'Sleeping with the Far right' - Channel 4 documentary, a nationalist view
We eventually managed to watch that Channel 4 episode of 'Sleeping with the Far right'. Having been involved in nationalism since 1976, we got a great sense of 'deja-vu' here.
Just why do 'nationalists' constantly agree to do these media projects ?
Especially since the 'modus operandi' of these media companies has never altered one iota, to our personal knowledge, since the early 1970's. And further, have recently seen similar 'hatchet jobs' by these mass media hacks who were doing similar since the 1950's on people like Oswald Mosley and Colin Jordan.
Even John Tyndall has been duped in the past, in the 1970's, by lying 'journos'. Even in JT's own home, they used similar tactics to the above example using dirty underhanded tricks. Then using previously agreed behaviour to be pulled away, so that the hopefully expected 'outburst' is then filmed.........and broadcast. Thus making their 'target' look very bad. One outburst was; Most notable of these is when Sen’s mother lets slip his original name,
and Levine asks why he changed it. What was never a particularly amiable
mien changes to a furiously aggressive one; Sen demands that this be
removed from the film as an utter irrelevance - GUARDIAN https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2019/feb/21/sleeping-with-the-far-right-review-could-you-move-in-with-a-man-too-racist-for-ukip.
The sad thing is, there have been enough examples of the controlled mass medias hatred against nationalists for us to seemingly keep falling for the same old 'dirty tricks'. Why do nationalists keep providing ammunition for the enemy ?
We have no personal knowledge of Jack Sen . We have no idea on how 'au fait' he is in dealing with modern day political discourse. Especially from the nationalist perspective. So we have no idea why yet another embarassing job against nationalism was made, and then aired again on national TV.
There was a part in the programme where both David Duke and Nick Griffin appeared via something such as Skype. Did both of these two agree to be filmed and included in that TV programme ? Especially when the interviewer is Alice Levine. All their antennaes should have been up.........we spotted that right away.
Did Jack Sen discuss with Duke & Griffin at length about this TV programme ? Did they advise Sen, or indeed warn him about how these media people really operate ?
And why didn't Jack Sen literally hammer Levine as to her antecedence, pretentiousness, and being a raving leftie and .......... zionism ?
Duke is normally pretty media savvy. Griffin by contrast, has been absolutely woeful in dealing with the media. His record has been disastrous . One prime example was when he allowed Mark Collett to do 'Young, Nazi & Proud', a similar hatchet job on the BNP some years back. We don't think we need to really mention the disaster that was Griffins appearance on Question Time in 2009. That shocking display, effectively hammered the 'final nail' into the BNP coffin. But then again Grifin has a record of trashing nationalist parties. He trashed the BNP, and earlier trashed the National Front in the mid 1980's.
We have to deal with the 'controlled mass media' as that is the nature of politics today. But what we don't need to do is, invite them into our homes for a full week. Thus providing them with any angle to do their dirty work.
Set interviews have to be the only way for dealing with mass media organs who are effectively 'the main enemy' and obstruction to British nationalism. We have to set the agenda.
Not get too religious here at all, but the Bible mentions about the major corrupters being "Scribes & Pharisees". Nothing has changed over 2,000 years.
The home of real patriotic British people. The independent nationalist voice in the UK. The Red Rose County - Lancashire. A cummerbund & Griffinite free zone.Nick Griffin wrecked the National Front in the 1980's and then he wrecked the British National Party when he hijacked the BNP in 1999.A blog that supported John Tyndall.
Friday, February 22, 2019
George Galloway is a leftie scumbag.....................but his views on zionism need to be heard !
We disagree with Galloway on many issues. But his TV interviews especially on the issue of zionism are a joy to view. Zionism is the greatest enemy free peoples of the world need to know about and endure.
Most people have no idea what zionism is. Hence why the 'controlled mass media' have given us the lie that anti zionism is anti-semitism.
