'Sleeping with the Far right' - Channel 4 documentary, a nationalist view

We eventually managed to watch that Channel 4 episode of 'Sleeping with the Far right'. Having been involved in nationalism since 1976, we got a great sense of 'deja-vu' here.

Just why do 'nationalists' constantly agree to do these media projects ?

Especially since the 'modus operandi' of these media companies has never altered one iota, to our personal knowledge, since the early 1970's. And further, have recently seen similar 'hatchet jobs' by these mass media hacks who were doing similar since the 1950's on people like Oswald Mosley and Colin Jordan.

Even John Tyndall has been duped in the past, in the 1970's, by lying 'journos'. Even in JT's own home, they used similar tactics to the above example using  dirty underhanded tricks. Then using previously agreed behaviour to be pulled away, so that the hopefully expected 'outburst' is then filmed.........and broadcast. Thus making their 'target' look very bad. One outburst was; Most notable of these is when Sen’s mother lets slip his original name, and Levine asks why he changed it. What was never a particularly amiable mien changes to a furiously aggressive one; Sen demands that this be removed from the film as an utter irrelevance - GUARDIAN https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2019/feb/21/sleeping-with-the-far-right-review-could-you-move-in-with-a-man-too-racist-for-ukip.

The sad thing is, there have been enough examples of the controlled mass medias hatred against nationalists for us to seemingly keep falling for the same old 'dirty tricks'. Why do nationalists keep providing ammunition for the enemy ?

We have no personal knowledge of Jack Sen . We have no idea on how 'au fait' he is in dealing with modern day political discourse. Especially from the nationalist perspective. So we have no idea why yet another embarassing job against nationalism was made, and then aired again on national TV.

There was a part in the programme where both David Duke and Nick Griffin appeared via something such as Skype. Did both of these two agree to be filmed and included in that TV programme ? Especially when the interviewer is Alice Levine. All their antennaes should have been up.........we spotted that right away.
Did Jack Sen discuss with Duke & Griffin at length about this TV programme ? Did they advise Sen, or indeed warn him about how these media people really operate ?

And why didn't Jack Sen literally hammer Levine as to her antecedence, pretentiousness, and being a raving leftie and ..........  zionism ?

Duke is normally pretty media savvy. Griffin by contrast, has been absolutely woeful in dealing with the media. His record has been disastrous . One prime example was when he allowed Mark Collett to do 'Young, Nazi & Proud', a similar hatchet job on the BNP some years back. We don't think we need to really mention the disaster that was Griffins appearance on Question Time in 2009. That shocking display, effectively hammered the 'final nail' into the BNP coffin. But then again Grifin has a record of trashing nationalist parties. He trashed the BNP, and earlier trashed the National Front in the mid 1980's.

We have to deal with the 'controlled mass media' as that is the nature of politics today. But what we don't need to do is, invite them into our homes for a full week. Thus providing them with any angle to do their dirty work.

Set interviews have to be the only way for dealing with mass media organs who  are effectively 'the main enemy' and obstruction to British nationalism. We have to set the agenda.

Not get too religious here at all, but the Bible mentions about the major corrupters being "Scribes & Pharisees". Nothing has changed over 2,000 years.