Sunday, December 06, 2009


David Irving speaks in Spain


GRANADA
Viernes 11.12.2009 a las 19,30 lugar conferencia
BARCELONA
Sábado 12.12.2009 a las 18,30 lugar conferencia LIBRERÍA EUROPA, calle Séneca 12
MADRID
Domingo 13.12.2009 a las 12,00 lugar conferencia

David Irving

LA DESTRUCCIÓN DE DRESDEN

Dígase lo que se quiera sobre el polémico historiador británico, sus documentadas obras no dejan impasible a ningún interesado y mucho menos a los profesionales, que en muchos casos se limitan a leer cuatro libros sobre un tema para escribir el quinto.

David Irving profundiza en los archivos rusos, alemanes, británicos y norteamericanos para analizar los documentos originales y exponer lo que estos reflejan y no las interpretaciones políticas de los mismos.

Perseguido, procesado, encerrado en prisión a causa de sus investigaciones, boicoteadas sus conferencias en España, Irving no ha tirado la toalla…

LIBROS LIBERADOS: El autor firmará ejemplares de sus libros recientemente publicados en español “La destrucción de Dresden” y “La guerra de Hitler”.


(Click image to enlarge)

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

hope Irving isn't going to promote his new book on Reichsführer-SS Himmler and talk utter nonsense about the Reinhard camps on his visit to Spain? If he isn't careful he will become the Jews' willing tool? Irving needs a few history lessons from Prof Faurisson and think less about shagging his young blond bit on the side and get back to the archives?

Anonymous said...

Irving is an historian NOT a politician.

Anonymous said...

I don't care if Irving is a historian or a politician, what counts he's stirring up the thieving kikes.

Anonymous said...

Griffin joins the Establishment and plays at silly politics (climate change debate) while the Nationalists in the real world in multi-racial cities & towns fight for the real cause Race & Nation.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H1JLA4mpfN8

Anonymous said...

Irving is money oriented, a bit like Gri££in. He has done some excellent research and work in the past, but I afraid he wants to be more accepted and has capitulation about so called mass extermination in the Reinhard camps, his new book coming out soon puts the Reichsführer in a very poor light. Heinrich Himmler's heroic daughter Gudrun has had a run in with Irving over this flawed research. This brave lady is involved with the organisation Silent Help, assisting elderly people constantly hounded by the Jews. My message to Mr Irving is stop thinking about your bank balance and libido and get on with proper Nationalist writing!

Anonymous said...

I wonder who the private individuals are?


Germany still owes £50m in reparations for the First World War
Published Date:

By Allan Hall in Munich
Published Date: 03 December 2009 The Scotsman
http://news.scotsman.com/world/Germany-still-owes-50m-in.5879378.jp

GERMANY has still to pay off about £50 million of the notorious "reparations" demanded from it after the end of the First World War more than 90 years ago.

The German Finance Agency, the country's authority on debt management, has revealed that tens of millions of euros are still being transferred to private individuals holding debenture bonds as agreed under the Treaty of Versailles, signed on 28 June, 1919.

Those bonds were issued at the time to investors hoping to make money out of Germany's financial quagmire.

"The still-open contract for interest and amortisation payments is around 56 million," agency spokesman Boris Knapp said. "That is the debt still outstanding from all those years ago, but Germany will make good on it."

The news that modern-day Germany is still in debt for one world war that laid the foundations for the next one was revealed by the agency after a written freedom of information request by a newspaper.

With the signing of the Versailles accord, Germany accepted blame for the war which cost nine million men their lives.

Article 231 of the peace treaty – the so-called "war guilt" clause – declared Germany and Austria-Hungary responsible for all "loss and damage" suffered by the Allies during the war and provided the basis for reparations.

The treaty was despised by Germans and seized on by the Nazis to foster a feeling of victimhood among their countrymen.

The initial agreed sum for war damages in 1919 was 226 billion Reichsmarks, a sum later reduced to 132 billion Reichsmarks. This was the equivalent at the time of some £24 billion.

France, which had been ravaged by war – its farmlands devastated by battles, its industries laid waste and some three million men killed – pushed hardest for the steepest possible fiscal punishment for Germany.

The principal representative of the British Treasury at the Paris Peace Conference, John Maynard Keynes, resigned in June 1919 in protest at the scale of the demands, warning correctly that it was stoking the fires for another war in the future.

"Germany will not be able to formulate correct policy if it cannot finance itself," he warned.

When the Wall Street Crash happened in 1929, the Weimar Republic – Germany's first and only democracy until after the defeat of Nazism in 1945 – spiralled into debt.

What the Bank of England now calls "quantitative easing" was started in Germany, with the printing of money to pay off the war debt, triggering inflation to the point where ten billion marks would not even buy a loaf of bread.

Up until 1952, Germany had paid some 1.5 billion marks in war reparations to the Allied countries. However, in 1953, the outstanding balance was suspended pending a reunification of East and West Germany.

After the two states officially became one on 3 October, 1990, the old debts went into effect again, with 20 years for them to be paid. Germany plans to pay off all its First World War debts by 3 October next year.

Anonymous said...

The Lefty Guardian newspaper is practising Soviet censorship, Mr Mortl letter has been removed from their website. Below is the letter he wrote that was printed in the hard copy.

Corrections and clarifications
Corrections editor
The Guardian, Saturday 5 December 2009
 The Guardian issued this statement yesterday: "We published a letter by John Mortl in the Guardian of 3 December [page 37, and guardian.co.uk] relating to the case of John Demjanjuk, who is accused of assisting in the murder of 27,900 people in Poland. Unfortunately, we misread the letter. The underlying meaning, we now realise, implied Holocaust denial. As soon as we realised our mistake, we removed the letter from the website. It should never have been published and we apologise unreservedly that it was."

Sir:

What kind of justice is it that proscribes the normally accepted right of an accused to challenge the assumption that a crime had, in fact, occurred?

Normally the prosecution is obliged to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the crime of murder had taken place.

This is not the case in the German trial of John Demjanjuk. The prosecution will not have to present such evidence. The court will, without proof, arbitrarily accept that the alleged crime took place. His legal counsel will be prohibited on pain of prosecution from presenting evidence contradicting this assumption. Being stripped of his most powerful defense, the accused is reduced to pleading mistaken identity or that he had nothing to do with an unproved murder.

John Mortl
London

Anonymous said...

http://www.ukcolumn.org/cp-exposed-takedown/


CP NEWS UPDATE.

Anonymous said...

Its funny how for some folks, WW2 only starts with the bombing of Dresden.

For the previous decades of English victims of German air bombing (and here I can remind the 'forgetful' that Germany first bombed England by air in WW1) their attitude is 'fuck Dresden'.

PICTURED: American-Israeli teenager, 19, arrested for making hoax bomb threats against Jewish community centers in the US The unnamed te...