Even David Icke has now been banned from speaking in Australia, due to zionist pressure 'downunder'.
We disagree with Galloway on many issues. But his TV interviews especially on the issue of zionism are a joy to view. Zionism is the greatest enemy free peoples of the world need to know about and endure.
Most people have no idea what zionism is. Hence why the 'controlled mass media' have given us the lie that anti zionism is anti-semitism.
Even David Icke has now been banned from speaking in Australia, due to zionist pressure 'downunder'.
Monday, February 18, 2019
Jihadi schoolgirl's dad took her to hate preacher's rally at 13: Shock admission by man who blamed police when girl fled to join ISIS
- Abase Hussen said maybe his daughter was influenced by attending a rally
- Amira Abase was one of three teenage girls who fled to Syria in February
- Mr Hussen attended one rally alongside one of Lee Rigby's killers
- He said he moved to Britain in 1999 for freedom and democracy
Published:
05:08, 6 April 2015
|
Updated:
08:47, 7 April 2015
The
flag-burning father of a runaway British jihadi schoolgirl yesterday
admitted taking his daughter to an extremist rally when she was 13.
Abase
Hussen – who blamed police for failing to stop his daughter fleeing to
join IS earlier this year – conceded the teenager was ‘maybe’ influenced
by the rally organised by banned terror group Al-Muhajiroun.
Mr
Hussen told MPs last month, after his daughter Amira Abase fled to
Syria aged 15, that he could think of ‘nothing’ to explain why she and
two friends had decided to join IS, as well as keeping quiet about his
own links to radicalism.
Scroll down for video
+4
+4
Abase Hussen, left, took his daughter Amira, right, to a demonstration when she was aged just 13
+4
Abase Hussen, circled, marched at the head of a violent rally held by Muslim extremists in London in 2012
It
then emerged he had been in caught in shocking video footage amid a
flag-burning mob, screaming in rage at a protest outside the US embassy
in London, in 2012. Also at the rally were hate cleric Anjem Choudary
and Michael Adebowale, one of the killers of Fusilier Lee Rigby.
He has now apologised for attending, but admitted going to two further rallies – with his impressionable daughter in tow.
One
took place outside the Saudi embassy in London, in 2013, and is said to
have been organised by the Islamic extremist group Al-Muhajiroun,
founded by hate cleric Omar Bakri Mohammed and linked to many Islamic
terror atrocities of the past decade.
Yesterday
Mr Hussen, who went to this rally and another similar one with his
daughter and wife Fetia, conceded they might have influenced the
youngster, who would have been 13 at the time.
‘The
only reason we took her first time, was because there was no one to
look after her and we both felt it important to go,’ he said.
The
rally was held against the treatment of Ethiopians in Saudi Arabia
after human rights violations, and Mr Hussen, 47, who is from Ethiopia,
said: ‘We both lost many people back home, we wanted to try to get help
for people back home, too many human rights violations there. Many died.
Maybe it influenced her.’
Amira
was one of three girls from Bethnal Green Academy in East London who
flew to Turkey before being smuggled across the border into Syria in
February. Soon after, in an extraordinary exchange at the home affairs
select committee, Mr Hussen blamed the authorities for failing to stop
his daughter running off to Syria. Asked by chairman Keith Vaz if Amira
had been exposed to any extremism, Mr Hussen replied: ‘Not at all.
Nothing.’
Yesterday
respected analyst Shiraz Maher, senior fellow at The International
Centre for the Study of Radicalisation at King’s College London,
tweeted: ‘Remember that Amira Abase’s father blamed the police for his
daughter going to Syria and effectively misled Parliament with this
nonsense.’
Mr
Hussen told The Times yesterday that he felt ashamed to have been at
the flag-burning rally. He said: ‘I went to show my feelings because my
religion was being insulted, my faith. Protesting is not radical, it is
our right.’
