Debate Invite for Paul Golding

One of our avid readers has submitted the following article, and images.

They wish to enter into a debate with, Paul Golding, over his recent article, and ask him “Are you a hypocrite, or in the wrong party?”

The images are of Tommy Williams, and In one image we see him manning the camera and part of the BNP security team at this years, RWB. The same Tommy Williams can be seen sieg heiling in the other image,

After reading Paul Golding’s article, you will understand why our reader would like some answers.
-------------------------
-------------


“One of these same hard-liners said to me, "The media will always attack us, so our image doesn't matter." Using the scenario of war, this is the same as saying, "The enemy will always shoot at us, so it doesn't matter how much ammunition we give them!" As we can see, this argument - a favourite of the hard-liners to justify their obsession with WWII, the Jews and Adof Hitler - is completely flawed. The phrase "but it's the truth" just doesn't cut it. Such a stance takes no account of the peculiar circumstances we face. We are up against an immense media machine, which uses anything surrounding the Second World War, Nazism or Hitler to demonise and thus effectively immobilise any patriotic movement in the modern age.

Nationalists have to be very clever. We have to learn to bite our tongues and use our brains to side step tradtional Establishment attacks. We must not charge full steam ahead into well prepared media traps, giving our opponents what they want, time and time again, thus scuppering our chances of success.

The Establishment and the media absolutely love and adore these rigid, self-destructive hard-liners. Without them, the Establishment would be without the huge amount of ammunition they have traditionally weilded against patriotic movements. Not playing ball with the Establishment is really quite simple. We must completely and skilfully avoid any resemblance whatsoever to all the labels and connections given to us by the media: namely that we are 'Nazis', 'Fascists', 'racists', 'extremists', 'anti-semitic', and so on. This is not hard, since we are not these things anyway. But some people love to engage in moronic activities that give the media the ammunition they use to discredit all of us,nd the Cause. This is what the overly proud, false morons of the true "far right" don't understand: they help our nation's enemies to enslave our people, while at the same time destroying the chances of success for real and genuine nationalists. They do this by utilising demonised language and behaviour, falling easy prey to media snipers.”

Prison for BNP activist's killer

Khan stabbed his neighbour in July last year
An Asian man who killed his British National Party activist neighbour in a fight has been jailed for eight years.
Habib Khan, 50, of Stoke-on-Trent, was convicted in May of the manslaughter of 52-year-old Keith Brown who he stabbed with a kitchen knife in July 2007.
The two men had been involved in a long-running dispute over land.
Khan said living for five years next door to Mr Brown had been "hell" and his family had been subjected to "racial hostility" by his neighbours.
Stafford Crown Court was told Khan had killed Mr Brown in a fight outside their homes in Uttoxeter Road, Normacot.

The dispute started when Khan put in a planning application to build a house on his land several years before.
Mr Brown objected to it and when it was granted and work began, he "took steps to obstruct it".
I think what we've witnessed here is an outrageous betrayal of justice
Martin Coleman, BNP councillor
The court heard that in the incident last July, Khan held a knife against his neighbour "to scare him" when he saw him trying to strangle his son Azir.

A post-mortem examination found Mr Brown died from a single stab wound.
Judge Tonking said: "What became obvious as the evidence unfolded, however, is that from time to time, despite denials to the contrary, both Mr Brown and his son Ashley Barker were involved in acts of racial aggression towards members of Mr Khan's family."
He added that Khan had acted "in the honest belief that he needed to protect his son" but in doing so had killed Mr Brown.

Khan, described by a Muslim colleague as a respected, religious and helpful person, was also found guilty of wounding Mr Brown's son, Ashley Barker, during the fight.
Khan's other son, Kazir Saddique, was sentenced to a year in prison and a year on licence after admitting unlawful wounding but Azir, 24, was found not guilty of wounding.
At a news conference outside the court, Mr Brown's widow Julia said she felt justice had not been done.
She said: "At the end of the day, it should have been murder not manslaughter.
"If he did not have the intention to go out and murder he should not have taken the knife out.
"Everybody feels sorry for that family but what have we been through?"

