At 8 am on Thursday June 5 revisionist publisher Simon Sheppard, of North Yorkshire, was woken up by a group of police threatening to break down the door of his house unless he opened it immediately, even refusing his request to be allowed to put on some clothes first.
Once inside, they arrested him on "suspicion of distributing racially inflammatory material, under section 19 of the Public Order Act 1986", allowed him to dress, handcuffed him and took him away.
Soon afterwards a search team arrived on the premises to prowl through his materials, confiscating two computers and some books (he does not know which).
Sheppard’s friend Paul Ballard explains
" … it seems that some sourpuss at the Post Office opened an outgoing package, saw something about Anne Frank, deemed it 'anti Semitic' and reported it to the police. This was enough for the special 'anti racist' task forces to spring into action."
Suspect Sheppard was detained until 1 pm, then bailed for three months, during which time he may or may not be charged with having committed an as yet unspecified act.
His activity as a revisionist publisher is well known to the authorities: in 2008 he was tried and convicted for distribution of "racist" tracts and imprisoned for three years. But he is unbowed, having no intention of giving up his life's work merely because the arbitrary ruling power disapproves of it.
Today the offence of "distributing racially inflammatory material" carries a sentence of up to seven years. So much for freedom of expression in England.
David Irving comments:
WE have to ask who were the traitors who allowed this to happen to Britain. In 1962 finally an act was passed restricting coloured immigration into England -- too late, and not strict enough even then. Lord Hailsham was one such traitor, as I reported on Day 15 in the Lipstadt Trial, cross examined about a speech I made in 1990 to my Clarendon Club.
In
1954 Lord Hailsham (right) said
that only 100,000 immigrants had so far
arrived and he did not expect many more.
Rather like Tony Blair last year with the
influx from East Europe, only far more
deadly. I am glad to say that The
Times reported my swipe at Hailsham
the next day.The cowardly newspapers always allow others to take the heat -- they are too frightened to say these patriotic things themselves -- and if others say them, the newspapers call them "racist." Nobody has dared pin that label in Churchill, yet.
MR RAMPTON: Could you turn to -- this is the Clarendon Club in 1990? Can you turn to page 9 of 12, please? I am going to read the whole of this.
You say: "Thus, we follow this tangled thread. At the end of the war in 1945, the British Empire was at its greatest ever extent in history. Our armies straddled the globe. We were beginning to get back the territories that we had lost in the Far East through Churchill's foolish military and naval strategy. And suddenly the Empire went.
Groping around in the darkness, we look for", capital G, "Guilty", capital M, "Men. Partly I think that we must blame sins of omission. If we look back from where Britain is now, with just a handful of people of true English, Irish, Scots and Welsh stock - apprehensive, furtively meeting in dinners like this, exchanging our own shared sensations and sorrows - then we can see where some of the worst errors have been made.
"In 1958, for example, we find Lord Hailsham saying at a Cabinet meeting, 'I do not think this Coloured Immigration is going to be much of a problem in Britain.
We only have 100,000 of these immigrants so far, and I do not think the numbers are likely to grow much beyond that! So on balance I am against having any restrictions imposed". . .
Then you close the quote from Lord Hailsham and you say: "Traitor No. 1 to the British cause". What do you mean by that?
IRVING. Lord Hailsham, these were records that were in 1988 just released from the Public Record Office, Cabinet records, and they reveal Lord Hailsham, who later became a Lord Chancellor, I believe, having said at a Cabinet meeting in 1958 in a totally negligent manner that he did not think that immigration into Britain was going to be a problem and that so far only 100,000 had arrived, and he thought it would not go to more than that.
http://www.fpp.co.uk/online/14/06/Sheppard_arrest.html
14 comments:
http://english.pravda.ru/photo/album/7577/
Illegal migrants pour into Britain: How we have lost control of the UK's borders
ONLY one in every 70 migrants suspected of being in the country illegally is arrested, Home Office figures revealed last night.
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/481143/Illegal-migrants-pour-into-Britain
Laws to stop chickens slaughtered under Halal from suffering delayed
LAWS aimed at reducing the suffering of animals have been put on hold after Muslims complained that they undermined their religious rights.
Animal rights groups have reacted with horror after the plans, which were due to come into effect next month, were suddenly delayed.
The measures would have forced abattoirs to use a stronger electric shock to stun chickens before their throats are cut, making it less likely that they would feel pain during slaughter.
They were agreed after research found that many birds were currently still conscious when their throats were slit.
However, Muslim leaders said there was a risk that a stronger current could kill the animals before the ritual slaughter - meaning they would no longer be halal.
Speaking to the Daily Mail, British Veterinary Association president Robin Hargreaves, who campaigns for better conditions in abattoirs, said: "Failure to implement the new regulations risks a percentage of chickens being ineffectively stunned, thus compromising animal welfare."
A spokesman for the Compassion in World Farming pressure group said the decision meant thousands of chickens could daily be enduring ‘horrific’ deaths.
Halal producers had been planning a judicial review to halt the new legislation before it was unexpectedly dropped.
