Italy appoints a 'banker' and Bilderberger

The 'New World Orders' facade of democracy is falling.

Mario Monti

Prime Minister of Italy
Incumbent
Assumed office
16 November 2011
President Giorgio Napolitano
Preceded by Silvio Berlusconi
Minister of Economy and Finance
Incumbent
Assumed office
16 November 2011
Preceded by Giulio Tremonti
Personal details
Born 19 March 1943 (1943-03-19) (age 68)
Varese, Italy
Political party Independent
Children 2
Alma mater Bocconi University
Yale University
Religion Roman Catholic[1]

Mario Monti (Italian pronunciation: [ˈmaːrjo ˈmonti]; born 19 March 1943) is an Italian economist and politician who has been the Prime Minister of Italy and the Minister of Economy and Finance since 16 November 2011.[2] He served as a European Commissioner from 1995 to 2004, with responsibility for the Internal Market, Services, Customs and Taxation from 1995 to 1999 and then for Competition from 1999 to 2004. He has also been Rector and President of Bocconi University. He was appointed a Senator for Life in the Italian Senate on 9 November 2011, and was asked to lead a new government in Italy after Silvio Berlusconi's resignation.[3]

Contents
1 Education and academic career
2 Political career
3 Personal life
4 References
5 External links


[edit] Education and academic careerMario Monti was born in Varese on 19 March 1943.[4] His father is an Argentinian of Italian descent, while his mother is of Italian descent.[5] Mario Monti holds a degree in economics and management from Bocconi University, Milan. He completed graduate studies at Yale University,[6] where he studied under James Tobin, the Nobel prize-winning economist.[7]

He taught economics at the University of Turin from 1970 to 1985 before moving to Bocconi University, where he was its Rector from 1989 to 1994, and has been its President since 1994. He was also the President of SUERF (The European Money and Finance Forum) from 1982 to 1985.[8] His research has helped to create the 'Klein-Monti model', aimed at describing the behaviour of banks operating under monopoly circumstances.

Monti is a member of the Presiderium of the Friends of Europe, a leading European think tank, was the first chairman of Bruegel, an European think tank founded in 2005. He is the European Chairman of the Trilateral Commission, a think tank founded in 1973 by David Rockefeller.[9] He is also a leading member of the Bilderberg Group.[10]

Monti is an international adviser to Goldman Sachs and The Coca-Cola Company.[11]

[edit] Political careerIn 1994 Monti was appointed to the European Commission, along with compatriot Emma Bonino, by the first Silvio Berlusconi government. In his capacity as European Commissioner from 1995, he was responsible for Internal Market, Financial Services and Financial Integration, Customs, and Taxation. His work with the Commission has earned him the nickname 'Super Mario' from his colleagues and from the press.[12]

Four years later, in 1999, Massimo D'Alema's government confirmed his appointment to the new European Commission under the presidency of former Italian Prime Minister Romano Prodi. Thereafter he was responsible for Competition policy, in which capacity he initiated anti-monopoly proceedings against Microsoft. He also led the investigation into the proposed merger between General Electric and Honeywell in 2001, which the European Commission blocked.

The second Berlusconi government did not confirm his appointment for a third time in 2004, instead proposing Rocco Buttiglione in his place. Since Rocco Buttiglione was rejected by the European Parliament, the government proposed Franco Frattini.

In 2007, Monti was one of the first supporters of the first European civic forum, Etats Généraux de l'Europe, initiated by European think tank EuropaNova and European Movement.

In December 2009, he became a member of the the future of Europe, chaired by former Spanish Premier Felipe Gonzalez. In this forum, he advocated an economic government for Europe and a European Monetary fund. He also supported a New European Deal with a better coordination between social and economic issues in Europe.

