The home of real patriotic British people.
The independent nationalist voice in the UK.
The Red Rose County - Lancashire.
A cummerbund & Griffinite free zone.Nick Griffin wrecked the National Front in the 1980's and then he wrecked the British National Party when he hijacked the BNP in 1999.A blog that supported John Tyndall.
Friday, May 29, 2015
Whit Walks and band contests: Times and locations for all the events in Oldham and Tameside
The greatest free show on earth !
Heading to celebrate Whit Friday tomorrow? Here's everything you need to know
Thousands are expected to line the streets of Tameside and Oldham tomorrow for the ‘greatest free show on earth’ as the annual Whit Walks and band contests take place.
Bands
from all over the country will compete tomorrow and will be seen
driving all over both districts in order to compete in the minimum of
six contests to qualify for the cash prizes.
As usual each band must perform two pieces, on a march as they arrive at the contest and then their second prepared piece.
Each band will be judged ‘blind’ by a judge who will remain hidden so they can only hear the band and not know who is playing.
VIEW GALLERY
Last year more than a million people attended the contests,
and the Whit Walks, which take place in the morning and are organised by
local churches.
This year there will be more than 20 contests taking place across the two districts.
Prizes are awarded to the best ranking across any six contests in Oldham and Saddleworth or across Tameside.
Some contests have a separate prize open for youth bands.
The
first contest was held in Stalybridge in 1870, followed by two more in
Saddleworth in 1881. Since then they have spread across Saddleworth and
Tameside, always held the Friday after Whit Sunday.
TAMESIDE
Audenshaw Contest:
Aldwinians Rugby Union Football Club, Droylsden Road, Audenshaw, M34 5SN: 4pm - 10.30pm
Last year's Whit Friday Brass Band Contest in Scouthead, Saddleworth.
Scouthead and Austerlands contest:
Dawson's Field, Huddersfield Road, Scouthead, Saddleworth, OL3 5EG: 4:15pm to 11pm
Uppermill contest:
King George V Playing Field, Saint Mary’s Gate, Uppermill, OL3 6AT: 4pm to 10:30pm
Central banks aim to institute "governmental approval" for all purchases and sales
Economist Martin Armstrong
claims there is a “secret meeting to end cash” set to take place in
London before the end of the month involving representatives from the
ECB and the Federal Reserve.
Armstrong, who is known for successfully predicting the 1987 Black Monday crash as well as the 1998 Russian financial collapse, expressed his shock that no news outlet has reported on this upcoming conference.
“I find it extremely perplexing that I
have been the only one to report of the secret meeting in London.
Kenneth Rogoff of Harvard University, and Willem Buiter, the Chief
Economist at Citigroup, will address the central banks to advocate the
elimination of all cash to bring to fruition the day when you cannot buy
or sell anything without government approval,” writes Armstrong.
“When I googled the issue to see who
else has picked it up, to my surprise, Armstrong Economics comes up
first. Others are quoting me, and I even find it spreading as far as the
Central Bank of Nigeria, but I have yet to find any reports on the
meeting taking place in London, when my sources are direct.”
Armstrong first brought attention to the alleged meeting earlier this month
when he revealed that representatives from the Federal Reserve, the ECB
as well as participants from the Swiss and Danish central banks would
all be attending a “major conference in London” at which Kenneth Rogoff
of Harvard University, and Willem Buiter, the Chief Economist at
Citigroup, would give presentations.
“We better keep one eye open at night
for this birth of a cashless society that is coming in much faster than
expected. Why the secret meeting? Something does not smell right here,”
concludes Armstrong.
Discussions and moves towards banning cash have repeatedly cropped up in recent weeks.
Willem Buiter, who Armstrong claims is speaking at the secret meeting, recently advocated abolishing cash altogether in order to “solve the world’s central banks’ problem with negative interest rates.”
Last year, Kenneth Rogoff also called for “abolishing physical currency”
in order to stop “tax evasion and illegal activity” as well as
preventing people from withdrawing money when interest rates are close
to zero.
