The decision was reportedly made at a private hearing at Croydon Crown Court this morning, although court officials have refused to comment on the proceedings.
West, 34, who has suffered from mental health problems for many years from New Addington, has controversially been denied bail at her hearing on December 6.
She was remanded in custody until January, allegedly for her own safety. It was revealed that West has received death threats since the YouTube video showing a woman shouting racial abuse was posted on November 27.
West is now due to appear at Croydon Magistrates’ Court on January 3 for a committal hearing.
Source: Eastlondonlines Dec. 13
15 comments:
I hope her legál team have asked for a "old style commital" that means police will have to prove there is a case to answer, before its commited to crown court ,or its thrown out , and you can question all there witnesses , so you know what they will in crown court .....jim
Devon kitten in microwave woman Gina Robins jailed.
What a complete and utter bastard!!
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-devon-16186471
This young English mother will at least have Christmas with her family, but the threat of court still hangs over her.
who the fuck labels any one 'a mental health case' she spoke out and now mental health keeps creeping in, so everyone who has got issues about the way this country is run, and our leaders open door policy to wogs, pakis, indians, romanians,white european trash coming in and having no respect for this country has mental health problems, i aint saying emma aint got any depressive issues, im pointing out that her outburst was not because of mental health, even the liberel elite very quitely say theres too many over here, the only people who are mad are our leaders past and present who think we are going to bolt up and shut up while this country goes to the dogs.
"Vampires do not live on Vampires" What Benjamin Franklin said about the Money Masters.
http://careandwashingofthebrain.blogspot.com/2011/12/vampires-do-not-live-on-vampires-what.html
I think all british have mental health problems,why else would we put up with all these parasites sucking the life out of are country? If we all spoke out like emma, these parasites will know we fu??king hate them and "we want are country back"...jim
Anonymous @ 15 December 2011 19:03 - dead on target - the marxist Common Purpose cunts will try labeling anyone complaining about the tidal wave of wogs of all shades swamping and turning Britain into a shithole, as suffering from the non-extant mental disease, NIGGERPHOBIA.
Miss West's legal defense team should insist she's tried under Magna Carter and 1689 English Bill of Rights Common Laws, as they override present-day EU and administrative laws, and also legally protect English-born citizens' inalienable right of free speech.
Fly On The Wall
They stopped doing 'old style committals some years ago, as too many ppl were getting charges dropped and because it was giving criminals advanced info on what evidence the Police had.
But the "criminals" are allowed "advanced information" before court case,are you sure "old style" has stoped? people only get of if police cant prove the case, which sounds fair to me .......Jim
Ha ha yes ive got "nigerphobia" I've been barred from tescos by a "big fat African" barred from my bank by a "skinny Muslim" barred from the post office "smelly Indian". All of them were racist , they talked to me like a British mug , then called police .
Anonymous said...
But the "criminals" are allowed "advanced information" before court case,are you sure "old style" has stoped? people only get of if police cant prove the case, which sounds fair to me .......Jim
Positive. I should've worded that better, what I meant was, witnesses would be called. Sometimes they would not turn up, and cases would be thrown out.
ES said...=They stopped doing 'old style committals some years ago, as too many ppl were getting charges dropped and because it was giving criminals advanced info on what evidence the Police had.
16 December 2011 12:26
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
ES - Magna Carter, 1689 English Bill of Rights and Common Law rules and laws override all present-day Administrative Laws - and any English-born person (hopefully, not wogs and related tar-brush races - they may be born in England but will never be racially English) can declare him/herself a `Freemam of England' and insist he/she is tried under Magna Carter, 1689 English Bill of Rights and Common Law rules, and be tried by jury. Should a magistrate try bluffing and bullying you out of that decision, don't give ground and use the `Legal Fiction' ploy, as many LAWFUL REBELLION adherents have successfully done in various kinds of court cases.
If you want to know how not to pay council rates or TV licenses, peruse LAWFULL REBELLION and UKCOLUMN - the more people who get involved in standing-up to the shower of shylocking zog/Establishment shit illegally stealing our money by using EU and `adminstrative laws' (read: bogus/pseudo/make-believe laws) the quicker English people can start reclaiming their country.
Fly On The Wall
Well said Jim @00:36. Emma West is like the boy in the story who exclaimed, '...but the Emperor is a naked as the day he was born!' This after years of indoctrination to disguise the reality of ethnic cleansing! The puppeteers had to come down heavily on Ms West because they don't want to encourage a trend where the natives start saying in public the bleeding obvious.
