Sunday, September 08, 2013


Obama's Syria War Is Really About Iran and Israel


President Barack Obama meets with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel. 

The dirty little not-so-secret behind President Obama’s much-lobbied-for, illegal and strategically incompetent war against Syria is that it’s not about Syria at all. It’s about Iran—and Israel. And it has been from the start.
By “the start,” I mean 2011, when the Obama administration gradually became convinced that it could deal Iran a mortal blow by toppling President Bashar al-Assad of Syria, a secular, Baathist strongman who is, despite all, an ally of Iran’s. Since then, taking Iran down a peg has been the driving force behind Obama’s Syria policy.
Not coincidentally, the White House plans to scare members of Congress into supporting the ill-conceived war plan by waving the Iranian flag in their faces. Even liberal Democrats, some of whom are opposing or questioning war with Syria, blanch at the prospect of opposing Obama and the Israel lobby over Iran.
Item for consideration: a new column by the Syria analyst at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, the chief think tank of the Israel lobby. Andrew Tabler headlines his piece: “Attacking Syria Is the Best Way to Deal with Iran.” In it, he says:
At first glance, the festering Syria crisis seems bad news for diplomatic efforts to keep Iran from developing nuclear capabilities. In actuality, however, achieving U.S. objectives in the Syria crisis is an opportunity to pressure Iran into making hard choices not only in Syria, but regarding its nuclear program as well. More U.S. involvement to achieve its objectives in Syria will inevitably run counter to Tehran’s interests, be it to punish the Assad regime for chemical weapons use or to show support for the Syrian opposition in changing Assad’s calculus and forcing him to “step aside” at the negotiating table or on the battlefield.
Many in U.S. policymaking circles have viewed containing swelling Iranian influence in Syria and preventing Iran from going nuclear as two distinct policy discussions, as the Obama Administration only has so much “bandwidth” to deal with Middle East threats. But the recent deepening of cooperation between Tehran, Hezbollah and the Assad regime, combined with their public acknowledgement of these activities, indicates that they themselves see these activities as furthering the efficacy of the “resistance axis.”
Like every alliance, its members will only make hard policy choices if the costs of its current policies far outweigh the benefits. U.S. strikes on the Assad regime, if properly calibrated as part of an overall plan to degrade the regime, would force Tehran to become more involved in Syria in order to rescue its stalwart ally. This would be costly for Iran financially, militarily and politically. Those costs would make the Iranian regime and its people reassess aspirations to go nuclear.
Needless to say, such a strategy is bound to be counterproductive, since—by slamming Syria, never mind toppling Assad—Washington is likely to undermine doves and bolster hawks in Tehran and undermine the chances for successful negotiations with Iran’s new president, Hassan Rouhani, who’ll be speaking at the UN General Assembly later this month.
In fact, both Russia and Iran have signaled recently, in the wake of Syria’s obvious deployment and use of sarin gas and other deadly weapons that they might be getting ready to join the rest of the world in condemning Syria’s chemical warfare, and that makes it far more likely that the much-postponed US-Russia “Geneva II” peace conference on Syria might work. The hawkish Washington Post today notes Rouhani’s new administration in Tehran is softening its tone on Syria, and it reports that the new Iranian foreign minister, Javad Zarif, has acknowledged the Syria has erred, saying: “We believe that the government in Syria has made grave mistakes that have, unfortunately, paved the way for the situation in the country to be abused.”
Meanwhile, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin, while issuing scathing denunciations of the coming U.S. attack on Syria, has dropped broad hints that he might be willing to join with other nations if and when the United Nations weapons team concludes that Assad used nerve gas, suggesting that Russia might not block a UN Security Council resolution against Syria. In his much-reported interview with the Associated Press, Putin insisted on waiting for the UN report:
“If there is evidence that chemical weapons have been used, and used specifically by the regular army, this evidence should be submitted to the U.N. Security Council. And it ought to be convincing. It shouldn’t be based on some rumors and information obtained by intelligence agencies through some kind of eavesdropping, some conversations and things like that.”
Then, according to the Washington Post, Putin declared that he might join a UN-sponsored coalition on Syria:
He said he “doesn’t exclude” backing the use of force against Syria at the United Nations if there is objective evidence proving that Assad’s regime used chemical weapons against its people. But he strongly warned Washington against launching military action without U.N. approval, saying it would represent an aggression. Russia can veto resolutions at the U.N. Security Council and has protected Syria from punitive actions there before.
But a change in tone on the part of Russia and Iran—the latter of whom the Obama administration still refuses to invite to Geneva II if and when it occurs—won’t mean a thing if the object of war with Syria is to send a message to Iran. As Jeffrey Goldberg, writing for Bloomberg, says, for Israel it’s all about Iran:
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel would prefer that Obama enforce his red line on chemical weapons use, because he would like to see proof that Obama believes in the red lines he draws. From Netanyahu’s perspective, Israel isn’t unduly threatened by Assad. Syria constitutes a dangerous, but ultimately manageable, threat.
Netanyahu believes, of course, that Iran, Syria’s primary sponsor, poses an existential threat to his country, and so would like the Iranians to understand very clearly that Obama’s red lines are, in fact, very red. As Robert Satloff, the executive director of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, told me last night, the formula is simple: “If the Iranians do not fear Obama, then the Israelis will lose confidence in Obama.”
In his round-robin television appearances on Sunday, Secretary of State John Kerry—now the administration’s über-hawk—repeatedly said that bombing Syria would send a message to Iran. As he told Fox News on Sunday:
“The fact is that if we act and if we act in concert, then Iran will know that this nation is capable of speaking with one voice on something like this, and that has serious, profound implications, I think, with respect to the potential of a confrontation over their nuclear program. That is one of the things that is at stake here.”
http://www.thenation.com/blog/176040/obamas-syria-war-really-about-iran-and-israel#