Striking a similar tone, former Bank of England economist Jim Leaviss penned an article for the London Telegraph
earlier this month in which he said a cashless society would only be
achieved by “forcing everyone to spend only by electronic means from an
account held at a government-run bank,” which would be, “monitored, or
even directly controlled by the government.”
Big banks in both the United Kingdom and the U.S. are already treating the withdrawal or depositing of moderately large amounts of cash as a suspicious activity. Reports emerged in March of how the Justice Department is ordering bank employees to consider calling the cops on customers who withdraw $5,000 dollars or more.
Meanwhile in France, new measures are set to come into force in September which will restrict French citizens from making cash payments over €1,000 euros.
Armstrong suggests that “financial police” could enforce this new law
by, “searching people on trains just passing through France to see if
they are transporting cash, which they will now seize.”
As Armstrong notes, banning cash in
order to eviscerate what little economic freedoms people have left to
avoid disastrous Keynesian central bank policy is nothing short of
economic totalitarianism.
“In the mind of an economic tyrant, banning cash represents the holy grail,” writes Michael Krieger.
“Forcing the plebs onto a system of digital fiat currency transactions
offers total control via a seamless tracking of all transactions in the
economy, and the ability to block payments if an uppity citizen dares
get out of line.”
Ann Coulter is back, more fearless than ever. In ¡Adios, America! she
touches the third rail in American politics, attacking the immigration
issue head-on and flying in the face of La Raza, the Democrats, a media
determined to cover up immigrants’ crimes, churches that get paid by the
government for their “charity,” and greedy Republican businessmen and
campaign consultants—all of whom are profiting handsomely from mass
immigration that’s tearing the country apart.
Applying her
trademark biting humor to the disaster that is U.S. immigration policy,
Ann Coulter proves that immigration is the most important issue facing
America today. As Ann points out, if we cave to the Democrats’ scheme to
bring in 30 million new liberal voters, we lose on everything else,
too, from the economy to social issues to foreign policy to
constitutionalism, to the very identity of our nation.
Immigration
is the one issue where it’s nearly impossible to get the facts—or even
the other side of the argument. But Ann blows the lid off the cover-up
by government, both political parties, and media alike. A sampling of
the scintillating insights and revelations in ¡Adios, America!:On building a border wall: “People who live in gated communities tell us fences don’t work.”On welfare: “Today’s immigrants aren’t coming here to breathe free, they’re coming to live for free.”On how the media shut down the immigration debate:
“It can be difficult to discuss America’s immigration policies when
it’s considered racist merely to say, ‘We liked America the way it
was.’”
The Democrats have always regarded “immigration reform” as
a way to stuff the ballot box—starting with Ted Kennedy’s immigration
law of 1965.
The Democrats know that by changing the makeup of
our population they can deliver themselves a permanent majority.
Immigration “amnesty” will do just that overnight; continuing our
current legal immigration policy will do it within ten or twenty years.
Ann Coulter shows what we need to do to stop them.
If you love your country, you need to read ¡Adios, America!
NWN: This book looks promising ? In 2010 she wrote;
In 1960, whites were 90 percent of the country. The Census Bureau
recently estimated that whites already account for less than two-thirds
of the population and will be a minority by 2050. Other estimates put
that day much sooner.
One may assume the new majority will not be such compassionate
overlords as the white majority has been. If this sort of drastic change
were legally imposed on any group other than white Americans, it would
be called genocide. Yet whites are called racists merely for mentioning
the fact that current immigration law is intentionally designed to
reduce their percentage in the population.
Thursday, May 21, 2015
Russell Brand .........................!!!!!
Wednesday, May 20, 2015
Far-right groups planning demonstration ‘against Jewish privilege’ in Golders Green
May 19, 2015
Golders Green
By Jenni Frazer Anti-Semitic and far-right groups are
planning a major demonstration “against Jewish privilege” in Golders
Green, the heartland of the community, on the first Shabbat in July.