In 2010, Monti was asked by Commission President Manuel Barroso to produce a "Report on the Future of the Single Market" proposing further measures towards the completion of the EU Single Market.[13]

Monti is a founding member of the Spinelli Group,[14] an organization launched in September 2010 to facilitate integration within the European Union (other members of the steering group include Jacques Delors, Daniel Cohn-Bendit, Guy Verhofstadt, Andrew Duff and Elmar Brok).

On 9 November 2011 Monti was appointed a Lifetime Senator by Italian President Giorgio Napolitano.[15] Mario Monti was seen as a favourite to replace Silvio Berlusconi to lead a new unity government in Italy in order to implement reforms and austerity measures.[16] On 12 November 2011, Napolitano invited Monti to form a new government [17]. Monti accepted the offer, and opened talks with the leaders of Italy's political parties, saying that he wanted to form a government that would remain in office until the next scheduled elections in 2013.[18][19]

[edit] Personal lifeMario Monti is married, and has two children.[20]

Monti is interested in Ancient Egypt, a passion acquired during his time at Turin University, and he is a patron of the renowned Museo Egizio in Turin.[21]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mario_Monti



============================================================
Socializing losses: Trilateral takeover of Europe?

The sovereign debt crisis tightening its grip on Europe has claimed the scalps of two prime ministers – those of Greece and Italy. Looking at the men poised to replace them, one cannot but ask – is this another turn of the screw for ordinary people?

Greece and Italy hold huge swathes of public debt they are unable to service unless they get massive European Central Bank and International Monetary Fund support, as a prelude to refinancing by international banks.

Greece has already replaced its prime minister after he dared to say he would put a further round of harsh austerity measures to a referendum vote. The country’s new PM is Lucas Papademos, former vice president of the ECB and of Greece’s own Central Bank, and a member of David Rockefeller’s (JPMorgan Chase/Exxon) powerful Trilateral Commission.

As for Italy, the replacement for Silvio Berlusconi is the former European Commissioner Mario Monti, who happens to be European Chairman of the Trilateral Commission.

Whenever we hear of “sovereign debt crises” – whether in Mexico 1997, Brazil 1999, in my native Argentina in 2001/2, or today in Greece, Italy, Spain, Portugal, Ireland and (soon to come) the UK, France, or the US – what it really means is that governments cannot collect enough tax revenues from their people to pay interest and capital on debt that is mostly in the hands of private banking institutions.

Cutting through the Orwellian Newspeak (*) of the media, this means that the people of Greece, Italy, and Argentina must pay for the mistakes of bankers and corrupt governments, suffering higher taxes, unemployment, lower wages and pensions, and a deterioration in public healthcare, education, and infrastructure.

So, whenever there is a public debt crisis, “We the People” must pay for it.

However, when in September 2008 a private debt crisis exploded due to the derivatives swindle which buried Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch, AIG and many other private institutions, the US and other governments came to the rescue of the bankers, providing bailouts for banks “too big to fail” (Newspeak for too powerful to fail). They saved the likes of CitiCorp, Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs with…. taxpayers money (TARP), and by having the FED (hyper)inflate the US dollar (know in Newspeak as “Quantitative Easing I, II and III”), which means passing a huge chunk of the cost of those bailouts on to the Rest of the World using the US dollar as global currency.

So again, irrespective of whether debt collapses are public or private, it is always “We the People” who pay because, under the current system, all profits are privatized and all losses are socialized.

But let us go back to Messrs Monti and Papademos. They sit on the Trilateral Commission together with hundreds of corporate chairmen and CEOs such as Ana Botin (Bank Banesto/Santander, Spain), Peter Sutherland (Goldman Sachs/BP, UK), Michel David-Weill (Lazard Bank, France), Jurgen Fitschen (Deutsche Bank, Germany), Stephen Green (HSBC, UK), Nigel Higgins (Rothschild Group, UK), Lord Guthrie (N M Rothschild, UK), Klaus-Peter Müller (Commerzbank, Germany), Dieter Rampl (UniCredito, Italy), Otto Ruding (CitiCorp Europe), Lord Simon of Highbury (Morgan Stanley, UK), Emilio Ybarra (BBVA, Spain), Robert Kelly (Bank of NY Mellon) Lord Brittan (UBS, UK), Robert Zoellick (World Bank), plus Timothy Geithner, Henry Kissinger and many, many others…

In fact, the Trilateral Commission articulates with the powerful Council on Foreign Relations (New York), Chatham House (London) and many other think-tanks forming an intricate web of private global power-brokers bringing together key players in finance, industry, media, government, academia, intelligence and the military, who run today’s global system focusing on their interests, and clearly not on those of “We the People.”