Julia Barker states that justice has not been done
Local BNP councillor, Martin Coleman, told reporters the party would start a campaign to "expose what has gone on today in court" and said he viewed the case as "insanity and madness".
He added: "It bears no relationship with any form of justice that I understand, can understand recognise or accept.
"We've got a man who has been murdered in the street.
"Someone has ran out into the public street with a knife and murdered a man and the judge says there's literally no case to answer.
"I think what we've witnessed here is an outrageous betrayal of justice."
Khan denied murdering Mr Brown but was convicted of manslaughter on 23 May.
A spokesman for Staffordshire Police said the investigation into Mr Brown's death had been handled in a "thorough and impartial" way.
In a statement, the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) said the force had had repeated contact with both families during the dispute and investigated complaints made on both sides.
A spokesman said they were unable to substantiate any of the claims made about the way the families were treated by the force but one officer received advice from officials.
Khan's barrister, Simon Drew, said police investigations into the various incidents often "came to nothing" because of "generous failures by the system".

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/staffordshire/7588105.stm

NWN: Another example of the bias in our judicial system ! The judiciary and police have once again shown themselves to be an enemy of patriotic British people.

BNP to honour ‘martyr’ with rally as Asian neighbour gets eight years for manslaughter

The British National Party has said that it will hold a rally in honour of its first claimed martyr, whose Asian killer was jailed for eight years for manslaughter yesterday.
Keith Brown, a father of eight and friend of the party leader, Nick Griffin, was stabbed to death by his neighbour Habib Khan, a Muslim community leader. A judge said that the dead white man and his skinhead son had both been involved in acts of racial aggression towards the Khan family.
The BNP said that it will hold a rally in Stoke-on-Trent on September 20 to protest about the case and Staffordshire Police’s handling of the long-running neighbours’ dispute. The Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) announced that it had cleared the force of any blame.
Officers had dealt with more than 100 complaints in five years from the feuding families.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article4636785.ece

Two million could be out of work by Christmas, Bank of England warns






No jobs left for school leavers
Britain is already in a recession
House prices could fall more than 30%
Workers will not be getting a pay rise


Around two million people will be unemployed by Christmas as the credit crunch bites, a key Bank of England policymaker warned yesterday.

Professor David Blanchflower said he predicts 2,000 people will lose their jobs every day over the next four months.

This would take unemployment levels to their highest since Labour came to power in 1997.


For families up and down the country, redundancy would be devastating at a time of soaring household bills.

Millions of people are barely coping with rising food, fuel and gas bills, and will be crippled if they lose their job - particularly if they are the sole breadwinner.

Young people will also be affected, with 'no jobs' for hundreds of thousands of children when they leave school, he warned.

In an interview, Professor Blanchflower, who is a member of the Bank's Monetary Policy Committee, gave a series of warnings about Britain's economic meltdown.

He says that Britain is already in a recession which is in danger of being 'very serious and long-lasting' unless urgent action is taken.

And he admits his original forecast that house prices will fall 30 per cent might be 'optimistic' and the drop could be even sharper.

And as a further blow to workers, he says those who keep their jobs will not get a pay rise, or will get one which is below inflation.

His interview, with the news agency Reuters, will worry workers up and down the country who fear that their job is no longer safe.

As one of the nine people who set interest rates every month, he is one of the most powerful economic voices in the country.

Every week, more companies admit that they have had to sack staff in a bid to cope with the economic crisis.

In the past few days, one housebuilder, Bovis, said it has cut 40 per cent of its staff and rival Taylor Wimpey has axed 900 jobs.


And to make things worse for those who lose their job, many will face an impossible struggle to get a new job because firms have 'stopped hiring'.

Professor Blanchflower, an economics lecturer at Dartmouth College in the U.S., said: 'I am expecting to see a number of something like two million by the end of the year. School leavers are coming into the jobs market and there are no jobs for them.

'People have to start to respond to the fact that we are in a recession and the danger is that we will be in a very serious and long-lasting recession unless we do something..'

'I certainly think we are in negative growth now and I expect several further quarters.'

He also launched a veiled attack on his fellow members of the Monetary Policy Committee. At the last 11 meetings, Professor Blanchflower has voted to cut interest rates. But other members, including the Bank's governor Mervyn King, have largely ignored him, and voted to cut rates on only three occasions since October.

