Examples of Democracy in Rochdale 1992 General Election

 

Examples of Democracy in Rochdale 1992 General Election

This is a document that was distributed in 1992. Today we have more efficient methods of distribution. The next part(s) will appear ASAP.

27th.November 1992

1992 General Election & Local Elections
Extremist Examples of Democracy in Rochdale

Part 3  of this report;

General Election April 9th. 1992. 

On the 1st April 1992, we sent a letter to the commanding Officer of Rochdale Police (P division), pointing out that the Anti Nazi league (ANAL)  and Anti Fascist action (AFA) . Two extreme communist groups who actively promote violence against their opponents (see RED ACTION newspaper of AFA dated July/August 1992 of which we have a copy). These two groups form an 'umbrella'  group for the various left-wing groups from the Labour party, for example the Labour parliamentary candidate Cllr. David Williams, to the criminal underworld of AFA. In the letter we stated that these two 'umbrella' groups and all the left were organising to distribute several thousand illegal smear leaflets contrary to the 'representation of the peoples act'.

After the Parliamentary and local election  was completed the returns of all the duly nominated candidates in the elections have been examined and it was found;

1). That neither the Anti Nazi league  nor Anti Fascist action had a candidate standing in the elections.

2). That none of the candidates who were duly nominated in the elections and wo were entitled to issue or authorise the issue of printed material in the constituency/ wards. Which would be calculated to influence the outcome of those elections, did not indeed adopt those costs of these leaflets numbering in their many thousands, as part of their election expanses.

Therefore, an offence had been committed ! 

WE had forewarned Rochdale Police. In the event, they did nothing to uphold the law !

I would draw your attention to a number of letters published in the Rochdale Observer  during the election period, from members of the public. In effect , over a period of several weeks these left wing mobs had harassed shoppers and passers-by via the use of violent language through portable megaphones. Their sheer weight of numbers in their hundreds , and preventing passers by walking with having 'stickers' placed on their persons and having leaflets thrust at them - in this case illegal leaflets !

And that these leaflets were designed to influence these elections. A few of these published letters in the Observer, explicitly condemned the Police for just standing around and doing nothing. 

Our letter to Rochdale Police informed them that these people were organising again to distribute illegal leaflets designed to subvert  the democratic process. As is explicit under the House of Lords v Michael Luft 1975 precedent. In that precedent, Luft a jewish communist and SEARCHLIGHT magazine from Oldham and others, organised the distribution of illegal smear leaflets in their thousands in 1974. 

These smear leaflets were distributed around the country and also in the North West, against nationalist candidates. These offences were investigated by Scotland Yard Fraud Squad and Special Branch  detectives. Their investigations led to successful prosecutions and convictions quoted in the case mentioned herein.

A Parliamentary General Election is a fundamental part of our democracy, and we feel very strongly that the authorities responsible for upholding the law, without fear or favour, would take steps to make it clear they will NOT tolerate the electoral process to be subverted by means of unlawful acts.

All this was pointed out to Rochdale Police, and who were fully aware of the 'House of Lords v Luft  1975' precedent.

Police said in a curt reply to Mr. Henderson, the BNP Parliamentary Rochdale candidate that they would uphold the law. They did not !

Rochdale Police's past performance with regard to election offences leaves a lot to be desired. In 1982, in spite of 'prima facie'  evidence published in the Rochdale Observer  dated Weds, 18th August 1982 in the letters page. One Peter Atkinson, who was at the time was the leader of  Rochdale Communist party, he admitted in his letter that he and others handed out illegal leaflets in Norden, Rochdale. The Police refused to take any action, and we had to resort to once again making a formal Police complaint to the Chief Constable of Greater Manchester  Police. Still the Police refused to take any action, or indeed, explain why they had dropped the case. In fact, we never even got a reply !

*******************************************************************************

This report, having viewed the original 1992 document about the then report, is larger than was originally thought, and which is far more comprehensive.

We are going to re-publish this document in full. So therefore, there are going to be THREE more parts to this historical and comprehensive document. TWO tier Policing and a Two tier establishment system, has been going on in the UK for decades. 

We are supposed to have a 'Separation of Powers' in the UK. But this report will highlight the Civil service and the Judiciary  as well as the Police, all failed to uphold the law.

What happens when a Police constable is ordered to stand against the very people he swore an oath to protect ?

 

We will be re-publishing Part THREE of our 1992 Rochdale election report, and the shenanigans that 'the state' committed against duly nominated BNP candidates - one a Parliamentary election candidate, and several local council election candidates. This 'TWO tier treatment' and justice, has been ongoing for decades.

We will re-publish Part 3, soon.

 

Quite unbelievably the British Broadcasting Company / BBC, have just put out this piece of propaganda. But when they report on failing pupils, they have white children. 

Last night in Portsmouth - illegal immigrants forced through protestors by Police. There was also an incident in Bolton too.

Port of Dover blocked by large anti-migrant protest.  Well done !

 In 1992, Ann Widdecombe MP opposed the draconian lawbreaking by the 'state' and it's agents, against duly nominated  British National Party election candidates in Rochdale

This two tier system from the 'establishment' has been ongoing, both before and since that time in the UK. The below example was at the 1992 General Election. A combination of oppression from the Police, a Chief executive for Rochdale council, a High Court judge, and Rochdale magistrates. This was as a result of the British National Party standing in the then parliamentary General election of that year, plus local council election candidates.

There was only ONE senior MP and then Government minister, that publicly in the press voiced any opposition to what occurred in those elections of them breaking the law, and election laws. That person was Ann Widdecombe MP.