No doubt Messrs Papademos and Monti (if the latter becomes Italy’s new prime minister) will do everything necessary to ensure Italy and Greece do not default on their debts – but rather that their peoples endure all the hardship, undergo all the pain, and make all the sacrifices so that major bankers sitting on the Trilateral can all get their money back. Those who should never have made loans to Greece and Italy (and Argentina and Portugal…) the way they did.



Adrian Salbuchi for RT
(*) Newspeak – a fictional language of hypocritical euphemisms in George Orwell's novel “1984”.
Adrian Salbuchi is a political analyst, author, speaker and radio/TV commentator in Argentina

http://rt.com/news/europe-debt-crisis-takeover-215/

Dr. David Duke Exposes the new Zionist-doctored U.N. report meant to move us to war against Iran



Is Iran Developing Nuclear Weapons? The Big Lie Again!

A recent article by Fredrik Dahl of Reuters unintentionally exposes the next Big Lie to create a war for Israel. A war with Iran, whether from Israel, the U.S. or both, would of course be a catastrophic war that would far eclipse the incredible destruction of the Iraq War. The Iraq War which was launched on the big lie that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. It did immense damage to the Iraqi people and also to the over 300,000 Americans who have endured traumatic brain damage, horrific injuries, or death. It has also cost trillions of American dollars in direct costs and trillions more in a huge spike of oil prices that caused enormous economic damage to the United States and the world.

The Zionists through their enormous clout in politics, international finance and media are working hard to create another catastrophic, unpatriotic, treasonous war based on new lies. The first war was led by Jewish extremists Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz and a host of Zionist warmongers collectively called Neocons. They just as well should be called Ziocons. For they are Zionists and con men. I say the Iraq war was criminal and treasonous by U.S. law because it was nothing less than treason to send American troops into a war that caused hundreds of thousands of them to lose life or limb, for a lie. To send Americans into battle in a war that ultimately harms America and is for a foreign power is nothing short of treason.

I dared to travel the nation and the world to say there were no weapons of mass destruction. But, it turned out I was right, and even a government study proved that all of the so-called weapons of mass destruction had been destroyed by 1995, 8 years before this war.

Of course, even if Iran had weapons of quote, ”mass destruction,” such cannot justify a massive war anymore than America’s weapons of mass destruction would justify a massive bombing of our cities and an invasion that would leave a million dead Americans. The Israeli government committed terrorism against us in the false flag terrorist attacks on American facilities in Egypt, and the murderous attack on an American navy intelligence ship in international waters, causing a total of 173 American casualties and killing 34.

Now we are coming closer to a more horrific war that will lead to more terrorism and hatred across the world. But, the Zionist Jews of Israel and NY and Washington and London can’t get support for a vicious attack on Iraq without creating the lie that Iran is threat to America and Europe. So our Zionist-handled, Goldman Sachs-financed president says no option is off the table, even to point of bombing nuclear power plants which would have horrific ramifications similar to Chernobyl or Fukashima. To justify that carnage they must make the big lie that Iran is going to turn their non-existent weapons on Europe. Before they make that lie they first they have to manufacture evidence that Iran is building an atomic bomb.

So, the U.N., whose highest echelon, of course, is overwhelmingly controlled by the Security Council and ultimately by the United States, has been dispatched to set up the new big lie that Iran is building a bomb.

