Je suis Charlie ? Well we are not !
Garron Helm vs. Charlie Hebdo: Elite versus non-elite mechanisms for censoring public discourse
Here is a sobering thought. How many of those left-wing defenders
of free speech who stood to remember the victims of Charlie Hebdo also
condemned the
PEGIDA
(Patriotic Europeans against Islamization of the West)
anti-Islamification rallies in Dresden over Christmas? How many would
have supported the
counter-rallies in which the German government is doing so much to encourage?
What would the reaction of those same people have been if the targets
had been members of anti-immigration Front Nationale or any other right
wing or nationalist group. We know the answer because of their
reaction after the murders of Dutch anti-Islamisation campaigner Pym
Fortuyn and film-maker Theo Van Gogh; sneers, contempt and an
undisguised glee that the right-wing had got what it deserved.
And what of the victims themselves? Indeed they were in many ways
caricatures of the antifa campaigners who would go to the barricades to
preserve mass immigration and the end of France.
Stéphane Charbonnier
Take Stéphane Charbonnier, the editor of Charlie Hebdo, and one of
the victims. He is of a kind you can find in every White country in the
West. A dedicated “antifascist” who occupied a crucial opinion-shaping
position in the French media. In fact, as
Joshua Bonehill
points out, everybody killed in the attacks today would have almost
certainly have been anti-White and left-Wing and there’s a great irony
behind that as well.
Another victim was cartoonist Georges Wolinski who had a
strong Jewish identity and whose work appeared in a number of left-leaning publications besides
Charlie Hebdo, including
Liberation (which has agreed to
allow Charlie Hebdo to use its offices in the wake of the murders).
Advertisement
And it fell to one of the most unlikely voices to make a penetrating
and uncomfortable observation. Andjem Chaudhary is Fleet Street’s
favourite firebrand Islamic preacher and a man said to have encouraged
thousands of young Muslims to go on Jihad.
He tweeted: “If freedom of expression can be sacrificed for
criminalising incitement and hatred, Why not for insulting the Prophet
of Allah?”
He has a fair point. Why are we free to sneer and disparage Islam
while criticism of the secular religion of the Holocaust is out of
bounds? In Britain Simon Sheppard has spent years behind bars for
merely distributing Holocaust revisionist literature.
And not just the Holocaust, criticism of gay marriage, women priests,
abortion and much else are also off limits. Only a few months ago in
Britain,
Garron Helm, a 21-year-old Liverpool man, was
jailed for insolence after he got into a Twitter spat with Luciana Berger, a Jewish female politician.
She had defended the previous Labour government’s policy of mass
third world immigration against the wishes of the population. He had
responded that you could always trust a Jew to show their colours
eventually. For that he got a month in prison. If he had criticised
Islam in such stark terms it is unthinkable he would have been
prosecuted. One law for them, one for us.
And what use was Western freedom of speech to the people of Gaza when
3,000 were killed in the Israeli bombardment last year. How many know
that seventeen journalists were among the dead? Freedom of speech is
not an issue when you can decide which stories are covered and which are
not.
In a Europe where the mildest criticism of gay marriage or immigrants
brings with it media-led howls for prosecution, the double standard
towards Islam is glaring. In the end, as regular readers of the
Occidental Observer will be only too aware, the freedom of speech issue is a complete red herring.
What matters is ethnic group power and as Lenin said “who? whom?” —
which group is in a strong enough position to dish it out, and in the
West these days there is no doubt who that is. A crisis like this is too
good to waste. Before the blood has been swept away Jewish journalists
were maximising this heaven-sent opportunity to stir up enmity.
The Jewish media and their puppets will be working hard to make sure
that the debate stays framed around the issue of “extremist religion” by
which they means both Christianity and Islam. They are desperate to
avoid an ethnic dimension emerging, or that people start questioning the
role of Jews in creating Third World immigration into the West. Or
calling attention to the strong support that the
organized Jewish community has
giving to implement laws censoring free speech related to ethnic
conflict throughout the West. Heavens knows where those questions would
lead.
In the
Spectator (UK) Nick Cohen was
working hard
at this. “Undoubtedly there are white racists and Hindu nationalists
who treat religion as a race and hate Muslims because they are Muslims.
Their existence ought to present no problem to principled people, who
should fight, criticise and satirise them with the same force and for
the same reasons they fight religious obscurantism.”
One of the most penetrating observations came from
TOO writer
Mark Green in yesterday’s comments. It is worth reading again.
Many (not all) of these ‘Muslims’ are Caucasoid people —
often war refugees — from various nations with traditional customs and
different levels of education. Some are black African. Yet the media
makes no racial distinctions. Just one word: ‘Muslim’. …
These Muslims are not all barbaric and violent fanatics. Many are war
refugees. But I agree that they are generally ill-suited for life in
the West. But the same argument can be made of ‘Christians’ who hail
from Mexico. It’s a race and language issue as much as anything. ‘Islam’
is one element among many.