Communal leaders have asked Home Secretary Theresa May to ban the event. Police told Jewish News this
week that they are powerless, legally, to stop a static demonstration.
It is understood that the planned rally is due to be held at or near
Golders Green station on July 4, and antisemitic and neo-Nazi websites
have been buzzing for months with information about the event. Among those thought to be involved in
organising the rally – which follows a similar, though unsuccessful
event in Stamford Hill in April – are right-wing groups such as New
Dawn. The Stamford Hill demonstration, described by the Community
Security Trust as “quite pathetic and largely ignored”, was attended by
less than 30 people who were held by police away from the Jewish
community. But Mark Gardner of the CST
acknowledged this week that such an outcome “cannot be guaranteed in
Golders Green”, He said that CST, which was “fully aware of this
explicitly antisemitic demonstration”, was in discussion with both
police and government about the next steps. He said: “We sincerely hope
that our Jewish community will not be cowed by this neo-Nazi
intimidation”.
Adrian Cohen, of the London Jewish Forum, said the forum deplored
“the vicious antisemitic message of the proposed neo-Nazi rally. We,
along with other major Jewish organisations, have asked the Home
Secretary to ban the rally. If it goes ahead we will support those who
wish to counter- demonstrate in support of the local community, and the
relevant authorities in ensuring that peace and security is maintained
in the area.”
Andrew Dismore, London Assembly member for Barnet and Camden, has
written to the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, London mayor Boris
Johnson and the Home Secretary Theresa May, calling for a ban on
the event. Dismore said: “This is clearly a highly provocative scheme
on the part of the far-right to insult and incite hatred against the
Jewish community. This year has seen a huge rise in anti-Semitic
attacks in London, including in Barnet. After the events in Paris, the
Jewish community is feeling very insecure.
“This event is designed to play on those fears and the risk of
violence against Jewish businesses and residents is clearly present.
This is why I have written to demand that the demonstration be banned
and that those who plan to attend it are prevented from using TfL public
transport to get to Golders Green to ensure any ban is effective.”
Local MP Mike Freer told Jewish News: “I have called on the
Home Office to step in and ban this demonstration. This rally is not
about free speech but a deliberate attempt to promote tension and
anti-Semitism.”
A spokesman for the anti-fascist group, Hope Not Hate, said it was
strongly opposed to the rally going ahead but wished the community to be
both prepared and informed. What is additionally troubling community
leaders is the possibility of secular Jewish groups staging a
counter-protest – and any resulting violence.
Chief Superintendent Adrian Usher, head of policing in Barnet, said:
“Officers from Barnet will continue to work closely with the local
community to make sure we fully understand their concerns and to brief
them on the policing operation as it develops”. He said that officers
were speaking to the organisers of the rally “to understand what their
plans are”.
Police said they were “mindful” of the “passionate response” that was
possible, particularly when protests were held at religious or
culturally significant sites. But they made it clear that “disorder,
crime and incitement to hatred will not be tolerated… and we will take
appropriate action.” http://www.jewishnews.co.uk/far-right-group-planning-demonstration-against-jewish-privilege-in-golders-green/
Monday, May 18, 2015
Hello Doll !
Sunday, May 17, 2015
Trouble in UKIP ?
Of course, Nigel Farage could ask his mate photographed here with him , Tony 'bomber' Lecomber to help him with the current UKIP infighting.. Lecomber is an expert in fomenting destruction of a political party. As is Farage, if this picture is anything to go from. The third person is Dr.Mark Deavin.Even though Deavin was involved in the hijacking of the BNP for crook Nick Griffin. He was able to still work in 'academia' , and publish books about arch traitor Harold Macmillan apparently.
All the above were involved in the destruction of John Tyndalls genuine nationalist BNP..