21 comments:

Anonymous said...

Claim: Obama hid 'gay life' to become president.


Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2012/09/claim-obama-hid-gay-life-to-become-president/#Q0rBipWrTcBZj5eT.99

Anonymous said...

MARRIED TO THE MOB; PRESIDENTS AND IN-LAWS.

http://aangirfan.blogspot.co.uk/2013/09/married-to-mob-presidents-and-in-laws.html

Anonymous said...

China Sends 1000 Marines To Syrian Coast, Russia Sends More Warships (Video)

http://beforeitsnews.com/middle-east/2013/09/china-sends-1000-marines-to-syrian-coast-russia-sends-more-warships-video-2454142.html

Anonymous said...

'CIA'S BANDAR SUPPLIED GAS FOR DAMASCUS ATTACK'


http://aangirfan.blogspot.co.uk/2013/08/cias-bandar-supplied-gas-for-damascus.html

Anonymous said...

Increasingly Desperate Jewish Lobby Openly Plays “Support Israel” Card against Syria.

http://davidduke.com/increasingly-desperate-jewish-lobby-openly-plays-support-israel-card-against-syria/

Anonymous said...

Britain sent poison gas chemicals to Assad: Proof that the UK delivered Sarin agent to Syrian regime for SIX years
British companies delivered sodium flouride to Syrian firm from 2004-2010

The chemical is a key component in manufacture of nerve gas

Sale has been blasted as 'grossly irresponsible' in light of chemical attacks

Intelligence expert says substance will have been diverted to regime


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2415081/Britain-sent-poison-gas-chemicals-Assad-Proof-UK-delivered-Sarin-agent-Syrian-regime-SIX-years.html#ixzz2eFoIn1dR

Anonymous said...

The Zionist Plan for the Middle East.

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article33220.htm

Anonymous said...

US deployed nuke force before Syria crisis.


http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/09/07/us-deploys-nukes-for-war/

Anonymous said...

'Anti-racist is anti-white' sign removed from overpass.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c69Q30091js

Anonymous said...

Beauty and The Beast: Asma al Assad vs Michelle Obama/


http://tomatobubble.com/asma_al_assad.html

Anonymous said...

Holocaust, the Comics.

http://www.roitov.com/articles/comics.htm

Anonymous said...

The Grim, Relentless March to War with Syria

Pro-Israel Lobby Pushes America into War. AIPAC Is A Grave Threat To World Peace.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/pro-israel-lobby-pushes-america-into-war-aipac-is-a-grave-threat-to-world-peace/5348592

Anonymous said...

US Journalists and War Crime Guilt.

http://consortiumnews.com/2013/09/05/us-journalists-and-war-crime-guilt-2/

Anonymous said...

Syria: Poll Shows French Overwhelmingly Oppose Military Action.

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/articles/502763/20130831/france-syria-military-francois-hollande-bva-poll.htm

Anonymous said...

Busted: UK-US Backed Terrorist Doubles as Rebel Fighter AND fake Sarin Gas Attack Victim.


http://nodisinfo.com/Home/takfiri-terrorist-busted-faking-sarin-gas-injury-one-gas-attack-threat-video/

Anonymous said...

The Jewish side of Muslim Brotherhood.


http://ashraf62.wordpress.com/2013/08/24/the-jewish-side-of-muslim-brotherhood/

Anonymous said...

NYPD: Man Brain-Dead Following Random Rampage In Union Square

Witness: Suspect Vowed To Attack 'Next White Person Who Walks By'

Anonymous said...

Norway's anti-immigration party likely to enter government this week

Survivors of the Utøya island massacre in 2011, perpetrated by an anti-immigration extremist, are concerned this will lead to a rise in social hostility
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/08/norway-anti-immigration-party-coalition-election

Anonymous said...

'Islam destroys democracy in France'

http://english.pravda.ru/world/europe/23-08-2013/125489-islam_france-0/

Anonymous said...

'Islam destroys democracy in France'

http://english.pravda.ru/world/europe/23-08-2013/125489-islam_france-0/

Anonymous said...

Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi a Zionist scum bag.

http://balder.org/judea/Richard-Coudenhove-Kalergi-Practical-Idealism-Vienna-1925.php








http://blog.balder.org/?p=404