The Report by the International Atomic Energy Agency which is to be released shortly, is being set up as a reason to go to war against Iran. But listen carefully to the wording of the Reuter’s news story.

The lead off of the story says quote,

(Reuters) – The U.N. atomic watchdog is set to issue a report this week with detailed intelligence pointing to research and experiments in Iran to develop the technology and skills needed to make nuclear bombs, Western diplomats say.

That sounds pretty ominous doesn’t it, “a report with detailed intelligence pointing to research and experiment to develop the technology and skills needed to make nuclear bombs. But, this statement is so meaningless. It doesn’t say Iran is developing any nuclear bomb but is doing research that could develop the technology and skills needed to make nuclear bombs. So that could include practically anything, such as having physics instructors at their universities and training them. Learning about nuclear power which the reason why they have nuclear plants to begin with, that could also develop technology and skills for weapons, etc. This argument could be used if Costa Rica developed a nuclear power plant.

One has to read deep into the article to find the source of this very speculative claim.

Finally the heart of the new big lie comes to light. In a section subtitled “Where does the information come from,” it says and I quote,

It has not named the countries which have supplied the data, but it is widely believed to come from the United States, its European allies such Britain, France and Germany as well as Israel, and through the agency’s own investigations.

Oh, it’s intelligence from the United States, the same Zionist agents who are actively trying to destroy the Iranian regime because it opposes Israel. It is driven by the same inordinate Zionist influence prominent during the Iraq War, the same Zionist intelligence network that went before the world with its step-and-fetch-it, Colin Powell, reading the Zionist prepared lies about Iraq’s later proven to be non-existent weapons of mass destruction. But ladies and Gentlemen, have no fear, the UN report is based on intelligence from Britain, home of a Jewish Pac is just as strong as AIPAC is here, and France, which has a Zionist Jew as President, and of course, a main source of the intelligence is also supplied by Israel. We can really trust Israel, which is seriously planning a strike on Iran even a possible nuclear strike on Iran, sure we can!

We can’t be intelligent if we trust one line of any of this intelligence!

Just remember folks. Iran signed the nuclear non-proliferation treaty and allows inspections.

Israel will not sign the NPT and Israel allows no inspections of any of its huge arsenal of biological, chemical and nuclear weapons.

Israel threatens Iran with horrific attacks.

Iran does not threaten Israel, by saying, unless Israel dismantles the Atomic weapons it already has, Iran will attack.

If Israel attacks Iran, and if America supports Israel in such an insane endeavor, such a policy is nothing short of treason to the American people and treason the true interests of every American loyal to America rather than Israel.

-David Duke

http://www.davidduke.com/general/podcast-and-article-dr-david-duke-exposes-the-new-zionist-doctored-u-n-report-meant-to-start-war-against-iran_24805.html#more-24805

NWN : There is a podcast with this report on the above link on David Dukes website.

'Onwards and upwards' - Nick Griffin leading BNP to power

These are the results of two by-elections held yesterday;


Islington St Marys: Lab 1120, LD 640, Green 317, Tories 282, BNP 22.


Turnout 23.64% = 2397 votes


Lab 48%, Lib Dem 27%, Green 15%, Tory 13%, BNP 0.8%
================================================

Redbridge Aldborough

Lab 1436 Con 1071 LD 87 UKIP 83 Green 64 BNP 34

Lab 51.7%, Cons 38.6%, LD 3.1%, UKIP 3.0%, Grn 2.3%, BNP 1.2%

NWN: At this rate, the BNP should be in power in about 10,000 years.

BNP Court Disaster: Nick Griffin Loses Another £45,000, Faces Bankruptcy Order in Excess of £100,000

Nick Griffin and the British National Party leadership have been plunged into their worst legal crisis yet with the Court of Appeal’s decision today that all further rights to appeal in the “Decemberists” case have been refused.


This means that the BNP leader and former deputy leader Simon Darby are now directly liable for what will be a six figure sum in costs.