----------------------------------------------------- Dr Sked pointed to one notorious meeting Mr Farage had with far right
activists as reason why he wanted to leave the party he founded. Mark
Deavin, a former PhD student of Dr Sked’s and BNP activist, managed to
infiltrate Ukip in the late 1990s and was photographed after a lunch
meeting with Mr Farage alongside the twice-jailed BNP activist Tony ‘the
bomber’ Lecomber. Dr Sked admitted bringing Deavin into Ukip but said
he had “no idea” he was research director of the BNP. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/ukip-founder-nigel-farages-influence-means-the-party-wont-win-a-seat-in-the-general-election-9983519.html
"...............But here's an even stranger coincidence. Shortly
before the 1997 general election, Mark Deavin spoke freely of his plans
to undercover researchers from Searchlight magazine and The Cook Report,
who had posed as emissaries from Jean-Marie Le Pen's Front National.
One necessary step, he said, was to get rid of the BNP leader John
Tyndall ("who is actually an obstacle") and replace him with Deavin's
chum Nick Griffin. This would leave one other obstacle. "If Blair
becomes prime minister," Deavin predicted, "the BNP will be the official
opposition in the inner cities, in working-class areas. The UKIP will
be the opposition in the shires, the county areas, the middle-class
opposition. That party is a serious opposition to us in middle England,
but, if we had the resources, we could tear it to pieces." ......................... http://www.guardian.co.uk/racism/Story/0,,202962,00.html
We all know that Farage is ill . Is this the 'States' way of destroying a vehicle that they helped to build, which has now got too influential ? Surely 'the state' wants us all to vote for either the Conservatives or the Labour Party as our Dads did and their Dads before them ? All dumbed down so we haven't a clue ? All voting for the Zionists Rothschild family enterprise so that all the top one's can toddle off to the Annual BILDERBERG conference.to get their orders.
UKIP got almost 4 million votes. That is a serious threat to 'them'.
Come on baldy bomber Lecomber. We know you visit here. Explain you traitor !
England face 2018 World Cup ban for fans' anti-IRA chant
Fifa's new anti-discrimination monitoring system can dish out sanctions that
range from a £20,000 fine all the way up to disqualification from a
competition
Email
Warning: England will be punished if fans chant anti-IRA songsPhoto: PA
The Football Association is at risk of being punished as early as the
historic friendly in the Republic of Ireland next month, following the
unveiling of the world governing body’s anti-discrimination monitoring
system at Wembley yesterday.
The system will involve World Cup qualifiers – and high-risk friendlies
– being scrutinised for any discriminatory behaviour, which one of its
architects, Piara Powar, of Football Against Racism in Europe, confirmed
would include anti-IRA chants.
Any association whose supporters are found guilty of such behaviour
faces sanctions that range from a fine of £20,000 all the way up to
disqualification from a competition.
Powar, a member of Fifa’s task force against racism and discrimination,
revealed the governing body was considering instructing him to send an
observer to England’s first match in Dublin since violence forced the
abandonment of a friendly there 20 years ago. The FA has already taken steps to stop supporters singing anti-IRA chants at next month’s game, but will now be able to warn them that such actions could have dire consequences for the national side.
Powar said: “ 'No Surrender To The IRA’ comes from a point which is
extreme nationalism. It’s about conflict between two states. That then
would be reported. We would be making reports as often as our experts
feel there is a case to answer. Then it’s down to Fifa.”
Powar said repeat offenders would face the most severe sanctions. “Some
of the countries in this competition are going to commit three or four
offences. That would mean they will have at least a stadium closure and
possibly face being kicked out of the competition. We wouldn’t be doing
this if we weren’t confident Fifa had the intention at least to take
action on the evidence we provide to them.”
Fifa
developed its new monitoring system after being condemned over its
failure to punish clear incidents of discrimination at the World Cup
last year, something it vowed yesterday would not be repeated. Yaya Touré welcomed Fifa's new anti-discrimination initiative
The initiative was welcomed by the Manchester City midfielder Yaya Touré,
who warned in 2013 that African players could boycott the tournament in
Russia after he was racially abused playing there against CSKA Moscow
in the Champions League. • Yaya Toure insists racist abuse can 'break' players
Touré, who sidestepped questions about whether he still held that view,
said: “I have been in the situation where there have been monkey chants
and it’s difficult to deal with that. As sportsmen, you want to
continue to the end, but when you hear something like that, it hurts you
and breaks you. You need to give them [offenders] a radical sanction –
paying a £20,000 fine is not enough, you need to do more.” http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/news/11601689/England-face-2018-World-Cup-ban-for-fans-anti-IRA-chant.html
NWN: This site knows for a fact, that rather a lot of Army veterans will be very unhappy about this codswallop.