He said: 'To sit and worry about inflation expectations and what is going to happen to those, rather than worry about the fact that the economy is going to go into a recession, seems to be misguided.'


Tory Treasury spokesman Philip Hammond said: 'This is a startling prediction from a member of the Bank of England's Monetary Policy Committee.

'If it turns out to be true, it will represent a meltdown in employment and yet more misery for families in the months ahead.'

There is already evidence that unemployment is starting to rise sharply as bosses are forced to cut staff to cope. The latest figures from the Office for National Statistics show 60,000 became unemployed between April and June, raising the total to 1.67million.

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23546506-details/Two+million+could+be+out+of+work+by+Christmas%2C+Bank+of+England+warns/article.do

NWN: And what is Nick Griffin going to do about this ? Since Griffin conned his way to the BNP leadership, the BNP 'hibernates' till early April immediately after the RWB. Activists have been purged to allow this to happen.

Everyone is Searchlight except me; says Joe Owens !


Dear Peter,

Thanks for sending me Joe Owens' pathetic and illiterate little squib posted on the 'Stormfront UK'. Owens says he doesn't find it "strange" that you post some of my items on your blog, as he claims that we are "both 'Searchlight'." Hi-ho!

In the light of that, how does he explain his long and persistent e-mail correspondence with me, initiated by him via a text message in January 2006, and terminated by me with a "Delete/Unsubscribe" notice to him in November 2007?

During that period there were a total of 97 exchanges, nearly all instigated by him. This volume of contact with me should be sufficient indication of Owens' hypocrisy in denouncing your posting of my commentaries!

Owens wanted me to assist him with the promotion of his memoirs which were then being 'ghost-written' for him by a professional journalist working for a mainstream tabloid newspaper (I think the 'Daily Mirror', which has a long-established close liaison with 'Searchlight').

In due course this relationship with the tabloid "ghost-writer" lapsed, perhaps because the memoires were so turgid.

Owens sent me a whole chapter of the stuff.

It was nothing but a chronicle of punch-ups in the Merseyside area. That may have been the substance of the life of the Liverpool Branch of the National Front, but it was certainly not a reflection of the work of the party as a whole.

'His' text did not give one iota of the political context of the NF.

The screed served only to confirm the view of the nationalist movement beloved by 'Searchlight' and the establishment media: that the nationalist movement is merely a gang of thugs. I conveyed my opinion to Owens in those terms, and indicated that I was unable to assist him with the promotion of his memoirs. First Black Mark against me in Owens' resentment book!

Later Owens badgered me to confirm his view that the attempt made by Tony Lecomber during Christmas 2006 to recruit him as an assassin of Establishment figures was "an entrapment operation organised by the Special Branch/MI5". Why Owens wanted a statement from me confirming that view, I do not know, but I could not oblige him. I maintained to Owens that Lecomber (then Gri££in's No. 2 man) was quite sincere (if nutty and misguided) about his proposition.
I think Lecomber approached Owens because of Owens' boasting about his connections with the Liverpool criminal underworld and allegations of murder. Second Black Mark against me in Owens' resentment book!

As a PS on the Lecomber/'Murder Incorporated' affair, I should mention that Liverpool Police got to hear of Lecomber's proposition to Owen and approached Owens for a statement. Owens refused to assist with their investigation, so it lapsed.

Finally, Owens and I fell out over my interpretation of the way in which Joe Pearce, once the leader of the Young National Front and of nationalist 'radicals', not only abandoned the nationalist cause (along with his first wife and children) but also denigrated it to the media in order to gain himself a new life as "Joseph Pearce", a new wife and a well-paid career at a Roman Catholic university in Florida.

Owens disliked my article about Pearce and began forwarding me 'anonymous' critical letters about it which he claimed to have received. I do not entertain anonymous correspondence, first or second-hand, and so I terminated my contact with him. Third and final Black Mark against me in Owens' resentment book!

Hence his silly posting on 'Stormfront UK' .

Such is life.

Sincerely,

Martin Webster.

BNP Members are Evil

According to, Trudy Gold, chief executive of the London Jewish Cultural Centre.


Paul Ryan has been ordered to stay at home after allegedly impersonating Hitler while on duty.

