Sen. Rand Paul raises an interesting question:
When has Hillary Clinton ever been right on foreign policy?
The valkyrie of the Democratic Party says she urged President Obama
to do more to aid Syrian rebels years ago. And last summer, she
supported air strikes on Bashar Assad’s regime.
Had we followed her advice and crippled Assad’s army, ISIS might be
in Damascus today, butchering Christians and Alawites and aiding the
Islamic State in Iraq in overrunning Baghdad.
But if the folly of attacking Assad’s army and weakening its
resistance to ISIS terrorists is apparent to everyone this summer, why
were Clinton, Obama and Secretary of State Kerry oblivious to this
reality just a year ago?
Consider the rest of Hillary’s record. Her most crucial decision as
senator came in 2002 when she voted to invade Iraq. She now concedes it
was the greatest mistake of her Senate career.
She voted against the surge in 2006, but confided to Defense
Secretary Bob Gates that she did so to maintain her political viability
This is statesmanship? Not voting your convictions about what is best
for your country at war, so as not to antagonize the liberals in the
In 2009, Hillary presented a “reset button” to Vladimir Putin’s
foreign minister. In 2011, she supported U.S. air strikes to bring down
Col. Gadhafi and celebrated in Tripoli when he was overthrown and
How did that work out? Libya is today a hellhole of murder and mayhem, and Islamists are threatening a takeover.
Who did Hillary think would rise when Gadhafi fell?
Hillary’s failure to anticipate or prevent the Benghazi massacre and
her role in the botched cover-up, all concede, are burdens she will
carry into the primaries in 2016, should she run.
Where, then, has Hillary exhibited the acumen to suggest she would be
a wise and savvy steward of U.S. foreign policy in a disintegrating
world? Order Pat Buchanan’s brilliant and prescient books at WND’s Superstore.
Is this a convincing argument for the Republican alternative?
Hardly. The principal GOP voices on foreign policy, who get more airtime than Wolf Blitzer, are John McCain and Lindsey Graham.
Their track record: McCain wanted to confront Putin over South
Ossetia. He and Graham wanted to arm Ukrainians to fight the Russians in
Crimea, Luhansk and Donetsk. They wanted Moldova, Ukraine and Georgia
brought into NATO, so that if war were to break out, we would be
fighting the Russians alongside them.
This year, Graham was trolling around a Senate resolution to give Obama a blank check to attack Iran.
Last year, McCain and Graham were for attacking Assad’s army. This
year they are for bombing ISIS, which is attacking Assad’s army.
But if Hillary, McCain and Graham have been repeatedly wrong about Syria, what do we now? Answer: Stop and think.
First, this war in Syria and Iraq, like all such wars, is eventually
going to be won by soldiers, by boots on the ground, by troops who can
take and hold territory. And in such wars, as Napoleon said, God is on
the side of the big battalions.
America should declare to friends and allies in the Middle East, as
Nixon did to our friends and allies in Asia in the Guam Doctrine of
1969, that while we will stand with them when they are attacked, they,
not we, will provide the soldiers for their own defense.
No nation is less threatened by ISIS than ours. And as the Syrians,
Turks, Kurds and Iraqis have the proximity and manpower to defeat ISIS,
they should do this job themselves.
Turkey shares a 550-mile border with Syria and could march in and
crush ISIS. But if President Recep Tayyip Erdogan wishes to play games
with ISIS, out of hatred of Assad, let him and the Turks live with the
As for Syria’s army and regime, which either defeats ISIS or dies,
let us cease impeding their efforts by backing a Free Syrian Army that
has rarely won a battle and is only bleeding the Syrian army.
Kurdistan and its ethnic cousins in Syria, Turkey and Iran are
capable of defending themselves, and we should encourage any nation,
including Iran, that is willing to send them the weapons to fight ISIS.
As for Baghdad, if it wants its Sunni lands back, it either should
fight for them or accept their loss. We Americans are living today with
the consequences, in considerable losses of blood and treasure, of
fighting other people’s wars in Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya.
Yet, we are suffering not at all from having kept out of other people’s wars – in Georgia, Crimea, Donetsk, Syria and Iran.
Speaking of the debate over U.S. air strikes in Syria, the New York
Times writes, “There are too many unanswered questions to make that
decision now, and there has been far too little public discussion for
Mr. Obama to expect Americans to rally behind what could be another
costly military commitment.”
Sometimes the Times gets it right.