LGBT Foundation to hold hate crime vigil against Homophobia, Biphobia and Transphobia
LGBT Foundation will take a stand against hate crime this weekend
Joel Goodman
Rainbow flag on Canal Street
LGBT rights campaigners are set to hold a vigil against hate crime.
The LGBT Foundation, formerly known as the Lesbian and Gay Foundation, will hold the vigil this Sunday to mark the International Day Against Homophobia, Biphobia and Transphobia.
The commemoration will start at 1pm in Sackville Gardens in Manchester’s Gay Village.
Guest
speakers will include: Paul Martin OBE, chief executive of LGBT
Foundation, Police and Crime Commissioner Tony Lloyd and Bethany Black,
stand-up comedian and TV actress from Russell T Davies’ TV shows Cucumber and Banana.
Paul
Martin said: “The simple fact is if hate crime isn’t reported then
nothing can be done about it, and we’ll never know the true extent of
the problem.
“It could also mean that other people might receive the same or worse abuse.”
He added: “We believe that every single incident of hate crime, no matter how big or small, should be reported.”
Out
of all the hate crimes reported to LGBT Foundation last year, 81pc were
homophobic, 13pc were transphobic and 3pc were biphobic, the
organisation said. http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/lgbt-foundation-hold-hate-crime-9266626
Saturday, May 16, 2015
Top barrister to review controversial decision not to charge Labour peer Lord Janner over historic sex abuse allegations
Director of Public Prosecutions had claimed peer was too ill to face trial
But the decision was slammed by abuse victims and campaigning MPs
Crown
Prosecution Service announced today that an independent review of the
decision not to prosecute Lord Janner would be carried out
The decision could see the 86-year-old Labour peer dragged to court
A
senior barrister has been brought in to review the controversial
decision of Britain's top prosecutor not to charge Lord Janner over
alleged child sex crimes.
In
a move that could see the Labour peer dragged before the courts, the
Crown Prosecution Service announced that the unnamed QC had been hired
to give an independent assessment of the case.
The
barrister - who has had no previous involvement with the case – will
decide whether or not it is in the public interest to charge the former
Labour MP because of his increasingly severe dementia.
+3
Police investigations in 1991, 2002
and 2007 had uncovered sufficient evidence to charge Lord Janner with
sexual offences, but the peer - who is suffering from Alzheimer's - is
now considered too ill to face prosecution
The
move comes after victims challenged the decision of Alison Saunders,
the Director of Public Prosecutions, not to proceed with the case
because of the peer's illness.
Ms
Saunders has insisted that her decision was justified because Lord
Janner - who is suffering from Alzheimer's - is too ill to stand trial.
The peer is also said to be too unwell to face any meaningful sentence
if he was prosecuted.
But
if the review rules that Ms Saunders' decision was wrong, the peer will
face the prospect of a trial over the alleged sex crimes committed over
several decades.
Ms
Saunders announced last month that she believed police investigations in
1991, 2002 and 2007 had uncovered sufficient evidence to charge Lord
Janner with sexual offences.
She
said it was a matter of 'deep regret' the police evidence was never
tested in court but said it was not in the public interest to prosecute
him now.
The 86-year-old peer's family insists he is innocent of any wrongdoing.
Campaigning Labour MP Simon Danczuk 'cautiously welcomed' the decision to review the case.
He
told MailOnline: 'I'm still of the view we should come up with a way of
prosecuting Lord Janner for the alleged sex crimes. I hope the
independent QC reached the right decision.'