Tuesday, August 22, 2006

Part Two : Rochdale report - General Elections and Local Elections, 1992.


General Election : April 9th. 1992

On the 1st.April 1991, we sent a letter to the Commanding Officer of Rochdale Police , pointing out that the Anti-Nazi league (ANAL) and Anti-Fascist Action (AFA) , two groups who actively promote violence against their opponents (See RED ACTION newspaper of AFA dated July/August 1992, of which we have a copy). Where organising to come to the Town in large numbers.

These two groups form an 'umbrella' for the various left wing groups from the local Labour Party and their Labour Party Rochdale candidate David Williams, to anarchist groups and AFA; who have active IRA supporters/bombers among their ranks [2006 Note: Leading ManchesterAFA and top gangster at that time was Dessie Noonan, a member of Sinn Fein/IRA. Noonan was murdered by a black 'yardie' fairly recently over a drug dispute.] So we can see definite links to the political and criminal underworlds here.

Officially these groups were organising to illegally distribute several thousand smear leaflets. We can hazard a wild guess as to their real intent. Their actions behold their real intent.


After the Parliamentary and Local elections were completed, the returns of all the duly nominated candidates in the elections have been examined, and it was found;

1). That neither the Anti-Nazi league nor Anti-fascist Action had a candidate standing in the local areas for election,

2). That none of the Candidates who were duly nominated as standing, and were entitled to issue or authorise the issue of printed material in the Constituency/wards, which would be calculated to influence the outsome of those elections , did not indeed adopt those costs of these leaflets , numbering thousands, as part of their election expenses.

Therefore offences had been committed .


We had forewarned Rochdale Police , in the event, they failed to uphold the Law.


I would draw your attention to a number of letters in the Rochdale Observer newspaper, during the election period from members of the public, in effect, over a period of several weeks. Letters from the public complained about these 'left wing mobs' who were harassing and haranguing shoppers and passers-by in Rochdale Town centre.

Letter writers complained of the use of violent language through portable megaphones, the sheer amount of numbers of them crowding the bottom of Yorkshire Street, and preventing passers by walking and having ‘stickers’ placed on their person and leaflets thrust in their faces - in these cases illegal leaflets and these leaflets were designed to influence the elections.

A few of these letters published in the Rochdale Observer criticised the Police for standing around doing nothing. Many offences were pointed out to the Police , but the Police sadly did nothing.


Our letter to the Police informed them that these people were organising again to distribute illegal leaflets intended to subvert the democratic process, as is explicit under;

House of Lords v. Luft and others 1975 precedent.

In this case Mike Luft of Failsworth, Oldham , and others , mainly other jewish/communist activists, were involved in distributing thousands of illegal leaflets at the 1974 General Elections including in the North West against British nationalist Candidates. Luft was also a senior  official for SEARCHLIGHT magazine for the North west. SEARCHLIGHT magazine is  a Communist  party ran organisation. These offences by Luft and others, were investigated by Scotland Yard Fraud Squad detectives and Special Branch. Their investigations led to the successful prosecutions against Luft and others, and the convictions quoted in the aforementioned case.


A Parliamentary General Election is a fundamental part of our democracy, and we feel very strongly that the Authorities responsible for upholding the Law , without fear nor favour, would take steps to make it clear that they will not tolerate the electoral process to be subverted or corrupted by means of unlawful acts.

All this was pointed out to Rochdale Police, and they were fully aware of the House of Lords v Luft precedent.

Rochdale Police said in a curt reply to Mr.Henderson, in writing, that they would uphold the Law. They didn’t !

Rochdale Police’s past performance in regard to election offences leaves a lot to be desired .

In 1982, in spite of ‘prima facie’ evidence , a letter published in the Rochdale Observer , Wed. 18th.August 1982 in the letters page. A letter by one Peter Atkinson , who was at the time the leader of the local Communist Party , admitted in the letter that he, and others, handed out these illegal leaflets.

Rochdale Police refused to take any action, and we had to resort to the use of again writing to the Chief Constable - still the Police would not take any action ,or indeed explain why they had dropped the case.


General Election 1992 and attempts to hire a Public Hall in Rochdale


As you will know it is explicit in the Representation of the People Act. Local authorities must make arrangements so that duly nominated are able to avail themselves of these facilities, suitable premises to hold a Public meeting.

You will also be aware that when the BNP tried to avail themselves of a school for a meeting in early 1991 (in this instance a compromise venue of Greenbank School was agreed) in order to hold a meeting, the Chief Executive John Pierce was threatened 'with the sack' by the ruling Militant led Labour Council .

Pierce held out as long as he could , to try and deny the BNP it's rights .

Ex- Rochdale MP Sir Cyril Smith ,and the Home Office Minister Anne Widdicombe, had to come out in support of Mr.Pierce and the rule of Law, in the face of an all out sustained attack from the local Labour Party Council which was led by MILITANT TENDENCY member, Cllr. Richard Farnell .

This is the background to Mr.Ken Henderson , the duly nominated BNP Parliamentary Candidate’s attempts to hire a public hall.

In 1992 , the Rochdale Chief Executive, John Pierce flouted the Law by denying Mr.Henderson from exercising his democratic rights under the Representation of the People Act.

When Mr.Henderson having his patience exhausted again since Mr.Pierce refused to meet Mr.Henderson, or to answer his phone calls or letters, he had no recourse other than to go to Law.

Surely here, the Individual would be protected from Town Hall bureaucracy and high-handedness. Surely here the Law would be abided by ?    ****** Part 3 of this report  will be published soon.