Mr Ryan, a Police Community Support Officer working for the Safer Neighbourhoods Team in Swiss Cottage, north London, is being investigated by the Metropolitan Police after complaints about his behaviour.

The alleged incident happened last month at the unit's base in Finchley Road when Mr Ryan began goose-stepping around the office and making Nazi salutes during a conversation about Germans, police sources said.

The PCSO was previously removed from Kentish Town Safer Neighbourhoods Team for suggesting to a black colleague that there was nothing wrong in voting for the far-right British National Party, it is understood.

A spokesman for Camden police said Mr Ryan was suspended on August 5 after an allegation of misconduct at work on July 24.

He said: "The alleged incident occurred in police premises not accessible to the public. All such allegations are taken very seriously and an internal investigation has been launched.

"It would be inappropriate to comment any further at this stage."

Mark Gardener, spokesman for the Community Security Trust, a charity guarding against anti-semitism in the UK, said the Met was right to take tough action.

Mr Gardener said: "Obviously we would thank the police for their prompt action and voice extreme concern at the suitability of this police officer.

"This kind of action would cause offence, not only to Jewish people, but many others as well.

"We would be extremely concerned at any police officer making fun of Nazism."

But Trudy Gold, chief executive of the London Jewish Cultural Centre, urged caution and said that dismissing the PCSO as a racist could be political correctness gone mad.

She said: "If it was meant as humour it is probably in bad taste but is Monty Python funny? Is Mel Brooks funny when he does the dancing and singing Hitlers in The Producers?

"It comes down to the question of whether we can make fun of evil. It is a difficult area but I wouldn't want to condemn him as evil for making a Hitler salute until we know the context - if he is a card-carrying member of the BNP, for example."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2637752/Police-support-officer-suspended-for-goose-stepping-and-making-Nazi-salutes.html

The missing six million

Author: Editorial, Solidarity, 21 August, 2008

The Socialist Workers Party’s behaviour at last Saturday’s [16 August 2008] protest against the British National Party’s Red White and Blue festival was spectacularly crass. But nothing they did was odder than the text of the petition they were circulating to gather contact names.

Using Love Music Hate Racism as a party front, their petition’s second bullet point reads: “[The BNP] deny the holocaust where thousands of LGBT people, trade unionists and disabled people were slaughtered.”

No mention of the main victims of the Holocaust, the Jews.

How could such an omission be accounted for? Perhaps, it could be argued, the Jews were simply forgotten, left off the list of victims through casual error. Perhaps we should regard this as a stupid mistake, but not a malicious or politically significant one. Perhaps a young, new SWP member should take the blame.

Let us assume that a young member did write this. Don’t more experienced comrades in the SWP check political material before it is circulated? We know they do.
But let us also assume that the youngest, newest SWP member produced this material, which was then circulated, unchecked by anyone else within the SWP. Why would this hypothetical new member “forget” the Jews?

To say something has been “forgotten” is a description, not an explanation. For example, one of us might forget our office keys — a description of an event. But the explanation may well be that somewhere in our brain, perhaps semi- or sub-conciously we don’t really want to go to work.

Political people, writing political documents, make such glaring omissions for identifiable political reasons.

Our charge against the SWP is not that they hate Jews — not as individuals. Our charge is not that they are Hitlerites — of course they are not. Our charge against the SWP is that their hostility to “Zionism” (i.e. to most Jews in the world) is now so deep-running, so pernicious, so unthinking, blinkered and automatic, that such an “accident” or “mistake” is possible. By creating an organisation with such a default setting, the SWP’s leaders are building a group which will “forget” the Jewish victims of the Holocaust. Shame on you!
http://www.workersliberty.org/story/2008/08/25/missing-six-million

More power to the SWP for finally recognising those who bring misery on every country in the world, including ours. Perhaps deep down the SWP may think Hitler had a point, or perhaps they realise that the 6 million figure has purchased war and misery on a level the Jews themselves have never felt. It was only 2 weeks ago that Israel was looking to shed blood in Ossetia. One would genuinely assume that any peoples who had really suffered would never wish it upon anyone else, but we enlightened few know differently.
http://judicial-inc.biz/88georgia_tillawi.htm

Just when we thought we’d lost, and lost again…

The EGM of last weekend isn’t as bad as we first thought, well, not now we’ve had time to digest the contents of the new amendments, and once written up, they will be placed online.

