Wednesday, May 20, 2015

Far-right groups planning demonstration ‘against Jewish privilege’ in Golders Green

Golders green
Golders Green
By Jenni Frazer 
Anti-Semitic and far-right groups are planning a major demonstration “against Jewish privilege” in Golders Green, the heartland of the community, on the first Shabbat in July. Communal leaders have asked Home Secretary Theresa May to ban the event.
Police told Jewish News this week that they are powerless, legally, to stop a static demonstration. It is understood that the planned rally is due to be held at or near Golders Green station on July 4, and antisemitic and neo-Nazi websites have been buzzing for months with information about the event.
Among those thought to be involved in organising the rally – which follows a similar, though unsuccessful event in Stamford Hill in April – are right-wing groups such as New Dawn. The Stamford Hill demonstration, described by the Community Security Trust as “quite pathetic and largely ignored”, was attended by less than 30 people who were held by police away from the Jewish community.
But Mark Gardner of the CST acknowledged this week that such an outcome “cannot be guaranteed in Golders Green”, He said that CST, which was “fully aware of this explicitly antisemitic demonstration”, was in discussion with both police and government about the next steps. He said: “We sincerely hope that our Jewish community will not be cowed by this neo-Nazi intimidation”.
Adrian Cohen, of the London Jewish Forum, said the forum deplored “the vicious antisemitic message of the proposed neo-Nazi rally. We, along with other major Jewish organisations, have asked the Home Secretary to ban the rally. If it goes ahead we will support those who wish to counter- demonstrate in support of the local community, and the relevant authorities in ensuring that peace and security is maintained in the area.”
Andrew Dismore, London Assembly member for Barnet and Camden, has written to the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, London mayor Boris Johnson and the Home Secretary Theresa May, calling for a ban on the event. Dismore said: “This is  clearly a highly provocative scheme on the part of the far-right to insult and incite hatred against the Jewish community.  This year has seen a huge rise in anti-Semitic attacks in London, including in Barnet. After the events in Paris, the Jewish community  is feeling very insecure.
“This event is designed to play on those fears and the risk of violence against Jewish businesses and residents is clearly present. This is  why I have written to demand  that the demonstration be banned and that those who plan to attend it are prevented from using TfL public transport to get  to Golders Green to ensure any ban is effective.”
Local MP Mike Freer told Jewish News: “I have called on the Home Office to step in and ban this demonstration. This rally is not about free speech but a deliberate attempt to promote tension and anti-Semitism.”
A spokesman for the anti-fascist group, Hope Not Hate, said it was strongly opposed to the rally going ahead but wished the community to be both prepared and informed. What is additionally troubling community leaders is the possibility of secular Jewish groups staging a counter-protest – and any resulting violence.
Chief Superintendent Adrian Usher, head of policing in Barnet, said: “Officers from Barnet will continue to work closely with the local community to make sure we fully understand their concerns and to brief them on the policing operation as it develops”. He said that officers were speaking to the organisers of the rally “to understand what their plans are”.
Police said they were “mindful” of the “passionate response” that was possible, particularly when protests were held at religious or culturally significant sites. But they made it clear that “disorder, crime and incitement to hatred will not be tolerated… and we will take appropriate action.”
http://www.jewishnews.co.uk/far-right-group-planning-demonstration-against-jewish-privilege-in-golders-green/

Sunday, May 17, 2015

Trouble in UKIP ?


Of course, Nigel Farage could ask his mate photographed here with him , Tony 'bomber' Lecomber to help him with the current UKIP infighting.. Lecomber is an expert in fomenting destruction of a political party. As is Farage, if this picture is anything to go from. The third person is Dr.Mark Deavin.Even though Deavin was involved in the hijacking of the BNP for crook Nick Griffin. He was able to still work in 'academia' , and publish books about arch traitor Harold Macmillan  apparently.

All the above were involved in the destruction of John Tyndalls genuine nationalist BNP..
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
 Dr Sked pointed to one notorious meeting Mr Farage had with far right activists as reason why he wanted to leave the party he founded. Mark Deavin, a former PhD student of Dr Sked’s and BNP activist, managed to infiltrate Ukip in the late 1990s and was photographed after a lunch meeting with Mr Farage alongside the twice-jailed BNP activist Tony ‘the bomber’ Lecomber. Dr Sked admitted bringing Deavin into Ukip but said he had “no idea” he was research director of the BNP.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/ukip-founder-nigel-farages-influence-means-the-party-wont-win-a-seat-in-the-general-election-9983519.html 