This morning in Court 74 at the Royal Courts of Justice, Lord Justice Ward dismissed Mr Griffin’s and Mr Darby’s application for leave to appeal in the Griffin & Another v. Smith & Others case.

The BNP leader’s counsel, Mr Carpenter-Leech, accepted that the end of the road had been reached.

Lord Justice Ward expressed pity for the barrister who had drawn the short straw of having to represent Griffin and Darby: “You’ve done very well. I’m unimpressed, I’m afraid. It’s not your fault.”

He concluded: “None of the arguments are substantial enough to give a realistic prospect of success. I see no realistic prospect of success and I dismiss the application.”

The £45,000 which Mr Griffin and Mr Darby were forced to put up as a deposit into the court as a precursor to the appeal, has been forfeited.

The court will now, over a period which will last around three months, determine the final costs against Mr Griffin, which in December 2010 stood at around £111,000.

The final bill will be well in excess of this figure, over and above the £45,000 which has already been paid in.

The total amount owing has been compounded by the idiotic manner in which Mr Griffin and his “advisors” have continually sought to delay the proceedings.

Mr Griffin and Mr Darby have been ordered to pay interest on the final amount at a rate of 8 percent back dated to the date of the original order, which was granted in December 2010.

The “delaying tactic” has therefore unnecessarily added several thousand pounds to the bill.

Failure to pay the final bill will result in a bankruptcy order being made against Mr Griffin, Mr Darby and the British National Party. Should such a situation arise, the party would be put into administration under a court-appointed official, and would, in all likelihood, cease to function.

This is not the only disaster which is about to strike. A renewed employment tribunal hearing in the “Michaela Mackenzie” case starts today, as does party staff manager Adam Walker’s criminal affray case in the North East. Neither of these cases are likely to end in a positive outcome for the BNP.

http://bnpideas.com/?p=2942

NWN: And the walls came tumbling down !

Don't forget the National Front Remembrance Day Parade on Sunday 13th November.

This is our day to march through the streets of London, our capital city. All good/decent white nationalists to attend, and after the recent problems in London and across the country this is our chance to let everybody know that it is OUR CAPITAL

The parade should commence in the Victoria area and proceed to the Cenotaph for the wreath laying ceremony to honour Britain's war dead of all past conflicts and current ones.

Appropriate dress would be appreciated.

ANNUAL NATIONAL FRONT REMEMBRANCE DAY MARCH AND RALLY

Sunday 13th November 2011

Assemble: 2pm-2.30pm at Bressenden Place, Victoria, London SW1

Wear your poppy with pride- ALL PATRIOTS WELCOME

Gilad Atzmon: Armageddon Ahead
Friday, November 4, 2011 at 7:39AM Gilad Atzmon







It does not take a genius to gather that the Israeli aggression towards Iran would endanger every living species on this planet. Devastatingly enough, our Western governments do nothing to stop the Jewish State. That should not take us by surprise: our politicians are largely funded and vetted by Israeli lobbies that openly support attack on Iran.

Here in Britain Defence Secretary Liam Fox had to resign two weeks ago when it became clear that he was ‘breaching ministerial laws’. The British press went out of its way to reduce the issue of his resignation into just another 'gay-ish mini scandal'. But we actually have strong reason to believe that Fox was working intensively for Israel. He was enthusiastically advocating Israeli interests such as an attack on Iran. Together with his ‘best friend’ Adam Werritty, he was also funded by the Israeli lobby. We know also that Fox and his ‘flat mate’ Werritty were in direct contact with Mossad, and were even warned by MI6 about it.

But Fox was not alone: with 80% of our leading party’s MP's being Conservative Friends Of Israel’s (CFI) members, we have good reason to believe that treachery is now institutional amongst UK elected politicians.

As we brace ourselves while learning from the Israeli press about the IAF’s final preparations ahead for an attack on Iran's nuclear plants, I would like to share with you a short passage from The Wandering Who.