Why are they not so bad we hear you mutter, well, it goes like this…

Mr Nicholas John Griffin, was insisting on an amendment that would give him the right to sit upon his increasingly prickly throne for 4 years without being challenged. But, because he lost, the fail-safe’s put in to prevent a mad ( which Griffin clearly is) leader remaining in situ come into force, and this our dear readers means that Griffin cannot be challenged once a year, but THRICE!

How on earth could he have missed this? Well, he missed it because not only was, Mr Nicholas John Griffin, to lazy to write those amendments, as he clearly thought he was going to win. He was also to damned lazy to read them, but to late now, Mr Griffin, they were voted upon and passed.

Who was this genius responsible for the following? We’d like to know, as the man is clearly a friend of the democratic process, and possibly a future BNP leader.

Challenge 1, can be done on Oct/Nov of each year if 20 paid up voting members request it at the annual AGM.

Challenge 2, can be triggered at any time by 2/3rds of the AC impeaching, Mr Griffin, for gross misconduct, and we all know he’s done plenty of that.

Challenge 3, can be done annually after local elections are out of the way and requires no more than 250 signatures, a walk in the park for any serious challenger who would have Griffin in court in the likelihood he should refuse, or tamper, with the membership list.

So, there we have it readers, REAL POLITICS, in action, and there’s certain to be plenty of that over the coming months.

BTW, we hear, Mr Griffin, is away on a sulk because he knows, and is aware of, what he thought we’d missed. Well, we all know now, and we reckon he must be feeling like a proper clown. We couldn't find an image of a stitched up kipper...

Update:

Motion 1

Advisory Council

Passed with an amendment defining what a Voting member is – namely a full member with two years continuous membership, who has attended a training event within the year, who is an activist as certified by their Regional Organiser (includes councillors, and officers) and who makes a financial contribution (exempt officers and councillors)



S.5.1. Replace "the organisers of the party's four strongest regions" with "all Regional Organisers".



S.5.2. replace "three times a year" with "four times a year"



Motion 2

Leadership Elections

Passed with amendment deleting all references to election years and 4 yearly term –and replacing 10 Voting Members and 100 members of 24 months standing as nominators to 1/5 of all members of over 24 months continuous membership with the total number of 2 year members being declared on 1st July every year.



The whole of the existing Section 4 should be replaced with:



S.4.1. Elections for the post of National Chairman shall be held every
four years, starting in 2009. Nominations shall open on 20th July in each
leadership election year and close at noon on 10th August. The election
shall be held on a 'one member, one vote' basis in a secret postal ballot
of all members paid up by 1st of July.

S.4.2. Any member of the party may become a candidate for the post of
National Chairman of the party provided that person has on or before the
close of nominations is and has been a fully paid up member of the party
for a minimum of five consecutive years, and has secured the signatures on
his or her nomination paper of ten current Voting Members and one hundred
members each with a minimum of 24 months continuous membership. Each
member can only nominate one candidate.

S.4.3. Notification of a leadership election shall be issued in the
September issue of British Nationalist, while the October issue will
include an A4 manifesto sheet from each candidate (designed and supplied
by them) and a ballot paper, and will be sent by post to all members,
including those who normally receive their bulletins electronically.

S.4.4. A prerecorded debate between the candidates shall be publicised on
BNPtv, a private page on the BNP website will give each candidate up to
six sides of A4 designed by them, the party magazine shall give each
candidate equal space to set out their ideas, and at least three hustings
meetings will be held with equal time for each candidate in different
parts of the country and be open to all paid up members from the areas in
question. In the event that unavoidable external circumstances render any
of these methods of communication impractical they may be omitted or
replaced as decided by a simple majority vote of a special meeting of the
Advisory Council.

S.4.5. The ballot papers shall be kept unopen-ed until the post has
arrived on the third Thursday of October, where all received ballots shall
be opened and counted under the supervision of two senior officials
appointed by the AC who are not candidates, together with the candidates
and up to two scrutineers each.