But the irony here is that if these dead journalists ever tried to
mock and ‘make fun of’ Jews the way they routinely derided Muslims, they
would have been put in jail or ruined in a different way far sooner. In
the ‘free’ West, Jews destroy their enemies silently but quite
effectively. No one says a word Incredibly, the Muslims know this better
than most Christian Westerners do, since so many of us have been
brainwashed via Jewish news and television our entire lives.
In fact, just being tarred as ‘anti-Semitic’ is enough to destroy
people in the West. This is Jewish magic at work and it is a deplorable
double standard that operates silently but profoundly. It is a taboo. It
is all Kosher. And it is a cancer on Western Civilization as well as
the Middle East. Just consider all the Zionist-friendly wars we’ve
conducted there. Count the dead.
What if all the war dead from these recent wars were Jews?
Jewish-friendly taboos also infuriate Muslims who see and understand
that Jews dominate the West and have a license to destroy Muslim nations
by remote control. The average American, on the other hand, has no
comprehension of this, as he’s been raised watching Jewish-made TV
shows, news programs, comedies and Holocaust dramas.
These Muslim fanatics may be nutty and dangerous, but I still view
them as victims of world Jewry which has become the primary
mover/manipulator of world geopolitics.
Is this mass killing in Paris good for the Jews? Incredibly, yes. It
makes unwitting Parisians think: ‘We’re all Israelis now’. Well it’s not
true.
If the French simply declared this anti-Muslim ‘satire’ to be
‘anti-Semitic’ one year ago, no one in Paris would now be dead as the
magazine would have been shut down. That’s the Jewish way. Censorship.
Shame. Control.
Unfortunately for Muslims, they don’t have that kind power. And that
also enrages them since they are constantly being bombed and invaded by
the West and, once they arrive in the West, they get mocked and insulted
here, as well. This double standard is a cancer. And I blame the Jews
for it.
Jews however don’t have to deal with any of this. Many Jews probably
pretend to be confounded by all this ‘Muslim anger’. Jewish
sensibilities, on the other hand, are coddled by the French and the West
in general. Israel gets rather special treatment, too. Jews have
attained a license to kill. No wonder the Muslims are angry. They are
powerless and unable to communicate the source of their rage to the
hapless and Zionized cultures in Europe and America.
If we expel all the Muslims, then let’s expel the Jews as well, as
they are the more fundamental cause of all this chaos and discord.
It’s really the difference between an elite strategy versus a
non-elite strategy for controlling public discourse. As noted, the
organized Jewish community has been the major force behind hate speech
laws throughout the West. This implies influence over the legislative
and executive process, dinners and rallies attracting prominent
non-Jewish spokespeople, financial and career support for those who make
alliances with them and strong, effective economic and social pressure
on those who oppose their interests. In the U.S., where “hate speech”
laws have made only minor inroads because of the First Amendment, there
are dozens of cases of where activist Jewish organizations (mainly the
ADL and the SPLC) have attempted to get people fired from their jobs for
saying the wrong thing about Jews (“
Jews control Hollywood“)
or other non-White groups or about sexual non-conformists. Or saying
things or having associations that edge too closely to explicitly
advocating for White interests, as in the recent
Steve Scalise/David Duke furor.
But these mechanisms are only open to an elite group. A non-elite
group like immigrant Muslims in France has little choice but to engage
in violence if they want to shut down speech they don’t like. Muslims
can’t control the legislative process to put
Charlie Hebdo out of business. Nor could they exert financial pressure on them or get them fired from their jobs.
So we will continue to be forced to listen to hypocritical media and
politicians spouting sanctimonious encomiums about free speech (e.g.,
Jeffrey Goldberg’s (“
Europe is under siege“)
while continuing to favor restrictions on free speech that they don’t
like. And the element of racial/ethnic conflict of interests that is at
the heart of the problem of massive non-White immigration to the West,
whether by Middle Easterners, Africans, or Latin Americans, will be
obliterated from public consciousness. Welcome to the Orwellian West of
the twenty-first century.
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2015/01/elite-versus-non-elite-mechanisms-for-censoring-public-discourse/
NWN: What a kerfuffle. Is it all a false flag operation by such as Mossad ? Have some muslims actually done a major disaster to their own 'plans' here ? Charlie Hebdo are just a very minor gang of leftists including as you would expect a number of jews. More info will come out, but by then, the attentions of the 'masses' will be focussed on some other rubbish such as 'Big Brothe'r or 'X-Factor'. They have similar rubbish broadcast in France. We bet there will be none of the 'terrorists' kept alive to stand trial ?