Alison
Saunders, the Director of Public Prosecutions (left), has been slammed
by MPs - including Simon Danczuk (right) over her decision not to
proceed with the case against Lord Janner because of the peer's illness
Announcing
the decision to hire the QC, who is not being named until after their
assessment of the Janner case is completed, the Crown Prosecution
Service said the move was in line a 'right to review' policy introduced
in 2013.
It allows any alleged victim to request a review of a prosecution decision not to charge the suspect in their case.
A
CPS spokeswoman said: 'The CPS Victims' Right to Review scheme was set
up to give complainants the ability to ask the CPS to review its
decisions – usually when there has been a decision not to prosecute.
'The
CPS has been asked to invoke this process in the case of Lord Janner
and that review is now taking place. This review would normally be done
by the CPS Appeals Unit. However, due to the unique circumstances
surrounding this case, the CPS has instructed external counsel instead.'
CPS
guidelines say that such reviews should normally take around 30 days,
but that longer could be required in more complex cases.
NWN: We won't hold our breath. Janner is higher ranking than the Queen in the power stakes in the UK.
Monday, May 11, 2015
Is British nationalism finished ?
The election results are in. We are now worse off than when I first started in 1976.What has happened and what can we do next ?
I could write an essay here but to be quite frank most nationalists are too intellectually dim. So why should I write and waste my time ?
I will give just one prime example of what is wrong in nationalism.
The National Fronts leaflet in my home town of Rochdale was a total embarassment .The grammar,spelling and punctuation was appalling A 13 year old could do better. The content was even worse. Yes.............yet again the pakistani grooming gangs of Rochdale ! But knowing the folk involved, there was no surprise there. They have no idea of 'ideas', nor of policies. Their idea of winning a General Election is running around with a banner about the pakistani rapists, which they have been doing for the last few years. That does not get you votes.
If anyone wishes to write, the place is open for you.Nonsense from the current nationalist idiots will be binned.
Replace Zionist Cameron with Zionist Churchill
Friday, May 08, 2015
Election 2015: Rochdale arrests after 'disorder' outside count at town hall
Police say the men - both affiliated to a political party - were detained outside the venue
Rochdale election count at Rochdale Town Hall
Police have arrested two people outside Rochdale Town Hall as council staff and volunteers attempt to verify and count votes.
The arrests were made at around 10.30pm tonight just half an hour after voting closed.
Police officers covering the event including Rochdale top cop Chief Inspector Chris Sykes dealt with the incident.
It
is believed that the two people may have been intoxicated and had an
allegiance to the same political party, but this has not yet been
confirmed.
They were taken into custody, where they currently remain.
The count at Rochdale was not disrupted by the incident. http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/election-2015-rochdale-arrests-after-9208715
NWN: The GMP helicopter was circling over Rochdale town centre around 10.45pm. We suspect more trouble occured than the media are admitting here.
Naming and Shaming – The List Of Israel’s Agents Within British Politics
Ahead of Election Day tomorrow, the ultra Zionist www.webelieveinisrael.org.uk published its list of Sabbos Goyim operating within British politics. “With
Polling Day in the General Election this Thursday, here is a list of
all the parliamentary candidates who have sent positive replies to the Fairness for Israel Charter,” the Zionist outlet informed its followers. Our British candidates agree, for example that, “boycotts against Israel in any sphere must be opposed.” The shameless British parliamentary candidates
listed below are willing to sacrifice freedom of expression to please
their paymasters; agreeing that the “democratic State of Israel is not
an ‘apartheid state’ and must not be described as one.” The Zionist
outlet explains; “It is noted that every (Israeli) citizen has the
right to vote and discrimination based on race, religion or sexuality is
illegal.” But We Believe In Israel fails to mention a basic crucial
fact. Millions of indigenous Palestinians living within areas controlled
by Israel and subject to Israeli oppression are not entitled to be
citizens let alone vote. And why? Because they are not ‘racially’
qualified. This extensive list reveals that British politics is
in urgent need of a major overhaul. It must cleanse itself of the
corrosive influence of a very dangerous foreign Lobby. The list reveals
that Zionist corruption has planted its roots in pretty much every
British parliamentary party. This fact alone may help to explain why
Brits have lost interest in their politics and do not believe their
political parties. No matter who you vote for, at the end of the
day, it is the Jewish Lobby that calls the shots.