In the following extract, I explore the exact genocidal scenario that Israeli pilots are now training to accomplish, in these very days. As much as it is clear that our treacherous elected puppets will fail to restrain Israel, it is equally and tragically obvious that Israel lacks the means to restrain its own madness.

“…I will try to elucidate this idea through a simple and hypothetical yet horrifying war scenario. We, for instance, can envisage a horrific situation in which an Israeli so-called ‘pre-emptive’ attack on Iran escalates into a disastrous nuclear war, in which tens of millions of people perish. I guess that amongst the survivors of such a nightmare scenario, some may be bold enough to argue that ‘Hitler might had been right after all.’

The above is obviously a fictional scenario, and by no means a wishful one, yet such a vision of a ‘possible’ horrific development should restrain Israeli or Zionist aggression towards Iran. As we know, Israeli officials threaten to flatten Iran rather too often. In practice, pre-TSD[1] Israelis make this devastating scenario into a possible reality.

Seemingly, Israelis and Zionist politicians fail to see their own actions in the light of history. They fail to look at their actions in terms of their consequences. From an ethical perspective, the above ‘imaginary’ scenario is there to prevent Israel from attacking Iran. Yet, as we all know, Israel and its lobbies are desperate to dismantle the so-called ‘Iranian threat’. My explanation is simple. The Jewish state and the Jewish discourse in general are completely foreign to the notion of temporality. Israel is blinded to the consequences of its actions, it only thinks of its actions in terms of short-term pragmatism. Instead of temporality, Israel thinks in terms of an extended present.” (The Wandering Who pg. 179)

The Jewish State and its lobbies are the greatest threat to world peace. If we want to save ourselves, there is no other way of doing so than looking closely into Jewish, Israeli and Zionist culture, identity and ideology. There is no other way of doing so than scrutinising Israel’s unique and relentless attitude towards lobbying.

The issues we are dealing with here are not solely political they are actually deeply philosophical, psychological and sociological -- and it is also about life and death.


You can now order The Wandering Who on Amazon.com or Amazon.co.uk







--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[1] Pre TSD Pre-Traumatic Stress Disorder-Within the condition of the Pre-Traumatic Stress Disorder, the stress is the outcome of a phantasmic event, an imaginary episode set in the future; an event that has never taken place.



http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/gilad-atzmon-armageddon-ahead.html

A letter to the PM - with some real common sense!

Response to Cameron's October (2011) Immigration Speech

Written by Frank Ellis
Thursday, 13 October 2011 20:05


From: Dr Frank Ellis
To: Mr David Cameron, Prime Minister MP
Date: 12th October 2011 A.D.

Re: The Prime Minister’s Speech on Immigration delivered to the Institute of Government 10th October 2011


Dear Mr Cameron



Mass immigration is not a natural disaster akin to some tsunami, drought or earthquake that periodically and unpredictably overwhelms a country. Mass immigration is a purely man-made phenomenon which is encouraged openly or covertly by people who benefit from it economically or by people who for ideological reasons wish to see England looking like some failed Third-World state, Pakistan, for example.



Mass immigration, especially mass non-white immigration, poses real dangers for the future of England. The idea that England can survive the mass, continual influx of hundreds of thousands of non-white immigrants is hideously naïve. As the white indigenous people of England are relentlessly displaced by the rapid and aggressive breeding of non-whites, the whole texture and nature of our towns and cities will be changed forever, is already changing, and, in some places, Bradford, Birmingham, whole swathes of London, have already changed for the worse.



I do not regard these huge, unprecedented changes, changes which were imposed on the white indigenous English without any consultation or any regard for England’s future, with no regard for the links to our past and heritage, as in any way beneficial. In every possible regard they are disastrous. As I have made clear to you before, the changes brought about by mass, non-white immigration represent the racial, cultural, physical and psychological dispossession of the white indigenous English.



In what way, pray tell, do the indigenous English, especially those left in London, benefit from having their capital, my capital, overrun with non-whites?