                                        ------------------------------------------------------

 "...............But here's an even stranger coincidence. Shortly before the 1997 general election, Mark Deavin spoke freely of his plans to undercover researchers from Searchlight magazine and The Cook Report, who had posed as emissaries from Jean-Marie Le Pen's Front National. One necessary step, he said, was to get rid of the BNP leader John Tyndall ("who is actually an obstacle") and replace him with Deavin's chum Nick Griffin. This would leave one other obstacle. "If Blair becomes prime minister," Deavin predicted, "the BNP will be the official opposition in the inner cities, in working-class areas. The UKIP will be the opposition in the shires, the county areas, the middle-class opposition. That party is a serious opposition to us in middle England, but, if we had the resources, we could tear it to pieces." .........................
http://www.guardian.co.uk/racism/Story/0,,202962,00.html

We all know that Farage is ill . Is this the 'States' way of destroying a vehicle that they helped to build, which has now got too influential ? Surely 'the state' wants us all to vote for either the Conservatives or the Labour Party as our Dads did and their Dads before them ? All dumbed down so we haven't a clue ? All voting for the Zionists Rothschild family enterprise so that all the top one's can toddle off to the Annual BILDERBERG conference.to get their orders.


UKIP  got almost 4 million votes. That is a serious threat to 'them'.



Come on baldy bomber Lecomber. We know you visit here. Explain you traitor !

England face 2018 World Cup ban for fans' anti-IRA chant

Fifa's new anti-discrimination monitoring system can dish out sanctions that range from a £20,000 fine all the way up to disqualification from a competition






















Email

England face 2018 World Cup ban for fans' anti-IRA chant
Warning: England will be punished if fans chant anti-IRA songs Photo: PA
 
ADVERTISING
The Football Association is at risk of being punished as early as the historic friendly in the Republic of Ireland next month, following the unveiling of the world governing body’s anti-discrimination monitoring system at Wembley yesterday.
The system will involve World Cup qualifiers – and high-risk friendlies – being scrutinised for any discriminatory behaviour, which one of its architects, Piara Powar, of Football Against Racism in Europe, confirmed would include anti-IRA chants.
Any association whose supporters are found guilty of such behaviour faces sanctions that range from a fine of £20,000 all the way up to disqualification from a competition.
Powar, a member of Fifa’s task force against racism and discrimination, revealed the governing body was considering instructing him to send an observer to England’s first match in Dublin since violence forced the abandonment of a friendly there 20 years ago. The FA has already taken steps to stop supporters singing anti-IRA chants at next month’s game, but will now be able to warn them that such actions could have dire consequences for the national side.
Powar said: “ 'No Surrender To The IRA’ comes from a point which is extreme nationalism. It’s about conflict between two states. That then would be reported. We would be making reports as often as our experts feel there is a case to answer. Then it’s down to Fifa.”
Powar said repeat offenders would face the most severe sanctions. “Some of the countries in this competition are going to commit three or four offences. That would mean they will have at least a stadium closure and possibly face being kicked out of the competition. We wouldn’t be doing this if we weren’t confident Fifa had the intention at least to take action on the evidence we provide to them.”
Fifa developed its new monitoring system after being condemned over its failure to punish clear incidents of discrimination at the World Cup last year, something it vowed yesterday would not be repeated.

Yaya Touré welcomed Fifa's new anti-discrimination initiative

The initiative was welcomed by the Manchester City midfielder Yaya Touré, who warned in 2013 that African players could boycott the tournament in Russia after he was racially abused playing there against CSKA Moscow in the Champions League.
• Yaya Toure insists racist abuse can 'break' players
Touré, who sidestepped questions about whether he still held that view, said: “I have been in the situation where there have been monkey chants and it’s difficult to deal with that. As sportsmen, you want to continue to the end, but when you hear something like that, it hurts you and breaks you. You need to give them [offenders] a radical sanction – paying a £20,000 fine is not enough, you need to do more.”
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/news/11601689/England-face-2018-World-Cup-ban-for-fans-anti-IRA-chant.html

NWN: This site knows for a fact, that rather a lot of Army veterans will be very unhappy about this codswallop.

What the bloody hell is all this about ?