S.4.6. The election shall take place on a first past the post basis.

S.4.7. In any election year in which no nominations for the post of
National Chairman of the party are received in accordance with Sub-section
2 of this Section, the currently serving holder of the post will be deemed
to have received a mandate from the party to hold it for a further full
term. In any election year where a leadership challenge is entered the
currently serving National Chairman shall be deemed to be nominated
automatically should he wish to stand again.

S.4.8. In event of a General Election being called before the ballot
papers have been posted, the campaign may be suspended at the discretion
of simple majority vote of the AC, resuming the schedule immediately after
polling day.

S.4.9. If an outgoing National Chairman is a paid employee of the party
and either does not wish to remain as such or is not required as such by
the new incumbent, he shall receive severance pay in line with the
statutory requirement, plus one month for each year served up to a total
of eight years, and one week extra for each year thereafter.

S.4.10. The successful candidate in any such election will be considered
as occupying the office of National Chairman immediately on completion of
the counting of votes in that election.

Please note that the following proposed alterations are so closely
connected to the changes proposed for S.4 that it is necessary to take
them together with it as one composite motion 1.

S.5.6. The only other power of the Advisory Council shall be that it may
call a General Members' Meeting by a two-thirds majority of Advisory
Council members voting in a properly convened meeting with a quorum of
two-thirds, even if this is opposed by the National Chairman.
Alternatively the National Chairman may call such a meeting or postal
ballot at any time he deems it necessary. Should such a meeting or ballot
be called, it must be held within 40 days, and the matter which led to it
being called shall be put to the members to decide. If a two-thirds
majority of those voting should vote against the National Chairman then he
is bound to accept that decision or to resign from the leadership,
triggering a leadership election in which he may stand if he so wishes.

S.5.7. The National Chairman may also be held to account by a motion
proposed and supported in writing by twenty Voting Members and submitted
to the party's registered headquarters address not later than 14 days
before the date of the Annual Conference. This motion shall then be
debated and voted upon by all Voting Members at the conference and, if
passed by a minimum two-thirds majority, a leadership election shall be
triggered, using the procedures and time-scale laid out in this
Constitution, but with the schedule starting from 14 days after the date
of the Annual Conference. The previous National Chairman may stand in this
election is he so wishes.

S.5.10. A member of the Advisory Council shall not be removed from the
Advisory Council on the day of an Advisory Council meeting.
General Members' Meetings & Ballots

S.13.2. In the event of the National Chairman or the Advisory Council
calling a General Members' Meeting, at least 14 days' notice must be given
to all members by post with notification of the proposed motions. All
members of the party shall have the right to attend and vote, subject to
the provisions of Section 2, Sub-section 6 of this Constitution.

S.13.3. remove "not later than 28 days before the scheduled date of the
meeting" and replace "National Chairman" with "Chairman of the meeting."


Not passed - Motion 3

Postal ballot option



S.13.5. General Members' Meetings may only be called by the National
Chairman or by the Advisory Council in accordance with Section 5 of this
Constitution. All matters which may be decided by a General Members'
Meeting may also be put to the membership by postal ballot. The motions
for such a postal ballot are to be decided by a two thirds majority of the
Advisory Council or by the National Chairman and are to be sent out in the
first available British Nationalist together with a ballot paper for each
paid up member, who should have a minimum of 14 days in which to return
the ballot paper. The opening and counting of the ballots is to be
witnessed by the proposers and a minimum of two national officers, with
all members of the Advisory Council entitled to attend should they so
wish.



Not passed Motion 4

Determination of Core Policies by Voting Members

(Note: This is part of a rolling programme intended to transfer additional
key powers to the Voting Membership, and further changes in that regard
are expected in the future as the institution itself develops)



Remove Section 3.1.d.

S.13.4. Add Section 14 to list of protected Sections in S.13.4. and remove
reference to ghost ss.6.

S.14.2. Change method of notification of any changes to the Constitution
to "or publication on the party's official website."

Add S.14.3. No proposals to change any part of Section 1 of this
Constitution, or to change or adopt any major policy, are to be proposed
to either a General Members' Meeting or in a postal ballot until
previously passed by the Annual Conference of Voting Members.