+4
Amira Abase, pictured, was one of three girls who flew from Gatwick to Turkey before crossing to Syria
Asked
why he was pictured at the front of the mob, he said: ‘The crowd pushed
me. I feel tricked. I did not know who they [the organisers] were. I
just followed the crowd, I feel ashamed.’
Mr
Hussen came to Britain from Germany in 1999 and said he came ‘for
democracy, for the freedom, for a better life for children, so they
could learn English’. He said he was upset with his daughter joining IS,
saying she was ‘just a normal kid who is a victim of extremists’.
Mr
Hussen said he felt ‘terrible’ to know he had been protesting with one
of Mr Rigby’s killers and said: ‘It was brutal, it has nothing to do
with Islam, it is not human. You don’t do things like this.’
Amira
fled to become a ‘jihadi bride’ with her friends Shamima Begum, 15, and
Kadiza Sultana, 16. A fourth girl from their school, Sharmeena Begum,
left for Syria in December. Giving evidence to the MPs’ committee, Mr
Hussen accused police of not doing enough to warn him and other parents.
Last
night Tory MP Michael Ellis, who sits on the committee, said: ‘I would
certainly be in favour of Mr Hussen being recalled to give him a full
opportunity to explain what he clearly did not when he appeared before
us.
‘It’s
shocking and outrageous anyone would think it appropriate to take their
13-year-old to such a rally. But then to tell a House of Commons
committee you have no idea why a young teenager should seek to travel to
Syria, when you have taken her to more than one of these events, is
simply breathtaking.’
'They deserve no mercy': Iraq deals briskly with accused 'women of Isis'
A Baghdad court has sentenced more than 40 foreign women to death after 10-minute hearings
Martin Chulov in Baghdad and Nadia al-Faour
In a small holding room in a Baghdad court, French citizen Djamila
Boutoutao cradled her two-year-old daughter and begged for help.
Boutoutao, 29, is accused of being a member of Islamic State. Whispering in her native tongue within earshot of other accused Isis members – all foreigners like her – she said life had become unbearable.
“I’m going mad here,” said Boutoutao, a small bespectacled woman with a deadpan stare. “I’m facing a death sentence or life in prison. No one tells me anything, not the ambassador, not people in prison.”
Guards moved closer as Boutoutao continued. So did her fellow accused – all from central Asia or Turkey, who had all lost husbands and, in some cases, children as the Islamic State collapsed in Iraq last year.
“Don’t
let them take my daughter away,” she pleaded. “I am willing to offer
money if you can contact my parents. Please get me out of here.”
With that, the short conversation was shut down and Boutoutao returned to a corner, waiting for the judge in the adjoining room to summon her. There were no French officials present, and nothing at all to connect her to her former life in Lille. If convicted of joining the terrorist group, she faces life in a central Baghdad jail, or death by hanging.
All the 15 women in court last week had been widowed by the war that eventually ousted Isis from much of Iraq, killing tens of thousands of its members and replacing its promises of an Islamic utopia with a crushing defeat. The women here had in some cases willingly joined the group, travelling alone from Europe and central Asia, or with their partners, to what they believed to be a promised land.
More than 40,000 foreigners from 110 countries are estimated to have travelled to Iraq and Syria to join the jihadist group. Of those, around 1,900 are believed to have been French citizens, and around 800 were British.
Boutoutao arrived in Iraq in 2014, with her husband, Mohammed Nassereddine and two children. He was killed in Mosul in 2016 as was her son, Abdullah, one year later. She was captured by the Kurdish peshmerga in northern Iraq and eventually sent to Baghdad, where the fortified court in the centre of the capital has become a focal point of the post-Isis era.
Up to 1,000 women accused of belonging to Isis were rounded up from the ruins of Iraq’s towns and cities and are now being held in Baghdad to face a reckoning from a society and government that remains deeply scarred by the past four years, with much of their anger directed at foreign fighters and their families. Up to 820 infants accompany the women, with some others yet to be born.