The short answer is that they do not benefit from being overrun by non-whites. They suffer from overcrowding, reduced quality in public services, noise, freakish behaviour, poor education provision as a consequence of schools overrun with immigrants, exceptionally high levels of crime and corruption and high taxes to pay for foreigners.



Moreover, they are daily bombarded with BBC and other state-sponsored propaganda that they should actually be grateful for all these non-white immigrants being here.



Furthermore, should the white indigenous English protest about what is happening to their country, they will be vilified as something monstrous, when in fact their opposition to being dispossessed is entirely rational and moral, in every way normal.



What is not normal, what is perverse, what is most decidedly unnatural, is that white politicians such as you Mr Cameron, are actively encouraging hordes of non-whites currently resident in England, and others swarming across our borders, to overwhelm our country. Mass, non-white immigration has not delivered a single benefit at all to the white indigenous English.



Your portrayal of the immigration debate as one dominated by extremes, is itself extreme (and wrong) and designed to show you as the conciliator, the moderate with sensible proposals, when in fact you have a long record of colluding with those who have sponsored mass non-white immigration.



Some form of immigration, subject to exceptionally tough controls is acceptable, but the numbers involved should be very small indeed and it should be made clear that employment in England does not in any way imply a right to permanent residence. There are absolutely no benefits to be derived from the mass influx of unemployable Third-World immigrants.



One of the main problems, especially with regard to Indian and Pakistani immigrants, is the reliability of any qualifications. In the NHS this can literally be a matter of life and death, or lead to operations which are bungled because they are carried out by incompetents. Remember Daniel Ubani, the Nigerian with a German passport? Ever heard of the Indian, Manjit Bhamra?



One of the weak links in your immigration proposal is that you show no understanding of the race factor. Race and race differences, matter and they cannot be made not to matter by government diktat. Nor can endless race relations laws and amendments deny the basic consequences of race and race differences.



Large numbers of non-whites in a white country will always be a permanent source of tension and very often violence. We see the evidence for this all over the world. The fact that, for most of her history, our England has been racially homogenous has been a great blessing. Racial diversity is a curse.



As the number of non-whites increases, as it has done grotesquely over the last 30 years, so the racial, social and economic stresses become ever harder to hide, or to deny. Blacks engaging in looting and raping are just obvious and visible examples of how mass, non-white immigration has failed and how the white population bears the costs, economic, cultural and psychological.



Immigration is not just about the on-going immigrant threat to England, it must also face the problem of those who have come here in large numbers and who have managed to secure a British passport. They have come here and wish to stay, because they enjoy a standard of living in a First-World economy that would be impossible in Pakistan or Africa.



If the numbers involved were exiguous and all further non-white immigration was almost impossible, except for a highly-qualified and suitable few, then all the legitimate fears and worries about immigration would disappear. That the rational, logical, healthy and morally reasonable fears of the white English indigenous people with regard to mass, non-white immigration show no sign whatsoever of abating, is because the problems associated with mass, non-white immigration – crime, corruption, child abuse, depraved honour killings and forced marriages violence, physical dispossession and overcrowding/overpopulation – are getting worse.



On these trends the English will be reduced to a racial minority in their own country some time in this century. Do you really want that outcome for your children Mr Cameron? Immigration policy must therefore deal with two problems: one immediate; the other long term.



The threat posed to England by mass, non-white immigration is largely a consequence of immigrants exploiting legal instruments which oblige us to accept them. The obvious first step is to rescind all legislation that prevents or hinders the expulsion of immigrants.



Your view, Mr Cameron, that ‘Britain will always be open to those who are seeking asylum from persecution’ is an outrageous proposition and one that has done so much to make it possible for immigrants to enter England under false pretences. It leaves us permanently vulnerable to events in other parts of the world, over which we have no control, but which, when they lead to political collapse, mean that we are obliged to permit hordes of so-called asylum seekers (criminals and illegal immigrants) to enter England and “enrich” us. This is something that must change if we are to have any chance of saving England. Leaving the EU must also be a very high priority.