-----------------------------------------------------------

LGBT Foundation to hold hate crime vigil against Homophobia, Biphobia and Transphobia


LGBT Foundation will take a stand against hate crime this weekend

Joel Goodman Rainbow flag on Canal Street
Rainbow flag on Canal Street
LGBT rights campaigners are set to hold a vigil against hate crime.
The LGBT Foundation, formerly known as the Lesbian and Gay Foundation, will hold the vigil this Sunday to mark the International Day Against Homophobia, Biphobia and Transphobia.
The commemoration will start at 1pm in Sackville Gardens in Manchester’s Gay Village.
Guest speakers will include: Paul Martin OBE, chief executive of LGBT Foundation, Police and Crime Commissioner Tony Lloyd and Bethany Black, stand-up comedian and TV actress from Russell T Davies’ TV shows Cucumber and Banana.

Paul Martin said: “The simple fact is if hate crime isn’t reported then nothing can be done about it, and we’ll never know the true extent of the problem.
“It could also mean that other people might receive the same or worse abuse.”
He added: “We believe that every single incident of hate crime, no matter how big or small, should be reported.”
Out of all the hate crimes reported to LGBT Foundation last year, 81pc were homophobic, 13pc were transphobic and 3pc were biphobic, the organisation said.
http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/lgbt-foundation-hold-hate-crime-9266626

Saturday, May 16, 2015

Top barrister to review controversial decision not to charge Labour peer Lord Janner over historic sex abuse allegations

  • Director of Public Prosecutions had claimed peer was too ill to face trial
  • But the decision was slammed by abuse victims and campaigning MPs
  • Crown Prosecution Service announced today that an independent review of the decision not to prosecute Lord Janner would be carried out
  • The decision could see the 86-year-old Labour peer dragged to court

A senior barrister has been brought in to review the controversial decision of Britain's top prosecutor not to charge Lord Janner over alleged child sex crimes.
In a move that could see the Labour peer dragged before the courts, the Crown Prosecution Service announced that the unnamed QC had been hired to give an independent assessment of the case.
The barrister - who has had no previous involvement with the case – will decide whether or not it is in the public interest to charge the former Labour MP because of his increasingly severe dementia.
Police investigations in 1991, 2002 and 2007 had uncovered sufficient evidence to charge Lord Janner with sexual offences, but the peer - who is suffering from Alzheimer's - is now considered too ill to face prosecution
Police investigations in 1991, 2002 and 2007 had uncovered sufficient evidence to charge Lord Janner with sexual offences, but the peer - who is suffering from Alzheimer's - is now considered too ill to face prosecution
The move comes after victims challenged the decision of Alison Saunders, the Director of Public Prosecutions, not to proceed with the case because of the peer's illness.
Ms Saunders has insisted that her decision was justified because Lord Janner - who is suffering from Alzheimer's - is too ill to stand trial. The peer is also said to be too unwell to face any meaningful sentence if he was prosecuted.
But if the review rules that Ms Saunders' decision was wrong, the peer will face the prospect of a trial over the alleged sex crimes committed over several decades.
Ms Saunders announced last month that she believed police investigations in 1991, 2002 and 2007 had uncovered sufficient evidence to charge Lord Janner with sexual offences.
She said it was a matter of 'deep regret' the police evidence was never tested in court but said it was not in the public interest to prosecute him now.
The 86-year-old peer's family insists he is innocent of any wrongdoing.
Campaigning Labour MP Simon Danczuk 'cautiously welcomed' the decision to review the case.
He told MailOnline: 'I'm still of the view we should come up with a way of prosecuting Lord Janner for the alleged sex crimes. I hope the independent QC reached the right decision.'
Alison Saunders
Simon Danczuk
Alison Saunders, the Director of Public Prosecutions (left), has been slammed by MPs - including Simon Danczuk (right) over her decision not to proceed with the case against Lord Janner because of the peer's illness
Announcing the decision to hire the QC, who is not being named until after their assessment of the Janner case is completed, the Crown Prosecution Service said the move was in line a 'right to review' policy introduced in 2013.
It allows any alleged victim to request a review of a prosecution decision not to charge the suspect in their case.
A CPS spokeswoman said: 'The CPS Victims' Right to Review scheme was set up to give complainants the ability to ask the CPS to review its decisions – usually when there has been a decision not to prosecute.
'The CPS has been asked to invoke this process in the case of Lord Janner and that review is now taking place. This review would normally be done by the CPS Appeals Unit. However, due to the unique circumstances surrounding this case, the CPS has instructed external counsel instead.'
CPS guidelines say that such reviews should normally take around 30 days, but that longer could be required in more complex cases.
NWN: We won't hold our breath. Janner is higher ranking than the Queen in the power stakes in the UK.

https://youtube.com/shorts/hb9IvkrBELg?si=NkjI93Qqv8cjmNNA   PAT BUCHANAN - always worth listening to, and he was a very articulate 'pat...