The List:
Constituency Candidate Party
Aberconwy Guto Bebb Conservative Aberconwy Mary Wimbury Labour Aldridge Brownhills Ian Garrett Lib Dem Banbury John Howson Lib Dem Barrow & Furness Simon Fell Conservative Battersea Jane Ellison Conservative Beaconsfield Dominic Grieve Conservative Belfast South Rodney McCune UUP Bexhill & Battle Geoffrey Bastin UKIP Birkenhead Clark Vasey Conservative Blackpool South Peter Wood Conservative Bognor Regis & Littlehampton Francis Oppler Lib Dem Bolsover Peter Bedford Conservative Bolton West Chris Green Conservative Bournemouth East Tobias Ellwood Conservative Bournemouth East David Hughes UKIP Bournemouth East Peter Stokes Labour Bournemouth West Conor Burns Conservative Bradford West Celia Hickson Green Braintree Matthew Klesel Lib Dem Brent Central Stephen Priestly UKIP Brigg & Goole Andrew Percy Conservative Brighton Kemptown Paul Chandler Lib Dem Brighton Pavilion Nick Yeomans Independent Burnley Sarah Cockburn-Price Conservative Bury North Richard Baum Lib Dem Bury North David Nuttall Conservative Bury South Daniel Critchlow Conservative Bury South Ivan Lewis Labour Carlisle Lorraine Birchall Lib Dem Carmarthen W & S Pembs Selwyn Runnett Lib Dem Carshalton & Wallington Ashley Dickenson Christian People’s Alliance Chatham & Aylesford Tristan Osborne Labour Cheadle Shaun Hopkins UKIP Chelmsford Simon Burns Conservative Chingford & Woodford Green Iain Duncan-Smith Conservative Chippenham Michelle Donelan Conservative Chipping Barnet Victor Kaye UKIP Chipping Barnet Theresa Villiers Conservative Christchurch Christopher Chope Conservative Cleethorpes Martin Vickers Conservative Corby Jonathan Hornett Green Corby Tom Pursglove Conservative Crawley Henry Smith Conservative Dudley South Mike Wood Conservative Ealing Central & Acton Rupa Huq Labour East Antrim Sammy Wilson DUP East Belfast Gavin Robinson DUP East Devon Stuart Mole Lib Dem East Ham David Thorpe Lib Dem East Kilbride, Strathaven & L Lisa Cameron SNP Eastbourne Paul Howard Independent Edinburgh North & Leith Alan Melville UKIP Enfield North Cara Jenkinson Lib Dem Epping Forest Eleanor Laing Conservative Epping Forest Mark Wadsworth Young People’s Party Erith & Thamesmead Sidney Cordle Christian People’s Alliance Exeter Dom Morris Conservative Finchley & Golders Green Jonathan Davies Lib Dem Finchley & Golders Green Mike Freer Conservative Finchley & Golders Green Richard King UKIP Finchley & Golders Green Sarah Sackman Labour Folkestone & Hythe Claire Jeffrey Labour Grantham & Stamford Barrie Fairbairn Labour Hammersmith Millicent Scott Lib Dem Hammersmith Richard Wood UKIP Hampstead & Kilburn Maajid Nawaz Lib Dem Hampstead & Kilburn Magnus Neilson UKIP Hampstead & Kilburn Tulip Siddiq Labour Hampstead & Kilburn Simon Marcus Conservative Harborough, Oadby & Wigston Edward Garnier Conservative Harrow East Bob Blackman Conservative Harwich & North Essex Mark Hughes UKIP Hemel Hempstead Howard Koch UKIP Hemsworth Martin Roberts Yorkshire First Hendon Andrew Dismore Labour Hendon Raymond Shamash UKIP Hertford & Stortford Michael Green Lib