The immediate problem is to prevent all further immigration. It must be a matter of the highest priority to hunt down, round up and to deport all illegal immigrants. If they have assets these can be seized to cover the costs of deportation. The next step is make it clear to non-whites currently resident in this country, especially blacks, that they shall not be permitted to enjoy any special status merely because they are non-whites.



If large numbers of blacks are incarcerated, having been subjected to the due process of English law then that must be seen as an indication of a black predisposition to commit crime, not some insidious racist plot, as in the Marxist slander of institutional racism.



Again, black educational failure reflects low-mean black IQ – well documented – not a white conspiracy. Blacks will have to learn to live with their limitations. Whites are not responsible for black failure and the psychological terror aimed at whites, often by other whites, to make white society feel guilty for black failure should be dismissed out of hand.



The next step is to recognise that the welfare state has created a massive parasitic underclass. People who refuse to provide services in return for welfare handouts should be denied any money at all and housed in government hostels where they will receive basic survival provision and no more. This means a bed, basic food and a roof.



For those who show willing there will be firmness but fairness and maybe at times some warmth. Those that riot can expect ruthless counter measures to restore order and discipline. Respect, dignity, status, self-esteem, a sense of achievement cannot be donated by charity: they have to be earned. The only politician in England who grasps these facts of life is Frank Field, a very honourable and decent man.



Other measures, some of which I noted earlier this year can also be taken.



First, long term, every effort must be made to encourage large numbers of non-whites to return to their own countries. Generous financial benefits and inducements can be made to encourage repatriation.



Second, under no circumstances must there ever be an amnesty for illegal immigrants.



Third, under no circumstances will the creation of an independent Islamic/Muslim state ever be permitted within the territory of the United Kingdom.



Fourth, the provisions of Sharia are grossly incompatible with the legal, political and cultural traditions of England and shall not be permitted.



Fifth, family migration cannot be used as an excuse to bring relatives to this country. People who cannot bear to be separated from their families should not separate themselves from their wife (wives) in Pakistan. That these individuals are allegedly in search of a better life is an irrelevance, an emotional red herring, and imposes no obligation, moral or legal, on England to end this self-induced separation.



When you say - ‘immigration is not just about people coming to live here for a while. Some will want to settle and then join us as fellow British citizens…’- you ignore one very important consideration. Do I, as a white Englishman, want these people to join me?



What happens when I emphatically do not want these people to join me? How can millions of non-white immigrants just ‘join me’? The answer is they cannot and they must not be encouraged to believe that they are welcome to ‘join us’.



I do not want to have to endure the psychologically distressing sight of English cities overrun with immigrants and it is not just the cities that face invasion. The next attack wave to hit white England, currently being planned by your government, is the calculated destruction and concreting of the countryside, including the Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONBs) and National Parks.



The aim here is to impose thousands of non-white immigrants on areas which have so far escaped them and when your party has managed to tear up the planning laws – not a perfect legal instrument by any means – and given the red light to rapacious developers, what will be the result? The result will be hundreds of thousands of shoddy, high-density, anti-social housing units in the countryside.



For the first time there is now the real risk that mosques, hitherto confined to cities, will appear in the countryside. It is a truly dreadful thought. The long term problems will be racial tension, soaring council taxes, more crime, certainly more violent crime and Third-World squalor in England’s ancient shires and when hordes of blacks imported to Ludlow, Ripon, and why not Witney, as part of government policy, start to engage in a bit of looting and violence, because that is what they do in the hood, the liberals will explain this degenerate behaviour as arising from a lack of opportunities for ‘young black people’ in a market town: the rioters were alienated and misunderstood; it’s not the fault of the ‘young black people’.



The final result of permitting the developers to run riot and to build these shanty towns will be the destruction of a priceless asset.



So Mr Cameron: it really is time to stop the talking, posing, the endless consulting and act.



Yours sincerely,



Frank Ellis