Northwest Nationalists, every English citizens needs to know it's been established, in the highest court in the land, that law-abiding citizens can arm themselves with weapons for self-defense, defending the Queen's Peace, and for defending the Realm.
This wasn't an academic exercise - but a serious court action to establish beyond all doubt, a law-abiding Freeman's natural and inalienable human right protected by the English Bill of Rights 1689, to carry weapons for lawful purposes.
As the following, and the:
Regina v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Michael James Burke Appeal judgment established self-defence was/is available at Common Law.
Self-defence is a natural right recognized at common law. Sir Michael Foster, judge of the Court of King’s Bench and Recorder of Bristol, wrote the following:
"The right of self-defence in these cases is founded in the law of nature, and is not, nor can be, superseded by any law of society. For before societies were formed, (one may conceive of such a state of things though it is difficult to fix the period when civil societies were formed,) I say before societies were formed for mutual defence and preservation, the right of self-defence resided in individuals; it could not reside elsewhere, and since in cases of necessity, individuals incorporated into society cannot resort for protection to the law of the society, that law with great propriety and strict justice considereth them, as still, in that instance, under the protection of the law of nature".
The right to have arms is not restricted to individual use for private self-defence, as the following Judgement demonstrates:
"The right of His majesties subjects to have arms for their own defence, and to use them for lawful purposes, (such as hunting) is most clear and undeniable. It seems, indeed, to be considered, by the ancient laws of the Kingdom, not only as a right, but as a duty... And that this right which every (subject) most unquestionably possesses individually may, and in many cases must, be exercised collectively, is likewise a point which I conceive to be most clearly established...
"It seems to follow, of necessary consequence, that it cannot be unlawful to learn to use them (for such lawful purposes) with safety and effect. For it would be too gross an absurdity to allege that it is not lawful to be instructed in the use of anything which is lawful to use...
"The lawful purposes for which such arms may be used (besides immediate self defence) are the suppression of violent and felonious breaches of the Peace, the assistance of the Civil Magistrates in the execution of the laws, and the defence of the kingdom against foreign invaders.
"To strengthen the civil power, and to keep themselves at all times prepared for a vigorous and effectual discharge of their duty as citizens ... are, in my view, sufficient visible and legal objects for the continuation of the London Association."
The Recorder of London, 1795. (From "The Origins and Development of the Second Amendment". David T. Hardy. 1995).
……………………………………
continued .........
continued .......
A person who has survived a criminal assault may make a civil claim for compensation. For example the victim of a rape who had been told by the police or Home Office that they were not entitled to arms for self defence would have grounds to claim damages against the individuals who were responsible for the breach of their legal duty to respect the rights of the subject. This would be in addition to a claim from the Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme.
copyright Michael Burke
Permission to copy and post by kind permission of Michael Burke, Esq.,
The above gentleman has established that law-abiding citizens can legally arm themselves with weapons for: self-defense; defending the Queen's Peace; defending the Realm.
Mr. Burke always carries three types of self-defence weapons (none are firearms) hidden about his person, when in public - even when going to the courts of law, from Magistrates Courts to the Royal High Courts, the Strand, London, which he regularly does, where he deposits all three self-defence weapons with court security staff, and collects them on the way out. The only time his self-defence weapons were held back, was by an over-zealous police sergeant ignorant of Common Law - but a letter of complaint of theft of private property by said police sergeant, to that police officer's Chief Constable, immediately resulted in all three self-defence weapons being returned to Mr. Burke.
Now increasingly more in the LAWFUL REBELLION movement are legally carrying self-defence weapons hidden about their person, in public.
EXTREMELY IMPORTANT - If you decide carrying a self-dence weapon(s) in public, always carry a copy of the Regina v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Michael James Burke Appeal judgment. AND ALWAYS KEEP YOUR SELF-DEFENCE WEAPON(S) HIDDEN FROM VIEW WHEN IN PUBLIC, BECAUSE CAUSING THE PUBLIC TO FEAR IS A CHARGEABLE OFFENCE.
Good luck with your `carrying' and the more of you who do, the merrier - so start spreading the word.
With special thanks to Michael Burke, Esq., and regards to Northwest Nationalists and all nationalists.
Fly On The Wall
18 December 2011 00:55
Post a Comment