seems clear that this is one reason the Baker-Hamilton report was dead on arrival. With Friends Like This... George W. Bush may have the best of intentions in his zeal to defend Israel, but he and Cheney have the most myopic of policies.
Israeli leaders risk much if they take reassurance from the President's rhetoric, particularly vis-à-vis Iran.I am constantly amazed to find, as I speak around the country, that the vast majority of educated Americans believe we have a defense treaty with Israel. We don't, but one can readily see how it is they are misled. Listen to the president exactly two years ago: "Clearly, if I was the leader of Israel and I'd listened to some of the statements by the Iranian ayatollahs that regarded the security of my country, I'd be concerned about Iran having a nuclear weapon as well. And, in that Israel is our ally [sic] -- and in that we've made a very strong commitment to support Israel -- we will support Israel if her security is threatened."
We do no favors for Israeli leaders in giving them the impression they have carte blanche in their neighborhood -- especially as regards Iran -- and that we will bail them out, no matter what.
Have they learned nothing from the recent past?
Far from enhancing Israel's security, the U.S. invasion of Iraq and Washington's encouragement of Israel's feckless attack on Lebanon last summer resulted in more breeding ground for terrorist activity against Israel.
This will seem child's play compared to what would be in store, should the US and/or Israel bomb Iran.
Bottom line: there is a growing threat to Israel from suicide bombers. The most dangerous two work in the White House.
------------------------------------------------------- *Ray McGovern works with Tell the Word, the publishing arm of the ecumenical Church of the Saviour in Washington, D.C. He was a CIA analyst for 27 years and is on the Steering Group of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS).
Wednesday, February 21, 2007
Tuesday, February 20, 2007
DALLAS (Reuters) - Previously unreleased footage of John F. Kennedy's fateful motorcade in Dallas moments before he was gunned down was released on Monday, a surprising new detail in a saga that has gripped the United States for four decades.
The silent 8mm film shows a beaming Jacqueline Kennedy close up in vivid color waving to the crowd.
A group of excited bystanders -- women sporting big 1960s hairstyles -- waves to the cameraman shortly before the motorcade sweeps past.
The president's coat is clearly if briefly seen bunched up on his back -- a detail that will be scrutinized by conspiracy theorists who see evidence of a plot in, among other things, the fact the bullet wounds on his jacket and body did not appear to match.
Monday, February 19, 2007
I couldn't agree more.
What turns my guts is when I hear journalists and politicians whine on that these killings are "a sign that our society has broken...."OUR society????!!Our society (that is, the society of the indigenous white Anglo-Saxon-Celtic people of the British Isles) started to get systematically broken when Big Business and the parties in Westminster decided that the time had come to flood our island with the flotsam and jetsam of Afro-Asia, and when leftist/liberal "idealists" tried to feed us the notion that "tolerance" and "love" would overcome all the "short term" difficulties of racial integration.
Their mad multi-racial experiment has FAILED.
It is the murderous society of the multi-racialists that has broken. THEIR society -- not "our" society.
And it was not the murders of these savage young n*glets that has woken up the multi-racialists to a realisation of this failure. Oh no. They're no more compassionate about the fate of the negroes than they were about the fate of OUR folk 30 and 40 years ago when they were plunged into the multi-racial madhouse.
What woke them up were the murders last year of millionaire bankers in their own homes in posh Chelsea; of the activities of the "Rolex Gang" of n*gger robbers who followed wealthy people (identified by their £50,000 Rolex watches) from their nightclubs in the West End to their multi-million pound homes in the select suburbs. When the Rolex-wearers turned the key in their front doors, they suddenly found their homes invaded by savage apes who commenced a violence-loot-and-rape spree!
All this wasn't supposed to happen to THEM. No No!
This was the kind of awful thing one read about happening to the Working Classes in Inner City slums, my dear!
It was the lower orders who were to endure the agony of the alien invasion, not the wealthy elite who were able to derive short-term financial benefit from it!
If there has been a slight turn against immigration from elements of the "upper class" section of British society and from certain elements of the media, then it is because the toffs have come to realise that they are now not safe from the savagery of n*gger hoodlum robbers.
To paraphrase the Jew propagandist Ben Hecht: "Every time I hear one of the toffs has been raided, robbed, beaten-up (or worse) by a gang of n*ggers, I have a little holiday in my heart!"It couldn't happen to nicer, more deserving people!
=======================Date: Thursday, February 15, 2007 12:44 PMSubject: (no subject)
Hi Martin,Watching Sky news this morning on the Black on black killings, all I hear is the usual bunch of apologists (police, community leaders MP's etc) for the multi-racial sess pit that they have created, wine on about pathetic drivel such as it's the parent's (as if they have more then one) fault etc etc etc. Yesterday's Ape crime was all about Illegal immigrants killing other illegal ape's etc.john
Saturday, February 17, 2007
A Ministry of Defence spokeswoman said the Daily Mirror report was "entirely speculative" because no final decisions have been made on which units will relieve the 19th Light Brigade currently in Iraq.
She added that the next handover is not even due until around May.
But a senior military source told the Mirror that the decision has been made to send Harry, a second lieutenant in the Blues and Royals Regiment.
"The final details are being sorted, but he is definitely going. Naturally, his royal status has to be taken into account -- but he will see action," the source was quoted as saying.
Harry, 22, has made it clear he wants to be treated no differently from other officers he trained with at the elite Sandhurst Military Academy, from which he graduated last year.
Prince Harry is the second son of Prince Charles.
'The newspaper said Harry is likely to be in charge of a troop of 12 soldiers in light armoured vehicles who will likely spend days or even weeks out in the desert conducting reconnaissance missions.
It added that Defence Secretary Des Browne is expected to announce the news on February 26.
"He has insisted on being able to perform his duties as any other officer would. He won't be just flying a desk," said a senior military source quoted by the newspaper.
"As a young officer Harry will want to go to war as a point of pride. There would have been no point in him training for this if that was never going to happen," the source said.
A total of 132 Britons have died serving in Iraq since the US-led invasion in March 2003.
Some 7,100 British soldiers are currently deployed in Iraq, mainly in and around its second city of Basra, although the government in London says it hopes to withdraw "thousands" by the end of this year.
British forces are deployed in Iraq as part of the US-led coalition and have overall security responsibility for Basra and the surrounding region, where rival Shiite militias and criminal gangs are vying for supremacy.
NWN: There is no way that any member of royalty will be put in 'harms way'. Can we just imagine if Prince Harry was killed in action in Iraq ? Blair and his masters would crap themselves.The country would fall.
It is our distinct pleasure to post this picture of 'Jose Antonio' speaking in Southern Spain. Apparently, it is quite rare.
Spanish nationalists at the Valle de Los Caidos (Valley of the fallen, in the Spanish civil war 1936-1939 ). This is always held on the 20th November, to commemorate the murder by communists of Jose Antonio Primo De Rivera, at Alicante jail in 1936.
Jose Antonio was the leader of the Falange in Spain.
Ironically, 'Jose Antonio' was involved in serious discussions with Spanish anarchists at that time and many wanted him dead from 'both sides'. Both communists and reactionary conservatives were glad he was put up against a wall and shot.
I spoke with John Tyndall many times and discussed this issue about Jose Antonio many times, this guy (JA) could have been the 'bees knees'. He was from an aristocratic family, but was in favour of workers rights and power.
They march from central Madrid close to the Plaza Colon to the Valle de los Caidos about 30 miles outside Madrid in the Valderrama mountains.
A moving experience.
The Architects of Western Decline: A Study on the Frankfurt School and Cultural Marxism This is the long overdue study of t...