The proceedings had a sense of urgency, and so did the 10-minute
hearings in Baghdad’s central criminal court that have summarily
dispensed with the accused foreign women, sentencing more than 40 to
death, and dozens more to life in prison since the so-called caliphate crumbled.Boutoutao, 29, is accused of being a member of Islamic State. Whispering in her native tongue within earshot of other accused Isis members – all foreigners like her – she said life had become unbearable.
“I’m going mad here,” said Boutoutao, a small bespectacled woman with a deadpan stare. “I’m facing a death sentence or life in prison. No one tells me anything, not the ambassador, not people in prison.”
Guards moved closer as Boutoutao continued. So did her fellow accused – all from central Asia or Turkey, who had all lost husbands and, in some cases, children as the Islamic State collapsed in Iraq last year.
Advertisement
With that, the short conversation was shut down and Boutoutao returned to a corner, waiting for the judge in the adjoining room to summon her. There were no French officials present, and nothing at all to connect her to her former life in Lille. If convicted of joining the terrorist group, she faces life in a central Baghdad jail, or death by hanging.
All the 15 women in court last week had been widowed by the war that eventually ousted Isis from much of Iraq, killing tens of thousands of its members and replacing its promises of an Islamic utopia with a crushing defeat. The women here had in some cases willingly joined the group, travelling alone from Europe and central Asia, or with their partners, to what they believed to be a promised land.
More than 40,000 foreigners from 110 countries are estimated to have travelled to Iraq and Syria to join the jihadist group. Of those, around 1,900 are believed to have been French citizens, and around 800 were British.
Boutoutao arrived in Iraq in 2014, with her husband, Mohammed Nassereddine and two children. He was killed in Mosul in 2016 as was her son, Abdullah, one year later. She was captured by the Kurdish peshmerga in northern Iraq and eventually sent to Baghdad, where the fortified court in the centre of the capital has become a focal point of the post-Isis era.
Up to 1,000 women accused of belonging to Isis were rounded up from the ruins of Iraq’s towns and cities and are now being held in Baghdad to face a reckoning from a society and government that remains deeply scarred by the past four years, with much of their anger directed at foreign fighters and their families. Up to 820 infants accompany the women, with some others yet to be born.
Foreigners in particular, often carrying babies, are processed with an uncompromising efficiency rarely seen in other parts of Iraq’s judicial system. In mopping up the aftermath of Isis, the court system has taken on the role of bringing the country towards a closure. As Iraqis try to stitch their torn social fabric back together, a stark resentment remains towards the jihadists whose rampage took a toll on a national psyche that was yet to recover from sanctions, invasion and civil war.
France and other European countries remain hostile to those of their citizens who are now facing Iraqi courts, insisting they should face local justice abroad. The French government has shown some leniency towards children orphaned by the fighting, but none towards adults who made decisions to join the group.
Earlier this year, the defence minister Florence Parly said those who did make it back to France would be “held to account for their acts”. French officials have told their counterparts in the region, however, that those who failed to escape can expect no comfort.
With Isis now all but ousted from Iraq’s lands, there is little talk of reconciliation. Asked what he would say to the leader of Isis, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi if he was put in front of him, Sheikh Qais al-Khazali, the leader of one of Iraq’s most feared Shia paramilitary groups, Asa’ib ahl al-Haq, said: “I would tell him he failed. He wasn’t good enough. He was nothing and he is beneath us all.”
Mustafa Rashid, a car dealer in east Baghdad was similarly scathing about the foreign prisoners. “Be damned with them,” he said. “They deserve no mercy. The women too.”