Dem Hertsmere Oliver Dowden Conservative Horsham Martyn Davis Labour Horsham Jeremy Quin Conservative Hove Graham Cox Conservative Ilford North Lee Scott Conservative Ilford North Wes Streeting Labour Ipswich Chika Akinwale Lib Dem Islington South & Finsbury Pete Muswell UKIP Kingston & Surbiton James Berry Conservative Lagan Valley Alan Love UKIP Lagan Valley Trevor Lunn Alliance Leeds North East Fabian Hamilton Labour Leeds North East Warren Hendon UKIP Leeds North East Simon Wilson Conservative Leeds North West Greg Mulholland Lib Dem Leicester East Susanna Steptoe UKIP Lewisham East Heidi Alexander Labour Liverpool Wavertree Luciana Berger Labour Livingston Charles Dundas Lib Dem Loughborough Steve Coltman Lib Dem Louth & Horncastle Victoria Atkins Conservative Manchester Withington Mark Davies UKIP Meon Valley Dave Alexander UKIP Mid Norfolk Anna Coke UKIP Mid Sussex Toby Brothers UKIP Mitcham & Morden Richard Hilton UKIP Newbury Catherine Anderson UKIP Newcastle-upon-Tyne East Nick Brown Labour Newcastle-upon-Tyne North Violet Rook North East Party North Antrim Jayne Dunlop Alliance North Antrim Ian Paisley Jnr DUP North Belfast Nigel Dodds DUP North East Fife Huw Bell Conservative North East Fife Tim Brett Lib Dem North West Hampshire Andrew Adams Labour Nottingham South Tony Sutton Lib Dem Penistone & Stocksbridge Graeme Waddicar UKIP Penrith & The Border Neil Hughes Lib Dem Plymouth Sutton & Devonport Oliver Colville Conservative Poplar & Limehouse Elaine Bagshaw Lib Dem Portsmouth North John Ferrett Labour Redditch Karen Lumley Conservative Richmond Park Andree Frieze Green Richmond Park Zac Goldsmith Conservative Richmond Park Sam Naz UKIP Richmond Park Robin Meltzer Lib Dem Rochester & Strood Kelly Tolhurst Conservative Romsey & Southampton North Ben Nicholls Lib Dem Ross, Skye & Lochaber Philip Anderson UKIP Ruislip, Northwood & Pinner Gerrard Barry UKIP Ruislip, Northwood & Pinner Michael Borio Labour Ruislip, Northwood & Pinner Nick Hurd Conservative Sheffield Hallam Ian Walker Conservative Sheffield Heeley Howard Denby UKIP Somerton & Frome Alan Dimmick UKIP South Belfast Paula Bradshaw Alliance South Cambridgeshire Sebastian Kindersley Lib Dem South Northamptonshire Tom Snowdon Lib Dem South West Surrey Jeremy Hunt Conservative Stockport Daniel Hamilton Conservative Stockton South Ted Strike UKIP Stone Martin Lewis Lib Dem Stangford Jim Shannon DUP Stratford-on-Avon Elizabeth Adams Lib Dem Stratford-on-Avon Nadhim Zahawi Conservative Surrey Heath Laween Atroshi Labour Tatton Stuart Hutton UKIP Tooting Dan Watkins Conservative Vale of Glamorgan David Paul Morgan Lib Dem Wallasey Chris Clarkson Conservative Warrington North Sarah Hayes Green Warrington South Nick Bent Labour Warwick & Leamington Chris White Conservative West Worcestershire Julian Roskams Green Wimbledon Stephen Hammond Conservative Witham Priti Patel Conservative Witham Garry Cockrill UKIP Woking Chris Took Lib Dem Worsley & Eccles South Iain Lindley Conservative Wythenshawe & Sale East Victor Chamberlain Lib Dem Ynys Mon Nathan Gill UKIP
By Gilad Atzmon