A Department for Environment spokesman said: "We realised that our regulations might have unintended consequences in that they could limit religious freedoms.
"This is a complex area and we need to get it right."
He said that "robust" regulations about animal welfare remained in place.
Laws to stop chickens slaughtered under Halal from suffering delayed
LAWS aimed at reducing the suffering of animals have been put on hold after Muslims complained that they undermined their religious rights.
Animal rights groups have reacted with horror after the plans, which were due to come into effect next month, were suddenly delayed.
The measures would have forced abattoirs to use a stronger electric shock to stun chickens before their throats are cut, making it less likely that they would feel pain during slaughter.
They were agreed after research found that many birds were currently still conscious when their throats were slit.
However, Muslim leaders said there was a risk that a stronger current could kill the animals before the ritual slaughter - meaning they would no longer be halal.
Speaking to the Daily Mail, British Veterinary Association president Robin Hargreaves, who campaigns for better conditions in abattoirs, said: "Failure to implement the new regulations risks a percentage of chickens being ineffectively stunned, thus compromising animal welfare."
A spokesman for the Compassion in World Farming pressure group said the decision meant thousands of chickens could daily be enduring ‘horrific’ deaths.
Halal producers had been planning a judicial review to halt the new legislation before it was unexpectedly dropped.
A Department for Environment spokesman said: "We realised that our regulations might have unintended consequences in that they could limit religious freedoms.
"This is a complex area and we need to get it right."
He said that "robust" regulations about animal welfare remained in place.
Kevin Bryan is banned from attending David Irving activities.
A few years ago he refused to pay the attendance at a gathering in Rossendale. He did a runner.
Not only did he refuse to pay, but he also took the piss!
He ate the lunch with his 'gun running' friend Ken Kelly.
Aderonke Apata deportation case: 'If the Home Office doesn’t believe I’m gay, I’ll send them a video that proves it'
Aderonke Apata felt she had tried everything to persuade the Home Office she was gay. She’d sent letters from former girlfriends – both in Britain and Nigeria – and supporting statements from friends.
But once her claim that she could be killed because of her sexuality if sent back to Nigeria was rejected, she felt there was only one way of providing a judge with irrefutable evidence that she was gay: by sending a very personal home video.
On Monday Ms Apata will hand in a petition to Theresa May, the Home Secretary, demanding that the deportation of all LGBT asylum-seekers is halted until a review of their treatment is concluded.
Sitting with her girlfriend, Happiness Agboro, in a bar on Manchester’s Canal Street, Ms Apata, 47, reveals the traumatic ordeal she has experienced: “I was asked to bring my supporting documents for my judicial review for the court to look at. What evidence do we have to compile apart from letters from people? I knew we had a home video of ourselves, so I thought why not just put it in? I cannot afford to go back to my county where I will be tortured, so if I have to prove it with a sexual video, then I have to do it.”
Her experience is echoed by many LGBT asylum-seekers in Britain who are having to go to extreme lengths to persuade sceptical immigration officers of their sexuality. She still feels distraught at having shared such an intimate record of her personal life.
“I feel so bad it’s got to this stage. It’s such a desperate and precarious situation to be in, very dangerous, because anything could happen to those pictures, those videos.”
The Home Secretary ordered a review of how border officials handle gay asylum claims in March after leaked documents revealed that inappropriate interrogation techniques were being used to make people “prove” they were homosexual.
Ms Apata will present her petition at a meeting with the Independent Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration, attended by asylum-seekers and activists in Manchester.
When she came to Britain from Nigeria in 2004, her asylum claim was on religious grounds. She came from a Christian family, but had married a Muslim man in what she says was a sham arrangement to cover up her long-term relationship with another woman.
Has the BNP finally gone mad?
Or is it part of the plan to destroy it?
I refer to a recent article on its website about Islam being full of hate etc.
In it, the author Christopher Robinson, says that birth control is the best way to control Islam and that castration is the most effective method.
Whatever our private views might be, it is surely utterly stupid to call for the castration of Muslims.
This risks a prosecution and the closing down of the BNP website, which is almost the only bit of the BNP still functioning.
Jewish Corruption Scandal Mafia: Jews killing US´s Kids to send.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Ic_J_R9nD18&app=desktop
On Jewish Blood Rituals .
http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/on-jewish-blood-rituals.html
How the Israel Lobby works.
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2014/06/08/366097/how-the-israel-lobby-works/
Web of Deceit: Britain’s Stealth Internet Censorship Programme.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/web-of-deceit-britains-stealth-internet-censorship-program/5386142
Economic Hitman reveals shocking truths about the Government.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0CofEbxtIxI
Jewish leaders call for Le Pen to be stripped of his immunity as an MEP
The founder of the Front National in France is facing fresh allegations of inciting racial hatred after racist comments.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jun/08/jean-marie-le-pen-bruel-racism
Drug cartels? Amateurs! Here’s the real thing.
https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2014/06/09/drug-cartels-amateurs-heres-the-real-thing/
Post a Comment