In the same court a day earlier, an Iraqi woman had been cleared of all charges and released after successfully mounting a defence that her brother had forced her to join Isis. While some Iraqi women, and large numbers of men, have been sentenced to death for their roles in the terrorist group’s rampage, only a small number of foreign women have received any concession
“In the minds of Iraqis and the judiciary and the government, by virtue of the fact that you are foreign and chose to live in Isis territory there is a level of agency in what you did and more culpability,” said Belkis Wille, the senior researcher for Iraq for Human Rights Watch. “It is not the same in the case of Iraqi women, where very specific evidence is often lessening sentences. If you buy a plane ticket, cross a border and make your choices, you are far more exposed.”
The Baghdad courtroom was bustling with men who were shuffled into a dock in the centre of the room. A group of 12 were sentenced to death by hanging, then escorted back to cells. Next it was Zahraa Abdel Wahab Al Kaja’s turn. Just turned 17 years old, and originally from Tajikistan, she also cradled a baby, whom she had dressed in a hijab, and seemed disorientated.
“I was brought to Syria about five years ago with my mum and dad,” she said. “They married me to a Turkish man. He was good to me. This is his child. We settled in Iraq. My father and husband died. I am now imprisoned with my mother and daughter. I want to go back home, even though my country is no good. I didn’t wear hijab back home. Isis is good, it taught me how to cover myself.”
More women came and went: a Turk, a Russian, and two from Kyrgyzstan. In each case one of three judges asked several curt questions, then ordered the accused woman from the room. A prosecutor then made a short statement, and a defence lawyer read from a brief. Outside, one of the state-appointed defenders said he had not spoken with his client, and had only seen a summary of the investigation notes.
Human Rights Watch said that, despite its urging over the past two years, there had been no sign of lawyers playing a more proactive role, or the judiciary seeking more substantive evidence for prosecutions. Justice instead depended heavily on instinct, an official said during a break. “I’ve worked here for 10 years and I can tell who’s innocent with one look in their eyes. I can tell you horror stories and I can share moments of magic.”
Guards who bring the women from a nearby prison said most were unrepentant. “An Isis prisoner once asked me for something which I couldn’t provide and she called me an infidel.”
What to do with the children is a more vexing question for Iraqi authorities. Some infants chewed on apples while their mothers waited for their hearings. Others were passed around the women who each took turns at calming them.
“They will grow up to be just like [their mothers],” said one of the guards. “No, it’s a sin to say that,” said another. “All children are innocent.”
“Maybe,” came the reply. “But let’s finish with this quickly. There are still so many of them.”
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/may/22/they-deserve-no-mercy-iraq-deals-briskly-with-accused-women-of-isis?CMP=share_btn_fb&fbclid=IwAR0d-vCbetJBPwp2HbUhWieBEHNB3rjtr9FefMGZ0nlQvoCDijmM8Cn9OVY
NWN: This story might be over 9 months old but it is a very 'NOW' story. Especially with all the furore over that female muslim terrorist who will no doubt be allowed back into the UK. Our politicians ought to insist, she is never allowed back into the UK. Also, the father of one of the other girls ought to be simply thrown out of the UK together with his poisonous family and all their relatives . He was heavily involved in 'brainwashing' these stupid traitorous girls and he also attended meetings with the killers of Lee Rigby.
We the 'real' British people are mad to allow this state of affairs. Our politicians will just acquiesce, without even a fight, to keep her and her dangerous ilk, free access to Britain.
In days of yore, the number one priority of monarchs was ; 'Defence of the Realm'.
Tuesday, February 12, 2019
Saturday, February 09, 2019
A picture from the archives. In the early 1980's there were many National Front demonstrations in Rochdale. This is one of them. Sorry about the quality, but it shows about 200 - 300 NF demonstrators in the centre of Rochdale, at the bus stop at the top of John Street/Yorkshire street. Most were Rochdale folk.
The Police then as now, were no friends of nationalism, so an amount of subterfuge was needed/used to have these demonstrations .
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
Someone has just tried to post the link to this website on here, we have deleted it. WARNING 2008 list online WTF is going on at the BNP ? ...